• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

CL - seriously?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This is well said ^^^

    I have worked for honest flipper and dishonest ones.

    One I worked for (I was the rider) had a nice QH gelding. He NQR and he was taken to a vet about it. Result was he would be a good low level guy. I loved riding him. Some ppl came to look at him and wanted to vet him and loved him also. A few days later they saw me at a store and said "Hey, we actually know you. You sold your horse Ben to some friends of ours and they think he is wonderful. You must be an honest person... what do you think of Dobbin?" I ask what they had been told and they failed to mention his issue. I did lightly mention it because daughter wanted an upper level eventer. I told them that would wouldn't pass a vet check.

    He ended up being sold to someone else.

    I actually would like to get into the business again. I am not at a place in my life to start now because I don't have the money to buy them. I liked riding sales horses. It would be great to do this until my foal (born 2013) is 3ish.
    Last edited by Nootka; Nov. 30, 2012, 05:45 PM.
    Draumr Hesta Farm
    "Wenn Du denkst es geht nicht mehr, kommt von irgendwo ein kleines Licht daher"
    Member of the COTH Ignorant Disrepectful F-bombs!*- 2Dogs Farm

    Comment


    • Nothing made me madder than to find out that the stray dog I took to the shelter was euthanized the next day. Why? Because when I dropped her off, the guy that took her in told me that they were a no-kill shelter and that they would find her a good home. If I had known that she was that close to being euthanized, I would have taken her back to the barn and found her a home. I was lied to, plain and simple, and because of that I will never donate to the local shelter again. I'm still steamed about it to this day. Poor dog!

      Bottom line, this guy sounds like he would tell you the truth if you asked and that's good enough. If people won't ask, a pox on them, but I'll take honesty any day.

      Comment


      • Don't you ask potential buyers questions such as what they hope to do with Dobbin. where you will keep him etc. So why wouldn't you ask the same questions from a person who you are giving the horse to?

        It is up to the owners to ask what he plans to do with it and if they don't then that is their problem. JMO

        Comment


        • Why is it such an unacceptable concept that the cost of putting a bullet in unsaleable horses might be a reasonable cost of doing business/overhead if you're a flipper/dealer? Why MUST a dealer squeeze every last penny from every horse? Let's say you buy 5 horses for $500 each. You sell 2 for $1000, 2 for $500, and one is lame and unsaleable except for slaughter. Why is it so nuts to think the $1000 total profit you might might be used, in part, to shoot the horses so they have a humane end (before giving the body to the knackers or other)? You profit on some, you lose on some but just like you have other expenses like hay, grain, etc. as a cost of doing business--- why isn't a humane end sometimes part of your overhead? I mean, he's getting them FREE so he isn't even OUT anything up front for the horses. He really NEEDS a couple hundred bucks from the meatman versus spending $10 of a bullet. REALLY?

          If I was in that business, I'd have to find a way to cover hunamely disposing of the unsaleable or else I wouldn't be able to sleep at night. And at least around here (and I suspect there with the number of area hunts) it costs next to nothing to get someone to come and shoot a body and minimal to dispose of the carcass unless it's taken for meat in which case it's free.

          There is no reason that just because someone flips they HAVE to sell horses at auction to the meatman. There are alternatives.
          ~Veronica
          "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
          http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

          Comment


          • Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
            Why is it such an unacceptable concept that the cost of putting a bullet in unsaleable horses might be a reasonable cost of doing business/overhead if you're a flipper/dealer? Why MUST a dealer squeeze every last penny from every horse? Let's say you buy 5 horses for $500 each. You sell 2 for $1000, 2 for $500, and one is lame and unsaleable except for slaughter. Why is it so nuts to think the $1000 total profit you might might be used, in part, to shoot the horses so they have a humane end (before giving the body to the knackers or other)? You profit on some, you lose on some but just like you have other expenses like hay, grain, etc. as a cost of doing business--- why isn't a humane end sometimes part of your overhead? I mean, he's getting them FREE so he isn't even OUT anything up front for the horses. He really NEEDS a couple hundred bucks from the meatman versus spending $10 of a bullet. REALLY?

            If I was in that business, I'd have to find a way to cover hunamely disposing of the unsaleable or else I wouldn't be able to sleep at night. And at least around here (and I suspect there with the number of area hunts) it costs next to nothing to get someone to come and shoot a body and minimal to dispose of the carcass unless it's taken for meat in which case it's free.

