• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

No states with Stableman's Lein???

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • No states with Stableman's Lein???

    http://www.pennsylvaniaequestrian.co...ks-New-Law.php

    She states that in her research there are no state laws in any of the states that would cover this?
    Every man has a right to his opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.
    Bernard M. Baruch

  • #2
    She needs to do better research. My state has such a procedure - AND a procedure and a separate statute for unpaid board for kenneled dogs. It's simple. My state does not require the owner to sell at auction - the statute leaves it to the discretion of the lienholder - but spells out the procedure for sale at auction. Unless it's changed in the last couple of years.
    Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
    Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
    -Rudyard Kipling

    Comment


    • #3
      The article says this is what she researched:

      In her research Passero has not found one state with a law determining when the boarding facility may take ownership of a horse after non-payment of board.
      That may be true. Every stableman's lien law that my layman's self has ever read has spelled out the steps that can be taken, and these almost always end with the horse being sold at an auction of some sort, with any money over the amount owed going to the owner.

      I don't think I've ever seen anything that would allow a stable to simply take ownership. And I think that would be a very bad thing to have in law, actually. The auction process protects everyone.
      Halt Near X | Horse Bloggers - Blog Directory

      Comment


      • #4
        Oh, here. Google found the PA lien law:

        Pennsylvania Liens for the Care of Horses

        I suspect the boarding barn's owner problem here is that they want to keep the horses rather than sell them.
        Halt Near X | Horse Bloggers - Blog Directory

        Comment


        • #5
          Try loking it up under: "Livestock Lien"
          "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

          Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

          Comment


          • #6
            Or under "agister's lien"

            Illinois has one.
            Most people don't need a $35,000 horse. They need a $1,000 horse and $34,000 in lessons.

            "I don't have to be fair… . I'm an American With a Strong, Fact-Free Opinion." (stolen off Facebook)

            Comment


            • #7
              Is the pertinent word "when", as in when a BO may take ownership, a month, 2 months, 6 months? Or is it as said above, the issue that she wants to own the horses rather than sell at auction.

              Comment


              • #8
                A pretty good site:

                http://asci.uvm.edu/equine/law/

                G.
                Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

                Comment


                • #9
                  If the case is wanting to keep the horses...

                  They could find an auctioneer that will run the auction for like $50 and buy them thru the auction herself. Then she is only out the additional of the auctioneer and cost of running the ad for the auction.

                  Put the ad in a paper that has NOTHING to do with horses, but has a big enough circulation to be legal announcement..
                  " iCOTH " window/bumper stickers. Wood Routed Stall and Farm Signs
                  http://www.bluemooncustomsigns.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    My head hurts at the stupidity of that article.

                    Every state's stableman's lien law is so grounded in precedent and common law that there is nothing to argue.

                    That idiot argues that essentially there is no finality to the disposal of a stableman's lien. Nothing could be further from the truth.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Chall View Post
                      Is the pertinent word "when", as in when a BO may take ownership, a month, 2 months, 6 months? Or is it as said above, the issue that she wants to own the horses rather than sell at auction.
                      "When" is when the conditions for discharging the lien are met pursuant to the laws of whatever state the horses are stabled.

                      It varies. But there is due process to follow for a good reason.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I always find MD laws very interesting.

                        http://www.northamericanequine.com/A...-Maryland.html

                        The lien is allowed after 30 days late. A letter needs only to be sent to the last known address and if there is no last known address, a notice is put on the courthouse door.

                        They have to publish notice of the sale once a week, for two weeks, in the county the livestock is in and give the owner 30 days notice. So yes, there is a very specific timeframe and 60 days after you have gone late, a stable owner can sell your horse.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          This is a good example of why a business should use a lawyer when coming up with their contracts.

                          Her arguement is silly; she had a recourse to recover her expenses, which was to sell the horse at a public sale. She could have bought the horses back, but this method of sale is meant to ensure the horse is sold for fair market value (and the defaulter is paid any overage).
                          Freeing worms from cans everywhere!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            lein

                            You know, I do not want to hold my boarder's horse under a lien. I don't want their horse! I notify them that if I am not paid/contacted by them by such and such date (usually 5 days after receipt) their horse will be at their house, not mine. So far, I've had no one to challenge me on that. They contact me and show up. And trust me, I'd take a horse to the boarder's place ---- downtown, wherever. Of course, I would NEVER endanger a horse by leaving it in an non-secure situation but they do not know that. And I'd call the news while en route to their place. I know it is extreme, but hey, I do not like getting screwed over by a boarder when I bust my ass to take great care of their horse(s). Because again, I do not want their horse(s).

