• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Trying to find pervious owner

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    As happy as returning to riding has made me during the past couple of years, this is such a reawakening as to the kinds out there, who you're rubbing shoulders with, who don't think like you do.

    GW is beautiful, OGP. So glad he is in a good place. The whole thing just turns my stomach. Horse trainers, who probably were little girls and boys who loved them, and now can't figure out how to really take care of who they have benefitted from. Apparently get numb to getting personal with their horses unless they are raised up high by them. Why, oh why, can't they simply put them down in lieu of sending them off to auction? (And why didn't your buyer honor the contract?!?) Trainers who do this are not facing who they really are when they really just send them directly to the sale. Some foolishness that maybe some little girl will find them a home? There should be pictures of kill buyers plastering the office walls of these trainers, so that they look outside in their pastures and think twice.

    There but for the grace of God, though. I do not see myself, in my current situation, being able to keep mine forever, as much as I would like to. And then where eventually?

    The "common thread" that should be in the back of most of our minds.

    What a thread.
    Last edited by CVPeg; Dec. 14, 2012, 12:21 PM.
    But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post
      And THIS is what he looked like when he was rehomed to Lisa. http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/...g/11687104.jpg

      I'll let the OP decide if she wants to share any more images of him now. I want to respect her privacy, as she has done a wonderful wonderful thing.
      Wow, he is a pretty boy. It's sad that any of them wind up at auction, but downright scary when it's one that's as nice as Great Warrior. Glad for the OGP and GW that the OP was in the right place at the right time!!
      *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05

      Comment


      • #83
        Should we assume that his condition deteriorated while he was at Lisa's, so that he didn't look like much when she made the "trade"?
        This piece doesn't make any sense to me either. I got a picture from Lisa in the beginning of October that shows him looking just as amazing, with blue ribbons dangling from his bridle. I'd post it, but it includes her face, which I'd prefer not to share. It came from a professional photographer's website, and included the date of the event, so I'm fairly sure that it's legit. Now true, it's only a head/neck shot, but he tends to lose his topline very quickly, and it was the last thing to get built. It appeared that the work that he did under Lisa was making him even more valuable.

        He did WTC, lead changes, and jumped in great form. He is a little arthritic and creaky, a forward (but not crazy) ride, and had no...I mean ZERO...stop in him. He needed hock injections in his right hind, and he could get a little stifley, particularly if he wasn't turned out, but...he was one of the best, least complicated horses I've ever thrown a leg over, even when he was slightly green and I've thrown a leg over some NICE horses. I've also ridden a lot of not so nice ones over the last 10 years, and he's not one of them.

        He didn't want to be messed with, so you had to stay out of his face, and not goose him (very sensitive) but I taught my husband (a rank beginner) how to post the trot on him - he is that quiet. He's a little different out foxhunting, as a few who have met him can testify to, and needs a more confident rider in a field galloping with a ton of other horses, but he LOVES it. He is BOLD BOLD BOLD. He saved my butt when I landed on his neck after he overjumped something in the field, and the two years I had him I never came off. And that includes riding in 19 degree days on frozen footing with me being stiff as a board.

        That's why the Margo piece just doesn't make any sense. It just doesn't. This isn't a worthless horse. I didn't rehome him because he sucked, I rehomed him because I was giving up horses entirely. I'd say that it was because he didn't fit in with the other high value horses on her site, but she has one for sale for less than $5k right now posted on Facebook, so...?

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by CVPeg View Post
          The whole thing just turns my stomach. Horse trainers, who probably were little girls and boys who loved them, and now can't figure out how to really take care of who they have benefitted from. Apparently get numb to getting personal with their horses unless they are raised up high by them. Why, oh why, can't they simply put them down in lieu of sending them off to auction? They are not facing who they really are when they really just send them directly to the sale. Some foolishness that maybe some little girl will find them a home? There should be pictures of kill buyers plastering the office walls of these trainers, so that they look outside in their pastures and think twice.
          It's the old pets vs. livestock argument regarding horses.
          *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05

          Comment


          • #85
            I'd say that it does, except that this one doesn't make any financial sense. Even looking at it objectively, why throw away what you could make a bit more cash on?

            Unless there was some urgent need for money.

            Comment


            • #86
              I know it's not right to judge, but my gut says Margo is a horse trading snake who doesn't give a damn about the horses or the people she hurts. It's all business. And not even good business. Because the horse world is a small place. Someone, somewhere is going to figure out who Margo is IRL, and when they do, the gossip will go wild and (hopefully?) Margo won't get away with it again.
              A good horseman doesn't have to tell anyone...the horse already knows.

              Might be a reason, never an excuse...

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post
                That's why the Margo piece just doesn't make any sense. It just doesn't. This isn't a worthless horse. I didn't rehome him because he sucked, I rehomed him because I was giving up horses entirely. I'd say that it was because he didn't fit in with the other high value horses on her site, but she has one for sale for less than $5k right now posted on Facebook, so...?
                Maybe she hadn't done his hocks, or he was "stifley" as you mentioned, and looked off?

