• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Pit Bull Horse Mauling Ruling Expected Today

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pit Bull Horse Mauling Ruling Expected Today

    Photo of the horse at the link (not graphic).

    http://www.yumasun.com/news/spud-835...nzie-horse.htm

    Excerpt:

    The fate of a dog tied to the mauling death of a horse should be decided Wednesday.

    If Mackenzie the pit bull is declared vicious, as her companion Pano was, she could be sent away to a rescue organization. If the rescue option does not pan out, the dog could be euthanized.


    Judge Yolanda Torok wrapped up Mackenzie's vicious dog hearing Tuesday in Yuma Justice Court with the conclusion that Pano be destroyed and that she would have a ruling on Mackenzie today.

    Mackenzie and Pano are the two dogs seized after a quarter horse named Spud was attacked in his pen earlier this month at his Foothills home. The dogs, who belong to neighbors, had gotten out of their yard and squeezed through the bars of Spud's stall. Charles Knowlton, one of Spud's caretakers, found the horse on the ground, Pano gnawing on its flesh and Mackenzie hovering nearby. The elderly horse suffered such extensive injuries that a veterinarian euthanized him that night.
    "No matter how well you perform there's always somebody of intelligent opinion who thinks it's lousy." - Laurence Olivier

  • #2
    I saw a news article that said the horse that died was not even the first horse these dogs went after, it was the second. So sad for the horse and its owners.
    *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05

    Comment


    • #3
      I find it amazing that the dog owners themselves could not be bothered to do the right thing.....
      simply amazing!
      Originally posted by BigMama1
      Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
      GNU Terry Prachett

      Comment


      • #4
        I couldn't imagine...how horrible.

        Comment


        • #5
          Seems like the dog owner could have saved himself a lot of public humiliation by putting the dogs down himself right away and paying the horse's vet bill. Hope he faces charges.
          \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

          Comment


          • #6
            why do they punish the dogs for the owner's misdeeds?
            how hard is to keep the dogs properly fenced in? not that hard.
            to socialize dogs to livestock like horses so they don't mistake them for prey? a little harder than keeping the dogs fenced, but not that hard.

            Comment


            • #7
              Wendy I'm sorry but this argument over don't punish the dogs for the owners mistakes is right up there w/ guns don't kill people, people do. yes, the owners are at fault for having unruly, vicious dogs who's attack(s) have injured and caused the death of prey animals i.e. horse(s) I'm sick of this argument. You have plenty of other dumb dog owners who own other breeds of dogs. go ask a judge how many dog bite trials have they presided over and overwhelmingly the breed is a pit bull. I see no reason why either of those dogs should not suffer the same fate as their victim. Would you have the same sentiment if those dogs attacked and maimed a poor kid?

              Comment


              • #8
                I hope the dog are going to find a fitting rescue, and I hope the owner is punished. Poor horse

                Comment


                • #9
                  I want pictures of the dogs and a DNA test of their actual breeding....
                  Saddle Tree Acres

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by wendy View Post
                    why do they punish the dogs for the owner's misdeeds?
                    how hard is to keep the dogs properly fenced in? not that hard.
                    to socialize dogs to livestock like horses so they don't mistake them for prey? a little harder than keeping the dogs fenced, but not that hard.
                    Ok, so how many mistakes are allowed? Whoops, dogs got out killed horse. Whoops got out again, killed a goat. Whoops, owner forgot to shut gate, killed something else...

                    These particular dogs are dangerous. Plenty of dogs run free but don't kill livestock, and rescues are already overfilled with unwanted dogs that aren't dangerous. So what do you suggest should happen to these dogs, in order not to "punish" them? Find them better owners? How, since again, plenty of dogs already in shelters needing a forever home? Make the current owners fence them in? Ok, but what if they don't and another horse dies, how would you feel if it was yours?

                    Euth isn't a "punishment", it's an effective method of managing these problem animals.
                    Proud Member Of The Lady Mafia

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Most of the time I would agree yes, the owner should be ran over the coals and the dogs excused. Yes, this was not the owner of the year - dangerous dogs getting out at least twice per the news - but one of the articles on this story also said that as the dogs were being chased off the property by the owner of the horse that died, one grabbed a small dog owned by the horse owner and hurt the dog. The small dog's back was injured. I think these two dogs will be dangerous to other animals no matter where they are and (unfortunately) need to be put down.
                      *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I really am against sending them to a rescue. These are dogs that should never be trusted again, and the rescue is going to spend time, money, and resources possibly rehabbing them, and putting them out in society? The best thing for the dogs and the public is to euth.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          There are valid arguments for both sides. It is sad that irresponsible owners have allowed this to happen by not properly monitoring/containing their dogs. That being said, if the dogs are that aggressive, they should be put down irregardless of their breed.

                          Gottagrey, I am a judge and have seen just as many cases where labs and cocker spaniels have been aggressive/dangerous as have pit bulls. We recently had a child killed in out area by a mixed breed that was not any "bully breed." The dog was the family pet.

                          I own a pit bull, who is an absolute darling; however, I also recognize the power and stength of this breed. She has been well socialized and there is not an aggressive bone in her body. On the flip side, I have euthanized one of our pit rescues that starting getting too aggressive. We could not take the risk that anyone on anything would be injured by her.