            There is no reason that just because someone flips they HAVE to sell horses at auction to the meatman. There are alternatives.
            But this is all a guess, we have no idea whether he sells to the KB or not. He may well use a bullet on horses that he can't sell.

            We are all making up stories based on a CL posting that simply says he will take unwanted horses.
            www.headsupspecialriders.com

            Comment


            • Originally posted by skykingismybaby1 View Post
              But this is all a guess, we have no idea whether he sells to the KB or not. He may well use a bullet on horses that he can't sell.

              We are all making up stories based on a CL posting that simply says he will take unwanted horses.
              Well, it's a pretty clear indication from the "no grays" rule and people who've posted that they've seen him selling at low end auctions.

              But forget him... let's talk in the abstract. Why is it okay for a business person to do something nasty just because it makes more money. I am sure most businesses would save money if they dumped pollution in the river behind their shop. Is that okay? If not, why is sending horses to the slaughter pipeline okay just because someone's in the business of reselling?
              ~Veronica
              "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
              http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

              Comment


              • Vxf111 thank you!
                I\'m not crazy. I\'m just a little unwell.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                  Well, it's a pretty clear indication from the "no grays" rule and people who've posted that they've seen him selling at low end auctions.

                  But forget him... let's talk in the abstract. Why is it okay for a business person to do something nasty just because it makes more money. I am sure most businesses would save money if they dumped pollution in the river behind their shop. Is that okay? If not, why is sending horses to the slaughter pipeline okay just because someone's in the business of reselling?

                  It is ok for someone to sell horses 'down the slaughter pipeline' because it is legal.

                  it is not nasty. It is something you do not agree with.
                  Huge difference.

                  if the people who give/sell him horses don't give a rip, you are SOL on the case.
                  Of course, you can take the horses yourself, train them and give them to forever homes, or better yet, to make sure they never have a problem, you keep them yourself.

                  This is not like clothing manufacturers locking their 'workers' up inside the plant or making a buck on child labor.

                  Put your money were your mouth is.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                    It is ok for someone to sell horses 'down the slaughter pipeline' because it is legal.

                    it is not nasty. It is something you do not agree with.
                    Huge difference.

                    if the people who give/sell him horses don't give a rip, you are SOL on the case.
                    Of course, you can take the horses yourself, train them and give them to forever homes, or better yet, to make sure they never have a problem, you keep them yourself.

                    This is not like clothing manufacturers locking their 'workers' up inside the plant or making a buck on child labor.

                    Put your money were your mouth is.

                    1. It's not my business. I don't buy and sell horses. So I don't have any capability to do anything about what he (or anyone else) is doing. I have 2 retired/unrideable horses that I pay to board because I think that's the ethical thing to do. It would be cheaper/easier to dump them at auction but that wouldn't be right.

                    2. Yes, I disagree with his practice. But that is a separate question of whether it's a nice/ethical thing to do. Ethics are tough, but I personal find it unethical to profit on free horses (he's putting NO RISK into them, doesn't outlay any of his own money) by selling them to slaughter/kill buyers.

                    3. I don't know if the people who give him horses "give a rip" or not. Hard to say because I don't think he's being upfront with them. They may also be unethical people. I'm not absolving the owners of any poor behavior. But again, that's a separate question.

                    4. The question of whether it is "legal" is again different than whether it's ethical. No one ever said this behavior was illegal. (and for the record I didn't use "nasty" to refer to this specific person but the abstract idea of businesses in general doing bad things).

                    5. Again, false alternatives. "Forever homes" and keeping them isn't the only option. I am majorly in favor of a well placed bullet. Cheap (often free) and sometimes the meat can be used in a fruitful way (by the hunt, etc.). The only reason NOT to take that option is to squeeze the very last penny out of a horse... who was free in the first place. I just think that's a sorry way to do business. Especially when you turn a profit on the sale of other freebies. Shouldn't some of that profit be used to give a non-cruel end to other freebies. Someone who takes free horses has no skin in the game- no risk. And can profit greatly if they can be flipped to show/riding homes. So what's so crazy about a little, just a measly "price of a bullet" bit of that profit making a non-cruel end for the ones who didn't turn out to be good flips?
                    ~Veronica
                    "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                    http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                      1. It's not my business. I don't buy and sell horses. So I don't have any capability to do anything about what he (or anyone else) is doing. I have 2 retired/unrideable horses that I pay to board because I think that's the ethical thing to do. It would be cheaper/easier to dump them at auction but that wouldn't be right.

