• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Conspiracy theory or true?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Conspiracy theory or true?

    I had a little gun ownership discussion going on facebook, and one of the participants tells me that she has a horse farm in PA. She says that because of the Patriot Act and Homeland Security, she is forced to allow DHS to inspect her property and inventory her equipment, and they have done so, and continue to do so..

    Is there a hint of truth to this?

  • #2
    Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
    I had a little gun ownership discussion going on facebook, and one of the participants tells me that she has a horse farm in PA. She says that because of the Patriot Act and Homeland Security, she is force to allow DHS to inspect her property and inventory in case of emergency to allow them to use her property and buildings.

    Is there a hint of truth to this?
    I am thinking BS.

    However, in cases of emergency government has always made use of privately owned facilities....

    I am going to ask my fav group of nutters about this.
    Originally posted by BigMama1
    Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
    GNU Terry Prachett

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Thanks Alagirl. Sounds like nutter talk to me, but she has someone else convinced too. I have friends with farms right outside of DC, no one has ever mentioned anything like this...and I'm sure they would.

      Comment


      • #4
        That has GOT to be BS.

        Did she say that they actually have come to inspect/inventory or that (she suspects) they could if they wanted to? I bet she heard that from some other nutcase and just believed it.
        Charlie Brown (1994 bay TB X gelding)
        White Star (2004 grey TB gelding)

        Mystical Moment, 1977-2010.

        Comment


        • #5
          I have no clue, but there is a possible precedent.
          If you own a vessel of over a certain size, something like seven net tons cargo carrying capacity I forget exactly,or roughly 35 feet long if it's deep and wide, you can have the vessel federally registered, usually called documented. Your vessel becomes a portion of the sovereign United States and as such, is entitled to protection while engaged in lawful commerce (including the harvesting of shell or finfish) in any waters.

          By becoming documented you also agree to permit the use of your vessel for whatever purpose the US government sees fit in the event of war - so when those fabulous ocean liners stuffed dozens of troops into their ballrooms for transport during WW2, they weren't necessarily doing it out of patriotism.

          Is she perhaps getting confused about that farm census that we're all having to fill out about now? I can't believe she is right without having her come up with a citation - apart from "so-and-so says".
          Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
          Incredible Invisible

          Comment


          • #6
            Whoops, I clearly wasn't reading for comprehension.

            Since they apparently have before, ask her to see the paperwork. Or maybe she'll invite you next time they come??
            Charlie Brown (1994 bay TB X gelding)
            White Star (2004 grey TB gelding)

            Mystical Moment, 1977-2010.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              She says they do. And she has to fill out all kinds of forms. I think she's a whacko and her friend is very, very gullible.

              Comment


              • #8
                We've been inspected by our meat packing company to ensure that we meet their standards for pastured pork and we, along with eveybody else that has better than 10 acres in this county, thus qualifying for a "farm", are filling out some farm census right now, but Department of Homeland Security? Rly?? The closest thing we get to that is the marijuana fly overs during August.
                Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
                Incredible Invisible

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Horse farm, not cattle farm. I think she's probably nuts. Cuckoo, cuckoo. I've got the same census, ReSomething.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Yeah, but who is wandering through her - I mean "inspecting" her farm then? Harvey? Little green men?
                    Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
                    Incredible Invisible

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I just can't imagine they spend their time going through every horse farm and doing inventory. What a freakin waste of time.
                      Charlie Brown (1994 bay TB X gelding)
                      White Star (2004 grey TB gelding)

                      Mystical Moment, 1977-2010.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        ReS-no it's the black helicopter crowd from our government and the UN. The pilots aren't really human, but alien androids that are directly connected to the electronics of the aircraft. People actually believe this, and I'm not kidding.

