• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

What to expect from a Buck Brannaman clinic? UPDATE p. 9!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Original Poster

    I'm not afraid of being embarrassed, and I am willing to own up to and work on my sh!t - that is why I'm going, after all. The stories of crowding and horses flipping over and bucking people off is why I said I was scared. I think the clinic in Red Bluff is in a big space so hopefully it won't be too crowded.
    "A horse's face always conveys clearly whether it is loved by its owner or simply used." - Anja Beran

    Comment


    • My take away from this would be don't be AFRAID to go, but don't go in there thinking it's DEFINITELY going to be a life-changing experience. To some degree, it will depend on what you bring to it, how much experience you've had with this style of horsemanship, and what your personality will allow.

      For a class that's likely to have 20 odd people in it, you likely won't get any more individual attention then you ask for. You have to be okay with having to earn that attention. I never saw Ray in person, but this was apparently how he was wired too. The High River clinic (http://www.keithstewart.ca/clinics.php) is $650 + stabling fees, or $45/day to audit...quite a chunk of change. For that price you could get a clinic with other bridlehorsemen/women with more of an individual focus.

      I'd also suggest that, unless you KNOW the exercises that Buck will work on from having watched his videos/read clinic reports/watched a clinic or the movie, riding will be overwhelming. If you try to negotiate traffic, listen with one ear, and ride...it's a lot. You may be fine with that, but the people in my clinic that hadn't done the prep struggled. I knew the exercises and could focus on refining what I was doing. I didn't have to think about the basics of what was being asked, and that helped. I was also on a horse that didn't mind traffic and pressure.

      Then there's the negativity. I don't need to have my ego babied, or the constant positive affirmation that some require. Even still, it was a bit much. My personality style is to give people the benefit of the doubt until they prove otherwise, but this isn't how Buck teaches his clinics.

      So, YMMV.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Pocket Pony View Post
        I'm not afraid of being embarrassed, and I am willing to own up to and work on my sh!t - that is why I'm going, after all. The stories of crowding and horses flipping over and bucking people off is why I said I was scared. I think the clinic in Red Bluff is in a big space so hopefully it won't be too crowded.
        Just do your prep work and stay alert.

        If your horse has a big space bubble and can't deal with other horses coming in and out of that randomly, work on it. If you need your horse to fill in for you being nervous, know how much you can count on them. If you struggle recognizing when others can't handle their horses and you need to protect your horse from them, learn. If your horse hasn't dealt with large crowds and a bunch of unknown horses in close proximity, most of which will be radiating uncertainty, either make your peace with that or try to build up similar experiences.

        Otherwise, just keep your eyes open, and don't count on any particular level of horsemanship from your fellow riders.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ChrisS View Post
          Can anyone tell me what to expect if you're bringing a stallion to ride in a Buck Brannaman clinic? All replies are appreciated, but I'd especially like to hear from anyone who has ridden a stallion in a clinic, and from clinic sponsors.
          As a fellow rider, I know I'd appreciate at least a blue ribbon in your horse's tail (or any others as appropriate).

          Comment


          • Originally posted by aktill View Post
            For a class that's likely to have 20 odd people in it, you likely won't get any more individual attention then you ask for. You have to be okay with having to earn that attention. I never saw Ray in person, but this was apparently how he was wired too.
            I did attend a Ray Hunt clinic. And it was his practice to be in the arena 45 minutes ahead of the start of the day's clinic to answer any questions people had -- whether they were auditing or riding.

            After lunch break, he also started by asking about any particular issues riders were having. And he was most generous to people who asked for help and tried to follow his directions. He rewarded the try in people, too, even if they were hopelessly green and ignorant. Ask me how I know this.

            I don't know if Buck Brannaman makes himself that accessible. But if I were going, I'd just keep my ears and eyes open and my mouth shut ... unless he asks for questions.
            __________________________
            "... if you think i'm MAD, today, of all days,
            the best day in ten years,
            you are SORELY MISTAKEN, MY LITTLE ANCHOVY."

