• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Horse Slaughter Ban Lifted by Oklahoma Senate -- Needs Gov Signature -- YOU can help!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Abercrombie View Post
    Oh brother; you and your pro-slaughter peeps still shoveling the "slaughter is better than starvation" pablum?

    How about just telling the truth?

    1.) People want a convenient way to dispose of their horse(s)

    2.) The meat, cattle, and livestock industry want to slaughter horses to protect their "slaughter rights" for other animals.

    There? Wasn't that easy?
    Let's just put the cards on the table. Thanks, Abercrombie.
    "The captive bolt is not a proper tool for slaughter of equids they regain consciousness 30 seconds after being struck fully aware they are being vivisected." Dr Friedlander DVM & frmr Chief USDA Insp

    Comment


    • Originally posted by 7arabians View Post
      There are new, well-documented studies that will show that all of the hoopla about bute, roids, etc., in horse meat have been falsified. Just as the 'researchers' scammed the world and made up data to support the false theory of climate change, the rara crowd has made up the data on horse meat contamination. Wild horses living on grass in Colorado register higher levels of all contaminants than the rara's believe should be permitted. Just more cry baby, heart-horse fiction coming from people who may own a dog, but probably have never owned a horse. If horse meat is so bad for you, why is Taco Bell now featuring it in all of its tacos and burritos?
      Getting out my tinfoil hat now.
      "The captive bolt is not a proper tool for slaughter of equids they regain consciousness 30 seconds after being struck fully aware they are being vivisected." Dr Friedlander DVM & frmr Chief USDA Insp

      Comment


      • Originally posted by 7arabians View Post
        There are new, well-documented studies that will show that all of the hoopla about bute, roids, etc., in horse meat have been falsified. Just as the 'researchers' scammed the world and made up data to support the false theory of climate change, the rara crowd has made up the data on horse meat contamination. Wild horses living on grass in Colorado register higher levels of all contaminants than the rara's believe should be permitted. Just more cry baby, heart-horse fiction coming from people who may own a dog, but probably have never owned a horse. If horse meat is so bad for you, why is Taco Bell now featuring it in all of its tacos and burritos?
        Please provide links to all of the new, well-documented studies.

        Thank you.

        As for Taco Bell "featuring" it in all of it's tacos and burritos, please provide your proof of that as well. The search I did shows it is all part of the same horse meat scandal plaguing the European market right now. They did not intentionally put the meat in their food.

        You really should get your facts straight before you post.

        http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/w...andal/1957233/

        Taco Bell is the latest restaurant chain to acknowledge that its food has been adulterated with horse meat, yanking a variety of ground beef products from its three British outlets and issuing an apology to its patrons Friday. Meanwhile, in Iceland, a food official said his team had found a beef product which contained no meat at all.
        Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
        http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
        http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
          Sixty-three trailer loads arriving at two slaughter plants in Texas were observed in July and August of 1998.
          15 years ago... Way to post current data.
          The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by 7arabians View Post
            If horse meat is so bad for you, why is Taco Bell now featuring it in all of its tacos and burritos?
            OMG, where do you people come up with this crap??????
            ************************
            \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

            Comment


            • Originally posted by 7arabians View Post
              If horse meat is so bad for you, why is Taco Bell now featuring it in all of its tacos and burritos?

              Because it is tasty.
              The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                Well if they don't have papers to say what breed it is, they certainly can't know if it's been given a banned substance can they?

                Re: the breed, I believe it has to be ID'd on the EID... will go try to find a reliable source of that document that you can peruse.

                Here ya' go:

                EID and passport info, EU
                http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/farmin...entspassports/

                Canadian EID
                http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/...nexee.shtml#e2


                As of July 31, 2010,*an EID (Equine Information Document) is required for all horses presented at a processing facility in Canada. The document will require an owner-signed declaration to verify the accuracy of the information and include details, dating back 6 months, on the animal's health and any administered medications. A number of medications are no longer permitted in horses being processed for human consumption. For complete details on the*EID, the list of non-permitted drugs, and equine description terms, visit the CFIA web site.

