• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Tin Foil Hatters Unite. More animal rights attacks

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
    Oh! You mean like RaRa?
    No, Angela - "RARA" stands for "Radical Animal Rights Activists". That is the name they give themselves, how they self-identify, although I have not seen them use the shorthand version. How do you see it as analogous to TFH?
    Last edited by michaleenflynn; Feb. 14, 2013, 12:27 AM.
    VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
      Oh! You mean like RaRa?
      BTW, Angela - I answered your question to me a bit back in the thread about identifying the RARA groups, did you see it?
      VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

      https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
        I guarantee you I have never used that, if it is ok or not.
        It doesn't sound right to me, but then, I don't have a good ear for English.
        At most I have used AR, after writing out several times in a post "animal rights extremists", used then as short hand.
        It's simply an acronym; many of the dog boards and some FB horse pages use "RAs" or "AR" or "ARAs" or "ARists". It's all internet shorthand.
        VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

        https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
          "Radical Animal Rights Activist" . Certainly not a term coined by anyone around here. Media moniker. However I think to borrow from the arts "WALKERS" is much much more appropriate.
          Exactly LOL -- "walkers" and "humaniacs" would be the counterpart to TFHers, not RARAs.
          VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

          https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

          Comment


          • Gotta love the "everyone is coming to take your pets and horses group" AKA "tin foil hat brigade" (tfhb) they are the name callers and radicals advocating for the carriage horse industry, I think they say if a horse is not working, it is a horse life wasted. Too funny , VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC !!!!!!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
              Gotta love the "everyone is coming to take your pets and horses group" AKA "tin foil hat brigade" (tfhb) they are the name callers and radicals advocating for the carriage horse industry, I think they say if a horse is not working, it is a horse life wasted. Too funny , VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC !!!!!!
              Grudges are attractive !

              Now in all the time you've been attempting to discredit the pro-carriage/urban horse position you think you would have at least paid attention.

              Advocating for the RIGHT to work is vastly different then your statement.What they advocate for is in defense of this :

              "We believe that animals do not exist to serve human needs, and we are opposed to the exploitation of animals in all its forms.Nevertheless, we believe that all animal exploitation must ultimately be abolished and not merely regulated." -CHAI

              That group SV --fully and publicly supported by PETA


              Now pay follow along SV ...that statement includes your pretty ponies too. If you ride , drive , show , trail ride , make do a trick , keep in anyplace other then a huge field of green green grass with gentle moving springs and magjikal butterflies.


              "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                I think the same about kids. If they aren't getting trained to do something...they can not expect a happy future. That is the same with horses.

                SV..Considering the amount of money DEFHR has stated it takes to keep a horse...and considering the demand these horses be given FREE to sanctuaries...where are these 24/7 lush fields of green grass, babbling brooks, song birds and rail fences?

                It has been clearly stated by many...it does not matter if you are for or against...the attempt to steal these horses with an unrealistic promise is insidious. Most of us understand the minute the cameras stop rolling these carriage horses will suddenly disappear..much like PETA did with their van pickups of dogs and cats from families and seniors.

                It the first part of the original program is to be accepted, then maybe these groups will need to provide inspection time daily for 20 plus years for EACH of the horses stolen...I mean liberated.
                The Elephant in the room

                Comment


                • Seriously, this thread is about animal cruelty regulations. Nothing more nothing less, "horses will suddenly disappear...much like PETA did with their van pickups of dogs and cats from families an seniors" This statement is insanity, get some meds...get some help and for goodness sake "no one is coming to take your animals" !!! The government cannot afford it !!!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
                    Seriously, this thread is about animal cruelty regulations. Nothing more nothing less, "horses will suddenly disappear...much like PETA did with their van pickups of dogs and cats from families an seniors" This statement is insanity, get some meds...get some help and for goodness sake "no one is coming to take your animals" !!! The government cannot afford it !!!
                    The government can't.
                    But PETA and HSUS can.
                    Originally posted by BigMama1
                    Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                    GNU Terry Prachett

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      Animal control is paid for by the government whether it is county, state or federal...it is still government.
                      The Elephant in the room

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Airfern View Post
                        Right there is a possible seizure case depending on the sanity of the agent involved.?
                        Good lord what kind of animal control officer would impound based on that scenario, Homer Simpson? Barney Fife?
                        I realize that common sense is lacking these days but it's a stretch to think a trained officer would impound a dog in your scenario.
                        Actually, true story.

