• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Tin Foil Hatters Unite. More animal rights attacks

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
    Yes, but what the tinfoil hatters leave out may be one of the more important sections of JSwan's post:
    I don't know who the "tin foil hatters" are, or why they would leave that out.

    Also don't know if you and I have enough in common to even converse on any animal-related topic, Laura, as you recently told me that slaughter would be preferable to a horse pulling a carriage in NYC. After that, any conversation between us seems pointless to me.
    VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
      It's the knee-jerk 'it's a conspiracy!' reaction that is not helpful.
      Agreed. Conspiracy theories are great.

      In novels.

      I don't care for them in real life - they make a person paranoid.

      Besides - when it comes to the goals of the AR movement the people have been very open and honest about their goal - they don't need to conspire at all. So I believe them.
      Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
      Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
      -Rudyard Kipling

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
        If you live where this legislation is being implemented and you feel it's poorly configured.. go ahead and work to get it fixed to your satisfaction.

        If you don't live there, make sure that your area institutes legislation that makes sense [whatever that means].

        That's how our country is supposed to work... with input from citizens on how things are to be governed.

        It's the knee-jerk 'it's a conspiracy!' reaction that is not helpful.
        That is where you are wrong.
        Animal rights extremist groups ARE moving in many areas, are bringing all kinds of bills in all places.

        Those groups are going to other countries where they are organizing international drives.
        When two years ago the HSUS president went to Paris, France to coordinate animal rights groups there, at the same time international police groups were having a round of seminars, one of those was, guess what, how to handle animal rights extremists.

        No, the conspiracy really deserves a knee -jerk response, if you want to keep your rights, it always has, is what makes the USA a good place to be.
        Here you can respond to what others are trying to do to change the world in ways that don't make sense, unlike in other places, where a dictator or group of dictators do what they want and everyone else has to sit back and endure, or be run over.
        Remember, animal rights extremists have been known, from personally harass people, to foment outright terroristm to make their point.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by JSwan View Post

          But - again - every jurisdiction should have provisions for seizures, emergency euthanasia, and they should all have minimum care standards for livestock and pets. There should be severe punishment for those who abuse or mistreat animals. This is good public policy. I just cannot embrace bad or agenda driven legislation, and I cannot support giving animal rights groups more power over our ownership of animals. I just can't go there.
          What defines 'agenda driven legislation'? Is it simply if any RaRa group is involved at all? Don't ALL parties involved on all sides [of anything] have an 'agenda'?

          Who cares WHO brings about the outlining of a bill... if that bill has some merit, and we can then further flesh it out to make it complete [as if]... who cares who brought it up? THAT is what I do not understand!

          For every witch hunt case in which an innocent person was destroyed by a piece of legislation being enforced... there are cases in which laws are not enforced in which there is suffering.
          Is it really a reasonable expectation that that potential [in either direction] can be completely and thorough eliminated?
          Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

          http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
            What defines 'agenda driven legislation'? Is it simply if any RaRa group is involved at all? Don't ALL parties involved on all sides [of anything] have an 'agenda'?
            Yes - but one agenda wants to restore/preserve rights, and the other side wants to take them away.
            VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

            https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

            Comment


            • Originally posted by michaleenflynn View Post
              Where I have been shrill and hysterical? lol
              oh shut it, Casandra....

              Comment


              • One way of looking at it is if the proposed legislation tends to negatively impact the animal owner, inserts an unaccountable third party into the owner/animal relationship, and expands the powers of that unaccountable third party, and provides little or no remedy to an aggrieved owner. And the legislation will also be so vague as to be easily manipulated, not require extensive training or oversight- again - to the detriment of the animal owner.

                That legislation is intended to insert an unaccountable third party and forever change the animal/owner relationship. The owner has less control over the welfare of his animal or the decisions he makes about it - and the state (and that third party whispering in its ear) gains more control - but is not accountable and can only be made accountable at great cost.

                A better piece of legislation will simply state where and how property may be seized; and balance that power by providing remedies and protections for individual citizens. Definitions will be clear, concise, and not open to interpretation.
                Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                -Rudyard Kipling

                Comment


                • Originally posted by michaleenflynn View Post
                  I don't know who the "tin foil hatters" are, or why they would leave that out.

                  Also don't know if you and I have enough in common to even converse on any animal-related topic, Laura, as you recently told me that slaughter would be preferable to a horse pulling a carriage in NYC. After that, any conversation between us seems pointless to me.
                  Except that is NOT what I said. Nice try though.

                  This is what I said.


                  Originally posted by LauraKY
                  I don't think carriage horses belong on the streets of NY. That's it in a nutshell. I'm not against slaughter, there are worse things than death.
                  And your response:

                  ...and does that mean death is preferable to being a NYC carriage horse?
                  The comment I made was in response to your poem that for some reason you felt you needed to send me by PM about a horse at an auction. My comment was for the horse at the auction...there are worse things than death.

                  The reply I attempted to send you (your message box is full) said "I guess it can mean whatever you want it to mean." In other words, I knew full well you took it the wrong way.

                  But carry on with your tin foil hat friends. I think you're barking up the wrong tree in your defense, but that seems to be the direction you've chosen to take.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by michaleenflynn View Post
                    Yes - but one agenda wants to restore/preserve rights, and the other side wants to take them away.
                    And my point is that there is a middle ground that can be found if the name calling and knee-jerking would stop.

                    Would I be beyond unhappy if someone seized my dog whom I had tied to a post outside the grocery store? Well for one I would never tie my dog like that 'cause there are some real nasty pricks out there, Pitt bait comes to mind... but yes I would be upset if I had done so and s/he were seized.