                [If you actually go to the link and click on the words 'CFIA web site', you'll get taken to the actual website. I'm sure you can't argue with the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's own website as a 'reliable, unbiased source', now can you?]

                http://www.albertahorseindustry.ca/i...010&Itemid=283

                IF you will look at this document, FOIA from Beltex of a USDA Owner/Shipper Certificate, [below] you will see that the person dropping the load of horses at the plant indicates what breed/type the horse is.... Again if the person filling out the form can't be expected to accurately know the horses breed, they can't then know that the horses are clean of banned drugs.

                http://www.kaufmanzoning.net/nov24/06-108-Records-A.pdf
                And racehorses are tattoo'd, and even if it wasn't legible, you still know that they probably are TB/STB or QH, and most likely have received Bute and other drugs banned for use in food animals.

                Comment


                • Even with a brande new plant, my guess is 90% of us horses have had bute which disqualifies.this meat for human consumption. I readexport to Mexico was up to 100horsrs in 2013 from the USA. There is something wrong with these numbers unless mustangs are being slaughteredin record numbers.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by MoonoverMississippi View Post
                    I strongly agree that transportation, etc. need huge improvements, but really, I think data from 14 years ago shouldn't be used to judge how things may be done in 2013. I'm sure there must be more recent data; it would be interesting to compare to see if stronger enforcement is making the desired changes.

                    I think that people stating that skinny horses don't go to slaughter; from the above quote some do, and this was from a period where there were plenty of heavier horses to be found at auctions. I'm sure that is not the perferred state of things, and it seems more auctions are refusing horses with seere welfare issues (per AA's website).

                    As far as breed identification, the EU requires someone to fill out the declaration, and apparently this often is the trader. The trader can spend the time to make sure the drugs are out of the system, but that doesn't mean his identification of the breed is going to be any better after 6 months in a feedlot than it would be the day he/she purchased that animal.

                    In addition, I keep reading how ALL TBs and SB's MUST have had bute and other chemicals, so if it is a TB or Standardbred on the form (if correctly IDed), it must have had drugs.....how many of each breed actually hit the track? What about all of those at the farms or those used as riding horses? I agree that those with tattoos are suspect, but the drama and exageration is a bit much (often from both sides).
                    Most higher level performance horses have had Bute at some time in their life. I know all of the horses from the barns I've ever been at, have received some bute after a hard day of showing. Standing in a 10x10 stall and working hard all day, and no turn out can make them need the equivilant of an advil for people.

                    The horses going to slaughter today are in even better shape than 15 yrs ago due to the number of people that are giving horses away for free. KB don't have to take the leftovers. They can pretty much find horses in good shape for free or close to it, on CL, or at auctions, due to the economy, and people losing their jobs.

                    And regarding recent times...last yr a KB dumped 70 horses in the desert at the border at the Santa Teresa POE, because they were rejected due to a couple of horses having strangles. (If one horse on the trailer has strangles, they are all rejected.). There have been over 5000 horses a yr that were rejected at the border, dumped by killer buyers, and left to starve. For the record, these 70 that were dumped came from WI, which is certainly closer to Canada than here, yet they shipped them here. So having slaughter close, doesn't limit the transportation time. Even when Cavel was open, in IL, horses bought at Sugarcreek/New Holland, were routinely transported to Dallas Crowne and Beltex, near Dallas. Inj fact on a couple of those trips is when Baker was fined due to the driver continuing to drive thru 3 states after knowing that 2 horses were down in the trailer. He never stopped, and they were trampled to death. That fine (over 165k,) is still unpaid, and he never had his operations suspended. THAT's how well, we in the US enforce hunmane transport laws/slaughter abuse laws. Nothing has changed since then that would result in more stringent oversight.
                    KB's have dumped more horses outside the POE than have been accounted for by individuals, or in large scale seizures for the yr. So how is slaughter actually helping the horses?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                      This was predicted several years ago. At the time those anti slaughter folks claimed the nasty breeders were still flooding the market.

                      The market has curtailed itself and severly dropped.

                      Example...American Saddlebreds...stallion reports 2010 just over 1000 filed. 2011 was just over 450 and many of those were for ONE mare..