                      2. Yes, I disagree with his practice. But that is a separate question of whether it's a nice/ethical thing to do. Ethics are tough, but I personal find it unethical to profit on free horses (he's putting NO RISK into them, doesn't outlay any of his own money) by selling them to slaughter/kill buyers.

                      3. I don't know if the people who give him horses "give a rip" or not. Hard to say because I don't think he's being upfront with them. They may also be unethical people. I'm not absolving the owners of any poor behavior. But again, that's a separate question.

                      4. The question of whether it is "legal" is again different than whether it's ethical. No one ever said this behavior was illegal. (and for the record I didn't use "nasty" to refer to this specific person but the abstract idea of businesses in general doing bad things).

                      5. Again, false alternatives. "Forever homes" and keeping them isn't the only option. I am majorly in favor of a well placed bullet. Cheap (often free) and sometimes the meat can be used in a fruitful way (by the hunt, etc.). The only reason NOT to take that option is to squeeze the very last penny out of a horse... who was free in the first place. I just think that's a sorry way to do business. Especially when you turn a profit on the sale of other freebies. Shouldn't some of that profit be used to give a non-cruel end to other freebies. Someone who takes free horses has no skin in the game- no risk. And can profit greatly if they can be flipped to show/riding homes. So what's so crazy about a little, just a measly "price of a bullet" bit of that profit making a non-cruel end for the ones who didn't turn out to be good flips?
                      So you want somebody else to pick up the tab.
                      Understood.

                      However, giving a horse away is more economical than putting it down.

                      and when you deal with more than one a year, you cannot just put a bullet in their heads either. Disposal of the body is not cheap, even if the bullet it.

                      Comment


                      • Yeah, it is similar to other immoral things. Child labor? Pushing it, but similar to other LEGAL, BUT IMMORAL THINGS. Do you support puppy mills, dog fighting, run horses off cliffs for sport?

                        Just because a business practice is legal, does not make it morally correct.
                        Allagirl, follow a truck of horses bound for slaughter. Go and watch the entire ordeal, and then come back and say its OK for anyone to purposely do that for profit.
                        I guarantee, your view would change.

                        Till there is a way to make the process humane, I will continue to speak out against slaughter. And continue to view anyone who will knowingly and willingly subject a horse to that horror, and care only for profit, as human trash.

                        It does not make it better, IMO for this guy,or any to be sort of upfront. Kinda like the guy on the street corner that has the sign that says "I won't lie, I need a beer".

                        He's taking for free, and profiting on horrible ends. A decent, REALLY up front, honest guy would say " you should pay the vet to have this horse
                        PTS, because its not saleable except as dog food".

                        I get that many owners don't care, and I am not excusing them, but it doesn't make this guy or others any nicer
                        I\'m not crazy. I\'m just a little unwell.

                        Comment


                        • I think the person who profits should pay overhead on the business. Is that a radical concept, really?

                          I assume this guy has a good eye. If he just tries to make an effort not to buy ones that aren't resaleable, I think it'd be just a few that would have to be put down and that's not any more an unreasonable part of overhead than hay or grain.

                          This is his business. He takes free product, "refurbishes," and resells. Why is it so unreasonable that the profits from the ones that resell cover the costs of the ones that don't. It's a business.
                          ~Veronica
                          "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                          http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                          Comment


                          • Using IPAD.
                            Accidentally hit thumbs up Instead of thumbs down for Alagirls post
                            With you totally vxf111
                            I\'m not crazy. I\'m just a little unwell.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Sobriska View Post
                              Using IPAD.
                              Accidentally hit thumbs up Instead of thumbs down for Alagirls post
                              With you totally vxf111

                              we need an ROFLMAO icon.

                              (I suggest you hop on your alter and fix this mistake ASAP!)

                              I see you have found the RED thumb, well done.
                              Last edited by Alagirl; Dec. 1, 2012, 01:24 AM.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                I think the person who profits should pay overhead on the business. Is that a radical concept, really?

                                I assume this guy has a good eye. If he just tries to make an effort not to buy ones that aren't resaleable, I think it'd be just a few that would have to be put down and that's not any more an unreasonable part of overhead than hay or grain.

