• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Conspiracy theory or true?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    The EPA has been doing fly-bys around cattle facilities to be sure they are complying with several rules of permitted numbers, containment of waters, etc.
    It is cheaper than sending inspectors on foot everyplace.

    They also use satellite maps for that.

    Have not heard any other agency being very nosey around here.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Chall View Post
      Perhaps she is getting government aid. There are properties that I think are under "open spaces", where they get a tax break in exchange for allowing the public onto their land - and the land can only be sold for agricultural usage.
      One you let the camel's nose under your tent..
      In NJ farms that receive 'land preservation' status are subject to yearly inspection. You get a chunk of $$, depends upon land size, but six figures are not uncommon. Also depends upon the program, there are diff programs at diff levels of government.

      The land preservation people do come to 'my' farm once a year for a strut around session. They were also around clearing hiking trails behind the neighbors property this past spring. (Horses are NOT allowed on this new preserved park area. So I've decided the land preservation people suck.)

      There is also a 'wildlife management area' surrounding our farm. As in, folks with guns shootin' stuff up all weekend. It's lovely, really. Bear hunting season (like one day, I think?) was particularly muzzleloading, fire from the shoulder, fantastic....
      "Friend" me !

      http://www.facebook.com/isabeau.solace

      Comment


      • #23
        This is fun but, as an attorney and horse-farm owner, I recommend demanding a warrant for anything that amounts to a search. Private companies with whom you have a contract, like the electric company, of course have your permission to come on your land and that is entirely different from any local, state or federal agency.

        Exceptions to the 4th amendment are few and far between and aren't automatically granted simply because one says so. Having a badge is actually the first sign that this person needs a warrant. Your fellow citizens can't violate your constitutional rights. That's why you don't have a free speech right on Facebook. It is exactly the ones who pretend they don't need a warrant--the government--who in fact must get one under the 4th amendment to search or seize your property.

        Exceptions do exist such as for searching a car where probable cause exists that it contains illegal contents (due to the mobile nature of cars, can't really wait around for a magistrate to issue a warrant).
        \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Skip's Rider View Post
          Maybe it used to be a dairy farm and has silos. The military has silos for missiles, so it makes complete sense that they would want to inspect her farm that also has silos. Tangledweb's theory about the tin foil has a lot of merit too.

          uuummmm..... A missile 'silo' is a vastly different beast from a corn or silage 'silo'. I've been in both kinds; the only commonality is that both are round tubes, one above ground, the other below.

          *star*
          "Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit."
          - Desiderata, (c) Max Ehrman, 1926

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by furlong47 View Post
            I live in PA. I know dozens of people who own horse facilities, ranging from a few acres to hundreds. This is the first I've heard anything like this. I call BS.
            Ditto.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #26
              My friend says (claims actually) that this woman isn't crazy. I'm starting to wonder about my friend.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                My friend says that this woman isn't crazy.
                hehehe

                Originally posted by BigMama1
                Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                GNU Terry Prachett

                Comment


                • #28
                  There HAS been a shortage of tinfoil in the stores lately......

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #29
                    Originally posted by lcw579 View Post
                    There HAS been a shortage of tinfoil in the stores lately......

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      ReSomething has flyovers looking for marijuana! We used to have that every late summer, too, because while the crops were ripening and trees turning yellow the MJ was still bright green and could be spotted easily by air.

                      But now with several crops a year and all the rain - they have gone indoors.

                      We have greenhouses and and a retail nursery, so at least once a year some casually dressed men with little clipped mustaches and tidy haircuts come strolling through, and when asked if they can be helped, they just say they are just looking and stroll out.
                      Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                        This is fun but, as an attorney and horse-farm owner, I recommend demanding a warrant for anything that amounts to a search. Private companies with whom you have a contract, like the electric company, of course have your permission to come on your land and that is entirely different from any local, state or federal agency.

                        Exceptions to the 4th amendment are few and far between and aren't automatically granted simply because one says so. Having a badge is actually the first sign that this person needs a warrant. Your fellow citizens can't violate your constitutional rights. That's why you don't have a free speech right on Facebook. It is exactly the ones who pretend they don't need a warrant--the government--who in fact must get one under the 4th amendment to search or seize your property.

                        Exceptions do exist such as for searching a car where probable cause exists that it contains illegal contents (due to the mobile nature of cars, can't really wait around for a magistrate to issue a warrant).
                        Good answer. The Patriot Act does have some Constitutionally dicey stuff in it but most of that is regarding electronic surveillance, communications intercepts, etc.

                        Of course, given the Administration's rabid anti-gun tirade, expect Biden's Gun Police any time, now.

                        If a farm is a business then the "regulators" have a much larger power of legal, warrantless entry than if it's a purely private enterprise. State officials often have a broader right of entry than Federal ones (as odd as that often sounds). So you have to keep an eye on your state's intrusive policies as well as your Federal Civil Rights.

                        G.
                        Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by ShotenStar View Post
                          uuummmm..... A missile 'silo' is a vastly different beast from a corn or silage 'silo'. I've been in both kinds; the only commonality is that both are round tubes, one above ground, the other below.

