• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Has anyone ever heard of this?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wow, this has all gotten pretty silly. Do I think the rule is a little silly in itself? Yes, but it is her place so no matter how silly or crazy it may seem to us that's the rules. I have had horses relieve themselves on trails but never in an arena. I'm sure it happens but probably not so common. All the shows I've shown and been to I've never seen it happen.

    I would though be pretty ticked off if a group of people charged by dd on her pony in an arena because he looks as if he is going to pee. That is just really dangerous and they need to figure out a better way to deal with the problem. My DDs pony is head shy. Has been since we got him 6 years ago. Can't seem to break that habit. He is one of the best ponies and takes care of her but if people were running at him waving their arms and clapping etc he'd probably freak out.
    Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole

    Comment


    • OP, you've done nothing wrong and asked a legitimate question. At that level, it is an absurd rule. And the $100 fine is absolutely beyond outrageous.

      The only thing that I'm going to say on the subject of the arena footing is this: I am building 2 arenas; one covered and one outdoor. Both arenas are 100x200. The covered arena is a steel structure. I have high privacy hedges and fencing going in around the outdoor and fencing going around the covered arena. My footing is being imported entirely from Europe. It is superior to anything that Devon or any other horse show venue I've attended in the USA has ever provided. My point in sharing this is that the cost of ALL of this (BOTH arenas, all landscaping, the steel structure, ALL labor, etc.) is less than HALF of what you are claiming your friend paid to foot two rings. So either your friend was so majorly ripped off and now needs the $100/horse that pees fee to pay back her loan or you are exaggerating in a BIG way. Just sayin'.

      And if I didn't want to risk the chance of a horse being :::gasp!::: a horse in my arenas, I wouldn't have built them. And yes, my facility is private too...and I would open it to a clinic without hesitation or threats of penalties if someone asked.
      Nine out of ten times, you'll get it wrong...but it's that tenth time that you get it right that makes all the difference.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Kate66 View Post
        I don't know Laurirace in person, but I do read her posts and always find her to be knowledgeable, pragmatic, kind and honest. My feeling is that if she says there is a lot more to the story than meets the eye, we should believe it. She's been around here a lot longer than the OP and I would suspect that most people here have seldom found reason to question or criticise her posts.

        Laurirace- I'm sorry this has turned into such a drama for you and your friend.
        Lots of wisdom and kindness here. I'll admit that my first reaction to the rules the OP posted was and I don't doubt that anyone not in-the-know would feel the same way. However, the vitriol expressed here along with the assumption that there couldn't possibly be any back story or that the FancyFarmOwner is just a neurotic meanie pants is utterly ridiculous. People, tone it down. It's threads like this that get COTH it's reputation of being a BB run by a hostile clique. When/if the full story is divulged, then the pile-on may or may not be deserved, but for now, it's just uncalled for.
        Flip a coin. It's not what side lands that matters, but what side you were hoping for when the coin was still in the air.

        You call it boxed wine. I call it carboardeaux.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by jen-s View Post
          Lots of wisdom and kindness here. I'll admit that my first reaction to the rules the OP posted was and I don't doubt that anyone not in-the-know would feel the same way. However, the vitriol expressed here along with the assumption that there couldn't possibly be any back story or that the FancyFarmOwner is just a neurotic meanie pants is utterly ridiculous. People, tone it down. It's threads like this that get COTH it's reputation of being a BB run by a hostile clique. When/if the full story is divulged, then the pile-on may or may not be deserved, but for now, it's just uncalled for.
          Oh good grief.
          While I am prepared to eat crow, the back story has most likely nothing to do with the question.

          The question involved pee in the arena, and a BO offering to run up at kids on ponies, clapping and yelling.
          and a stiff fine and dismissal from the premises...

          No farm was mentioned. Hardly a soul would have bothered if it had not been for Laurie attacking the OP.
          Sure, there is probably more. If it wasn't, there is now.

          Laurie has been around for a long time.
          As have I.
          I would not expect anybody to just take my word for anything, especially if all I had to offer were attacks and 'you don't know the half of it'

          Whatever respect I did have for Laurie - and I have read a few hum-dingers from her in the past as well - pretty much evaporated.

          Of course, I also had held out hope that this morning she would come on and explain that she had a house guest taking liberties with her computer....