                    I would be equally upset if my dog got loose, HBC and was left to suffer when euth. would have been more humane, but AC had their hands tied and could not put him/her to sleep because of some 'we don't want no legislation' BS.
                    Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                    http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                      oh shut it, Casandra....
                      ROFL - where is my chorus?
                      VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                      https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                        And my point is that there is a middle ground that can be found if the name calling and knee-jerking would stop.
                        The only name-calling I saw on this thread has been "tin foil hatters".
                        As for knee-jerking, you'd have to be more specific.

                        Middle ground? Halfway to a bad place is still going in the wrong direction.
                        VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                        https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                          And my point is that there is a middle ground that can be found if the name calling and knee-jerking would stop.

                          Would I be beyond unhappy if someone seized my dog whom I had tied to a post outside the grocery store? Well for one I would never tie my dog like that 'cause there are some real nasty pricks out there, Pitt bait comes to mind... but yes I would be upset if I had done so and s/he were seized.

                          I would be equally upset if my dog got loose, HBC and was left to suffer when euth. would have been more humane, but AC had their hands tied and could not put him/her to sleep because of some 'we don't want no legislation' BS.
                          Just tell me, who do you want making policy for animal owners, some animal rights extremists groups that are all for eliminating all use of animals by humans and demanding all become vegans, or those of us that know animals and what is good and standard and what is unacceptable and why and how to go about it, as so many laws we already have determine?

                          Why add some more odd laws in the books, laws that really don't make much sense if you know animals, just because someone extremists decide that is the way the world should be run now?

                          Don't forget that those animal rights extremists groups only existence and way to finance it is to make waves, no matter how or if they make sense.
                          That is what fills their coffers.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                            I would be equally upset if my dog got loose, HBC and was left to suffer when euth. would have been more humane, but AC had their hands tied and could not put him/her to sleep because of some 'we don't want no legislation' BS.
                            I never said I didn't want any legislation; we are a nation of laws. I said that no RARA group should ever be given a seat at any animal legislation table, ever.
                            VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                            https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by michaleenflynn View Post
                              The only name-calling I saw on this thread has been "tin foil hatters".
                              As for knee-jerking, you'd have to be more specific.

                              Middle ground? Halfway to a bad place is still going in the wrong direction.
                              The the title of the thread is "Tin Foil Hatters Unite. More animal rights attacks." You came to post in agreement with the original poster, with no caveats...you need to complain to Leo about your designation.

                              Personally, I have no use for people who only see black and white...there are always shades of gray.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                The the title of the thread is "Tin Foil Hatters Unite. More animal rights attacks." You came to post in agreement with the original poster, with no caveats...you need to complain to Leo about your designation.

                                Personally, I have no use for people who only see black and white...there are always shades of gray.
                                yeah, but if the shades are all dark gray, they might as well be black....

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  I am not posting, not because I am not reading but I am becoming more informed as to the diversification of interpretation with what I posted.

                                  The comments here are very relevant

                                  Thank you

                                  Leo
                                  The Elephant in the room

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                                    yeah, but if the shades are all dark gray, they might as well be black....
                                    How so?

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                      The the title of the thread is "Tin Foil Hatters Unite. More animal rights attacks." You came to post in agreement with the original poster, with no caveats...you need to complain to Leo about your designation.

                                      Personally, I have no use for people who only see black and white...there are always shades of gray.
                                      Black and white, shades of gray?
                                      I think that is not at all what is going on here.
                                      There are way more layers to these questions than such a glib evaluation deserves.

                                      Give it another try.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                        How so?
                                        Oh come on.
                                        Really?

                                        Do we now have to drag every little snippet of historical evidence out again, to show when people slept on the job, the evil doers merrily dumped the manure cart over the fan?

                                        Do we really need to wait until we can only watch with helpless aspiration?

                                        I am too tired to play that game with you.

                                        You are normally a pretty smart cookie. Go and let your mind amble down that road. Don't think about the desired effects. Think about all the craptastic stuff life can throw at you, because what can go wrong will go wrong.

                                        Yes, we have had the precedent before, people telling you all the bad things they want to do, then they did it. And everybody was astonished....really?

                                        here we have a group of people with millions and millions in the bank - which effectively makes them richer than the US government!
                                        They are working every lever and button they can lay their greedy little fingers on.
                                        If the cute little puppies don't do the trick, they pay terrorists to do some intimidating.

                                        but fine...pay no mind to the man behind the curtain.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                          The the title of the thread is "Tin Foil Hatters Unite. More animal rights attacks." You came to post in agreement with the original poster, with no caveats...you need to complain to Leo about your designation.

                                          Personally, I have no use for people who only see black and white...there are always shades of gray.
                                          Why does it always have to be this pervasive Us Vs Them mentality.

                                          We all admittedly are animal lovers , we all agree on the importance of animal welfare and we all agree that legislation to define those things are important.

                                          It is the grey areas that are always subject to personal experience and interpretation.

                                          Honest question for those who call out the "Tin Foil Hatters". What about their/our cynicism and speculation do you really take issue with? We are not suggesting no legislation. Just pointing out the potential fallibility in the one provided by the OP. The law is fine , great , dandy ...but it allows for personal interpretation. I think asking for more definition is not a bad thing? Who would it hurt ..nobody. It could only prevent issues.

                                          Not suggesting no laws just gleaning that we should be cognitive of the laws and their interpretation we make and support.

                                          I know nobody likes the boy who cried wolf . Just remember in the end the wolf did come.
                                          Last edited by Lynnwood; Feb. 12, 2013, 12:31 PM.
                                          "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X