                                This is his business. He takes free product, "refurbishes," and resells. Why is it so unreasonable that the profits from the ones that resell cover the costs of the ones that don't. It's a business.
                                Well, you don't like him making a profit, so I suggest you take his losses.

                                No, wait...

                                you want him to take the loss, after all, the profit marging on low grade horses is huge, after all.

                                You don't like that the man might sell through channels you do not approve of.

                                You don't know, do you, not for certain.

                                You don't like it that he makes money off the horses....

                                ok, the first time he throws them food he is investing money into them.
                                In a very short time his profit margins shrink dramatically.

                                it is a business like the one who sells show prospects. No different.

                                And don't think for a second that the upper class dealer won't sell a horse down 'the slaughter pipeline' should there be a major flaw with the animal rendering it unsellable.


                                ust because a business practice is legal, does not make it morally correct.
                                Allagirl, follow a truck of horses bound for slaughter. Go and watch the entire ordeal, and then come back and say its OK for anyone to purposely do that for profit.
                                I guarantee, your view would change.
                                as to 'the ordeal'....
                                why don't you follow it and document the horrors.
                                while I am certain there is room for improvement, I don't believe it's as much of an 'ordeal' as certain groups have you believe.

                                Since you seem to understand that it IS a business - the other business, slaughter - it does not make the least bit sense to damage the goods before you get to process them.
                                why? you don't ask....
                                well, because the plant loses money on it.

                                Ah, evil people, they are making money off our horses that we never owned....


                                oh well....

                                The ordeal is likely no bigger for the horse than being trailered to any other place they have never been to, let's say a horse show. or with horses they don't know, say, a commercial transcontinental haul....

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                                  Well, you don't like him making a profit, so I suggest you take his losses.

                                  No, wait...

                                  you want him to take the loss, after all, the profit marging on low grade horses is huge, after all.

                                  You don't like that the man might sell through channels you do not approve of.

                                  You don't know, do you, not for certain.

                                  You don't like it that he makes money off the horses....

                                  ok, the first time he throws them food he is investing money into them.
                                  In a very short time his profit margins shrink dramatically.

                                  it is a business like the one who sells show prospects. No different.

                                  And don't think for a second that the upper class dealer won't sell a horse down 'the slaughter pipeline' should there be a major flaw with the animal rendering it unsellable.




                                  as to 'the ordeal'....
                                  why don't you follow it and document the horrors.
                                  while I am certain there is room for improvement, I don't believe it's as much of an 'ordeal' as certain groups have you believe.

                                  Since you seem to understand that it IS a business - the other business, slaughter - it does not make the least bit sense to damage the goods before you get to process them.
                                  why? you don't ask....
                                  well, because the plant loses money on it.

                                  Ah, evil people, they are making money off our horses that we never owned....


                                  oh well....

                                  The ordeal is likely no bigger for the horse than being trailered to any other place they have never been to, let's say a horse show. or with horses they don't know, say, a commercial transcontinental haul....
                                  People have followed trailers bound for slaughter and documented it. Look up Animal Angels recent investigative reports, and video of the 2 horses that went down and were trampled with no intervention. This happened recently. When we had it here, Baker had the same thing happen several times, and has been fined 165k, yet he never paid them, and was never suspended. Look at 3 Angels Farms, who FINALLY after 2 horrific wrecks, has been suspended.
                                  Most individuals transporting non slaughter horses would stop and unload if a horse went down. They don't continue driving thru 3 states while the horse struggles and is trampled and finally dies.

                                  Comment


                                  • Alagirl, are you actually reading what I'm saying?

                                    I never said I had a problem with anyone making a profit turning over horses. I don't know this particular individual's profit margin, but given that he starts off with SCOTT FREE HORSES (and not skinny ones or ones that aren't riding age remember) I think he's probably got an extra $100/year he could set aside from profits to pay for bullets and shovels over the course of a year.

                                    If a business can't turn a profit in an ethical way, that doesn't excuse acting unethically. If you can't make money without dumping toxic waste, does that justify dumping toxic waste? Clearly not. If his profit margin is so low that he doesn't have $10 for a bullet, that's a problem with the business model but it doesn't justify unethical behavior. If the only way I can make my store profitable is to embezzle, does that make it ok? Or ethical? It's the only way my store will be profitable. So that must make it okay?