                      Quarter Horse have also stated reduced by 30+% for stallion reports. Those reports are necessary for breeders to fill or it will cost them a LOT of money to register foals

                      TB breedings are down and some states now have their facing groups refusing to take entries from trainers who have dumped horses knowing they are going to slaughter.

                      The anti slaughter groups refuse to go on tours. As for ranchers...please tell me what is KIND and LOVING about a rancher who turns the old horse out on those thousand of acres...Dry winter...no snow to eat (which is not great for a horse anyway especially when they have not been bred as wildies...therefore small and able to subsist on limited feed. Or...they now are STARVING and in a weakened state are brought down by coyotes, cougars, wolves etc and eaten ALIVE.. Slaugter EVEN if two bolts are used is over in 7-10 seconds. Eating aliver can take up to TEN MINUTES... with the horse SCREAMING.

                      Get the picture....

                      Jenn..you need to come out west. Cattle are brought up to the ranch for feeding during the winter. They don't just "go where the deer and the antelope play" on thousands of acres when it is 40 F below.

                      A quick death for an old horse is kinder than losing weight...suffering the cold and trying to find dried grass under feet of snow.
                      Surely most of those ranchers know how to shoot a gun, and with thousands of acres can either bury one, compost it, or put it in a bone pile or use whoever they use to dispose of cattle that die on the property.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Blkarab View Post
                        .

                        I believe that a well regulated, US facility is the answer. As far as a market for the meat...most goes into dog and cat food or is rendered. Very little is sold for human consumption.
                        None goes into commercial pet food in the US. The majority of US horses that are slaughtered are slaughtered for human consumption. Rendering companies take already dead horses, or leftovers from the SH that slaughter for human consumption.
                        It's apparent from the quoted sentence that you are not really educated on horse slaughter, and might want to do some research.
                        And even when SH were open in the US, they often transported further away. See a post of mine from above about the 70 dumped horses from WI. Canada is certainly closer than Mexico, yet they shipped them to here.
                        Re- those starving horses in pastures and owners having no way to dispose of them...bull. A bullet is cheap. Composting is free if you can't bury them.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by 7arabians View Post
                          If horse meat is so bad for you, why is Taco Bell now featuring it in all of its tacos and burritos?
                          Fairfax: is this one of your peeps? Since I'm pretty sure this person isn't joking, and based on the "WTH?" factor of this statement, "7arabians" seems to have all the qualifications to be a member of your fan club.

                          But, just to clear things up for you, "7arabians"; I'm pretty sure that Taco Bell isn't 'featuring' horsemeat based on their attempt at damage control:

                          "Taco Bell is the latest restaurant chain to acknowledge that its food has been adulterated with horse meat, yanking a variety of ground beef products from its three British outlets and issuing an apology to its patrons Friday."

                          Wow...just...wow.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by MoonoverMississippi View Post
                            But no inspections, no running; they have to have USDA inspectors there.
                            As far as handling of the horses, etc., that is where people have a chance to make a difference; fight for laws that cover those things, demand follow-up with complaints, etc.}

                            {Everyones excuse to the above is "but we tried it before and it didn't work perfectly, so it won't this time either!!!!!!" I find it ironic with horse people that that is an acceptable excuse; we won't ever use that excuse with our animals (Fluffy wouldn't do it or is slow to make changes, so I'm going to give up because it will never get better no matter what".....um, yeah, right).
                            There is a difference between working and working perfectly. I dont think anyone is asking for perfection. I think those for and opposed are asking for humane treatment and the history just isnt there.

                            In 2008 there were reports of not enough inspectors in meat processing plants. That didnt improve over the last few years and with sequester looming, adding more inspectors is probably not top on the list even with the addition of horse processing plants. Government is going to be focusing on hot button topics like the manning of control towers at airports, TSA and many many more looming issues.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Abercrombie View Post
                              Fairfax: is this one of your peeps? Since I'm pretty sure this person isn't joking, and based on the "WTH?" factor of this statement, "7arabians" seems to have all the qualifications to be a member of your fan club.

