• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Horse Slaughter Ban Lifted by Oklahoma Senate -- Needs Gov Signature -- YOU can help!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jenm View Post
    Interesting that you believe you are right and the rest of us are wrong. Just because we don't agree with you doesn't mean we don't understand.
    Except when you give animal rights extremists propaganda as reasons to be against slaughter, that are fabricated and/or non-sensical ones, then I have to assume you don't know any better, or you would not use those.

    The reason many are not posting is because slaughter is not a PC subject.
    Being against banning it brings those claiming the high ground out and that call others names, directly or indirectly and that is hard not to respond in kind to.

    Being against a ban on slaughter, by the way, is not always being for it.
    It is understanding what all is behind this push for a ban.
    It is a principle with some that we should not ban slaughter just because some animal rights extremists, as part of furthering their agendas, demand we do so.

    Comment


    • Oh Look another Slaughter thread!
      To both sides, the definition of insanity is doing something over and over again and expecting a different result!
      Death is not pretty, for any creature. Our job as Animal owners is to give our OWN animals a decent life and a respectful end. You cannot save them all.
      If we pulled all the threads over the past several years they would all say the same thing, It never gets anywhere. Mental masturbation!
      That is all.

      Comment


      • What I don't get is why people strongly insist that there is no way to make horse slaughter more humane?

        When people attempt to discuss process improvements, strengthening laws, etc., it seems people stick their fingers in their ears and say "nahnahnah, can't hear you, can't be done, it was bad before, everyone involved is evil, etc."

        Years ago pet shelters killed in horrific ways and it was common for puppies & kittens to be drowned before they became another mouth to feed. But through massive education, and the following demands for improvement at least the vast majority are treated more humanely with better processes and oversight. Perfect? No, but better.

        Same with slaughter; it has changed, more education and improvements have been researched and made to the entire process. Perfect? No, but still large improvements. And the outcry when one place is bad is much more massive: look at how the treatment of downer cows hit the news.

        What changed that? Public knowledge, public education, instant media and public outcry demanding changes. Not perfect, no. But changes and improvement have been made, both in owner's education, and in animal management.

        Now we have the internet and thousands more with knowledge of the mechanics and the issues, yet people still insist that because it was one way before, it can never be different, never be better.
        I see no one stating that if it does pass there must be wording to require much more stingent regulations, oversight by humane organizations, etc., just "nahnahnah, I can't hear you, it can't be made better, nothing can possibly change, nahnahnah."

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
          So what, there are laws and regulations and if those are not followed, there are consequences, no matter who is the one not following them, a slaughter plant or your local machine or printing plant, or a city's sewer system.

          You fix what is not working, you don't ban it all with the excuse that someone, somewhere, didn't to it right at some time, be it slaughter or any other.

          Why is that such a hard concept to understand?
          Did you read what you quoted?
          I could also ask you 'why is that such a hard concept to understand' that it was not the case that the plants causing local issues with water and waste were old plants in need of renovation?

          What is so hard to understand, that issues discovered by OSHA, USDA and other agencies clearly show that even new plants were not 'better'? While those same agencies failed to collect fines when regulations were enforced....
          Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

          http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Sannois View Post
            Oh Look another Slaughter thread!
            To both sides, the definition of insanity is doing something over and over again and expecting a different result!
            Death is not pretty, for any creature. Our job as Animal owners is to give our OWN animals a decent life and a respectful end. You cannot save them all.
            If we pulled all the threads over the past several years they would all say the same thing, It never gets anywhere. Mental masturbation!
            That is all.
            You are right, we have to keep repeating those important concepts about some topics, here slaughter, because there are always new people asking questions and thinking this thru.

            You can't believe how many will PM saying they are thankful we went thru this again, as it gave them such a broader perspective of what the issues surrounding slaughter and the larger one of animal rights extremists bring forth.

            While it may look like we are doing the same and getting the same results and that seems silly at first, I consider these threads a bit of a PSA.
            So many seem to come to this clueless of what all there is behind that pervasive animal rights extremist propaganda out there, including the one against slaughter.

            P.S. I hope those out there following the little game of drinking to my words will remember not to drink and post.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by MoonoverMississippi View Post
              What I don't get is why people strongly insist that there is no way to make horse slaughter more humane?

              When people attempt to discuss process improvements, strengthening laws, etc., it seems people stick their fingers in their ears and say "nahnahnah, can't hear you, can't be done, it was bad before, everyone involved is evil, etc."

              Years ago pet shelters killed in horrific ways and it was common for puppies & kittens to be drowned before they became another mouth to feed. But through massive education, and the following demands for improvement at least the vast majority are treated more humanely with better processes and oversight. Perfect? No, but better.

              Same with slaughter; it has changed, more education and improvements have been researched and made to the entire process. Perfect? No, but still large improvements. And the outcry when one place is bad is much more massive: look at how the treatment of downer cows hit the news.