                          I am so sorry for the horse owners as well as the dogs

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by wendy View Post
                            why do they punish the dogs for the owner's misdeeds?
                            how hard is to keep the dogs properly fenced in? not that hard.
                            to socialize dogs to livestock like horses so they don't mistake them for prey? a little harder than keeping the dogs fenced, but not that hard.
                            I love dogs. I don't have anything against all pits either, but these two? They need to be euthed, I'd say the same thing if they were goldens or huskies or cattle dogs. The owners have proven they can't contain them and the dogs themselves have proven they aren't trustworthy. Why send them to a sanctuary? Just euth them.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by threedogpack View Post
                              I love dogs. I don't have anything against all pits either, but these two? They need to be euthed, I'd say the same thing if they were goldens or huskies or cattle dogs. The owners have proven they can't contain them and the dogs themselves have proven they aren't trustworthy. Why send them to a sanctuary? Just euth them.
                              Agreed. I don't have anything against pits either; I worked for a no-kill for awhile and some of my favorite dogs to work with were our pits. Regardless of what breed these two are, they have proven they are a danger to other pets and thus should be put down.
                              *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                So the ruling is that both are vicious, but the female will have 15 days to find a rescue willing to take her. Which is a bit odd to me - if a dog is vicious, just euth it (the male was ordered euthed, no rescue option).

                                I think there's a danger with the "OMG if no one takes her she will be killed OMG" rescue types, and this dog might eventually wind up somewhere inappropriate because of this.
                                Proud Member Of The Lady Mafia

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  If I remember the story correctly, the male was actively beating up on the horse when they were discovered and the female was just standing guard. Maybe they figure she's not the primary aggressor and will be better behaved without his influence? But I do agree she needs to be put down as well, even if she isn't as bad without the male how could you fully trust her again, she's learned how to kill animals from this incident.
                                  *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Coanteen View Post
                                    So the ruling is that both are vicious, but the female will have 15 days to find a rescue willing to take her. Which is a bit odd to me - if a dog is vicious, just euth it (the male was ordered euthed, no rescue option).

                                    I think there's a danger with the "OMG if no one takes her she will be killed OMG" rescue types, and this dog might eventually wind up somewhere inappropriate because of this.
                                    Likely.
                                    Sad but true.

                                    A spoiled dog will now take a place of a good one. Yipee...

                                    Yes, spoiled as in ruined by incompetent handling.
                                    Originally posted by BigMama1
                                    Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                                    GNU Terry Prachett

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Dogs are predators, and their natural behavior is to attack and kill prey animals- predation is not aggression, and killing a horse is not an act of "viciousness", it's an act of "getting supper". Attacking and killing a horse is what a "normal" dog does- do you accuse the deer-hunter who went out and shot his deer to eat for supper of being "vicious"? of course not. He was just hunting. Do you accuse the fox-hounds who ran down and caught and killed their fox of being "vicious"? no, they were doing their job. Do you accuse the wolves who run down and eat a deer of being "vicious"? no, they were just hungry. Normal dogs hunt and kill and often eat their prey if given the opportunity.

                                      What the responsible OWNER does is recognize that dogs are predators, and then they make sure the dog's predatory instincts are controlled/ directed. If you live anywhere near horses, the responsible dog owner makes sure the puppy is exposed to horses such that the puppy learns horses are not prey animals; and even if the dog is socialized to horses, the responsible owner also keeps the dog under control so the dog doesn't have the opportunity to go out and hunt and kill livestock, or even wildlife.

                                      These two dogs aren't abnormal in any way- they are perfectly normal dogs who just happen to be owned by an extremely irresponsible person. If they are taken away from their owner and placed with a responsible owner, they won't be involved in attacks on animals ever again. It is true that since there is a shortage of good homes a suitable home may not be found for these dogs, in which case euthanization is the best option.

                                      Their breed is totally irrelevant, and in fact, I'd be shocked to find out their breed had even been identified correctly. Most likely they are just big chunky mutts with short hair. Any large dog with intact hunting instincts- which is most- is capable or even likely to go out and attack horses if given the opportunity.

                                      Attacking humans is very different from attacking prey animals- most bites delivered to humans by dogs are not done so as part of predation. Most dog-to-human bites are efforts by the dog to defend itself from the human- self-defense fear-motivated bites. Dogs with high prey drive are no more likely than dogs with low prey drive to bite people; in fact, many of the breeds with extremely high prey drive and records of successfully killing prey animals (hounds) are among those who are least likely to bite people. Dogs who bite people need to be judged on a case-by-case basis; some of these dogs could easily be rehomed with no risk of another bite, but some definitely should be euth'd for the safety of all. Depends on what happened and why.

                                      Dogs attacking other dogs is also different from biting people or predation- sometimes when a small dog is killed swiftly by a large dog it is predation, but most dog-dog attacks are actually acts of aggression. Dogs who are aggressive to other dogs can sometimes be safely managed or retrained, but owners should certainly consider euthanization as a valid option for truly dog aggressive dogs, for the safety of others.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Mike Matson View Post
                                        If Mackenzie the pit bull is declared vicious, as her companion Pano was, she could be sent away to a rescue organization. If the rescue option does not pan out, the dog could be euthanized.
                                        If a rescue takes this dog, it will just reinforce my opinion that rescues are run by stupid people and should not be patronized.

                                        Besides that, what kind of idiot adopts a viscious dog? One with a death wish? Reminds me of when my sister bought her MR/DD cat - a friend noted "there a plenty of normal ones, why buy a defective one?" (and the cat is still around, but don't know if I'd say she's living a happy life as the Helen Keller of the cat world; she's generally pretty grumpy)
                                        Visit my Spoonflower shop

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X