                        A newly hired person drove to our place of work to put in a few personal items, get an ID card, etc. He left his cattle dog secured in the back of his pick up truck. It was a cloudy cool day. He came out of the building a short time later to find a police officer at his truck, writing a ticket with a call into animal control. Long story short, the dog owner had to take his dog to the local animal shelter and leave her there for the rest of the time (2 hours), pay a fee for reclaiming his dog, etc. The police officer claimed the dog posed an hazard and MUST BE REMOVED from the parking lot. Had the dog owner not shown up at that time, I'm sure the dog would have been taken to the shelter by animal control. I spoke with the officer myself, being a colleague of the new hire...

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
                          Seriously, this thread is about animal cruelty regulations. Nothing more nothing less, "horses will suddenly disappear...much like PETA did with their van pickups of dogs and cats from families an seniors" This statement is insanity, get some meds...get some help and for goodness sake "no one is coming to take your animals" !!! The government cannot afford it !!!

                          What Fairfax is saying is that PETA misrepresented themselves to families and seniors that were trying to rehome their pets and PETA took the animals from the front door to their collection van and promptly euthanized them. No remoming, just death. This is what PETA does, they got caught dumping the animals in dumpsters even. PETA invested in huge walk-in freezers to store the remains of thousands of euthanized animals at a time and then when they have a "full load" they go to a crematorium.

                          What Fairfax is saying is that once the horses are seized and are in sanctuaries, once the resulting media blitz dies down, the horses will be euthanized too. They are too expensive to keep.

                          Their sanctuary will be a syringe of pink liquid and a hole in the ground.
                          Last edited by Amwrider; Feb. 14, 2013, 02:57 PM.
                          Every man has a right to his opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.
                          Bernard M. Baruch

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Amwrider View Post
                            What Fairfax is saying is that PETA misrepresented themselves to families and seniors that were trying to rehome their pets and PETA took the animals from the front door to their collection van and promptly euthanized them. No remoming, just death. This is what PETA does, they got caught dumping the animals in dumpsters even. After that happened, PETA invested in huge walk-in freezers to store the remains.

                            What Fairfax is saying is that once the horses are seized and are in sanctuaries, once the resulting media blitz dies down, the horses will be euthanized too. They are too expensive to keep.

                            Their sanctuary will be a syringe of pink liquid and a hole in the ground.
                            100%

                            SV is right the government cannot afford it. PETA and HSUS certainly can and frankly DEAD is cheap !

                            Isn't it PETA that says "Better dead then fed"


                            "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
                              100%

                              SV is right the government cannot afford it. PETA and HSUS certainly can and frankly DEAD is cheap !

                              Isn't it PETA that says "Better dead then fed"


                              according to the papers they filed on their only 'shelter', with a near 99% euthanasia rate....that speaks volumes....
                              Originally posted by BigMama1
                              Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                              GNU Terry Prachett

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Amwrider View Post
                                What Fairfax is saying is that PETA misrepresented themselves to families and seniors that were trying to rehome their pets and PETA took the animals from the front door to their collection van and promptly euthanized them. No remoming, just death. This is what PETA does, they got caught dumping the animals in dumpsters even. PETA invested in huge walk-in freezers to store the remains of thousands of euthanized animals at a time and then when they have a "full load" they go to a crematorium.

                                What Fairfax is saying is that once the horses are seized and are in sanctuaries, once the resulting media blitz dies down, the horses will be euthanized too. They are too expensive to keep.