          Pile on?
          Did not happen until the challenges were issued.
          Originally posted by BigMama1
          Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
          GNU Terry Prachett

          Comment


          • Well said, my feelings exactly!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by alto View Post
              sorry, I'm in Canada & those are the Canadian standards
              Ah. I had three kids in Pony Club, in the US, and I was thinking, gee, those are pretty steep changes in the standards! And here I thought Pony Club was dumbing things down, not making it harder!
              blogging at HN: http://www.horsenation.com/
              check out my writing: http://jeseymour.com
              Just out: http://www.barkingrainpress.org/dd-p...ead-poisoning/

              Comment


              • Originally posted by jen-s View Post
                Lots of wisdom and kindness here. I'll admit that my first reaction to the rules the OP posted was and I don't doubt that anyone not in-the-know would feel the same way. However, the vitriol expressed here along with the assumption that there couldn't possibly be any back story or that the FancyFarmOwner is just a neurotic meanie pants is utterly ridiculous. People, tone it down. It's threads like this that get COTH it's reputation of being a BB run by a hostile clique. When/if the full story is divulged, then the pile-on may or may not be deserved, but for now, it's just uncalled for.
                ^This
                I'm rather nonplussed at the meanness displayed by some of the posters in this thread

                Comment


                • Sooo what if my mare squirts in the arena because she's in heat. It's not technically urinating....

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by alto View Post
                    ^This
                    I'm rather nonplussed at the meanness displayed by some of the posters in this thread
                    You do not think it is mean to threaten a ponyclubber (Laurie's posts were threats, there really is no other way to read them) or embarrass them because their pony had the audacity to urinate?

                    Comment


                    • Laurie has obviously gotten some undue vitriol here, as there is clearly a difficult backstory that really is none of our business. And I don't think it helps anybody to try to identify the individuals.

                      I myself think the rule is a bit odd and not something I would be entirely comfortable with. BUT last I checked, nobody is perfect. And if you decide to attend at this (private) facility, you take the good with the bad. No harm in asking, though.
                      Born under a rock and owned by beasts!

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by trubandloki View Post
                        You do not think it is mean to threaten a ponyclubber (Laurie's posts were threats, there really is no other way to read them) or embarrass them because their pony had the audacity to urinate?
                        As stated, meanness all around - some have emotional involvement (& spoke rashly) & that I more readily understand, others standing on the outside, far away, might've held to their viewpoints with less vitriol

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by ako View Post
                          Laurie has obviously gotten some undue vitriol here, as there is clearly a difficult backstory that really is none of our business. And I don't think it helps anybody to try to identify the individuals.

                          I myself think the rule is a bit odd and not something I would be entirely comfortable with. BUT last I checked, nobody is perfect. And if you decide to attend at this (private) facility, you take the good with the bad. No harm in asking, though.
                          undue?

                          one slip of the finger/tongue, yes, we can go with undue.

                          The allowance though shrinks with each following mishap though.
                          Originally posted by BigMama1
                          Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                          GNU Terry Prachett

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by rabicon View Post
                            Wow, this has all gotten pretty silly. Do I think the rule is a little silly in itself? Yes, but it is her place so no matter how silly or crazy it may seem to us that's the rules. I have had horses relieve themselves on trails but never in an arena. I'm sure it happens but probably not so common. All the shows I've shown and been to I've never seen it happen.

                            I would though be pretty ticked off if a group of people charged by dd on her pony in an arena because he looks as if he is going to pee. That is just really dangerous and they need to figure out a better way to deal with the problem. My DDs pony is head shy. Has been since we got him 6 years ago. Can't seem to break that habit. He is one of the best ponies and takes care of her but if people were running at him waving their arms and clapping etc he'd probably freak out.
                            maybe you should go.
                            with a little luck you can get a million dollar footing arena...


                            would suck for the kid though....
                            Originally posted by BigMama1
                            Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                            GNU Terry Prachett

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                              undue?

                              one slip of the finger/tongue, yes, we can go with undue.

                              The allowance though shrinks with each following mishap though.
                              I understand your point and I was kind of with you until there was a suggestion of a backstory, except it struck me that Laurie's always come across as very sane on here, so we were tipped off to something else possibly going on. The pile-on went on too long and, in true BB fashion, got too nasty.
                              Born under a rock and owned by beasts!

                              Comment


                              • Laurie's always comported herself well here on COTH. The unknown variable is the OP. While Laurie came on strong, I am going to trust that there's something going on here.

                                I'd rather have a no peeing rule than the unspoken rule that the host's dog may jump all over all comers and lick them to pieces. Cannot STAND a licky dog!

