• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Two Wild Horses Killed in Car Crash in Nevada

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Two Wild Horses Killed in Car Crash in Nevada

    Looks like the driver was lucky to survive. Warning: graphic photo at link.

    http://www.kolotv.com/news/headlines...1.html?ref=881

    "This could have easily been a fatal collision this morning," says Trooper Chuck Allen with the Nevada Highway Patrol.

    Look at the driver's car and you wonder how she survived hitting a more than thousand pound animal going at least 50-miles an hour--the posted speed limit here.

    The driver traveling behind 24-year-old Cristina Laughbon says he saw her car in the right lane, and went to the left to pass.

    "I tried to get away from them but the horses were blocking the road. So my choices were either to hit the horses or go into oncoming traffic," says Nick Mazo.

    "Unfortunately I saw it. I was taking my wife to work. We pulled up and there was the accident. We were probably one of the first people there," says David Jones an Andrew Lane resident.

    Jones says in more than one way, this accident was bound to happen.

    He says cars are still going too fast in the area, which means drivers have less time to react.

    "There has to be some public awareness," says Trooper Allen.

    Trooper Allen says horses coming down from the Virginia Range and making their way through Andrew Lane has now become a public safety issue.

    Those who live in the area say its one thing for the horses to come from a range where food is scarce to neighborhoods where grass and water is more plentiful.

    It's quite another they say when some residents feed the horses encouraging them to stay.

    The Department of Agriculture says its actually tried to trap some of the horses on private land at the request of the land owner--only to have those efforts thwarted by wild horse advocates.

    "But there would be a chance that that accident would not have happened today if in fact we had the ability to trap those horses that weekend," says Ed Foster with Nevada's Department of Agriculture.
    "No matter how well you perform there's always somebody of intelligent opinion who thinks it's lousy." - Laurence Olivier

  • #2
    I'm a little confused as to how this accident happened (can't watch the video at the moment) from the article - were the horses standing in the road and she kept coming, thinking they'd move? Or did they run out in front of her? Mazo's statement makes it seem like the horses were standing in the road and she just plowed right into them.
    *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Mike Matson View Post
      http://www.kolotv.com/news/headlines...1.html?ref=881

      "This could have easily been a fatal collision this morning," says Trooper Chuck Allen with the Nevada Highway Patrol.
      It WAS a fatal collision. Horses died.

      I'm glad no people were hurt, but come on!

      ETA: Here is the Merriam-Webster definition of fatal:

      fa·tal adjective \ˈfā-təl\

      Definition of FATAL

      1: obsolete : fated
      2: fateful <a fatal hour>
      3a : of or relating to fate
      b : resembling fate in proceeding according to a fixed sequence
      c : determining one's fate
      4a : causing death
      b : bringing ruin <a fatal attraction to gambling>
      c : causing failure <a fatal design flaw>

      Examples of FATAL

      a disease that is often fatal
      a chemical that can be fatal to birds
      She made a fatal mistake.

      The trooper pissed me off by implying this was not a fatal accident because no HUMAN lives were lost. If an accident causes death... then the accident, by definition, is fatal.
      Last edited by drmgncolor; Nov. 29, 2012, 12:23 PM.
      Dreaming in Color

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Mike Matson View Post
        The Department of Agriculture says its actually tried to trap some of the horses on private land at the request of the land owner--only to have those efforts thwarted by wild horse advocates.

        "But there would be a chance that that accident would not have happened today if in fact we had the ability to trap those horses that weekend," says Ed Foster with Nevada's Department of Agriculture.
        Weird isn't it. The govt can't control wild horse advocates but they can regulate the hell out of everything else. Something is wrong here and a person was hurt as a result.

        Comment


        • #5
          These are NOT WILD horses – they are FERRAL horses.

          I can tolerate the risk I take living and driving in deer country. I do not think it is fair to have people risking injury just so FERRAL horses can run lose.