                              But, just to clear things up for you, "7arabians"; I'm pretty sure that Taco Bell isn't 'featuring' horsemeat based on their attempt at damage control:

                              "Taco Bell is the latest restaurant chain to acknowledge that its food has been adulterated with horse meat, yanking a variety of ground beef products from its three British outlets and issuing an apology to its patrons Friday."

                              Wow...just...wow.
                              Wasnt it Taco Bell that last year was caught not having enough beef in its beef

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by casper324 View Post
                                Even with a brande new plant, my guess is 90% of us horses have had bute which disqualifies.this meat for human consumption. I readexport to Mexico was up to 100horsrs in 2013 from the USA. There is something wrong with these numbers unless mustangs are being slaughteredin record numbers.
                                According to the Canadian buyers only 10% test positive for bute. There will be a new test introduced in April that will be able to give a positive. They are also stating that there is evidence that horses that previously tested positive do NOT give the same test as low as 120 days after

                                As I stated...the majority of the horses (89,000 to Canada in 2011) did NOT test positive...so that would still be around 80,000 free and clear.

                                The poster 7 is correct with his/her statement that much of this was started by the RARA's in Europe and it is also supported by the HSUS. Wayne and his wife were there last spring spreading their mantra and also spreading the dollars

                                There is NO reason for horsemeat to be subjected to more tests than other edible meats pork chicken beef, lamb etc.
                                Specialty meats such as ostrich have 1/10th the number of tests.

                                Just stating that since a horse is QH etc it MUST be a probable is NOT scientific evidence.

                                The issue with the horsemeat in Europe is NOT a big scandal over there OTHER THAN the reason the meat was improperly marked.

                                According to Fort MacLeod...all shipments are back on track and will start again tomorrow.
                                The Elephant in the room

                                Comment


                                • If the majority of the population is against horse slaughter, as they are of the rounding up and put in holding pens hundreds of wild mustangs and petition upon petition has been submitted to both county, state and federal gov'ts, why is it still being pushed through? My next question is if a reason posted for by pro-slaughter groups is getting rid of excess animals and animals that are starving, why is just horses that are targeted?

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by andylover View Post
                                    If the majority of the population is against horse slaughter, as they are of the rounding up and put in holding pens hundreds of wild mustangs and petition upon petition has been submitted to both county, state and federal gov'ts, why is it still being pushed through? My next question is if a reason posted for by pro-slaughter groups is getting rid of excess animals and animals that are starving, why is just horses that are targeted?
                                    the majority of the population does not give a rip.

                                    th majority of the population would result in something like 200 Million signatures. I do not think I have seen these amounts anywhere.


                                    It is being pushed through because the majority is not against it.

                                    oh, and sometimes the people we voted in charge understand that things need to be done, even if John Q. Public thinks he does not want it.
                                    Originally posted by BigMama1
                                    Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                                    GNU Terry Prachett

                                    Comment


                                    • Here's more recent documentation of how slaughter horses are treated in New Mexico. March, 2012. The abuse documented would not be any different if the slaughterhouse was in the U.S. It is just the nature of the industry.
                                      http://animalsangels.org/images/stor...lunas%20nm.pdf
                                      "The captive bolt is not a proper tool for slaughter of equids they regain consciousness 30 seconds after being struck fully aware they are being vivisected." Dr Friedlander DVM & frmr Chief USDA Insp

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by ptownevt View Post
                                        Here's more recent documentation of how slaughter horses are treated in New Mexico. March, 2012. The abuse documented would not be any different if the slaughterhouse was in the U.S. It is just the nature of the industry.
                                        http://animalsangels.org/images/stor...lunas%20nm.pdf
                                        you know New Mexico is not a different country, right!
                                        Originally posted by BigMama1
                                        Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                                        GNU Terry Prachett

                                        Comment


                                        • A 30 month study of the horse slaughter industry from 2007 to 2009. http://animalsangels.org/images/stor...hort_paper.pdf
                                          "The captive bolt is not a proper tool for slaughter of equids they regain consciousness 30 seconds after being struck fully aware they are being vivisected." Dr Friedlander DVM & frmr Chief USDA Insp

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X