• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Tin Foil Hatters Unite. More animal rights attacks

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • That's awful, Jenn. Rescue groups play a vital role in animal abuse/neglect cases - but these are criminal acts and must be prosecuted by law enforcement. LEO's must be in charge of gathering evidence and ensuring the defendant is apprised of his/her rights. Otherwise - cases fall apart and criminals walk.

    In the end - these are crimes. When we develop bad public policy that foists them off on an ill informed self appointed police force - all it does is ensure animal welfare remains the red headed stepchild of law enforcement. That is not a good thing for animal welfare.
    Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
    Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
    -Rudyard Kipling

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      As far back as 2008, the Center for Consumer Freedom petitioned Virginia's Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) to have PETA officially reclassified as a "slaughterhouse." It claimed PETA's own official reports, which indicated that it put to death virtually ever dog and cat it took in for adoption. This policy extended from 2006 through 2011.

      Virginia requires animal shelters to report the number of dogs and cats taken in each year -- how many are euthanized and how many are adopted.

      These statistics are available through Virginia's Sunshine Law and, as incredible as some may find it, since 1998, of the 31,815 animals (mostly dogs and cats) admitted to PETA shelters, only 3,159 were adopted -- and 27,751 were killed.

      That's a 9.7% adoption rate and an 87.2% kill rate -- a ghastly record for an organization purporting to work on behalf of animals. To me that suggests a view that if an animal isn't free and in the wild, it is better off dead.

      But wait, it gets worse. Since 2006, the PETA adoption rate has dropped precipitously, and the kill rate risen dramatically. In 2006, of 3,061 animals admitted to PETA's shelter, 12 (0.39%) were adopted, 2,981 (97.49%) were euthanized.

      Last year - 2011 -- some 1,992 animals were admitted, 24 were adopted (1.2%) and 1,911 (95.9%) were killed. And this is just Virginia.

      PETA's practice of euthanasia has resulted in an alliance with the Humane Society of the U.S. A zero birthrate is the goal for dogs and cats, not a zero kill rate.

      For the whole article please go to

      http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/peter-w...b_1296370.html
      The Elephant in the room

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        At that time, a traffic stop was initiated on the van - a vehicle occupied by Cook and Hinkle.

        The bags located in the dumpster contained 18 dead dogs, including one bag containing seven puppies. An additional 13 dead dogs were found in the van.

        A license check revealed the van was registered to PETA in Norfolk, Va.

        It is not yet confirmed if Cook and Hinkle are official representatives of the animal rights group.

        However, Detective Sgt. Ed Pittman of the Bertie Sheriff's Office confirmed, through the county's Animal Control Officer, that Cook and Hinkle identified themselves as PETA representatives from Norfolk, Va.

        "According to Barry (Anderson, Bertie's Animal Officer), the man and woman told him they were picking up the dogs to take them back to Norfolk where they would find them good homes," Pittman said.

        Pittman added that as far as he knew, persons identifying themselves as PETA representatives had picked-up live dogs at the Bertie Animal Shelter for at least the last two months.



        http://www.pet-abuse.com/cases/1379/NC/US/
        The Elephant in the room

        Comment


        • I think in a bit we may have to start calling those that still don't believe who animal rights extremists are the true "tin hat wearers".

          They seem to be the ones that, no matter how much facts and data you present, choose to think it is a conspiracy.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
            I think in a bit we may have to start calling those that still don't believe who animal rights extremists are the true "tin hat wearers".

            They seem to be the ones that, no matter how much facts and data you present, choose to think it is a conspiracy.
            No, we just don't think all animal welfare laws are a conspiracy and that all animal seizures aren't motivated by money or a land grab. That's where you get the tin hat.

            Kind of along the lines of the head nutter, Wayne LaPierre.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
              I think in a bit we may have to start calling those that still don't believe who animal rights extremists are the true "tin hat wearers".

              They seem to be the ones that, no matter how much facts and data you present, choose to think it is a conspiracy.
              Gee, like all the names I have been called ? Some of which I am not allowed to repeat ? I'll tin hat wearer over those rude names and suggestions anyday !

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                Originally posted by sunridge1 View Post
                Caught with what exactly? You ARE drunk. I've NEVER lied about anything on trot or anywhere else for that matter. I am what I am. You OTOH are exactly what is wrong in this culture like so many others, a wannabe fake. "If you can dream. And not let dreams be your master." Sage advice from good 'ol Rudyard.
                Readers just go to page 8 of the Izanalter thread . One minute doesn't have a pot to pee in..a COTH poster said she shouldn't take the horse then..and Mary came back with she owned her property and money was not a problem. back to regular programing

                Mary...please go forth and heal thyself. I have more important things to do than defend myself against your ongoing attacks.
                The Elephant in the room

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  Most of us condemn the illegal seizures or those impropertly implemented or where there is a strong appearance of an agenda that does not reflect care for the animals...for one reason alone. Everytime an improper seizure is tossed out by the courts...it makes it more difficult for the valid seizures or apprehensions to take place.
                  The Elephant in the room