            Comment


            • Originally posted by mp View Post
              I did attend a Ray Hunt clinic. And it was his practice to be in the arena 45 minutes ahead of the start of the day's clinic to answer any questions people had -- whether they were auditing or riding.
              Very cool! I stand entirely corrected

              Comment


              • i am excited to go audit in september. i will bring a small notebook. I have read Buck's books, i know what he believes about people and horses and i feel he is doing a great service to the horses and owners. it's hard to please everyone. Some people need to have all the focus on them to be happy. I just want to come out saying i learned something.

                Comment


                • Aktill, Ray was very good at speaking with people directly. Every morning of the clinic I did, his wife had to wrangle him out of his golf cart and into the arena- he was mobbed by eager listeners and he was eager to help.

                  He also delayed us one morning to go get a girl's horse from a nearby barn. She came in to the grounds so embarrassed that she couldn't get her horse to load to come that morning- Ray jumped at the chance to go get him. And he did

                  Comment


                  • For example, Buck makes a different looking bridle horse compared to others that focus more on the hackamore stages, for example (Caldwell, Sandifer, Nichol). His emphasis on the snaffle and his leading rein exercises develop a different looking horse. It was cool to hear his take on things, even if ultimately I'm preferring the non-snaffle progression myself.
                    aktill - I think your comment about Buck's horses developing a different look is interesting. Can you please explain? And would you mind explaining why you prefer focusing on the hackamore stages versus the snaffle?

                    I've thought about this quite a bit and have always thought it was logical to progress with the hackamore first since it allows a young horse to reach with his neck freely and free up his jaw. It seems like a natural progression from the rope halter too. Moreover, I thought it was logical since a young horse's mouth is typically in a state of change for quite a while and I would think it would be less likely to cause issues. That's not to say that no young horses can go in a snaffle or that an ill-fitting bosal cannot cause issues. I've never made a bridle horse, and have started all my young horses in a snaffle. I'm only saying that it makes sense.

                    I've heard Buck say that the bosal is just a bluff anyway. I think I understand what he means by that, but wonder if you feel the same way.

                    Sorry for all the questions. I find this all so interesting, and I never have anyone to ask about these things!

                    I have two horses right now that I hope to someday make into bridle horses. One will be just that, but the other is going to be a dressage horse as well. Lucky he's still young because it might take me forever to get there.

                    Comment


                    • >aktill - I think your comment about Buck's horses developing a >different look is interesting. Can you please explain?

                      Sure, with the caveat that this is just my own opinion.

                      It's inevitable that any rider develops a "look" in their horses that represents what they believe in from a training perspective. The gear that they use, to some degree, influences that look as well.

                      When I (or someone else...can't remember) asked Buck at the clinic what his general progression was in developing a bridle horse, he said he'd have a horse in the snaffle for about a year and a half, go to the hackamore for about 4 months, then go into the two-rein (often a half-breed). When I asked him why he preferred this progression rather than starting in a hackamore, he said that carrying the snaffle was a good basis for understanding bits in general, and reduced the "getting to know bits" uncertainty when he went to the bridle bits. There's a certain amount of time required to get used to carrying a bit, and he prefers that time up front when the horse isn't "on the payroll" yet, rather than taking time off later when they're already useful on the ranch.

                      While I hate to use "traditional" here, the more generally accepted "traditional" California progression is to start colts in a stiff heavy hackamore (7/8 or 5/8), go down through a series of lighter bosals and bosalitas until you get to about 3/8, then move into the two rein (generally with a spade).

                      Why this creates a different look in a horse can be summarized by a saying I've heard Richard Caldwell use, in that a "snaffle causes a horse to break at the poll, and a bosal causes a horse to break at the withers". I'm not really sure that's strictly true anatomically, but what he's saying is that a snaffle has no longitudinal component, and can only act laterally. OTOH, a hackamore by its nature has the effect of encouraging a horse to telescope its neck, .

                      There's no doubting in my mind that, ridden consistently expertly, folks like Buck who extensively use the snaffle end up with a differently "shaped" horse then folks like Richard or Bruce Sandifer. I wouldn't say either one is less capable than the other by ANY stretch, however.