              What changed that? Public knowledge, public education, instant media and public outcry demanding changes. Not perfect, no. But changes and improvement have been made, both in owner's education, and in animal management.

              Now we have the internet and thousands more with knowledge of the mechanics and the issues, yet people still insist that because it was one way before, it can never be different, never be better.
              I see no one stating that if it does pass there must be wording to require much more stingent regulations, oversight by humane organizations, etc., just "nahnahnah, I can't hear you, it can't be made better, nothing can possibly change, nahnahnah."
              And we have people insisting it was only the OLD plants that caused problems for the local communities.

              Why don't I think things will change if we start over re-opening plants here in the US?
              Because there is a very vocal pro-slaughter group who refuses to admit there was a problem in the first place.
              Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

              http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Bluey View Post

                P.S. I hope those out there following the little game of drinking to my words will remember not to drink and post.
                any which way, it would be a win/win....

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                  Did you read what you quoted?
                  I could also ask you 'why is that such a hard concept to understand' that it was not the case that the plants causing local issues with water and waste were not old plants in need of renovation?

                  What is so hard to understand, that issues discovered by OSHA, USDA and other agencies clearly show that even new plants were not 'better'?
                  New here is relative, those plants have been closed for several years now.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                    And we have people insisting it was only the OLD plants that caused problems for the local communities.

                    Why don't I think things will change if we start over re-opening plants here in the US?
                    Because there is a very vocal pro-slaughter group who refuses to admit there was a problem in the first place.
                    No, no we were talking about an ancient plant in Dallas when the talk was of obsolete systems that kept breaking down.

                    Hard to keep all the stories straight, is it.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                      No, no we were talking about an ancient plant in Dallas when the talk was of obsolete systems that kept breaking down.

                      Hard to keep all the stories straight, is it.
                      And I pointed out that a newer plant in DeKalb Ill also had issues, so the issues were clearly not just that one plant or due to, as you suggested, the plant being old.

                      Yes clearly you are having trouble keeping your story straight. Go back and read what you wrote:

                      Originally Posted by Bluey
                      Everything we do has consequences, no one is denying that.
                      BUT, you are not being honest there, bringing the case of one plant that had a partially malfunctioning system to process water before being discharged, a plant that was where real estate was becoming pricey, or would if they could run industrial business out of there, like, horror, a slaughter plant.

                      I agree, the plant was old and needed to go somewhere else and they knew that and were trying their best to run with what they had.

                      Any other time, other place, they would have modernized, get their system replaced and stayed in business.
                      Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                      http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by MoonoverMississippi View Post
                        What I don't get is why people strongly insist that there is no way to make horse slaughter more humane?

                        When people attempt to discuss process improvements, strengthening laws, etc., it seems people stick their fingers in their ears and say "nahnahnah, can't hear you, can't be done, it was bad before, everyone involved is evil, etc."

                        Years ago pet shelters killed in horrific ways and it was common for puppies & kittens to be drowned before they became another mouth to feed. But through massive education, and the following demands for improvement at least the vast majority are treated more humanely with better processes and oversight. Perfect? No, but better.

                        Same with slaughter; it has changed, more education and improvements have been researched and made to the entire process. Perfect? No, but still large improvements. And the outcry when one place is bad is much more massive: look at how the treatment of downer cows hit the news.

                        What changed that? Public knowledge, public education, instant media and public outcry demanding changes. Not perfect, no. But changes and improvement have been made, both in owner's education, and in animal management.

                        Now we have the internet and thousands more with knowledge of the mechanics and the issues, yet people still insist that because it was one way before, it can never be different, never be better.
                        I see no one stating that if it does pass there must be wording to require much more stingent regulations, oversight by humane organizations, etc., just "nahnahnah, I can't hear you, it can't be made better, nothing can possibly change, nahnahnah."
                        Here is an article just about this, sorry it is several pages long:

                        http://www.cattlenetwork.com/cattle-...193907851.html


                        Animal management is an ongoing learning process.
                        As circumstances change, so do what works and doesn't, for many more reasons that is obvious.
                        Just think on how many used to manage horses years ago, how they trained and how much more we know today.

                        Comment


                        • I'm still waiting for proof that the new plants have addressed some of the issues. or are these new plants just another cattle facility retro-fitted (NOT) for horses. Still waiting for proof that enforcement of regulations can be accomplished. And last but not least, where the money going to come from for enforcement and inspection.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by sunridge1 View Post
                            I'm still waiting for proof that the new plants have addressed some of the issues. or are these new plants just another cattle facility retro-fitted (NOT) for horses. Still waiting for proof that enforcement of regulations can be accomplished. And last but not least, where the money going to come from for enforcement and inspection.
                            then why, instead of sitting there like the princess on the pea, won't you get involved.