                                Their sanctuary will be a syringe of pink liquid and a hole in the ground.
                                So you think PETA & HSUS go around pretending to be animal control officers to take people's animals to "santuaries" where the animals are then killed ?

                                As opposed to real animal control officers that take animals to shelters that kill them when they are not adopted ?

                                Nope you still make no sense.

                                Comment


                                • I know what I said and you know what I said also.

                                  Did I SAY or TYPE anything about Animal Control Officers? Nope.

                                  You just want to drag attention back to yourself because we all know the universe revolves around you.
                                  Every man has a right to his opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.
                                  Bernard M. Baruch

                                  Comment


                                  • Sorry if you don't believe it but it is true. Yes, agreed, it makes no sense. But this is what they do. They are dedicated to eliminating all human use of animals, even as companions.
                                    What's wrong with you?? Your cheese done slid off its cracker?!?!

                                    Comment


                                    • Actually, PETA and HSUS do lobby heavily to be given police powers. Judges and law enforcement officers do NOT want PETA people to be given a badge and a nightstick - we had a program in my state that backfired horribly. We had whackjob "investigators" who botched investigations of serious crimes (dog fighting, drug dealing, etc) They'll try and get that program reopened almost every session - and each time they want more power. They want to require an unlimited number of investigators to be outfitted at the expense of individual police depts, they wanted the blue lights on their cars, they wanted sovereign immunity but no training requirements - they want the ability to start investigations without any complaints or probable cause - the legislation is just crazy. But somehow they find a patron. One year they broke up the legislation into different pieces - assigned to different committees. Thinking they'd slid it through unnoticed. But people noticed.

                                      A reasonable goal is to have a well trained and funded ACO(s) for counties, who have the support of the community and who have a good shelter to work with.

                                      But it seems PETA and HSUS, at least in my state, is far more interested in acquiring police powers - with little to no accountability or process for contesting appointments, removal, discipline, background checks - nothing. They want the law enforcement powers but the unchecked ability to skirt the law.

                                      Luckily the legislature queried LEO's and judges about this program - and the answer was not only a resounding No - it was hell no. But... the groups keep pushing for it anyway.
                                      Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                                      Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                                      -Rudyard Kipling

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
                                        So you think PETA & HSUS go around pretending to be animal control officers to take people's animals to "santuaries" where the animals are then killed ?

                                        As opposed to real animal control officers that take animals to shelters that kill them when they are not adopted ?

                                        Nope you still make no sense.
                                        PETA does...dogs and cats. Yes ma'am they do.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                                          Actually, PETA and HSUS do lobby heavily to be given police powers. Judges and law enforcement officers do NOT want PETA people to be given a badge and a nightstick - we had a program in my state that backfired horribly. We had whackjob "investigators" who botched investigations of serious crimes (dog fighting, drug dealing, etc) They'll try and get that program reopened almost every session - and each time they want more power. They want to require an unlimited number of investigators to be outfitted at the expense of individual police depts, they wanted the blue lights on their cars, they wanted sovereign immunity but no training requirements - they want the ability to start investigations without any complaints or probable cause - the legislation is just crazy. But somehow they find a patron. One year they broke up the legislation into different pieces - assigned to different committees. Thinking they'd slid it through unnoticed. But people noticed.
                                          It isn't just PETA and HSUS, either. I had another rescuer (from Texas) approach me and say that we should go together to lobby to be given the power to seize horses/equine animals without law enforcement involvement. I cringed and told her that I don't want that responsibility and do believe law enforcement should be involved in these cases. But I am positive she'll keep hitting people up trying to get someone to help her get those powers.

                                          I cringe.
                                          Visit us at Bluebonnet Equine Humane Society - www.bluebonnetequine.org

                                          Want to get involved in rescue or start your own? Check out How to Start a Horse Rescue - www.howtostartarescue.com

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X