                      >And would you mind explaining why you prefer focusing on the >hackamore stages versus the snaffle?

                      As much as it seems like a cop-out, there's just more "life" in a hackamore.

                      I normally ride my horse in a 3/8 center-hung bosalita, adding a spade a day or two every week when I don't mind the extra cleanup. Once a week I also take a dressage lesson from a lady I really respect, and to keep life easy, I switch over into a snaffle for the lesson.

                      I injured my knee skiing over Christmas, and as I was healing up, I didn't bother with lessons. 6 weeks later, when I switched into the snaffle for my first lesson (having ridden with the hackamore for the whole time), the snaffle just felt...heavy. And a little dead. I'd done a clinic with a bridleman in that time, and compared to riding in the two-rein or hackamore, the snaffle really doesn't do much to help the horse in any way, shape or form.

                      By the time you're in a bosalita, especially, your rein work and weight is very light and soft, or the horse is running through the bridle. A snaffle, to my mind, just doesn't have that delicacy.

                      Hackamores are also especially nice for the winter months, since there's much less to clean and/or warm up.

                      >I've thought about this quite a bit and have always thought it >was logical to progress with the hackamore first since it allows >a young horse to reach with his neck freely and free up his >jaw. Moreover, I thought it was logical since a young horse's >mouth is typically in a state of change for quite a while and I >would think it would be less likely to cause issues.

                      Agreed (you're talking about telescoping the neck). For youngsters staying out of their mouth as they're shedding caps and growing teeth has to be less distracting, though as Buck said, they'll have to get used to a bit at some point with this tradition.

                      Some will say it doesn't allow direct flexion of the jaw, but I personally feel freedom in the POLL is actually the greater gateway to the spine then trying to lever on the jaw, though to each their own.

                      >It seems like a natural progression from the rope halter too.

                      I'm not a big fan of the halter as a riding tool. A simple sidepull has less propensity to slip and twist, and provides a clearer lateral cue. For familiarization rides a halter is more familiar though, I suppose, if the rider chooses not to do work in hand in a snaffle or sidepull.

                      >I've heard Buck say that the bosal is just a bluff anyway. I >think I understand what he means by that, but wonder if you >feel the same >way.

                      I don't actually feel the same, though that's a common saying about the bosal. In a nutshell it means you can't FORCE a horse to do anything with a bosal, and that you can get a horse running through one. Fine, but I've seen horses run through double bridles, so are those "bluffs" too? There are also some incredibly severe bosals out there that will do more damage than any snaffle bit could too, were someone so ham-fistedly inclined.

                      >Sorry for all the questions. I find this all so interesting, and I >never have anyone to ask about these things!

                      No apology required! It's fun to discuss this stuff with people who can speak about it objectively.

                      >I have two horses right now that I hope to someday make into >bridle horses. One will be just that, but the other is going to >be a dressage horse as well. Lucky he's still young because it >might take me forever to get there.

                      Good luck with that! If you find the right dressage instructor, you'll likely find that there's little in there that will be different then what a California bridleman(woman) would use...especially those leaning towards the French or Portuguese schools. I find my weekly dressage lessons and the twice-yearly clinics I take with the bridle horse folks to be almost completely complimentary, with only a little difference of terminology and tack.

                      Comment


                      • aktill, I enjoyed reading your detailed response even though I don't really know half of what you're talking about. Can someone explain what exactly a bridle horse is? I've not heard that term before until reading this thread. I also know nothing about spades or bosalitas.

                        On topic: I read Buck's book Faraway Horses many years ago and enjoyed it. I thought the movie was interesting and I'm curious to try his DVD set but I'm not sure if the rope exercises would be clearly explained or not. I'm more of a "show me in person and then I'll try to copy it" kind of learner.

                        Comment


                        • Sure, with the caveat that this is just my own opinion.
                          Understood. Thank you.

                          It's inevitable that any rider develops a "look" in their horses that represents what they believe in from a training perspective. The gear that they use, to some degree, influences that look as well.

