• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

It's LONGE people, NOT lunge, and FAZE, not phase! GAK!!!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Cindyg View Post
    I feel the same way about "gifting." It's supposed to be a noun, not a verb.
    still better than impacting...sounds like a need for Colon Blow...

    One more thing that makes me positively cringe:

    Through and threw....
    you know, walk me threw this course....
    No man, I could throw you through this wall for saying that...

    thank goodness, I can't spell nor type, it magically cancels each other out most of the time!

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by ILuvmyButtercups View Post
      What go me started on this rant is the SmartPak supplement winter 2013 flyer that came this month. On page 21 under the 6 stressors article, they write in # 5 where travel can take a silent toll: "Even if he seems unphased on the outside..." grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
      So I come onto COTH, my favorite most forums on horses ever, and over and over I see the carelessness, the abuse of these two terms. Don't even get me started on "flatting", "lessoning", oh, my poor head.

      Thanks for the well wishes! I'm on the fourth day of the flu, and almost hope it kills me - anything to be out of this misery!!!

      Really? That's what bugged you about the SmartPak flyer? What bugs ME is their claim, "5 minutes to a healthier horse". Um, feeding your horse a bunch of expensive crap he may or may not benefit from doesn't make him a healthier horse. It makes SmartPak a healthier company.
      "Absent a correct diagnosis, medicine is poison, surgery is trauma and alternative therapy is witchcraft" A. Kent Allen
      http://www.etsy.com/shop/tailsofglory

      Comment


      • #63
        Euthanize, not euthanatize.
        "I couldn't fix your brakes, so I made your horn louder."

        Comment


        • #64
          It's per se, not per say, although auto-correct wreaks havoc on Latin.
          And remember: "there is a RAT in 'separate'."

          Comment


          • #65
            "Alot."

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by RedHorses View Post
              The one that has me scratching my head is "me" - somewhere along the line "me" seems to have become a word that only idjits use ("me like hockey"). People are using "I" where they should be using "me" and I have to wonder why. "This is a picture of my horse and I" is incorrect use of "I". There's an easy way to check which to use - remove the other party and repeat the sentence. Would you say "This is a picture of I"? Of course not, you'd say "This is a picture of me" so when you put your horse back in it becomes "This is a picture of my horse and me." It works both ways - "My horse and I went on a hack today" is correct because you would also say "I went on a hack today."

              AAAACK! This has been making me CRAZY since about 1994. I believe it started Back East and moved West. It's just a simple hyper-correction, but I loathe it. It's so common now it's even present it otherwise well-written successful Hollywood films. News anchors use it "I" incorrectly all the time. All sure signs that this is becoming standard and acceptable but it still makes me want to wretch. I'd rather be told "This is her." in response to "May I speak to..?" on the phone all day long.

              Meanwhile, back to the OP, I've always figured longing/lunging was related to long-lining, which makes me think "longe" is an old timey English word and "lunge" comes from Americans reading "longe" as a soft "g." I don't like the way "longe" looks.
              An auto-save saved my post.

              I might be a cylon

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Cindyg View Post
                I feel the same way about "gifting." It's supposed to be a noun, not a verb.
                So (ha) I just read the quote from the Wiki article on lunge/longe. Interesting!

                Does anyone have knowledge of "gifting" having been a verb a littler farther back in history or outside the US? I'm pretty sure I've encountered it in that type of context, meaning in 19th C. British literature. This is one of those words that does seem a little silly, made up and lazy but, I dunno I just like it! "Giving" and "gift giving" are different things and I appreciate the efficiency.

                As for the ethical question, the vast majority of things discussed on COTH are trivial and pale in comparison to war, famine and poverty. I'm watching the Bachelor as I'm writing this. I have very real problems in my life on very fundamental levels. I still reserve the right to relax and pass the time on COTH and even to have some grammar pet peeves and to enjoy discussing them. Other people's peeves are not my own and language is always evolving with a standard only being a theoretical concept. However, collectively such concerns and discussions help to preserve our most basic ability to transmit information and have it be understood. While being an unrelenting grammar snob really can marginalize the uneducated, the society-wide denigration of eloquence and education hurts the margins even more. Few things are more disempowering than being unable to express yourself - to not have a voice (it's ok to split infinitives now). It might not matter much when talking about lunging, but when talking to an ER doctor it matters tremendously.
                An auto-save saved my post.

                I might be a cylon

                Comment


                • #68
                  I use lunge. Longe isn't aesthetically pleasing to me.

