• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

CL - seriously?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • He's better than most dealers, traders, dudes one step before the neat market because he will take your horse off your hands, for free, and somehow profit from that, even if it means a straight trip to the meat plant? Just because he's sort of up front? GAG!

    Still a greedy (insert bad word) in my opinion. I don't buy the "he's helping some find homes by training and selling". He's helping his own pocket, period!
    People who care about the horses, any good human, does not EVER put a horse on a slaughter truck, knowingly sell to a kill buyer. They just don't. Greedy (bad word) people do.
    If he were decent he would take and train saleable ones, and humanely PTS the others and give the body to a big cat rescue, zoo etc. he would have his main priority the welfare of the horse, if he were decent. Not how much money he could make.
    I am not against HUMANE transport and slaughter. But if anyone here thinks the current situations are anywhere close to humane, your heads are up your fannys.
    You can argue all you want. I think he's garbage, because I think decent humans don't do that. Being sort of upfront about it doesn't make him better, IMO.
    I\'m not crazy. I\'m just a little unwell.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Sobriska View Post
      If he were decent he would take and train saleable ones, and humanely PTS the others and give the body to a big cat rescue, zoo etc. he would have his main priority the welfare of the horse, if he were decent. Not how much money he could make.
      You mean, if he were independently rich. I mean, do you go around collecting unwanted horses and PTS/disposing of them humanely? Does anyone who's not a rescue and funded by donors? Of course not, you'd go broke.

      Most people in the horse business, from BNT down to the low-level flippers, have as their main priority keeping themselves fed and housed. So they must make money. They might draw the line here and there (for ex, getting rid of an abusive client), but this is a job, not a charity. The main function of a job is to make money, so that you can...you know, live and stuff.
      Proud Member Of The Lady Mafia

      Comment


      • Whatever on the bad rating, LOL! Bring on the silly anonymous thumbs down, rather than voicing your REASON why you disapprove of what I said. Because that's helpful, NOT.

        Slaughter, the way it is now, is terribly inhumane! And regardless of anyone's opinion of me, I will continue to say that anyone who sells a horse to slaughter, is greed driven, and without compassion. Make it humane, and I support it. I was raised in a family that hunted for food, and raised animals for food. I am not against eating animals. And I am not against anyone choosing to eat horses, dogs or cats. It's not for me, but if they are humanely killed, like every animal my grandparents and parents hunted or raised, I have no objection.

        I strongly object to greed driven, inhumane transport and slaughter. And people can continue to say this guy is Ok. My opinion will not change. I will never approve of some greedy turd profiting off of horses he knowingly sends to horrid ends. Good people don't do that. Good people use a bullet and dig a hole to spare suffering, even if it means they lost money on that risk. Defend all you want. Thumbs down, all you want. My view will not change. Because he's more up front, doesn't make him any less of a turd.
        I\'m not crazy. I\'m just a little unwell.

        Comment


        • To be fair I didn't get from the ad he's actively looking to take in horses to send straight to the meatman. He seems to actually want horses that have a potential for resale. However - his stipulations do say without speaking the words that if the horse doesn't sale or work out for whatever reason, the animal *could* go to auction or slaughter no problem.

          I'm not saying he's an upstanding citizen - I don't know this guy from Joe so I have no way to give that insight - but just that from the ad I read it as a guy looking for horses to train, vs. somebody that just wants to pick a horse up and haul it straight to the auction.

          My only problem with all of this is the small chance the horse could go to auction. I feel it should be said upfront that's a possibility because there truly are horse people out there that do not know horses get slaughtered. However small the chance of it happening may be, using myself as an example, if I didn't know about slaughter and it was my horse I gave to him thinking it was going on to this great new life I could no longer provide and it didn't work out and the horse did wind up at a slaughterhouse, I'd never forgive myself.

          ETA - I typed this when I was exhausted. I didn't mean from the ad itself, that definitely screams "meatman," but someone was talking to the guy and mentioned his responses, which made it seem to me like he preferred training horses for resale and didn't give me the impression he was going to haul them straight to auction.
          Last edited by shiningwizard255; Nov. 29, 2012, 12:17 PM. Reason: Typo and Bad Grammar City!!!
          *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05

          Comment


          • Make it humane, and I support it. I was raised in a family that hunted for food, and raised animals for food. I am not against eating animals.
            That's my view of it as well .

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Sobriska View Post
              He's better than most dealers, traders, dudes one step before the neat market because he will take your horse off your hands, for free, and somehow profit from that, even if it means a straight trip to the meat plant? Just because he's sort of up front? GAG!

