• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Pit Bull Horse Mauling Ruling Expected Today

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Oh Halo, now you have posted AGAIN.

    Once again, you are spot on.

    Just like my mom wanting a presa canaria a few years ago when they were coming into vogue.


    • #42
      Originally posted by rmh_rider View Post
      Excuse me, I do not think a dog who kills "animals" will distinguish between large or small animals, be that a human child, or adult child, chee wa wa or your new born foal.

      I do not think the dog (the dog who kills) can distinguish between protecting it's master from a person with a knife robbing, breaking and entering, or the paramedics coming into the house to help the owner.

      My elderly mom was wanting a presa canaria. She can not even control her corgi, let alone a huge dog like this.

      I know we are humans. But we humans are just another "animal" here on earth. I think we are all fair game when dogs start to take out other warm blooded creatures. Large or small.

      Please do not correct me or fix anything for me. I know exactly what I wrote, and typed.

      The dog of this subject will more than likely end up in a dead end no kill shelter, only to live out it's life in a chain link run. Pretty much a death sentence in solitary confinement.
      Well, it is noteworthy if a dog takes on a 1200 pound animal vs a cat.
      I think they can distinguish pretty well, even between burglars and parametics.
      Now, would I want to be a parametic chancing it? nope. cos dogs don't read the same books we do.


      • #43
        I do not dislike pits. I've rather liked the ones I've met. In fact we had a super sweet young brindled female when I worked at the no-kill I loved and wouldn't have minded personally adopting had I been in a position to take another dog.

        I have never met an aggressive pit bull but I am sure I'd think the opposite if I did. I've seen videos of pit attacks. An aggressive pit bull is a scary animal.

        Any animal can be dangerous of course, but I don't see why die-hard pit supporters cannot admit there is a problem with aggression in these dogs. I feel statistics say otherwise. Dogfighting is super cruel and there are idiot owners but what about the dogs that are pets, like these dogs, that were never treated badly but attack animals or people anyway? Attacks by "pets" still happen. So why not humanely euth all the aggressive pits? And keep the good ones and let their genes pass on? In a few generations, wa-la. Aggression largely bred out.

        It would actually help the pit bulls. The "save them all" attitude works against your cause of saving the dogs because when they attack, it is often so bad and makes the news, and then things like breed specific legislation get proposed and good dogs die needlessly. If we eliminate the aggression and pit bulls attacks become rare then no one has anything to complain or ban them for, and thus more dogs saved and having happy lives.

        I do not see why people are so against euthing these two particular dogs. They've proven they fall into the "aggressive and need to go" category. I'm sure there are pits that get loose that mind their own business like a normal dog and eventually go home. These dogs did not do that. Imagine if that was your horse that was killed and your small dog that was injured. Because that is exactly what these two PET dogs did.
        *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05


        • #44
          Anybody know how the sentencing in this case turned out?


          • #45
            The female dog was given 10 days for a rescue to take it, if none step forward it will be put down. Male is to be put down.

            ETA - I actually just Googled the story and found this latest article. No rescue wanted to chance taking the female, so both dogs were euthanized.


            I do feel bad for the dog owners losing their pets to an untimely death, especially the kids, but ultimately this was all the their fault and completely preventable. This was not the first horse these dogs went after; they had opportunity to learn from the first event where they got lucky because the horse was not harmed, but failed the dogs again. If you want to keep a known vicious dog, you need to take even more steps to keep the dog contained. Rest in peace Spud, Pano, and Mackenzie.
            *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05


            • #46
              Originally posted by shiningwizard255 View Post
              ETA - I actually just Googled the story and found this latest article. No rescue wanted to chance taking the female, so both dogs were euthanized.
              Thank freaking God for that.

              And yeah, poor Spud is the second horse those 2 went after. The article I saw has the dogs' owner saying something along the lines of "I don't know why they like to go after horses, durrrr*."

              I imagine him mouth-breathing as he says this, and idly imagine that he falls onto some kind of rake and stabs out his eyes.

              * the durrrr was added by me
              Proud Member Of The Lady Mafia


              • #47
                Originally posted by Coanteen View Post
                Thank freaking God for that.

                And yeah, poor Spud is the second horse those 2 went after. The article I saw has the dogs' owner saying something along the lines of "I don't know why they like to go after horses, durrrr*."

                I imagine him mouth-breathing as he says this, and idly imagine that he falls onto some kind of rake and stabs out his eyes.

                * the durrrr was added by me
                Agreed. The dogs' death is sad, but it was the right decision.
                *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05


                • #48
                  They should have been put down. Those dogs were dangerous. I would have put my two dogs down if they attacked a horse. I also own a Pit/Great Dane mix and a American Staffordshire Terrier. Both are great dogs and I have put hours upon hours of training into them. They are not easy dogs to train, no bull terriers/pits/Staffordshires or many other terriers are easy dogs to train. Both my dogs are well socialized and know commands and respond no matter what the situation. They have to be socialized and have to listen or I would not have them.

                  Its the owners who think they can handle dogs like these and don't train/socialize/be responsible. The owners are the problems but society blames the dogs. The owner needed to buck up and take responsibility for his dogs. They should have been put down right away, the owner should have paid damages, and not made a huge mess of the situation and the breed.

                  The owner is a moron.
                  I am on my phone 90% of the time. Please ignore typos, misplaced lower case letters, and the random word butchered by autocowreck.