                          *star*
                          This was tongue-in-cheek, like the tin foil theory.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Foxtrot, the funny (I guess) part about that is that I moved from the North Coast of CA, big marijuana growing area full of hippies and whackos, to bible thumping moral KY and I got to watch the choppers going back and forth about four miles away last summer as they'd found a patch.
                            Vivid green, it's supposed to be easy to spot once you've been told what to look for, and there really isn't anywhere on earth nowadays that doesn't get aerial surveillance at least every couple of years. I've got county GIS photos from I think 2010 and google earth photos from 2011 - I have dateable changes in my layout and the photos clearly show the expansion of the pig area and the installation of two paddock fences (plus you can see the pigs and the horses).

                            We did have the PVA/Assessor show up on the property a few months ago, but their truck is clearly marked, by and large we don't get visitors as we aren't running a roadside operation, by that I mean we don't advertise for sale to the general public - well, we do, via CL and word of mouth but we don't maintain a standing inventory and have it in any kind of storefront.

                            Completely not horse related, but years ago a small vessel carrying bales of marijuana decided that the best place to offlead their product would be at the end of a busy pier serving the Herring fleet in SF Bay - hide in the crowd, was the idea I guess. They got busted faster than you can say "fisheries observer" - there's a representative of the DF&G present at most commercial fisheries offloading points and the guy or gal trotted down there to check out this unknown boat, got shooed away and called it in - not to mention everybody spotted the stranger, it was a permit only fishery.

                            Back to the OP's question, there is a huge amount of regulation in some industries - say trucking - but it's easily verified. I won't argue yes and no about little green men walking on this person's farm, but somewhere there's a ton of paperwork to go with it, crazy lady needs to show Gullible Friend the contracts or whatever and settle the question.
                            Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
                            Incredible Invisible

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              I was told by a farmer's market friend, veteran and Baptist minister, who also runs a small farm for beef and pork in nearby NC that his friend/acquaintance got a job with some gov't agency, got some training and came back to "brag" to him (his words not mine) that he could come anytime and seize all of his farm's assets if the gov't "needs" them. To say the least my farmer friend was not pleased and told this gentleman, "over my dead body" will you take my animals, etc...

                              I'm not sure who this man worked for but I do believe that my friend was telling the truth. I don't think its in him to lie. Now could he have his facts twisted.??..yes for sure. Since Obama signed an executive order basically stating that the gov't can seize any assets they want in an "emergency," I think that is what he was talking about.

                              I've been inspected by the State of Virginia for my poultry meat/eggs operation in order to get a Virginia Poultry Producer exemption that will allow me to sell up to 20,000 birds to consumers directly. This inspection was something I initiated though to help further my business opportunities as this allows me to label my products differently and gives consumers an idea that I have had to meet certain standards.

                              So far as I know, no one cares much about the horse part of my farm operation since I'm not selling them to people as food.

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by Skip's Rider View Post
                                This was tongue-in-cheek, like the tin foil theory.
                                Hard to tell these days, with all the various flavors of 'government conspiracy' theories floating around the Interwebs ....

                                *Star*
                                "Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit."
                                - Desiderata, (c) Max Ehrman, 1926

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Originally posted by Daydream Believer View Post
                                  I was told by a farmer's market friend, veteran and Baptist minister, who also runs a small farm for beef and pork in nearby NC that his friend/acquaintance got a job with some gov't agency, got some training and came back to "brag" to him (his words not mine) that he could come anytime and seize all of his farm's assets if the gov't "needs" them. To say the least my farmer friend was not pleased and told this gentleman, "over my dead body" will you take my animals, etc...

                                  I'm not sure who this man worked for but I do believe that my friend was telling the truth. I don't think its in him to lie. Now could he have his facts twisted.??..yes for sure. Since Obama signed an executive order basically stating that the gov't can seize any assets they want in an "emergency," I think that is what he was talking about.
                                  ...
                                  Referencing some of the 'various flavors of crazy' on the loose these days, this one regarding the Executive Order is of the "you really need to read all the details before rabbiting down a conspiracy trail" variety. See Snopes for the particulars:

                                  http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/ndrp.asp

                                  *star*
                                  "Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit."
                                  - Desiderata, (c) Max Ehrman, 1926

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    you may want to put that tin foil hat back on as

                                    a 1984 Supreme Court case called Oliver v. United States, in which a majority of the justices said that "open fields" could be searched without warrants because they're not covered by the Fourth Amendment.

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      #38
                                      I sent my "friend" Lex's comments and she's gone quiet. LOL.

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Well, our sheriff, that happens to be our closest neighbor, has our lock code in his files already.
                                        So does the fire and EMT services, so does the USDA offices and they are all welcome to come in any time they need to.

                                        Any one other found trespassing WILL be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
                                        Even little, short legged green men with big eyes and funny hands.
                                        Attached Files
                                        Last edited by Bluey; Jan. 13, 2013, 10:22 AM.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Originally posted by ShotenStar View Post
                                          Referencing some of the 'various flavors of crazy' on the loose these days, this one regarding the Executive Order is of the "you really need to read all the details before rabbiting down a conspiracy trail" variety. See Snopes for the particulars:

                                          http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/ndrp.asp

                                          *star*
                                          You are aware that snopes is not an unbiased site aren't you? A simple google search will turn up plenty of sources on that one. Factcheck.org is another one of similar leanings.

                                          Not saying your above info is wrong but I don't use snopes anymore for that reason. I recall an article from somewhere on Obama's executive orders and how often he's done it to bypass the Congress rather than negotiate with them.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X