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Laurierace View Post
                                  No, they said the adults would be on the lookout and if a horse appeared to be getting ready to urinate that they would get the child's attention by clapping or whatever and walk the horse a few steps outdoors. Seriously, I am so pissed (pun intended) that I could spit nails.
                                  Why are you so pissed? Is what the OP stated not true? She doesn't have it posted not allowed to urinate? She doesn't have a 100.00 fine if they do? So what if she posted it, don't see the problem, whether or not she will be there or not. Nothing to get all upset over.

                                  Is weird request though...but would let me know I won't go there. Thanks for the PSA OP!
                                  I want a signature but I have nothing original to say except: "STHU and RIDE!!!

                                  Wonderful COTHER's I've met: belleellis, stefffic, snkstacres and janedoe726.

                                  Comment


                                  • The backstory is truly irrelevant to the topic of the thread. Even if the OP did something shockingly, heinously horrible to the BO it does not change the answers to the questions: Have you seen this rule before? Do you think it's a weird rule? Unless the backstory is that the BO made this rule specifically because "the-OP-spitefully-pees-in-BO's-arena-and-a-$100-fine-is-the-only-way-to-stop-her", the backstory is not relevant to the topic at hand.

                                    I do feel sorry for Laurie as she's clearly upset. But I don't think it's wrong to politely point out that someone who is acting as a judge (whether at a PC D rally or something "more important") is acting improperly if they suggest that they will be biased against someone they will be judging. Laurie's outburst unfortunately opened this door and I think it would have been weird if no one called her on it.
                                    I don't mind if you call me a snowflake, 'cause baby, I know a blizzard is coming.

                                    Comment


                                    • If Laurie had exercised any kind of tact when she responded or (and I know this is a totally CRAZY idea) not said anything at all, none of this ensuing drama would have happened. If you come out guns ablazing over what 99.99999% of people would think is a totally reasonable thing to ask, don't be surprised when people think you are totally unprofessional and out of line. There may very well be some explanation for her multiple outbursts (though nothing that makes it excusable) but that's why you have to act like an adult sometimes and think instead of just reacting.

                                      The rule and the way it was phrased is totally ridiculous. There are probably multiple PC parents wondering the same thing but this one happened to be on COTH. If Laurie is so sure she knows who posted this and their supposed ulterior motives, she should have taken up this issue with that individual directly instead of threatening PC kids on a public forum, where any other participant would see it. For all she knows, it could be a different person entirely and she went off the deep end over a truly innocent question.

                                      It's crazy that a barn owner is willing to embarrass a young child to the point of possibly souring them to horses in general after such poor treatment. Or even risking a law suit if a child gets hurt after they spook a horse about to relieve itself.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by ako View Post
                                        I understand your point and I was kind of with you until there was a suggestion of a backstory, except it struck me that Laurie's always come across as very sane on here, so we were tipped off to something else possibly going on. The pile-on went on too long and, in true BB fashion, got too nasty.
                                        I don't see where the OP was rude or where the information being questioned has been denied so what does it matter if there is a back story. How does that impact the question of wether this is a common thing or not?

                                        I don't see where the OP named any names and if Laurie had not started getting all worked up, the OP would have gotten their answer and there would probably not be an drama on this thread.

                                        For what it is worth, I have never seen this restriction before and I would think it was odd if I did.

                                        Oh, and I have ridden horses that have peed in the ring.
                                        Auventera Two:Some women would eat their own offspring if they had some dipping sauce.
                                        Serious Leigh: it sounds like her drama llama should be an old schoolmaster by now.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by katyb View Post
                                          That doesn't really coincide with anything said here. If the arena owner is dying, that's quite sad, but it doesn't make this a sensible rule.

                                          I'm suddenly the "parent" of two extra human children and spent the day rehoming their pets that we couldn't absorb into our family. Pee in an arena? Not even hitting my radar.
                                          Agree^^^^

                                          I have 99 problem and arena piss ain't 1.....

                                          My DH gets mad at little things and I tell him all the time.. is it really that serious? There are so many other things that could be going wrong right now. I guess since the death of my 6yr old son.. nothing seems worth stressing about anymore. Things could be far worse than a bit of tinkle/poo that is going to happen anyway somewhere down the line (more than just once). If you are that stressed about it you shouldn't have put it in to begin with or offer to let others ride on it.
                                          Draumr Hesta Farm
                                          "Wenn Du denkst es geht nicht mehr, kommt von irgendwo ein kleines Licht daher"
                                          Member of the COTH Ignorant Disrepectful F-bombs!*- 2Dogs Farm

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X