                        There are also inspections if you live in big marijuana growing locations, and are noted going into areas where they have found a pot farm. The anti-drug people used turn the aircraft in their search patterns where I lived. You learn to distinguish the sound of those aircraft from the regular flights very quickly. You could always tell when it was safe to plant garden seedlings, because it was growing season when the planes started scanning.
                        You can't fix stupid-Ron White

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                          I had a little gun ownership discussion going on facebook, and one of the participants tells me that she has a horse farm in PA. She says that because of the Patriot Act and Homeland Security, she is forced to allow DHS to inspect her property and inventory her equipment, and they have done so, and continue to do so..

                          Is there a hint of truth to this?
                          Unless she has ties to drug running organizations or anyone believed to be engaged in the moving or procurement of illegal weapons and drugs or with terrorist leanings, it's not likely that she is telling the truth. What she claims is 100% plausible under The Patriot Act if you use boolean logic after snorting half a kilo of Colombian Cocaine, but her claims of regular rectal rooting by DHS are about as realistic as my being 6'3 and African-American. DHS is more of an administrative agency than straight law enforcement and they don't have guys running around with guns and badges doing what she describes as that falls under the areas of agencies that are outside DHS control but might work with them as the DHS agencies focus on external matters around the borders for the most part. If she's getting searched, it's going to be the FBI, DEA, or ATF and they would be looking for guns, drugs, or explosives. DHS has occasional presence in such matters but they focus on terrorists for the most part. The only other possibility is that she is in possession of some sort of equipment or goods - what that would be on a farm I couldn't begin to guess - that is tightly regulated or controlled because it could be used for nefarious purposes. If she has large stockpiles of fertilizer or other dangerous things and she's down the road from some Federal property that is a potential target, that's one reason why she might get the occasional visit but that's still very unlikely.
                          Thus do we growl that our big toes have, at this moment, been thrown up from below!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Presumably when they inventory her equipment they record that she goes through tin foil at an unusually high rate. It takes a lot to line all your riding helmets with it.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Perhaps she is getting government aid. There are properties that I think are under "open spaces", where they get a tax break in exchange for allowing the public onto their land - and the land can only be sold for agricultural usage.
                              One you let the camel's nose under your tent..

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                The particular scenario doesn't strike me as valid- but we DID give up some rights under the Patriot Act. Just as we cheerfully gave up rights during depression/WWII. Americans have a history of doing the 'sheep' thing in response to major crises.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  If you google Homeland Security and horse farms, there is a few interesting tidbits. like when DHS did a study on bio hazards (equine diseases) with some Kentucky Horse Farms, and immigration insp, and buying up farms along the border etc.
                                  Maybe there's some study going on and the woman just has the facts mixed up.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    was looking at the line items of Homeland Security's budget and there was an interesting section regarding horses...

                                    6 USC Sec. 453c 01/03/2012 (112-90)

                                    -EXPCITE-
                                    TITLE 6 - DOMESTIC SECURITY
                                    CHAPTER 1 - HOMELAND SECURITY ORGANIZATION
                                    SUBCHAPTER VIII - COORDINATION WITH NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES; INSPECTOR
                                    GENERAL; UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; COAST GUARD;
                                    GENERAL PROVISIONS
                                    Part H - Miscellaneous Provisions

                                    -HEAD-
                                    Sec. 453c. Disposition of equines unfit for service

                                    -STATUTE-
                                    None of the funds made available in this or any other Act for
                                    fiscal year 2012 and thereafter may be used to destroy or put out
                                    to pasture any horse or other equine belonging to any component or
                                    agency of the Department of Homeland Security that has become unfit
                                    for service, unless the trainer or handler is first given the
                                    option to take possession of the equine through an adoption program
                                    that has safeguards against slaughter and inhumane treatment.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I live in PA. I know dozens of people who own horse facilities, ranging from a few acres to hundreds. This is the first I've heard anything like this. I call BS.
                                      Flickr

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Maybe it used to be a dairy farm and has silos. The military has silos for missiles, so it makes complete sense that they would want to inspect her farm that also has silos. Tangledweb's theory about the tin foil has a lot of merit too.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X