              Still a greedy (insert bad word) in my opinion. I don't buy the "he's helping some find homes by training and selling". He's helping his own pocket, period!
              People who care about the horses, any good human, does not EVER put a horse on a slaughter truck, knowingly sell to a kill buyer. They just don't. Greedy (bad word) people do.
              If he were decent he would take and train saleable ones, and humanely PTS the others and give the body to a big cat rescue, zoo etc. he would have his main priority the welfare of the horse, if he were decent. Not how much money he could make.
              I am not against HUMANE transport and slaughter. But if anyone here thinks the current situations are anywhere close to humane, your heads are up your fannys.
              You can argue all you want. I think he's garbage, because I think decent humans don't do that. Being sort of upfront about it doesn't make him better, IMO.
              Do you know how much money it costs to put a horse to sleep? Not to mention disposing of them when you do....it's no easy nor cheap trek. Would I do it for my most valued 4-legged friends? You betchya! However, if you look at it from a business standpoint it's just not affordable to put to sleep every unwanted horse that comes in that doesn't work or can't do a job. So what do you do with it then? There's a few options....sales (auction), donate to colleges, give away as yard ornaments or actually you can donate them to local fox hunts where they will provide food for the hounds. Circle of life maybe? I dunno..I just can't be totally against slaughter this day in age because I've seen first hand the amount of irresponsibility people have when it comes to horses and breeding them. Do I wish the process was more humane? Yes! I do not agree with the transporting and the actual way of killing them...horses are not cows, they are far more in tune with their surroundings and far more spirited. I hope that some day soon they will find a better way of doing it because I do believe it is necessary if people are going to continue being stupid and selfish and breeding animals for useless purposes without any real knowledge of hereditary things that pass on, etc.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by alittlegray View Post
                The only contact I've had with this man is when I had DD's large pony up for lease/sale before he went to live with a fellow COTHer. I never even considered his offer to me (to give me a baby off his stallion in exchange for my really nice made large children's pony) partly because I needed something DD could move up on now and partly because his tone in every email he sent me was absolutely condescending and rude. He also told me my pony would be for his daughter, but when I checked him out I found out he is a flipper and I felt like odds were good he'd be flipping my pony.
                I don't have anything constructive to add to what has already been said about his solicitous craigslist posting as I think the majority here have it correct - he will flip what he can and send the rest to slaughter. Just not surprised to hear him call anyone who questions him a "shithead" based on how he was when he was communicating with me last year.
                I know he was actually looking for a pony for his daughter, because the one she is showing now is one that I bred and was acquired in a trade for a Silvio baby. (The trade wasn't with me. I sold the pony years ago.) I don't really know anything about them and I have had no direct contact with him, but the mom called looking for background info on the pony when she figured out where she came from. I saw them at a show and the pony looked wonderful and well taken care of. The daughter has sent me pictures of her all grown up and is a real sweetheart. I have sent her back some baby pictures and am in the process of helping them get VPBA papers transferred.
                www.facebook.com/SunsetPonies

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Sobriska View Post
                  Make it humane, and I support it. I was raised in a family that hunted for food, and raised animals for food. I am not against eating animals. And I am not against anyone choosing to eat horses, dogs or cats. It's not for me, but if they are humanely killed, like every animal my grandparents and parents hunted or raised, I have no objection.
                  I Agree. The little snippets of slaughter hourses I have been able to watch before turning away, the horses looked terrified... like they were sure they were about to die. Well, Duh! They were right. Cows as a whole are a lot slower on the uptake and much less reactive. I'm not sure how you would engineer a slaughter plant to make it easier on a horse.
                  ::I do not understand your specific kind of crazy, but I do admire your total commitment to it::

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Kryswyn View Post
                    I know plenty about Tim Daly. I would not send a horse to him. I would not train with him, and I certainly would not date him. I would also not tell him how much money I had and put him in my will...
                    Interesting statement! I know someone earlier posted about how he and his girlfriend are taking care of the elderly woman who owns the property upon which they and his horses reside. I wondered if they were being so nice because they have good hearts or because they were hoping it would benefit them after she passed.

                    Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                    On a personal level he sounds like kind of a jerk in his emails. I've been very polite, and he calls anyone who has the nerve to ask what he does with the horses "shitheads".
                    Hmmm...and banned from COTH twice. He hardly appears to have the credentials of someone deserving kudos for doing horse owners a favor.
                    Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by jenm View Post
                      Interesting statement! I know someone earlier posted about how he and his girlfriend are taking care of the elderly woman who owns the property upon which they and his horses reside. I wondered if they were being so nice because they have good hearts or because they were hoping it would benefit them after she passed.



                      Hmmm...and banned from COTH twice. He hardly appears to have the credentials of someone deserving kudos for doing horse owners a favor.
                      nice.

                      maybe it is just a business arrangement.

                      and he has no people skills.

                      to sum it up, he must be a bad person.
                      and evil to horses.

                      sheesh, grow up.
                      he's a horse trader.
                      Originally posted by BigMama1
                      Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                      GNU Terry Prachett

                      Comment


                      • Jse: great that you would humanely PTS your beloved horses. And yes, I
                        DO know what it costs. I have 4 on my property.