                I'm wondering why she didn't just contact you after her horse died and ask if you wanted to BUY him back, as you've made clear you would have done. If she was so interested in having the money to buy a new horse, I'd think that would have gotten her farther (still duped on the lame mid-5-figure horse, though) anyway.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Because if Margo listed him for REGULAR sale, she'd have to advertise him and you might trace it back to her. She figured the auction dump was a little sneakier. That's my guess.
                  ~Veronica
                  "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                  http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                    Because if Margo listed him for REGULAR sale, she'd have to advertise him and you might trace it back to her. She figured the auction dump was a little sneakier. That's my guess.
                    Agree with this. Hence why horse never made it onto Margo's facebook page.

                    Sorry if I missed/forgot this, but has your trainer been in touch with Margo? Maybe she could somehow casually ask about GW? Though I could completely understand if your trainer doesn't want to get involved...
                    "Choose to chance the rapids, and dare to dance the tides" - Garth Brooks
                    "With your permission, dear, I'll take my fences one at a time" - Maggie Smith, Downton Abbey

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      I think Margo's real intention was to unload the lame horse. GW just got caught up in that effort and so she tried to get rid of him quick. Dollars to doughnuts there's some backstory on the lame horse. Margo probably broke him, or didn't have authority to sell him-- I *have* to think getting rid of HIM was the hook.
                      ~Veronica
                      "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                      http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                      Comment


                      • #91
                        Methinks, based on the thumbs down marks on certain posts, that perhaps Miss Margo is on the boards.
                        A good horseman doesn't have to tell anyone...the horse already knows.

                        Might be a reason, never an excuse...

                        Comment


                        • #92
                          Like everyone else I have been both elated and horrified by the journey his horse has had. Luck must be his middle name.

                          No matter how you personally feel about him, I think some small amount of credit should also go to Frank or whoever goes to NH and bought GW for the Camelot auction. Without that, nobody would have had the faintest idea of what had happened to the horse. Perhaps talking to Frank might shed a little more light on the sequence of events, and at the very least someone should at least thank Frank for helping to save this particular "starfish."

                          I also recently relocated a horse with a few ouchies to what looks like the perfect home, so this has hit closely. I guess what it all boils down to is you try your hardest to do the right thing and hope, hope, hope that you were right.

                          Sounds like at least several people plus the horse are going to have a Merry Christmas because someone made a fortuitous purchase and tried to find out more about what she bought.

                          Comment


                          • #93
                            Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post
                            This piece doesn't make any sense to me either. I got a picture from Lisa in the beginning of October that shows him looking just as amazing, with blue ribbons dangling from his bridle. I'd post it, but it includes her face, which I'd prefer not to share. It came from a professional photographer's website, and included the date of the event, so I'm fairly sure that it's legit. Now true, it's only a head/neck shot, but he tends to lose his topline very quickly, and it was the last thing to get built. It appeared that the work that he did under Lisa was making him even more valuable.

                            He did WTC, lead changes, and jumped in great form. He is a little arthritic and creaky, a forward (but not crazy) ride, and had no...I mean ZERO...stop in him. He needed hock injections in his right hind, and he could get a little stifley, particularly if he wasn't turned out, but...he was one of the best, least complicated horses I've ever thrown a leg over, even when he was slightly green and I've thrown a leg over some NICE horses. I've also ridden a lot of not so nice ones over the last 10 years, and he's not one of them.

                            He didn't want to be messed with, so you had to stay out of his face, and not goose him (very sensitive) but I taught my husband (a rank beginner) how to post the trot on him - he is that quiet. He's a little different out foxhunting, as a few who have met him can testify to, and needs a more confident rider in a field galloping with a ton of other horses, but he LOVES it. He is BOLD BOLD BOLD. He saved my butt when I landed on his neck after he overjumped something in the field, and the two years I had him I never came off. And that includes riding in 19 degree days on frozen footing with me being stiff as a board.

                            That's why the Margo piece just doesn't make any sense. It just doesn't. This isn't a worthless horse. I didn't rehome him because he sucked, I rehomed him because I was giving up horses entirely. I'd say that it was because he didn't fit in with the other high value horses on her site, but she has one for sale for less than $5k right now posted on Facebook, so...?
                            This whole thread just makes me sad and sick. We talk over and over here on COTH about how one of the biggest things we can do for a horse to keep them from landing in a bad place is give them useful training. Sounds like OGP's horse had the kind of training that would make him perfect for so many riders I can think of, yet he still ended up in a bad place. She took all of the steps you're supposed to take to ensure they end up in a good place and he still ended up at the auction. Obviously these skills can and do help horses land softly but you just never know. I can't help but wonder if the horse that "Lisa" ended up with would have been at the auction in GW's place had "Margo" not run across her at a vulnerable moment and I also find it so odd that she just dumped GW. He sounds like a totally marketable horse even if she couldn't sell him for the big bucks she'd prefer. Just an awful situation.

                            So sorry to OGP for all you're going through in this ordeal, but so glad you know he's safe and sound. And OP - you have ended up with a gorgeous and wonderful horse! He is so lucky that you found him and I'm sure you'll have many wonderful years together.