          If it were packs of ferral dogs - would "avocates" still be screaming that it is their right to run lose?
          APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by shiningwizard255 View Post
            I'm a little confused as to how this accident happened (can't watch the video at the moment) from the article - were the horses standing in the road and she kept coming, thinking they'd move? Or did they run out in front of her? Mazo's statement makes it seem like the horses were standing in the road and she just plowed right into them.
            Looks like the horses were on a 50 MPH high way in the dark, on a sweeping bend. I doubt that they were just standing and hanging out in morning commute traffic. They were most likely trying to cross the road when the driver came around the bend and was not able to stop in time to avoid them - or other choice was to swerve into on coming traffic and risk more human life rather than hitting the animal.

            I live in "deer country" (counted 12 on or near the road the other night). You have to be aware, but if one of those suckers jumps out at you, you are safer to just stay straight and hit it - rather than swerve and lose control of your vehicle. My friend flipper her car doing just that.
            APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

            Comment


            • #7
              This is where I live. I use to board my horse on Andrews Lane. The area backs up to BLM land.

              There are three different wild herds that call the area home. The residents in the Andrews Lane area seem to like the wild horses and they sure have made themselves at home. Most of the properties in that area are horse properties that are fenced. While I had my horse in this area (for several years) we all got to know the herds and loved to watch the babies grow. We were witness to the bachelor herds that would come and try to steal mares and then watched the stallions fight the bachelors to keep them away from their herds. We would come across the herds while trail riding but didn't not welcome them when they would run down the street during a lesson. The wild herds are just part of life in this neighborhood.

              The road the accident happened on, State Highway 395, use to be the main artery from Reno to anywhere south of Reno. There is now an interstate, that opened up a few months ago, which reduced the traffic on Hwy 395 immensely. FWIW, the speed limit along this stretch of road is 50 MPH due to many fatality accidents (no horses involved) over the years and the neighborhoods that the Hwy traveled through. Most people travel at 60-65 mph. There is also a bend in the road just before (south) the spot the accident happened. You can not see around the bend due to the hills.

              From the looks of the photo, the driver(s) were headed north on Hwy 395 and the area the horses would have been coming from would have been to the east. Right there, on the west side of Hwy 395 is a home on approx 2+ acres that has very LUSH grass that didn't have the best fencing. I have seen the wild horses there for days on end. If I had to guess, with less traffic, the horses probably spent more and more time there.

              "But there would be a chance that that accident would not have happened today if in fact we had the ability to trap those horses that weekend," says Ed Foster with Nevada's Department of Agriculture.

              I say BS to that quote. With three herds plus some bachelor herds, how does he even know that the horses killed were the ones they were trying to trap. Unfortunately now, BLM will probably round up the herds with helicoptors and there will be one less place in the Reno area where there will be the wild horses.

              As far as controlling the wild horse advocates. Most people that live in rural areas like this like the wild horses. They fight to keep the horses wild. I say, if you can't life with the wild life, then you are meant to live in a city with the human wild life.

              As far as them being feral horses vs wild, to me, that is just terminology. From Wikipedia: A feral horse is a free-roaming horse of domesticated ancestry. As such, a feral horse is not a wild animal in the sense of an animal without domesticated ancestors. However, some populations of feral horses are managed as wildlife, and these horses often are popularly called "wild" horses. Feral horses are descended from domestic horses that strayed, escaped, or were deliberately released into the wild and remained to survive and reproduce there. Away from humans, over time, these animals' patterns of behavior revert to behavior more closely resembling that of wild horses. A majority of these horses have been out on the range their whole lives. That makes them pretty wild.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Appsolute View Post
                These are NOT WILD horses – they are FERRAL horses.
                If it were packs of ferral dogs - would "avocates" still be screaming that it is their right to run lose?
                Originally posted by drmgncolor View Post
                The trooper pissed me off by implying this was not a fatal accident because no HUMAN lives were lost. If an accident causes death... then the accident, by definition, is fatal.
                And what aggravates me is when people take press quotes and get their panties all in a twist over what might have been implied. BUt then we've just come off a national election so I guess I'm being a bit over reactive on ya.
                ::With age comes wisdom. Apparently "wisdom" weighs about 40 pounds.::

                Comment


                • #9
                  Okay, they made be "wild" (as in no longer cared for by humans), but they are NOT part of the natural "wild life" and in fact feral.

                  We have "wild" pigs here in CA - and the government encourages hunters to take as many as they can. It would be ideal to eradicate them, because they are non native - just like horses are a non native species.