                                    I'm not naive enough to think the person who prompted the thread is the only one selling to the killers. I am well aware that others do, including purported show barns. But the fact that others act unethically is irrelevant. It doesn't excuse it. You know what your mother asked about jumping off bridges when everyone is doing it.
                                    ~Veronica
                                    "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                                    http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                      Alagirl, are you actually reading what I'm saying?

                                      I never said I had a problem with anyone making a profit turning over horses. I don't know this particular individual's profit margin, but given that he starts off with SCOTT FREE HORSES (and not skinny ones or ones that aren't riding age remember) I think he's probably got an extra $100/year he could set aside from profits to pay for bullets and shovels over the course of a year.

                                      If a business can't turn a profit in an ethical way, that doesn't excuse acting unethically. If you can't make money without dumping toxic waste, does that justify dumping toxic waste? Clearly not. If his profit margin is so low that he doesn't have $10 for a bullet, that's a problem with the business model but it doesn't justify unethical behavior. If the only way I can make my store profitable is to embezzle, does that make it ok? Or ethical? It's the only way my store will be profitable. So that must make it okay?

                                      I'm not naive enough to think the person who prompted the thread is the only one selling to the killers. I am well aware that others do, including purported show barns. But the fact that others act unethically is irrelevant. It doesn't excuse it. You know what your mother asked about jumping off bridges when everyone is doing it.
                                      you are not open to a serious discussion.
                                      You have had a made-up mind from the word go.

                                      If you consider something ethical is irrelevant..
                                      it is legal. That's all there is to it.

                                      And since you are also not party of the conversation this man has with customers on either side of the deal, you are a$$uming.

                                      what should I read?

                                      you ramblings on how bad the man is for making a profit?
                                      Hmm

                                      tough luck for you right there.
                                      Profit makes the world go round.
                                      More profit means more money for him to get more horses and feed them.

                                      Since apparently the other party does not want to do the feeding part anymore.

                                      I have read all your arguments time and time again, from your fingertips, or from the finger tips of others.
                                      They have not changed one bit, it's always the ZOMG THEY ARE MAKING A PROFIT
                                      like your farrier, your vet, your trainer, your BO, your tack store, etc...

                                      but the brokers in low-end horses must work for charity....
                                      Hypocrites.
                                      he deals in horses.
                                      so somebody may find a horse he/she likes.
                                      And for that business model to work, he has to get horses.

                                      So he puts an add in the paper.
                                      And he isn't exactly the scrap collector....
                                      or he gives people the incentive to part with their horses long before they turn unto some news head line.

                                      Your imagination is playing tricks on you. I am sure the rate of failure is much smaller than you like it to be. After all, a riding horse is worth more than a meat one - on hoof, anyway.

                                      Alas, i am wasting my time, because I know you are not reading my arguments either.

                                      So there.

                                      Oh, and I don't think it's about the welfare of the horses for any of you.
                                      just the vapors of righteous indignation.

                                      Comment


                                      • For someone that doesn't have any horses, you sure spend a lot of time arguing about horses on the internet Alagirl. You're right though, only you can comprehend the reality of owning horses.
                                        \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by skykingismybaby1 View Post
                                          But this is all a guess, we have no idea whether he sells to the KB or not. He may well use a bullet on horses that he can't sell.

                                          We are all making up stories based on a CL posting that simply says he will take unwanted horses.
                                          Let's see:

                                          1. He does not want skinny horses or grey horses. The obvious reason is that neither will fetch him money from a true KB. The arguments in his favor have been: a) he doesn't take skinny horses because AC will get called on him and b) he doesn't take grey horses because it's too difficult to keep them clean. These could be good arguments if it weren't for the fact that if he were helping horses, regardless of whether AC had to come out or not, he would have a relationship with them and they would be well aware of his rehab endeavors. Additionally, people LOVE grey horses and if this guy wanted to make money, it would be worth his while to clean one up for a prospective buyer.

                                          2. He stated in an email that anyone who asks what happens to the horses that don't work out is a "shithead". Strong word for someone who is humanely putting down horses that don't work out.

                                          3. He doesn't own the property he lives on and runs his business out of. While I don't know the circumstances under which he rents or leases, it's a stretch to believe the terms include burial of horses he cannot sell.

                                          4. He can't come to this thread and help us understand, because he's been kicked off COTH not once, but twice.

                                          I'm all for giving someone the benefit of the doubt, but in this case, the odds are stacked against him.
                                          Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                                          http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                                          http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X