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                    Readers just go to page 8 of the Izanalter thread . One minute doesn't have a pot to pee in..a COTH poster said she shouldn't take the horse then..and Mary came back with she owned her property and money was not a problem. back to regular programing

                    Mary...please go forth and heal thyself. I have more important things to do than defend myself against your ongoing attacks.
                    Twisting and turning in wind, you are. I am perfectly well I just don't like liars, thanks for your concern.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                      That's awful, Jenn. Rescue groups play a vital role in animal abuse/neglect cases - but these are criminal acts and must be prosecuted by law enforcement. LEO's must be in charge of gathering evidence and ensuring the defendant is apprised of his/her rights. Otherwise - cases fall apart and criminals walk.

                      In the end - these are crimes. When we develop bad public policy that foists them off on an ill informed self appointed police force - all it does is ensure animal welfare remains the red headed stepchild of law enforcement. That is not a good thing for animal welfare.
                      Agreed. I tried to nicely state that to the "rescuer" in question. She didn't want to hear it. I understand part of her reasoning - we all get tired of seeing places where the animals don't get help. But I prefer to work from a different angle: being there for law enforcement, assisting them as I can, and continuing to work to educate and support them.
                      Visit us at Bluebonnet Equine Humane Society - www.bluebonnetequine.org

                      Want to get involved in rescue or start your own? Check out How to Start a Horse Rescue - www.howtostartarescue.com

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                        No, we just don't think all animal welfare laws are a conspiracy and that all animal seizures aren't motivated by money or a land grab. That's where you get the tin hat.

                        Kind of along the lines of the head nutter, Wayne LaPierre.
                        Yeah, if anyone actually denying that PETA et al are RARAs? Or better yet, denying that RARAs exist?
                        But some of the TH's have pretty much come out and said outright that any animal welfare legislation in the present day is a step towards the elimination of animal ownership altogether. That's why I call them TH's, not because I doubt that PETA is a bunch of malignant kooks.

                        (Although tbh the almost-100% euth rate of PETA is the one thing that doesn't bother me about them, and it might be the only thing. Somehow, despite their kill rate, there are still plenty of unwanted dogs&cats around and filling non-PETA shelters to the brims. For crying out loud, what's wrong with mass euthing unwanted pets anyways, it's not like we're in danger of running out of pet dogs here?).
                        Proud Member Of The Lady Mafia

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                          No, we just don't think all animal welfare laws are a conspiracy
                          Neither do those of us who have been accused of being THFers - did you see my post where I cited an animal welfare law that I helped to write?
                          VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                          https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Coanteen View Post
                            Yeah, if anyone actually denying that PETA et al are RARAs? Or better yet, denying that RARAs exist?
                            But some of the TH's have pretty much come out and said outright that any animal welfare legislation in the present day is a step towards the elimination of animal ownership altogether.
                            Just speaking for myself here, to clarify - I said that any animal welfare legislation that was produced with the input of RARAs is intended as a step in that direction.
                            VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                            https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by michaleenflynn View Post
                              Just speaking for myself here, to clarify - I said that any animal welfare legislation that was produced with the input of RARAs is intended as a step in that direction.
                              The problem is that you and others assume all animal welfare legislation is produced with the input of RARAs. This is simply not true, I am involved in legislation and many people who have experience weigh in. To assume that all legislation related to animal welfare, such as the post posted by the OP, is some master plan of PETA is delusional. That is the counter point to this and other threads, look at what is before you, not everything is a conspirarcy !

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                If it is on the up and up and has professional groups involved, why is it that most animal legislation "sneaks" through piggybacked on other entries? They know that once it is in as a law it is very hard to remove.If only a couple per year sneak through, that is a great start.

                                Ask purebred dog breeders. AKC used to stay on top of it. Now they are playing catch up
                                The Elephant in the room

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                                  If it is on the up and up and has professional groups involved, why is it that most animal legislation "sneaks" through piggybacked on other entries? They know that once it is in as a law it is very hard to remove.If only a couple per year sneak through, that is a great start.

                                  Ask purebred dog breeders. AKC used to stay on top of it. Now they are playing catch up
                                  I don't associate with dog breeders, and your post is not specific. What is "sneaked through piggybacked on their entries" I look at the legislation.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
                                    I don't associate with dog breeders,.
                                    SNORT
                                    "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
                                      SNORT
                                      No real answers as is typical with the TFB. A reputation earned clearly not given.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
                                        No real answers as is typical with the TFB. A reputation earned clearly not given.
                                        Look I wear the cape so I get to make the whoosh noises..are we clear ?
                                        "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
                                          Look I wear the cape so I get to make the whoosh noises..are we clear ?
                                          Animal rights extremists can try to hide, but they give themselves away so easily by what they let slip here and there.
                                          "By their words you will know them".

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X