                  I once had an e-mail exchange with a rather famous author. After a while I noticed the e-mails varied in spelling and punctuation, so I asked the author whether he was writing all of them. He replied that some were written by his assistant, and that I would be able to tell which ones the assistant wrote because those were the ones with correct spelling and grammar

                  And did you know F. Scott Fitzgerald & Ernest Hemingway had problems with spelling and grammar? Hemingway wrote to Fitzgerald:

                  For Christ sake write and don't worry about what the boys will say nor whether it will be a masterpiece nor what. I write one page of masterpiece to ninety one pages of shit. I try to put the shit in the wastebasket. You feel you have to publish crap to make money to live and let live. All write but if you write enough and as well as you can there will be the same amount of masterpiece material. You can't think well enough to sit down and write a deliberate masterpiece and if you could get rid of Seldes and those guys that nearly ruined you and turn them out as well as you can and let the spectators yell when it is good and hoot when it is not you would be all right.
                  From: Ernest Hemingway Selected Letters 1917-1961

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    I specifically referred to cothers who have major problems and illnesses. Not to "third world" people, whomever they are. The people on this board with major problems would love to have just grammar to worry about. But I find it ironic that people who are complaining about grammar on this thread are wrong in their assertions about what words are proper to use in reference to horses. Lighten up! As someone said, we're not in college english class and we shouldn't be graded by others.

                    Once a word becomes common usage, Webster's Dictionary adds it as acceptable for use. Our language is ever expanding and we should be glad of that. Gerunds are good!

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      i'm usually quite tolerant, but the various spellings of the word love are a bit irritating to me, i admit.
                      love--not luv, not loff, not lurve.
                      sheesh.
                      feel better sick ones!

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        I luv this thread

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Ambitious Kate View Post
                          Conformation, as pointed out, not confirmation. When you talk about how a horse is conformed, (notice "formed"), you are talking about his build, or conformation. When something has been 'confirmed', it has been verified, and you made a confirmation of say, your reservation.

                          The worst is when people use apostrophes for plural words. In two hospitals I was greeted with this mistake every day, by the name of the cafe in the hospital. The first hospital had a place called "Cappachino's And More". I used to go in and ask the owner, who was behinnd the counter waiting on me, "Who's Cappachino? Its his deli, he should be here." It just grated on me. Just started a job at a new hospital, and Friday I finally found my way to the in-hospital cafeteria. What's the name of it? "Choice's Cafe". I wonder who "Choice" is. le sigh.

                          The thing is, both of these places have very expensive, large, neon style signs made for their cafes, and must have spent a ton of money on it. I do take a sly pleasure when pointing out, very quietly and sympathetically, that it must be such a shame to have spent all that money on such a lovely sign only to find out it was spelled wrong.
                          The blasted misused apo'strophe's are MAKING ME CRAZY. Doesn't anybody bother to check that text is correct before publishing it, whether as an ad or article or sign?? What's become scary to me is now I find myself starting to throw in random apostrophes.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Oh, and Misty, there is "a rat" in "separate."
                            LOL, I don't know what it is with me and that word! Every time I type it, it's easier to type that way. My pinkies hate typing, especially the left one.

                            suz..."loff" is a Cothism from the late, great Willem.
                            You jump in the saddle,
                            Hold onto the bridle!
                            Jump in the line!
                            ...Belefonte

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by GoForAGallop View Post
                              Yeah but she said "the barns have aisles," referencing the barns in the barn builder ads that she had just been reading.
                              I think she was saying, 'Hello, builders, it's aisles, not isles.'
                              *****
                              You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                suz..."loff" is a Cothism from the late, great Willem.
                                [/QUOTE
                                ]i know, makes me feel like an idjit, but there you have it.

                                Comment


                                • #76
                                  Originally posted by PNWjumper View Post
                                  Lunge and longe are both correct:
                                  "Lunge" is used as a rule in the UK (still a perfectly cromulent country despite its lousy credit rating).

                                  Comment


                                  • #77
                                    Originally posted by katarine View Post
                                    Rediculous has been getting quite the workout here of late.
                                    Rediculous and discusting! A viscious circle.

                                    Comment


                                    • #78
                                      Originally posted by JoZ View Post
                                      4
                                      : to treat (an animal) with a drug to destroy or expel parasitic
                                      worms
                                      I could care less! Or couldn't I??

                                      Comment


                                      • #79
                                        Originally posted by fburton View Post
                                        Rediculous and discusting! A viscious circle.

                                        Defiantly so

                                        Comment


                                        • #80
                                          And how many of us have horses that are dominate? (Bleurgh! )

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X