• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

IRH helmet question/general helmet question

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IRH helmet question/general helmet question

    I was just at a tack shop looking for a replacement for my IRH Elite today, and the owner talked me into a CO JR8 instead. She cited having some safety issues with IRH in general. Has anyone heard any negative stories about the safety/durability of their helmets? I'm taking her stories with a grain of salt and didn't want to post them as hearsay, but if they're true, would definitely cause me to avoid them in the future.

    Also, was discussing helmets afterward with my husband. He is a little confused as to why riding helmets are so expensive compared to, say, hockey or football helmets, and need replacement whenever they've had a hard hit. Hockey and football helmets see repeated heavy hits in a game, yet don't seem to need replacement each time... what's the difference in the technology? Just curious as to what insights anyone might have!
    "Remain relentlessly cheerful."

    Graphite/Pastel Portraits

  • #2
    I have NOT heard that, and I have an IRH. Perhaps salesperson was trying to talk you into a more expensive helmet? LOL

    I do agree with your husband however. I watch the PBR, and those guys hit the ground HARD, and even if they land on their feet or otherwise don't hit their heads, they often take off the helmet and fling it in the air, with it landing who knows where. I don't think they make THAT much money, that they want to buy a new helmet after each and every ride!! Why are theirs more durable and uncompromised by a "hit?" (Possibly more comparable than a hockey player - i.e., flung to the ground by a 2,000 lb bull rather than a 200 lb. hockey player! LOL)

    Comment


    • #3
      I've never read anything substantive re IRH not being safe enough.

      I had one a couple of years ago, fell on it and replaced it with a CO JR8 and a Tipp Sportage. IRH never fit me quite right, but CO and Tipp do.

      I'm going to guess football and hockey helmets are lined with a material that suffers elastic deformation on impact (the material resumes its original shape and volume after impact). Equestrian helmets (as well as motorsport helmets) are lined with material that suffer plastic deformation (they do not return to shape and volume after impact) so they are a one time use only.

      Comment


      • #4
        I presume the tack shop owner was talking you into the CO because it was a better fit for you compared to the IRH. I am not aware of current safety comparisons between brands. However, fit differs greatly by brand.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Well, I got a JR8, so the price was pretty comparable, but she no longer carried IRH because of the safety concerns. Either way I did like the JR8 anyway, but I am curious about any other negative reviews.

          Why the plastic versus elastic?
          "Remain relentlessly cheerful."

          Graphite/Pastel Portraits

          Comment


          • #6
            Charles Owen has a great replacement program if the helmet needs to be replaced due to a fall. I think it's about a 55-65% discount within 3 years of purchase.
            Born under a rock and owned by beasts!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by SarahandSam View Post
              Why the plastic versus elastic?
              I couldn't tell you why. While I am an engineer, helmet design is not my area of expertise.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by SarahandSam View Post
                she no longer carried IRH because of the safety concerns.
                Honestly, I would not do business with a shop that cannot substantiate such a serious allegation.

                But that's just me.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Originally posted by caballero View Post
                  Honestly, I would not do business with a shop that cannot substantiate such a serious allegation.

                  But that's just me.
                  As I said, she did give specific examples. But I didn't want to repost what could just be a disgruntled shop owner, I wanted to know if anyone else had any similar complaints about safety issues with IRH..
                  "Remain relentlessly cheerful."

                  Graphite/Pastel Portraits

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    They all pass the same standards in order to be certified.

                    As far as replacing helmets - bike and equestrian helmets work by having a layer of foam which compresses when the helmet takes a hit. The compression of the foam absorbs the impact of the fall, rather than your skull and brain, and also slows the motion so hopefully your brain doesn't hit inside your skull and bruise (concussion). Once that foam compresses, it is done - you can't uncompress it to use again, and if hit a second time it can no longer absorb the shock.

                    Football and hockey helmets, on the other hand, have a system of air pouches and dense padding and are designed to take multiple hits because these items can absorb the shock without being destroyed.

                    I imagine you could make a riding helmet that could be reused - but it would be big, ugly, heavy, and hot and no one would want to wear it.
                    Flickr

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      Furlong, thank you--the size necessities makes sense!
                      "Remain relentlessly cheerful."

                      Graphite/Pastel Portraits

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I had great service from IRH on a replacement when I crashed in mine a number of years ago. With the helmets being so expensive many manufacturers offer discounts if you need to replace due to a crash. It was years ago, but I think I paid $50 for an IRH replacement.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hmmm I had an IRH for many years that did its job quite well. I wouldn't hesitate to buy another and haven't heard anything negative either.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            An IRH XR9 saved my life four years ago. Have never heard rumors of "safety issues."

