• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

oh vey! I can't believe this happened at the farm today.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    OP, do you believe the BO will do something about this problem? If not then I would talk directly to the HO and try to get an idea if this problem was likely to continue. Then I would decide whether it were possible to rearrange my riding time to avoid the problem or if I needed to find another barn.
    My blog: Crackerdog Farm

    Comment


    • #22
      Did they intentionally make the situation unsafe? Horses can be unpredictable. Just last night Willow decided not to wait for Mom to actually get ON before she took off bucking, then she tucked her chin to her chest and could not be stopped. I thank God that nobody else was in the arena, or it could have caused serious problems. Obviously, that wasn't my intent when getting on. However, I choose my ride times carefully for that reason. I ride a big (17.1h horse) in a small (30x40) arena.

      Could it perhaps be that they didn't know the situation was going to go south? Or where they already doing something against the rules (ie riding bareback when the rules state you are not allowed, horse pulls a Willow, rider falls off, horse now tearing around the arena).

      Comment


      • #23
        If I was the BO or BM, I would want to know. IF another adult had approached the offender once, and the dangerous behavior had continued, then I would definitely want to know immediately.

        And that's for a whole range of dangerous behavior, from hard tying a horse in the barn aisle, to riding without a helmet, to jumping fences backwards of the way they're set, to lunging over fences with other horses in the ring, or not being able to control a horse while in the ring with others.

        I do have some concerns about the rules not being enforced or enforced for some and not for others, I believe that the BM has created this situation. However, she still does need to know exactly what her policies hath wrought.
        The plural of anecdote is not data.

        Comment


        • #24
          Agree with talking to the BO in this case, given the OP has already tried the direct route. But also agree with McGurk that selective enforcement is unfair and creates the perception (reality?) of favorites. "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" kind of deal.
          When there's lots of ppl ignoring safety rules, the thought process tends to be that the rule was meant for beginners / less experienced people. Those rules don't apply to me because I'm experienced enough that I can do it the quicker way, or because my horse is really well trained. Problem with this thinking is that failure to anticipate problems, and failure to understand all the risks, and overestimating one's skill is exactly what beginners do. They don't know what they don't know.
          I disagree with the thought that people not following the rules is the BM's doing. I'm assuming these boarders are not 12y/o. I would only blame the BM if rule-breaking were consistently reported to him/her and they didn't do anything. In this case, it's the boarders who ignore 90% of the rules, but now that want this particular one enforced against this particular boarder (but we don't plan to start following the rest of the rules). Safety culture needs to be instilled within everyone, not solely imposed/enforced from above. When everyone does the little stuff right, and feels not only open to, but obligated to saying something to each other when you see unsafe behavior, then the big stuff usually doesn't happen.

          Comment


          • #25
            I don't think this is about one boarder.

            The BO needs to enforce the rules for everyone, or the rules might as well not exist.

            This particular incident could be a good opportunity for everyone to stop and think about why the rules (ought to be) there in the first place, and to enact a barn culture shift to actually follow the rules.

            Otherwise this will just happen again. Maybe with the same boarder, maybe with some other boarder/horse. But it will happen.

            If you focus too much on the one boarder, you're missing the forest for the trees.

            The problem is not that this boarder did something that nearly caused an accident.

            It's that the barn culture does not take safety seriously and, consequently, sets it up for this sort of thing to happen.

            Comment


            • #26
              Absolutely talk to your BO straightaway. The last thing any reasonable BO wants is an accident. I would not assume that your BO knows exactly what is going on. A BO can't be there every second to supervise each and every boarder and some boarders do things only when the BO isn't there to correct them, so sometimes a BO might only know about issue if other people let them know. So please, make sure your BO is aware.

              FYI, "tattling" is a concept that pertains to grade school children looking to get their peers in trouble for minor infractions, it DOES NOT APPLY to adult situations where there are safety issues at stake. How would you feel if you didn't say anything, and then another person sustained a terrible injury a week later from the same issue?

              I think it is fine to say something directly to someone who does something unsafe in a environment like a boarding stable where other patrons and their horses are put at risk, but ultimately it is your BO's job to definitively deal with the behavior. If your BO knows that something unsafe is going on, but doesn't do anything about it, then that is another problem entirely. Some BOs are indeed reluctant to enforce rules because it is an unpleasant duty or because they might not want to risk losing the client.

