• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Pricey sports of the wealthy according to MSN...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pricey sports of the wealthy according to MSN...

    They're at it again folks,

    Kids Ponies
    Dressage
    Polo
    Horse racing

    4 out of 11 were horse related.


    But hey, croquet was on there, we played it as kids, must be better off than I thought.

  • #2
    Do those people have nothing better to do than to keep pushing their retarded class warfare?

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      nope

      It's the same old thing, they don't even consider how many people are employed because of "the wealthy".

      They. Just. Don't. Get. It.

      Should have had "Running for Office" under there somewhere.

      Comment


      • #4
        Oh the irony. I remember when the heads of GM and Chrysler were raked over the coals by democrats for taking their corporate jets to DC and how those airplanes were roasted by politicians and the press.

        All the while tens of thousands of union workers start wondering about their jobs yet again because the products they make are being demonized as "playthings of the rich".

        Comment


        • #5
          Errr, I don't understand this post. Horse sports ARE expensive, when you're talking little kids in big rings on expensive ponies....

          Polo, we're talking big strings of horses, played on fields in very luxe areas.

          Dressage...well, Steven Colbert covered that...

          And racing? Really? Are you arguing it's not a valid point that racing is a VERY expensive sport? When we're talking about unproven baby horses selling for many tens of thousands of dollars?

          Comment


          • #6
            It's not a question regarding the expense of the sports listed.

            It's a question regarding the motivation to write an article that has Captain Obvious written all over it and tells us nothing we don't already know.

            Some journalism......

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by caballero View Post
              It's not a question regarding the expense of the sports listed.

              It's a question regarding the motivation to write an article that has Captain Obvious written all over it and tells us nothing we don't already know.

              Some journalism......

              So what? The American public loves it. Take a peek at any reality television show...people love being "voyeurs" into the live's of others, whether it's watching them pick out a wedding dress, give a tour of their house, or deal with family drama. We're nosy.

              It has nothing to do with class warfare.

              Comment


              • #8
                I'd love to see a link to the article to see what it said, and what the other sports are.

                Never mind, found it. Well, they are expensive...right up there with golf.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                  I'd love to see a link to the article to see what it said, and what the other sports are.
                  http://money.msn.com/investing/9-pri...of-the-wealthy

                  It says a whole bunch of nothing. BTW, watch out golfers, the class warfarists are out to get you and your boring sport too!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by GoForAGallop View Post
                    http://money.msn.com/investing/9-pri...of-the-wealthy

                    It says a whole bunch of nothing. BTW, watch out golfers, the class warfarists are out to get you and your boring sport too!
                    Don't laugh. Pointing out how much wasted space, water, and resources on grass care golf courses take up versus the number of people who use them is nothing new.
                    Author Page
                    Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
                    Steampunk Sweethearts

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Oh puhleeze. Class warfare?? ...As if the constant parading of Craigslist ads, mocking their grammar, clothes, and general redneck-ness on this board is not the same effing thing.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Wealth is not a synonym for class.

                        There doesn't appear to be anything particularly inflammatory about the article, horses are absolutely an expensive hobby.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Horses are very expensive. I am not wealthy, therefore I can not afford to "play" in the high end horse show world.

                          Sure there are a few that can do it on a shoe string, but my working student years taught me that this IS a sport for the wealthy.

                          Not sure why everyone gets all aghasted by that.
                          APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Well, so what? I'd rather be the one being envied, than the one doing the envying.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Somehow or other, with a manure fork in my one hand and a full water bucket in the other, I don't feel rich, except in experience.
                              Some riders change their horse, they change their saddle, they change their teacher; they never change themselves.

                              Remember the horse does all the work, we just sit there and look pretty.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by HungarianHippo View Post
                                Oh puhleeze. Class warfare?? ...As if the constant parading of Craigslist ads, mocking their grammar, clothes, and general redneck-ness on this board is not the same effing thing.
                                ditto this.

                                I am just not getting where a fairly innocuous article on expensive sports, (which the OP obviously decided to read, despite it being a "same thing") has anything to do with class warfare. It's nothing more than a list of.....well, expensive sports.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  MSN made it political and hardly innocuous, IMO. From the article "




                                  9 pricey sports of the wealthy

                                  You don't have to be part of the 1% to enjoy these pastimes, but having lots of money will make it a whole lot easier."

                                  They tied it to the 1% by saying it instead of saying something like "these sports that many Americans enjoy require a cash outlay to play at the top." Those sports are expensive at the national level. At lower levels many ordinary, budget conscious, work 40+ hours a week, Americans enjoy them to the fullest.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    that article was just awful- many of the sports they said were "pricey" certainly can be pricey, but they can also be enjoyed by most for moderate sums of money.
                                    I mean, croquet? sure you can go all out, but you can also enjoy it any back yard for a minimal fee to purchase a cheap set.
                                    Or dressage- most people who enjoy dressage do so on their cheap grade horses on a shoe-string budget.
                                    Pheasant hunting? all you need is a hunting license, a gun, and a dog. Expensive hunting trips are entirely optional.

                                    journalism is really going downhill these days.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Nothing MSN does is apolitical. Nothing.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Pheasant hunting was in there?

                                        I've hunted with guys who didn't even have a dog and we did not come home empty handed. My most expensive shotgun cost me a little over $1K. The others all cost me less than $500 each.

                                        Even a week of driven pheasant shooting in an English estate (think Downton Abbey here) doesn't cost much more than many vacations upper middle class people take all the time. But since that's not a sport for the masses, class warfare kicks into high gear.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X