• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Israel to become first Nation to ban horses and donkey drawn vehicles from roads.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Israel to become first Nation to ban horses and donkey drawn vehicles from roads.

    http://www.chai.org.il/en/campaigns/...pr_nov2012.htm

    I often wonder in different regional and economic situations how a ban would seem on one hand adventitious yet on another. If the animals are no longer useful to their owners ..what becomes of them?

    My personal point of view is they are raised to view their livestock differently then you or I. I think organizations like http://www.thebrooke.org/ and http://www.princefluffykareem.com/

    That focus their efforts on education and rehabilitation seem to be the better way to go.

    The organization behind the push to ban http://www.chai.org.il/en/about/about_mission.htm

    Clearly states in their own mission page :
    "We believe that animals do not exist to serve human needs, and we are opposed to the exploitation of animals in all its forms. CHAI and Hakol Chai approach the challenge of reducing animal suffering with concurrent initiatives. Some of these efforts result in abolishing a particular form of abuse, while others result in regulations that reduce abuse through incremental changes. Nevertheless, we believe that all animal exploitation must ultimately be abolished and not merely regulated. "

    Seems vaguely familiar...if I could just put my finger on where I'd heard that before.


    "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

  • #2
    I wonder what will happen to the people that currently earn income by using horse/donkey drawn vehicles. I can't imagine that they will now magically be able to buy a truck and fuel.

    i wonder if this will really pass into law.
    Freeing worms from cans everywhere!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
      http://www.chai.org.il/en/campaigns/...pr_nov2012.htm

      I often wonder in different regional and economic situations how a ban would seem on one hand adventitious yet on another. If the animals are no longer useful to their owners ..what becomes of them?

      My personal point of view is they are raised to view their livestock differently then you or I. I think organizations like http://www.thebrooke.org/ and http://www.princefluffykareem.com/

      That focus their efforts on education and rehabilitation seem to be the better way to go.

      The organization behind the push to ban http://www.chai.org.il/en/about/about_mission.htm

      Clearly states in their own mission page :
      "We believe that animals do not exist to serve human needs, and we are opposed to the exploitation of animals in all its forms. CHAI and Hakol Chai approach the challenge of reducing animal suffering with concurrent initiatives. Some of these efforts result in abolishing a particular form of abuse, while others result in regulations that reduce abuse through incremental changes. Nevertheless, we believe that all animal exploitation must ultimately be abolished and not merely regulated. "

      Seems vaguely familiar...if I could just put my finger on where I'd heard that before.


      Lynn, I just put in an email to the Brooke today about this. I will post their response when it arrives.
      VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

      https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

      Comment


      • #4
        Maybe that is what the HSUS president was coordinating when he went jet setting all over Europe and other for international conferences on animal rights?

        That source is where you may have heard that misguided idea that animals should be off limits for any human uses, disregarding that we have evolved to be each other's resources in this world.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Originally posted by CHT View Post
          I wonder what will happen to the people that currently earn income by using horse/donkey drawn vehicles. I can't imagine that they will now magically be able to buy a truck and fuel.

          i wonder if this will really pass into law.
          According to CHAI's sight for whatever their opinion or word is worth :

          ". The ban still needs a signature by a parliamentary committee, but Nina Natelson of CHAI – Concern for Helping Animals in Israel calls that “a formality.” The ban will be the first of its kind in the world."
          "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

          Comment


          • #6
            That's interesting. And of course the ban will negatively impact Arabs the most. I doubt that is a coincidence.
            Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
            Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
            -Rudyard Kipling

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JSwan View Post
              That's interesting. And of course the ban will negatively impact Arabs the most. I doubt that is a coincidence.
              And that was my very first thought too.
              www.headsupspecialriders.com

              Comment


              • #8
                That is going to be very hard for the poorest of the workers. They need their donkeys to help support their families. The Brooke understands this and works to better the lives of these little beasts of burden without ruining the lives of their owners.

                There are literally millions of donkeys out there without a hope of getting help from anyone tho. (sadly).

                Check out the Brooke.org - it is interesting, enlightening, AND they organize amazing rides in far off places.
                Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Foxtrot's View Post
                  That is going to be very hard for the poorest of the workers. They need their donkeys to help support their families. The Brooke understands this and works to better the lives of these little beasts of burden without ruining the lives of their owners.

                  There are literally millions of donkeys out there without a hope of getting help from anyone tho. (sadly).

                  Check out the Brooke.org - it is interesting, enlightening, AND they organize amazing rides in far off places.
                  Just seems so wrong from a humanities point of view to swoop in and take away what in all accounts is a lively hood simply because some feel they are ethically superior.

                  Their culture is different they view their little donkeys as a farrier would his hammer not as a pet or a hobby. Yes they are in need of education and encouragement to reform for better husbandry practices. But who are "we" to sit upon our throne and condemn them.
                  "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    All y'all missed it.