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              This might be interesting.....could be argued under contract law.

                              Boarder signed a contract.....boarder failed to meet terms of the contract.

                              In May of Last year, Debra Passero took on a new boarder with four horses at her Rock Ridge Ranch in Dingman’s Ferry, PA. “She signed my boarding agreement and paid me for May’s board. My boarding agreement states that after one month I may in lieu of unpaid board put the horse(s) and her equipment up for sale, notifying her of the sale two weeks prior. It also states that in the case of non-payment for two consecutive months the horses will become the property of my ranch in lieu of board.”

                              Passero stated that after the initial payment in May, the board went unpaid and bills started piling up. “After sending numerous certified bills and letters I did not hear a peep. The owner signed for one certified letter which was the one that stated the horses were taken over for unpaid board,” she said. “This letter was sent in August - well after the two month time frame. She then contacted me via text and said she would have the money to pay me at the end of August. I had possession of the horses and as per my boarding agreement and relayed to her that they were owned now by the ranch.”

                              From a stable owner’s point of view, it seems like a straight forward case that should end there, but it didn’t. Passero reports that she received service of a lawsuit stating that the owner wanted the horses back or a monetary amount of over $30,000. Passero has secured a lawyer and has now countersued for possession of the horses. “My feeling is that these horses are owned by the ranch and I shouldn't even be at this point,” she said.
                              Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress.
                              Alfred A. Montapert

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                A contract may be unenforceable if it conflicts with an already well settled area of law.

                                So if this BO did not follow her state's lien law to take posession of the horses and instead relied on her own procedure defined in her "contract", the boarder in arrears may have recourse.

                                So bottom line, the BO should have known that her state already has a due process to cover her problem. She either did not do her due dilligence in researching that, or did so but chose to write her own terms.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  That's why you have a lawyer prepare your contracts. As far as I'm concerned, I'd rather get the horse off of my property ASAP to the owner, then go to small claims court for the back board. Why accumulate more expenses that you probably won't be able to recoup at the sale?

                                  ETA: Oh, so the barn owner just doesn't want to follow the law. OK, now I get it.
                                  Last edited by LauraKY; Feb. 12, 2013, 10:05 AM.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by grandprixjump View Post
                                    They could find an auctioneer that will run the auction for like $50 and buy them thru the auction herself. Then she is only out the additional of the auctioneer and cost of running the ad for the auction.

                                    ...

                                    I know a stable owner, that if you don't pay your board, the horse vanishes. Thirty days, the horse must have escaped and ran away.

                                    The person in the article was a fool to let this happen... "At this time I am owed over $13,000 for back board, vet and farrier bills, etc"
                                    The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      The article is confusing, and, I would guess probably not an accurate representation of the legal issues (the media is typically really bad at reporting on legal issues).

                                      That said, a lot of people have trouble understanding the difference between a lien and actual ownership. A lien gives a person an interest in an item as collateral. It does not give that person ownership. For example, MOST of us have a bank lien on our homes. We still own the home, but the bank has a lien on it. If we don't pay our bank debt, the bank can foreclose the lien and dispose of their collateral (our home). They can't show up after we don't pay the debt, take our keys, and start watching our T.V., though. They have to take the legal steps to foreclose the lien.

                                      A lien permits a person to take further legal steps to dispose of the collateral to satisfy the lien (sometimes that includes a right to credit bid the lienholder's debt and "purchase" the collateral; sometimes it does not). A transfer of ownership is totally different. One problem here is probably that the horse could be worth more than the value of the lien - so the barn owner taking "ownership" of the horse would be a windfall for the barn owner.

                                      The whole thing sounds sort of like a cluster to me, and one that could have been avoided by having the boarding contract either drafted or reviewed by an attorney.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        This Passero person obviously doesn't know how to do legal research and I am gobsmacked that the author would not do some fact checking before writing this drivel.

                                        Most states have a statutory method of handling unpaid board on horses.
                                        Visit Sonesta Farms website at www.sonestafarms.com or our FaceBook page at www.facebook.com/sonestafarms. Also showing & breeding Cavalier King Charles Spaniels.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X