                          When I (or someone else...can't remember) asked Buck at the clinic what his general progression was in developing a bridle horse, he said he'd have a horse in the snaffle for about a year and a half, go to the hackamore for about 4 months, then go into the two-rein (often a half-breed). When I asked him why he preferred this progression rather than starting in a hackamore, he said that carrying the snaffle was a good basis for understanding bits in general, and reduced the "getting to know bits" uncertainty when he went to the bridle bits. There's a certain amount of time required to get used to carrying a bit, and he prefers that time up front when the horse isn't "on the payroll" yet, rather than taking time off later when they're already useful on the ranch.

                          While I hate to use "traditional" here, the more generally accepted "traditional" California progression is to start colts in a stiff heavy hackamore (7/8 or 5/8), go down through a series of lighter bosals and bosalitas until you get to about 3/8, then move into the two rein (generally with a spade).

                          Why this creates a different look in a horse can be summarized by a saying I've heard Richard Caldwell use, in that a "snaffle causes a horse to break at the poll, and a bosal causes a horse to break at the withers". I'm not really sure that's strictly true anatomically, but what he's saying is that a snaffle has no longitudinal component, and can only act laterally. OTOH, a hackamore by its nature has the effect of encouraging a horse to telescope its neck, .

                          There's no doubting in my mind that, ridden consistently expertly, folks like Buck who extensively use the snaffle end up with a differently "shaped" horse then folks like Richard or Bruce Sandifer. I wouldn't say either one is less capable than the other by ANY stretch, however.
                          Thank you for explaining that so well! I’ve read that the generally accepted “traditional” California progression actually skips the snaffle altogether. Interesting how different horsemen adapt their methods to what they find works best for them – especially since they are typically making horses for a purpose and a job in a real world environment.

                          I’ve noticed that the overall look of bridle horses differed from one horseman to the next, and although some looked similar, there was a difference in shape and how the energy flowed through the horse (for lack of a better description). I always wondered what this was, and I think maybe that was what I was seeing.

                          As much as it seems like a cop-out, there's just more "life" in a hackamore.

                          I normally ride my horse in a 3/8 center-hung bosalita, adding a spade a day or two every week when I don't mind the extra cleanup. Once a week I also take a dressage lesson from a lady I really respect, and to keep life easy, I switch over into a snaffle for the lesson.

                          I injured my knee skiing over Christmas, and as I was healing up, I didn't bother with lessons. 6 weeks later, when I switched into the snaffle for my first lesson (having ridden with the hackamore for the whole time), the snaffle just felt...heavy. And a little dead. I'd done a clinic with a bridleman in that time, and compared to riding in the two-rein or hackamore, the snaffle really doesn't do much to help the horse in any way, shape or form.

                          By the time you're in a bosalita, especially, your rein work and weight is very light and soft, or the horse is running through the bridle. A snaffle, to my mind, just doesn't have that delicacy.

                          Hackamores are also especially nice for the winter months, since there's much less to clean and/or warm up.
                          Really interesting! I think I understand what you mean when you say the snaffle is "dead" feeling. I had an opportunity to ride a nice hackamore horse my friend has. Although I had no idea how to work the horse, and it kind of terrified me because I didn't want to take away training on my friend's nice horse, it was an incredible experience. His horse was light and soft and it was worlds different than riding in a snaffle. After that I really wanted to learn how to make a good hackamore horse.

                          Agreed (you're talking about telescoping the neck). For youngsters staying out of their mouth as they're shedding caps and growing teeth has to be less distracting, though as Buck said, they'll have to get used to a bit at some point with this tradition.

                          Some will say it doesn't allow direct flexion of the jaw, but I personally feel freedom in the POLL is actually the greater gateway to the spine then trying to lever on the jaw, though to each their own.
                          Like a dressage horse learning to work “through” as opposed to just compressing the front end or hinging at the poll?

                          I'm not a big fan of the halter as a riding tool. A simple sidepull has less propensity to slip and twist, and provides a clearer lateral cue. For familiarization rides a halter is more familiar though, I suppose, if the rider chooses not to do work in hand in a snaffle or sidepull.
                          I never thought of this. So, you work your young horses on the ground with the snaffle or sidepull before your first ride? And is your first ride is with a sidepull or hackamore?