              Comment


              • #27
                BeeHoney, tattling applies to adults too. Happens in workplaces all the time when people would rather have a manager fix issues than just confront the person themselves. It sucks, it's childish, and it's stupid. And it destroys an organization's culture.

                However, in THIS case, where the OP apparently HAS spoken with the outlaw already, then it is appropriate. She had not stated that initially.

                Additionally, with the details shared by PM it's likely that the BO now knows about it anyhow. This is not your run of the mill minor issue, but a major one.

                Still worth talking to the BO, but not by hints.

                Comment


                • #28
                  I agree with BeeHoney. This is something you should go to the BO about. I would calmly sit down with them and state everything as you have here. When safety is at stake, you can not be wrong with bringing it up. If the boarder who is breaking the rules gets mad, so be it, because if you were in the hospital it would be her fault.

                  "Tattling" is not a good term in this situation. It is not tatting. It is keeping everyone safe, which is commendable.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    I agree with BeeHoney. This is something you should go to the BO about. I would calmly sit down with them and state everything as you have here. When safety is at stake, you can not be wrong with bringing it up. If the boarder who is breaking the rules gets mad, so be it, because if you were in the hospital it would be her fault.

                    "Tattling" is not a good term in this situation. It is not tatting. It is keeping everyone safe, which is commendable.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      This is so fascinating to me.

                      Let me put a scenario (not the OPs) that could very well be read out of the OP's post.

                      "Outlaw" leaves her horse in the wash stall when going to the bathroom. This is against the rules. Another boarder sees this and doesn't say anything to Outlaw.

                      You are really going to have her go straight to the BO? Without talking to Outlaw?

                      No? That would be ridiculous right? But it happens in almost every barn across this country and it's childish.

                      Since we didn't know the nature of the previous safety incident, it's good to know the severity of the incident. It's also irresponsible to have someone going straight to the BO if outlaw has zero idea of what's going on.

                      Yes, it's tattling. Yes, it's childish.

                      And no, it actually doesn't apply to the situation as the OP has PMed because the incident was severe enough that BO likely already knows.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        If this was a barn full of men I have to imagine how it would go down.

                        Hey dummazz you're going to get us all killed, knock it off.

                        the end.

                        possible sequel: Hey, BO, tell Mr Dummazz to knock off the stupid stuff before he gets us all killed.
                        “Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.” Stephen R. Covey

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Let's say the scenario is one of the barn's rules are that horses are NOT to be lunged in the arena when X amount of horses (or any horses) are being ridden in said arena. Main reason being a horse gets away from owner, and tears around the ring with lunge line flying about, endangering all.

                          Poster has spoken to offender once, "Hey Fellow Boarder, One of the rules is horses are not to be lunged while others are riding, yadda, yadda, yadda". If the response was "Go pound sand", you bet your behind I would go straight to the BO. I would also call her out on the rule right then and there, esp. if I had a vibe from the others present that they aren't too keen on the rule being broken either....But I'm pretty direct and to the point...

                          I've been a boarder, worker, and now barn owner. IMO, I have always gotten the best results being matter of fact, direct, and timely on any issues. That way people know you are no pushover-and people stay safer when all are on the same page.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            It's way too late to mouth off at somebody when they've killed you..
                            ... _. ._ .._. .._

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              If I were the BO, I would be very unhappy if I were not told of the incident. If an accident HAD occurred, BO could have been held liable for not enforcing the rules. Even if nobody sued BO directly, insurance companies would go after her, most likely.

                              There's a difference between tattling to get someone in trouble and reporting an incident that endangered people. Telling on Tommy because he didn't do his homework is not the same as telling that Tommy was playing with matches and set the rug on fire but put it out. In the adult world, if he situation is one that could end with a person or animal being harmed and you have let the person know that their behavior is dangerous and asked them to stop and they keep right on doing it, it's time to involve BO before BO finds out because someone had to call 911 or the vet for an emergency that could have been prevented.

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Interestingly, I don't feel like the OP should have to address the situation directly at all. Sure, if it works out to do so, go for it.

                                But for Pete's sake, you are paying someone to manage the barn as part of your board. That includes establishing rules and making sure they are followed. It's not each boarder's job to police the other boarders and have "talks" about the rules and how it affects their safety, or their enjoyment of their horse, or whatever. Someone already has that job - it's the BO/BM.