                  So how are "wild pigs" different than "wild horses"? Horses are prettier? “Wild boar” (feral pigs) are tastier?
                  APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Appsolute View Post
                    Okay, they made be "wild" (as in no longer cared for by humans), but they are NOT part of the natural "wild life" and in fact feral.

                    We have "wild" pigs here in CA - and the government encourages hunters to take as many as they can. It would be ideal to eradicate them, because they are non native - just like horses are a non native species.

                    So how are "wild pigs" different than "wild horses"? Horses are prettier? “Wild boar” (feral pigs) are tastier?
                    A feral hog is a dangerous animal.
                    *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      And a feral horse is pretty dangerous if you smack it with your car. People run into moose and elk and lose their lives, there's always a lot of back and forth about how to manage the animals so as to minimize this kind of interaction.
                      Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
                      Incredible Invisible

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by SmartAlex View Post
                        And what aggravates me is when people take press quotes and get their panties all in a twist over what might have been implied. BUt then we've just come off a national election so I guess I'm being a bit over reactive on ya.
                        And you are allowed to be over reactive... just as I am allowed to be over reactive about the fact I didn't like how the trooper described the accident and I pointed that out in a thread about the accident on a horse forum.

                        The trooper said it was not a fatal accident. But the title of the thread is: "Two Wild Horses Killed in Car Crash in Nevada."

                        At any rate, I have nothing else to say expect I am sorry the horses died and I hope the driver and other witnesses are able to heal from this. I'm sure it was a frighting experience for them all.
                        Dreaming in Color

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          You say tomAto, I say tomawto.


                          Originally posted by Appsolute View Post
                          Okay, they made be "wild" (as in no longer cared for by humans), but they are NOT part of the natural "wild life" and in fact feral.

                          We have "wild" pigs here in CA - and the government encourages hunters to take as many as they can. It would be ideal to eradicate them, because they are non native - just like horses are a non native species.

                          So how are "wild pigs" different than "wild horses"? Horses are prettier? “Wild boar” (feral pigs) are tastier?
                          The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                          H. Cate

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I see my opinion is in the minority – I look at the issue from the direction of ecology / biology not “I luv horses and they look pretty running wild”.

                            Non native invasive species are not usually enabled, but rather eradicated, because in the end, they do not belong, and are harmful to the wildlife that DOES belong. Horses are not natural “wildlife” they are feral animals introduced by man.

                            But, there are a bunch of starry eyed horse lover groups who are very vocal, and push politicians etc to keep the pretty ponies running lose in the west.

                            If they damage ecosystems, kill drivers on the highway, too bad so sad – we love watching Cloud and his band running with the wind in their hair.
                            APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I've seen reports that swing both ways on this question. The point is alot of people think of them as part of our heritage. Whether they were here when the first rock rolled on the beach or not.

                              Originally posted by Appsolute View Post
                              I see my opinion is in the minority – I look at the issue from the direction of ecology / biology not “I luv horses and they look pretty running wild”.

                              Non native invasive species are not usually enabled, but rather eradicated, because in the end, they do not belong, and are harmful to the wildlife that DOES belong. Horses are not natural “wildlife” they are feral animals introduced by man.

                              But, there are a bunch of starry eyed horse lover groups who are very vocal, and push politicians etc to keep the pretty ponies running lose in the west.

                              If they damage ecosystems, kill drivers on the highway, too bad so sad – we love watching Cloud and his band running with the wind in their hair.
                              The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                              H. Cate

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                What is the differance in this case versus when someone has an accident when they hit a deer or bear?

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Semantics???

                                  Originally posted by Renae View Post
                                  What is the differance in this case versus when someone has an accident when they hit a deer or bear?
                                  The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                                  H. Cate

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Renae View Post
                                    What is the differance in this case versus when someone has an accident when they hit a deer or bear?
                                    Well one is non native and could be eradicated, the other is a native species which humans have encroached onto its habitat.
                                    APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I mean more along the lined of why is this news? People hit large mammals with their car and have serious accidents every single day.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Likely because it concerns "wild" horses and it could be another reason used to get rid of them.

                                        Originally posted by Renae View Post
                                        I mean more along the lined of why is this news? People hit large mammals with their car and have serious accidents every single day.
                                        The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                                        H. Cate

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X