                            Comment


                            • #94
                              Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post
                              I will add, though, it's much easier to be charitable when you know that the ending is good. I'm not sure how I would have felt had he shipped. Of course, I'd probably never have known.
                              Did I miss part of the story? Why did she not contact you when she realized GW was not going to be a good fit for her, and why did she lie when you inquired about him?
                              Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                              http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                              http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                              Comment


                              • #95
                                Originally posted by jenm View Post
                                Did I miss part of the story? Why did she not contact you when she realized GW was not going to be a good fit for her, and why did she lie when you inquired about him?
                                Sounded to me like GW was a good fit (or, not a bad fit), but when she lost her other horse she was just kind of distraught and made a rash (and unwise) decision. It doesn't excuse her behavior (or lying) but I can understand making bad decisions and rash decisions under those circumstances.
                                ~Veronica
                                "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                                http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                                Comment


                                • #96
                                  Originally posted by jenm View Post
                                  Did I miss part of the story? Why did she not contact you when she realized GW was not going to be a good fit for her, and why did she lie when you inquired about him?
                                  My question exactly. I'm very sorry this woman lost her horse, but that is no excuse to lie to you about the horse's whereabouts. She told you he was doing good the day he was listed on Camelot's page, which was at least 3 days after the NH auction (if I'm reading correct). I would be royally pissed, just because something bad happened to her is absolutely no excuse to not contact you before selling him, as stated in your contract, and to lie about it. Something very very fishy here with her too.

                                  I'm assuming you sold her the horse either very cheaply or gave him away (sorry if I missed that part). Obviously the horse was a good fit for her if she was winning ribbons on him and happy for several months. I think she saw an opportunity to "upgrade" and use your horse as barter to get a better horse. She already lied to you about him. Maybe she did think he was going to a good home, and I'm sure she could be upset about where he ended up, but it certainly doesn't make her innocent in this situation.

                                  I really hope more details come forward and this "Margot" character is outed. Sounds like a lot of shading dealings going on at her place and people should be aware of it. Can't imagine how many people have sold her horses in good faith only to have them pawned off at a kill auction. Glad this story had such a happy ending, but it also makes me sad for the many others who haven't.

                                  Comment


                                  • #97
                                    I don't understand why "Lisa" traded GW for a show horse, when she had already won a handful of blues on GW, and got a much less able horse in return.

                                    I do understand that when your heart horse dies tragically, that you want little to do with your others for a bit, but not getting rid of him. When mine died, I stayed away from the barn, I did not look for the fastest way to unload them.

                                    Im very happy that GW had a soft landing, I think he's handsome in both pics.

                                    CFF

                                    Comment


                                    • #98
                                      I think Margo's real intention was to unload the lame horse. GW just got caught up in that effort and so she tried to get rid of him quick. Dollars to doughnuts there's some backstory on the lame horse. Margo probably broke him, or didn't have authority to sell him-- I *have* to think getting rid of HIM was the hook
                                      vx, that's the only thing that makes any sense. I should add, that horse isn't lame, he's quite nice (as far as I can tell from pictures), he just has this old injury that means that he's not quite as valuable as he should be.

                                      Please keep in mind, I didn't have to hold Lisa accountable, as she is doing a very nice job of holding herself accountable right now. I know that anyone can act, but I believe that she is quite distraught about the whole situation. She did believe that he was doing well, and that she was doing the right thing by the horse. She's genuine, and I will be having more conversations with her in the future. I really don't think she understood what could happen, based on some of the questions she asked me (like, does he have his blanket).

                                      Why didn't she call me? I'm not sure. Why didn't her trainer talk to mine? I don't know. Those details (to me) are more of the "let's learn and move on" than the immediate, who the heck drove him to New Holland. THAT person...THAT one I'd like to talk to (and perhaps, I already did).

                                      It is entirely possible that he wasn't a good fit personality wise for Lisa, and perhaps after showing him he really wasn't what she wanted. The forwardness thing freaks some people out and I get that. And he is the type of horse that marches right to the fence, and that can feel a little rushy if you're used to a push and pick kind of ride. That's no criticism of her ability, I can't ride push and pick horses very well. But that's probably an issue for another thread.

                                      I do still think there's more to this story...it's not over yet.

                                      Comment


                                      • #99
                                        OneGrayPony - as you appear to be a MUCH better person than I in just about every sense of the phrase, I would like to offer my pugilistic services to field trip (even though it is winter and very cold) up north and punch the daylights out of this "Margo." She sounds sneaky & dishonest at the very least...and an absolutely dreadful waste of space if your spidey senses are on the money...which they probably are.

                                        Yay for GW!!! And thanks for setting an example to the rest of us for how we oughtta be behavin'

                                        Comment


                                        • OGP, look at it this way. You and the OP have thrown a gigantic monkey wrench into this whole scenario. Because GW was supposed to quietly disappear at NH. Either some anonymous person would have bought him or he would have caught that one-way truck to Canada. Now he and you and the OP have come back to haunt whoever did the dirty deed. And they are not going to be happy when the truth comes out.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X