                    There have been, for many years, efforts to help these folks with education, easier access to veterinary care, help with hoof care and nutrition. In other parts of the world there has been success with simply helping people - rather than forcing our upscale, elitist values on people who often go to bed hungry at night.

                    You have to remember that these are extraordinarily poor people who for political reasons have been relegated to the sewers. In so many ways. There is a reason the average resident of that city lives well and drives a nice car, eats in nice restaurants, and has a nice life. And there is a reason the people who own those animals don't look to be in much better condition than their animals.

                    Once that ban passes those animals will die. And the people who own those animals will not able to feed their families, much less buy a BMW. We are talking about survival, here. This is a harsh landscape.

                    You're catching a glimpse into what it is to be a Palestinian in Israel, and why Hamas is able to recruit members simply by offering people food and shelter.

                    I don't support animal abuse, and I would like to see all working animals provided basic care and nutrition, as well as access to veterinary and farrier care. But this is a helluva lot more than simply a group of wealthy elitists cramming their agenda through.

                    You're seeing the seeds of terrorism being sown.
                    Last edited by JSwan; Feb. 14, 2013, 03:14 PM.
                    Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                    Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                    -Rudyard Kipling

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      There's that Forel gal again.... 4 paragraphs down.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by skykingismybaby1 View Post
                        And that was my very first thought too.
                        Mine as well.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          JSwan..there have been other groups trying to assist the Palestinian population. They are unable to purchase gas due to restrictions or money and the carts are crucial to their movement of food and goods to the population.

                          This is also a way for Israel to "stop the flow" of weapons hidden in carts...so they claim.

                          I was very surprised when the U.S. Forein Affairs department became involved in this. They never had before. HSUS have a rep to the current administration on "world'animal care" and she is also very close to the Presidents wife having gone to college with her.

                          A move such as this would normally be quietly challenged by the U.S. stating Israel should consider the inevitable hardship on the Pals.

                          Very strange when one considers the direction this president has taken which has usually been against Israel in favor of the middle east.

                          I wonder if HSUS is going to step into Egypt to have the carriage donkey's removed under a hostile Arab government? When I phoned their H.O. after the overturn of the Egyptian Government and asked HSUS they stated they had not yet formulated a plan. I gave them names and numbers of British citizens who had established donkey help lines but they did not seem to be very interested.

                          Diplomats are a little puzzled over this "small" legislation. It is almost as though those supporting it..from outside Israel...are hoping it will create a hardship resulting in uprisings.
                          The Elephant in the room

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Fairfax View Post

                            This is also a way for Israel to "stop the flow" of weapons hidden in carts...so they claim.
                            .
                            Well, they would claim that, wouldn't they. Anything to keep those people in penury.

                            No - HSUS is not interested in helping animals - it's common knowledge they wouldn't work with other nonprofits trying to help educate owners and help with veterinary care.

                            It's always been about the complete abolishment of all human contact with animals - domestic or wild. From the Israeli perspective - this is just another nail in the coffin for Palestinians. A convenient marriage with AR groups to accomplish very different agendas.

                            It makes me want to vomit - and I am ashamed to learn that any American had a part in it.
                            Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                            Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                            -Rudyard Kipling

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The issue of Israel is another one of the "third rails" in U.S. politics. This means that we give them lots of money and they don't have to worry about accounting much for how they spend it.

                              Katusha rockets weigh in the neighborhood of 90 pounds and are five feet long; you're not going to haul many in a donkey cart.

                              Animals in the Third World live a hard life; so do the people there. The Occupied Territories are about as "third world" as it gets.

                              So, ban the donkeys...ban the humans...?

                              G.
                              Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
                                The issue of Israel is another one of the "third rails" in U.S. politics. This means that we give them lots of money and they don't have to worry about accounting much for how they spend it.

                                Katusha rockets weigh in the neighborhood of 90 pounds and are five feet long; you're not going to haul many in a donkey cart.

                                Animals in the Third World live a hard life; so do the people there. The Occupied Territories are about as "third world" as it gets.

                                So, ban the donkeys...ban the humans...?

                                G.
                                I suspect "ban the humans" might be the plan.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                  I suspect "ban the humans" might be the plan.
                                  truth. How humane can an organization be when they allow themselves to be used to destroy humanity . Although from a few dealings with their ilk I'm not surprised at all.
                                  "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Lynwood, I was talking about Israel's treatment of the Palestinians. Were you?

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I didn't miss the point at all - but it seemed a hot potato to get involved in discussing the whole situation over there. A lot of innocent, hard working families will be hurt if it goes thru.
                                      Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                        Lynwood, I was talking about Israel's treatment of the Palestinians. Were you?
                                        I understand whom you were referring too. My comment was aimed at those organizations who were allowing themselves to be used as a weapon to further destroy each other. I am sure it is not lost on those animal rights groups , the impacts a ban like that might have on the humans affected but as long as their agenda is sated they do not care.
                                        "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X