                                I'm not talking about stupid things like leaving a hoof pick on the ledge or a ball of manure that didn't make it into the muck tub. As adults I would expect people to work this sort of thing out and/or ignore it. But if there are people that are affecting the safety of other riders/horse owners, or even if they are just making the riding environment unpleasant, then yes, you should go to the BO/BM.

                                Obviously how you phrase things matters, and if you do this every week you are going to be labeled the barn PITA and be ignored anyway. But if you are a considerate boarder and pay your bills - take this issue to the BO/BM and if the other rider is pissed off...who cares? I am too old to pay for stuff and not get what I want.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  You need to tell the barn owner, because it comes down to the legal liability that they will have if the other boarder gets animals or people injured. It's not your place, but the barn owners to either stop it or ignore it. I also endorse the idea of barn shopping, because if nothing is done, then you need to move to a safer environment.
                                  You can't fix stupid-Ron White

                                  Comment

                                  • Original Poster

                                    #37
                                    UPDATE:


                                    I spoke with the BO today and related the situation in its entirety. The BO thanked me profusely for bringing the situation to their attention. This was apparently not the only problem they've had with this person, but has been the most severe. The BO told me that my account of the situation has convinced them to move forward with a swift and strong penalty for the offender. I'm very satisfied with the BO's plans. I won't relate them here to maintain confidentiality, but suffice it to say, the BO is not going to put up with any crap, particularly when it creates a safety problem.

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by cowboymom View Post
                                      If this was a barn full of men I have to imagine how it would go down.

                                      Hey dummazz you're going to get us all killed, knock it off.

                                      the end.

                                      possible sequel: Hey, BO, tell Mr Dummazz to knock off the stupid stuff before he gets us all killed.
                                      This. I wish more women could just say something. I don't know why it is so scary to do it. It doesn't have to be escalated, it doesn't have to turn into a knock down dragout fight, it doesn't have to be all passive aggressive.

                                      Do you know how much barn drama would go away if people could just say, hey, please stop doing that. OP, not saying you are being a drama llama, just can't understand why women can't speak up easily.

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #39
                                        @Lady Counselor: Some women do speak up easily. I and one other did on a couple of occasions and what ensued was a lot of trashtalking about us behind our backs, rude treatment at the barn, etc.. I could care less about that as long as I can ride in peace, but some people don't want to deal with that headache.

                                        In my opinion guys are very different. They will say, as another person pointed out, "hey stop it @$$hat before you get us all killed !". An hour later the same guys will be out having a beer or two. Women who disagree with each other often hold grudges for long periods of time, take it out on the person who brought it up, trash that person, make life difficult in other ways. I don't think guys do that kidn of stuff.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Originally posted by AlterMe123 View Post
                                          There are some excellent comments and suggestions, so thanks everyone so far!

                                          @mvp: you have a very valid point regarding "have I vetoed speaking directly with this person". In the previous case, I didn't say anything until it became clear there was a potential problem at which point I started talking to the person directly. Since then it hasn't been a problem with that individual. They got the message.


                                          In the current situation, I first ignored it, then I said something yesterday in an effort to find a mutually acceptable solution to the problem. Person said something that led me to believe the situation would be ok, but it went downhill quickly. So if I spoke to the barn owner, I don't think I would be tattling necessarily since I tried to speak with the person in question. I could speak with them again to say hey, after what happened, Im concerned about safety, yada yada, but I'll likely run into the BO before I run into that person.

                                          You're doing good. If you are "in negotiations" with Outlaw, don't go to the BO yet. What I mean is Outlaw said "Sure, I'll fix it," and then doesn't, your job is to see if Outlaw *was* making an effort but failed. Or, did Outlaw seem to blow you off? Even if this happened, you still aren't done "negotiating"-- handling this problem in-house with Outlaw. Now you need to say, "Yo! Outlaw! I thought you were going to fix it and it's not happening. What do you want to do?"

                                          If Outlaw gives you crap, *then* you go to the BO. Outlaw shouldn't be surprised.

                                          The point is that you handle things directly until you get to an unequivocal dead-end with that person before going "up" a level. Just like at work!
                                          The armchair saddler
                                          Politically Pro-Cat

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X