• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

It's LONGE people, NOT lunge, and FAZE, not phase! GAK!!!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Definately. Makes me grumble every time. Definitely!

    Not so much a word, but I really cannot stand "My bad." UGH!

    I love the Alot blog thread! I was going to post it here, but a few of you beat me to it. My sister sent it to me knowing it bothered me too.

    FF

    Pick up the clue phone, I'm sure it's for you - hilarious btw.

    Comment


    • Kate66, I'll concede to your argument. Wish I would have had you in court reporting school when the teacher would mark alright as a misspelling no matter the context because it wasn't in the dictionary we used. Actually it was but only to refer us to all right and mention the disagreement on whether it is or is not a word.

      Comment


      • Please indulge me here, and join the crusade to save the language we old timers had drilled into us since we were wee tots, as best we can.
        Yes, but sorry OP you are dead wrong about "lunge".

        "Lunge ' and "longe" are both correct but "lunge' is in fact the preferred spelling in some places such as the UK and Commonwealth countries.

        Yes, you may find 'longe ' in US pony club manuals and U.S. dictionaries but it is generally spelled "lunge' in UK dictionaries and in the original British Pony Club manuals .

        Next you'll be saying 'labour", "favour" and "neighbour" must also be incorrect because they are spelled differently in the U.S. than in some other countries
        Last edited by Crockpot; Feb. 26, 2013, 06:35 PM.

        Comment


        • what are you doing with all those "u"s? I'm Canadian, and that is the correct spelling for me, but here in TX I'm constantly corrected. And we can't forget cheque. Lol
          Last edited by 2BayPonies; Feb. 26, 2013, 07:19 PM. Reason: damn tablet!

          Comment


          • English is an evolving language - the now correct words that are allowed every year make some people gasp.
            A few years ago all this techno language was a foreig language.
            Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Foxtrot's View Post
              English is an evolving language - the now correct words that are allowed every year make some people gasp.
              A few years ago all this techno language was a foreig language.
              I am aghasted you should say that!

              Comment


              • Originally Posted by Foxtrot's
                English is an evolving language - the now correct words that are allowed every year make some people gasp.
                A few years ago all this techno language was a foreig language.
                "Foxtrot's" ???

                Comment


                • This discussion is moot.

                  1. open to discussion or debate; debatable; doubtful: a moot point.
                  2. of little or no practical value or meaning; purely academic.

                  This discussion is not mute

                  1. silent; refraining from speech or utterance.
                  2. not emitting or having sound of any kind.

                  Comment


                  • what are you doing with all those "u"s? I'm Canadian, and that is the correct spelling for me, but here in TX I'm constantly corrected. And we can't forget cheque. Lol
                    Yes why do people in the USA hate the humble "U".


                    Also, as someone who has spent lots of time in Canada, I thought it quite hilarious when told that the use of the word "cheque" by Canadians was pretentious.

                    Um, no, it's actually the correct usage of the word for both English and French in Canada

                    Comment


                    • That reminded me of another...

                      It's 'one fell swoop'. It's not 'one foul swoop', nor is it 'one fowl swoop'.

                      I didn't know the nuptials one, if I ever have impending nuptials I will remember that.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Loopy View Post
                        That reminded me of another...

                        It's 'one fell swoop'. It's not 'one foul swoop', nor is it 'one fowl swoop'.

                        I didn't know the nuptials one, if I ever have impending nuptials I will remember that.
                        You mean it isn't "One Swell Foop"?
                        Kanoe Godby
                        www.dyrkgodby.com
                        See, I was raised by wolves and am really behind the 8-ball on diplomatic issue resolution.

                        Comment


                        • When you have a cold one fowl soup can be helpful.

                          Comment


                          • And yet, I must confess to finding one regional thing utterly charming. A friend's grandmother died. This was in Virginia. A dear older nurse came out and quietly told him, "She done passed."

                            Some of you know that my announcement of a person's passing is rather direct ("Frank Sinatra? DEAD."), so this gentle delivery was just so sweet.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Kate66 View Post
                              Totally disagree with this. As the daughter of 2 teachers and having been brought up in the great British education system, I can assure you that "alright" is indeed a word.

                              "All right" means that everything was right
                              "alright" means it was OK, not great, but OK

                              For example,
                              "These numbers are all right". However, perhaps after a concert or a meeting "It was alright".

                              Totally different meanings.

                              Of course if the person you are referring to was trying to infer "all right" by writing "alright" then indeed it would be wrong.
                              Very interesting. Most American usage books (including the one I have sitting in front of me) state that "alright" is an "incorrect form." I believe that it will eventually be accepted, but it's not yet accepted here though I often see it.
                              I heard a neigh. Oh, such a brisk and melodious neigh as that was! My very heart leaped with delight at the sound. --Nathaniel Hawthorne

                              Comment


                              • I love regionalisms. When I went to grad school in western PA, I heard "youans" (plural "you") for the first time in my life and added it to my collection.
                                I heard a neigh. Oh, such a brisk and melodious neigh as that was! My very heart leaped with delight at the sound. --Nathaniel Hawthorne

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Dewey View Post
                                  Very interesting. Most American usage books (including the one I have sitting in front of me) state that "alright" is an "incorrect form." I believe that it will eventually be accepted, but it's not yet accepted here though I often see it.

                                  My spell check allows it...and it does not accept 'google' as verb yet...

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by Dewey View Post
                                    Very interesting. Most American usage books (including the one I have sitting in front of me) state that "alright" is an "incorrect form." I believe that it will eventually be accepted, but it's not yet accepted here though I often see it.
                                    Interesting discussion! I checked in with the OED, and they've listed "alright" as an obsolete usage, and "all right" as modern. Evidently, "alright" and similar forms stem from pre-seventeenth-century derivations of "eallriht". That said, for a supposedly obsolete form, it certainly gets frequent use!
                                    Piaffe Girl -- Dressage. Fashionably.
                                    http://piaffegirl.wordpress.com/
                                    https://www.facebook.com/PiaffeGirl

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by NoSuchPerson View Post
                                      I think of soda vs pop and hoagie vs sub as being simply regional differences in dialect, not matters of correct vs incorrect.
                                      I totally say soda and hoagie. : )
                                      So not Texan.

                                      One time my friend asked me to grab a "coke" for her at the gas station. So I bought a coke. I brought it back and she looks at it disgusted and says, "what's this? I wanted a Dr. Pepper."

                                      I'm still confused.
                                      http://kaboomeventing.com/
                                      http://kaboomeventing.blogspot.com/
                                      Horses are amazing athletes and make no mistake -- they are the stars of the show!

                                      Comment


                                      • I know, U is a perfectly good vowel, not sure why the discrimination :-)

                                        Pretentious, I think not. We have just maintained more of the English culture in Canada. Try finding vinegar for your fries or HP steak sauce in the south. Ha!

                                        My biggest peeve is moot-mute. Drives me batshit!

                                        Comment


                                        • Why the googly eyes, Crockpot?
                                          Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X