                            But you do expect the world to do your work for you....
                            You want to know, you go find out.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                              And I pointed out that a newer plant in DeKalb Ill also had issues, so the issues were clearly not just that one plant or due to, as you suggested, the plant being old.

                              Yes clearly you are having trouble keeping your story straight. Go back and read what you wrote:

                              Originally Posted by Bluey
                              Everything we do has consequences, no one is denying that.
                              BUT, you are not being honest there, bringing the case of one plant that had a partially malfunctioning system to process water before being discharged, a plant that was where real estate was becoming pricey, or would if they could run industrial business out of there, like, horror, a slaughter plant.

                              I agree, the plant was old and needed to go somewhere else and they knew that and were trying their best to run with what they had.

                              Any other time, other place, they would have modernized, get their system replaced and stayed in business.
                              I was still talking about the one plant I knew about and what the managers were saying.

                              I made it clear that I don't know about other plants and why they did what they did or didn't.

                              I will still say, that doesn't mean the next plant won't be up to regulations, just because some were not, just like our local old sewer treatment plant, once they finish the new one, we should not assume it won't be working right, because someone, somewhere has a new one that is not quite working right.

                              Besides the point here to bring what all plants doing anything that plants do have to do with banning slaughter because some animal rights extremists are making millions of the debate and the free publicity that brings them.

                              Comment


                              • Sunridge, hope you're not holding your breath, cause that can only end badly for you.
                                Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                                  And we have people insisting it was only the OLD plants that caused problems for the local communities.

                                  Why don't I think things will change if we start over re-opening plants here in the US?
                                  Because there is a very vocal pro-slaughter group who refuses to admit there was a problem in the first place.
                                  So because there is a vocal "other side", that is a reason not to loudly insist on improvements?
                                  So much better to only try to prevent it happening (and in this economy, voting down anything that might create jobs is unlikely) than to have a contingency of demanding improvements if it does pass?

                                  Color me confused.

                                  Comment


                                  • And who is going to buy the meat. That's the biggest question right now. Who will buy from an American horse slaughter house?

                                    I only buy beef from my neighbor (and I can see how his cattle are farmed) or from a known beef producer. Poultry, I stick with no antibiotics, no hormones. Same for pork, I don't want the 15% added liquid and flavorings, thank you very much. My tofu is non GMO soy, so is the soymilk.

                                    I wouldn't buy it, even if I liked the taste of horse.

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                      I was still talking about the one plant I knew about and what the managers were saying.

                                      I made it clear that I don't know about other plants and why they did what they did or didn't.
                                      Clearly you weren't... and didn't

                                      Originally Posted by Bluey
                                      Everything we do has consequences, no one is denying that.
                                      BUT, you are not being honest there, bringing the case of one plant that had a partially malfunctioning system to process water before being discharged, a plant that was where real estate was becoming pricey, or would if they could run industrial business out of there, like, horror, a slaughter plant.

                                      I agree, the plant was old and needed to go somewhere else and they knew that and were trying their best to run with what they had.

                                      Any other time, other place, they would have modernized, get their system replaced and stayed in business.


                                      Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                      I will still say, that doesn't mean the next plant won't be up to regulations, just because some were not, just like our local old sewer treatment plant, once they finish the new one, we should not assume it won't be working right, because someone, somewhere has a new one that is not quite working right.

                                      Besides the point here to bring what all plants doing anything that plants do have to do with banning slaughter because some animal rights extremists are making millions of the debate and the free publicity that brings them.
                                      I have no idea what that last sentence is supposed to mean...


                                      The next plant might work better... and yet history shows us that new plants do not work any better, are not any better neighbors, and regulations do not get enforced, and fines do not [STILL] get collected...
                                      Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                      http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by MoonoverMississippi View Post
                                        So because there is a vocal "other side", that is a reason not to loudly insist on improvements?
                                        So much better to only try to prevent it happening (and in this economy, voting down anything that might create jobs is unlikely) than to have a contingency of demanding improvements if it does pass?

                                        Color me confused.
                                        We demanded improvements before the plants closed and nothing got done. Look into what the town around Beltex, Cavel and Dallas Crown went through, YEARS of complaining and trying to get things improved and lawsuits and injunctions. YEARS.
                                        DeKalb supposedly GOT a new improved plant... and yet the new Cavle was as bad...

                                        LOL yes jobs! The plants will create JOBS! Seriously?
                                        Even those few jobs the plants create... with what OSHA has said about those plants, do YOU want to work there? Do you think anyone should?
                                        Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                        http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                          And who is going to buy the meat. That's the biggest question right now. Who will buy from an American horse slaughter house?
                                          is that your problem?
                                          if they made widgets, does it matter?
                                          They sold their meat before, they are selling the American horses through plants in Mexico and Canada right now....
                                          If they turned all of them into jello whole sale...and Mello Yello food color...
                                          does it really matter? Is it any of your business?

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X