                          I was talking about a rope halter for the first ride then transitioning to the hackamore or snaffle for the next ride. I started my colt in a rope halter since he had the biggest wolf teeth I’d ever seen extracted just before I was going to start him under saddle. I waited a week, but didn’t want to put a bit in his mouth at that point so we rode in a rope halter for about six rides. I agree that the rope halter does slip around a lot and wasn’t the clearest cue for flexing laterally, but it was all I had at the time. Lucky for me he’s a pretty gentle, good-natured colt so we got along fine.


                          I don't actually feel the same, though that's a common saying about the bosal. In a nutshell it means you can't FORCE a horse to do anything with a bosal, and that you can get a horse running through one. Fine, but I've seen horses run through double bridles, so are those "bluffs" too? There are also some incredibly severe bosals out there that will do more damage than any snaffle bit could too, were someone so ham-fistedly inclined.
                          I think it must be as hard to make a good snaffle horse as it is to make a good bosal horse since I’ve come across very few really good snaffle horses who work properly. I come from a classical dressage background and used to work for a trainer who’s stable was right next to the Los Angeles Equestrian Center. He was an incredibly gifted horseman and had the lightest, liveliest, happiest horse I ever rode. In the evenings, I would go over to the LAEC and watch the dressage horses with the big name competitors …and cringe. If the horse wasn’t dragging the rider around the arena, it was rearing or flipping over backwards. The dragging horses were the snaffle horses, the rearing and flipping over backwards horses were the double bridle horses. I did see quite a few horses who were so calloused in the mouth that they could drag their riders around in a double bridle too. No one looked happy and no one was having fun. It was a learning experience for me because it showed me what I never wanted to do to, and never wanted to be.

                          Good luck with that! If you find the right dressage instructor, you'll likely find that there's little in there that will be different then what a California bridleman(woman) would use...especially those leaning towards the French or Portuguese schools. I find my weekly dressage lessons and the twice-yearly clinics I take with the bridle horse folks to be almost completely complimentary, with only a little difference of terminology and tack.
                          Thank you so much for all the information! I truly appreciate it. I am unfortunately at a loss for dressage instruction right now since there is no one in my area who I would like to take lessons from. There are a few dressage trainers here, but they are not teaching what I want to learn. The same holds true for bridlemen/women. There are none here that do what I want to do. There are lots of cattle ranches and lots of cowboys, but none that follow a path I’d like to take. I do try to clinic as much as possible though.

                          And I think that’s what draws me to this type of horsemanship – the similarity to classical dressage. Their principles and goals are so closely aligned that it makes sense to me.

                          Thank you again for all your help, insights and information. It’s very much appreciated!!

                          Comment


                          • Martin Black has some videos on the Bridle Horse on Youtube, might be a place for interested folks to start if they are unfamiliar with the term or idea.

                            Lovely posts, aktill, very informative.

                            Comment


                            • Here is a start I just had to go look LOL
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyD9SAWm-mk

                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5X7iss69II

                              I haven't seen this one before.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Itfy3...rAI4OunMIW0Nyg

                              Comment


                              • Martin Black is a treasure.
                                “Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.” Stephen R. Covey

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by cowboymom View Post
                                  Martin Black is a treasure.
                                  Keep quiet about this please, we like him in his semi popular state

                                  Comment


                                  • So, the only thing that really intimidates me about these methods are that you need to be pretty handy with a rope. I am not. I can throw a lariat pretty well, but certainly not well enough to get it right when the timing is important.

                                    How good a roper do you have to be to follow Buck's methods?
                                    “Pray, hope, and don't worry.”

                                    St. Padre Pio

                                    Comment


                                    • You don't.

                                      Comment


                                      • He uses a lariat a lot. What do you use instead?
                                        “Pray, hope, and don't worry.”

                                        St. Padre Pio

                                        Comment


                                        • Well...for what? And what do you want to achieve?

                                          I mean if you want to learn to lead a horse by a hind foot, then yes you'll need some modest rope skills. But if you wish to only develop your own saddle horse- I can't see why you must use every tool he has.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X