• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

It's LONGE people, NOT lunge, and FAZE, not phase! GAK!!!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by VCT View Post
    Try searching for "longe" .... you get a lot of long things.
    So you get lunge lines because they are long.

    Comment


    • Since when are the ad and catalog writers the arbiters of grammar? I realize that the product hyperbole of one the above goes beyond spectacular.
      Some riders change their horse, they change their saddle, they change their teacher; they never change themselves.

      Remember the horse does all the work, we just sit there and look pretty.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ILuvmyButtercups View Post

        Isn't it bad enough the slaughter of the english language in general by the clue, and careless, but the folks on here are generally fairly bright, and obviously well educated.

        So, why would any horse person want to teach their horses to LUNGE around them????? Lunging is bad, lunging is out of control horsey madness. Dangerous. To longe a horse is to have him travel around his trainer while on a longe line, in a well controlled manner. This is good.

        A horse who does not spook at flapping things on the trail or elsewhere is un-FAZED. He may be going through a spooky PHASE while young, but when he's over all that silliness later, nothing should faze him at all, hopefully.

        Too much Benadryl.
        ... _. ._ .._. .._

        Comment


        • What about the use of "the"? In America, we say "He is in THE hospital." I have heard the British folks say "He is in hospital."

          WHY do we use "the", but the Brits don't? Is this the only case of the missing "the"? I would love more examples!

          L

          Comment


          • Why do y'all generally murder the language ?
            ... _. ._ .._. .._

            Comment


            • Originally posted by katarine View Post
              I avoid the issue by riding my horse rather than ____ing it.

              That's my new solution. I'll just ask "well, do you ever l____e him in side reins?"
              Here I was, just cruising through this thread, but when I hit this one, I totally laughed out loud!

              Comment


              • OK - finally finished reading everything! I can't believe no one has mentioned a total eye bleeder - PROLLY!

                I HATE THAT! It's PROBABLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by JumpQH View Post
                  OK - finally finished reading everything! I can't believe no one has mentioned a total eye bleeder - PROLLY!

                  I HATE THAT! It's PROBABLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                  you are prolly right, we forgot that....
                  alot of people hate that, it needs gone from the english language, like totally yesterday.

                  Originally posted by BigMama1
                  Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                  GNU Terry Prachett

                  Comment


                  • Biggest pet peeve ever: the word rode.
                    I RODE my horse today.
                    Not my horse has been RODE. No, your horse has been RIDDEN.

                    Comment


                    • This is great reading!! One of my personal peeves are news casters, reading a 'proof read' report with incorrect grammer.

                      Comment


                      • urm your from america most of you so you prononce things and says things differently and spell them differently
                        like color- here it is colour
                        and say centre line you spelt it center
                        recognise is another you say it recognize
                        different cultures countries lol and the correct word is lunge line and you lunge your horse- or its lungeing your horse

                        to long line is to use two lunge lines

                        Comment


                        • One of my personal peeves are news casters, reading a 'proof read' report with incorrect grammer.


                          Very funny. I see at least three errors there. Thanks for the chuckle.

                          Comment


                          • So here's a psychology question: Why does it bother one so much to see an unexpected word or bit of syntax even when it has no negative effect on comprehension?

                            I just had that nails on chalkboard feeling thanks to happening upon the following quote (altered to protect the accused); "...my stallion and I's first [competition]."

                            Ouch.
                            An auto-save saved my post.

                            I might be a cylon

                            Comment


                            • there's nothing wrong with 'I rode my horse today'.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Loopy View Post
                                there's nothing wrong with 'I rode my horse today'.
                                Indeed, I rode two horses yesterday, my own horses. I have ridden them many times over the years. And I will ride at least one of them today after work.

                                But when I ride, I will not be 'flatting' or 'clinicking' or 'lessoning.' Gack. I might well be hacking, though. On the horse, that is. The air quality is good in these parts today, so neither the horse nor I will likely engage in respiratory hacking.

                                Comment


                                • I misread Sargentmajors comment, I agree after all

                                  Comment


                                  • If this has come up already, I apologize. But when speaking of the parentage of an animal, the proper word for the female parent is 'dam', not 'damn'. Unless, of course, the second is being used in a descriptive manner prior to the first spelling.
                                    "In the beginning, the universe was created. This made a lot of people angry and has widely been considered as a bad move." -Douglas Adams

                                    Comment


                                    • Since this thread is still going, what's up with calling fetlocks (I presume) "ankles"? There are even "ankle boots" for sale! Craziness. And inaccurate to boot.

                                      Edited to add: More general spelling things that amuse and mildly irritate me are using "deep seeded" instead of "deep seated", "in the throws of" vs "in the throes of" and "mute" point (as already mentioned).

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by lorilu View Post
                                        What about the use of "the"? In America, we say "He is in THE hospital." I have heard the British folks say "He is in hospital."

                                        WHY do we use "the", but the Brits don't? Is this the only case of the missing "the"? I would love more examples!
                                        I'll go one further. I've noticed in British writing in the 1800s it's "he stood looking out of window," instead of "out the window" or "out of the window." Haven't seen that in more modern writing.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by trubandloki View Post
                                          So you get lunge lines because they are long.
                                          You would think so! But no... just mostly get long sleeved shirts
                                          2016 RRP Makeover Competitor www.EnviousBid.com

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X