                            But I did replace it with a Lamicell because it fit me even better. Truthfully, the Lamicell is the most comfie helmet I've ever put on my head in over 25 years of riding.
                            <>< Sorrow Looks Back. Worry Looks Around. Faith Looks Up! -- Being negative only makes a difficult journey more difficult. You may be given a cactus, but you don't have to sit on it.

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #15
                              I did like the CO replacement policy; apparently for the first year they replace at something like 50%, and for the next two years it's 20% off, I believe. That was what sold me on it more than the IRH alleged issues.

                              I really liked my Elite, and wouldn't mind getting another one in the future, but the CO was very comfortable and not as mushroom-y as I remembered.
                              "Remain relentlessly cheerful."

                              Graphite/Pastel Portraits

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I heard anecdotally from a tack store owner that in countries that have five star helmet rating systems, the CO's get five stars and the GPAs get three. Personally, it makes sense to me when the GPA's are half vent.

                                Jody Jaffe also wrote in one of her articles that she got a concussion once wearing a "CO knockoff" and switched to a real CO as a result, and we all know what the "CO knockoff" is.

                                The fact that all the helmets "pass" the same test does not mean they are equally safe. If passing is 75%, some can squeak by with a 76%, and others can get a 95%. Sure, they all met the same MINIMUM requirements, but some are still better than others.
                                The Noodlehttp://tiny.cc/NGKmT&http://tiny.cc/gioSA
                                Jinxyhttp://tiny.cc/PIC798&http://tiny.cc/jinx364
                                Boy Wonderhttp://tiny.cc/G9290
                                The Hana is nuts! NUTS!!http://tinyurl.com/SOCRAZY

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  I've generally been of the opinion that with safety ratings, there's not really a difference between the $40 Troxel and the $600 GPA because they all pass the same tests... but the anecdote I heard was related more to issues in manufacturing and warehouse handling as opposed to design, which is where I can see possible issues arising,I suppose. I am definitely curious now to find out more about how safety rating is determined, and how much oversight helmet companies have in actual production...
                                  "Remain relentlessly cheerful."

                                  Graphite/Pastel Portraits

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by SarahandSam View Post
                                    I've generally been of the opinion that with safety ratings, there's not really a difference between the $40 Troxel and the $600 GPA because they all pass the same tests... but the anecdote I heard was related more to issues in manufacturing and warehouse handling as opposed to design, which is where I can see possible issues arising,I suppose. I am definitely curious now to find out more about how safety rating is determined, and how much oversight helmet companies have in actual production...
                                    Different types of helmets are designed for different purposes. The standards applied will be in the service of the use for which helmet is designed.

                                    I flew carrier aircraft in the Navy for several years. Our flight helmets were "one time use" items. I didn't fly in an ejection seat, but had many friends who did. I also knew a couple of guys who "bailed out" the old fashioned way. "Hitting the silk" (by either going "over the side" or with "rocket assist") meant a new helmet.

                                    Motorcycle helmets, bike helmets, equestrian helmets, etc. are all examples of the "one time use" class. They are designed to take BIG hits and not fracture. They are not, necessarily, designed to take big hits and not be damaged.

                                    A football helmet is a very different beast, as it is designed to take multiple, medium level hits without being compromised.

                                    Re the IRH, I got unhorsed a few years back and suffered a mild concussion. IRH replaced the helmet at cost (I called them and reported the use; they sent me a new one, a bill, and asked that I return the old one in the same box the new one came it).

                                    While any two products might meet the same standard it's fair to ask "how well do they meet that standard?" An analogy could be made to restaurant kitchen inspection reports. Around here a 70 is a passing grade; a 95 is a passing grade.
                                    We could ask, rhetorically, are you more comfortable in a place with a 70 or a 95? Now apply the same logic to the $40 helmet and the $600 dollar helmet.

                                    I don't spend extra money on helmets for giggles and grins. I ensure that it meets the proper standards and that is passes the "feel" test when I handle it. And put it on.

                                    G.
                                    Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I believe it is only fair that if you are willing to state IRH by name for being deficient, you should also name the name of the TACK STORE that is making this claim.

                                      What is good for one...

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        The difference is the forces imparted on the head and the use of open or closed cell foams. Work done by CO shows the best material is the Extruded Polystyrene (EPS) for head strike energy reduction (thank you to Roy Burek, CEO of CO). EPS can only deform once and then must be replaced unlike the closed cell foams in other helmets, e.g. polyurethanes.

                                        Other helmets use a closed cell foam, e.g. neoprene, that can absorb multiple impacts but at the same time have a REDUCED ability to reduce impact energy.

                                        Studies show that football helmets take up to 50 or 60 hits PER GAME and over 1,000 hits per LIFETIME.

                                        Standards are created via industry input by independent entities.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X