                        And while I know it's not profitable to PTS horses you take as a business,I still feel that this person is greed driven. Cares far more for his wallet than for horses. Ad to me, that's wrong. Businesses have to make money. Of course. Or they don't survive. But MY opinion is that greedily scooping up horses and putting the almighty dollar above anything else is wrong. Immoral. Like selling water to people dying of thirst. Like puppy mills.

                        I would not care what Daly did with horses if slaughter were humane. But it's far from that. And it's NOT a necessary evil. A bullet and a backhoe, or donate them to the big cat rescues. A humane end. They ALL deserve that. NO animal deserves the horrors of slaughter as it is now. And anyone who knowingly and willingly deals that way, is trash to me. He damn straight knows when he picks up certain ones, that he can only sell them to slaughter. But he's a greedy bass turd, who cares about his profit only.

                        I try to be open minded. And I read arguments for those that defend him. But I am just shaking my head in disbelief that anyone can think its OK.
                        I\'m not crazy. I\'m just a little unwell.

                        Comment


                        • And as mentioned earlier in the thread, Valley Proteins, a rendering plant is fairly close, so it should be pretty cheap to either haul the body there or have them pick it up. Or if he or his family own the land the stables are on, a bullet and burying is cheap.

                          Comment


                          • According to many folks, every single person ever buying and selling horses needs to wuvs dem like family, fully vet any and all buyers with 20 page contracts and multiple site visits and accept any and all horses and care for them for life if nobody else wants the horse.
                            Normally I agree with your posts but.. .

                            This is one that has that judge judy appeal which people enjoy har har but not sure this is a fair response to posts on this thread which are really more concerned with inhumane transport/ slaughter than with the fact of slaughtering horses.

                            I think a bullet in the head is kinder that but guess people can't make a few bucks that way.

                            In other words, if it is all fine and dandy, rather than wink wink nudge nudge, why not just say up front -- if dobbin does not work out -he'll be shipped to slaughter. Make sure the sellers know so they can't be willfully blind and shirk responsibility.

                            Just be upfront about it. Many people are naive and sometimes it is non horsey parents moving a minor's horse along. They won't be in on the nudge nudge winky thing.

                            However, I agree that this is not so much the horse trader's problem (if they are up front and why not be totally upfront if there is nothing off about it?) but primarily the responsibility of the owner who is dumping the horse.I just think it is disingenuos to think that everyone knows what is going on.
                            Last edited by Crockpot; Nov. 30, 2012, 09:09 AM.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Crockpot View Post
                              Normally I agree with your posts but.. .

                              This is one that has that judge judy appeal which people enjoy har har but not sure this is a fair response to posts on this thread which are really more concerned with inhumane transport/ slaughter than with the fact of slaughtering horses.

                              I think a bullet in the head is kinder that but guess people can't make a few bucks that way.

                              In other words, if it is all fine and dandy, rather than wink wink nudge nudge, why not just say up front -- if dobbin does not work out -he'll be shipped to slaughter. Make sure the sellers know so they can't be willfully blind and shirk responsibility.

                              Just be upfront about it. Many people are naive and sometimes it is non horsey parents moving a minor's horse along. They won't be in on the nudge nudge winky thing.

                              However, I agree that this is not so much the horse trader's problem (if they are up front and why not be totally upfront if there is nothing off about it?) but primarily the responsibility of the owner who is dumping the horse.I just think it is disingenuos to think that everyone knows what is going on.
                              It's the fallacy that has been perpetually spouted with no real facts to support it that all transport of slaughter horses is always abusive and every single kill at the plant is preceded by several misses.

                              Considering that it IS a business after all and no profit can be made when the goods are perpetually damaged is a point that will just not come across.

                              i would rather have the plants closer, eliminating the rides, but hey, what can you do when the MLP crowd gets their way.
                              Originally posted by BigMama1
                              Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                              GNU Terry Prachett

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Sunset Ponies View Post
                                I know he was actually looking for a pony for his daughter, because the one she is showing now is one that I bred and was acquired in a trade for a Silvio baby. (The trade wasn't with me. I sold the pony years ago.) I don't really know anything about them and I have had no direct contact with him, but the mom called looking for background info on the pony when she figured out where she came from. I saw them at a show and the pony looked wonderful and well taken care of. The daughter has sent me pictures of her all grown up and is a real sweetheart. I have sent her back some baby pictures and am in the process of helping them get VPBA papers transferred.
                                Does it bother you that the pony you bred may wind up at an auction when they get the daughter a new one?
                                \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                                  Does it bother you that the pony you bred may wind up at an auction when they get the daughter a new one?
                                  It would bother me if that happened. The women who I was in contact with (who is not Tim Daly) understood my desire to keep track of her and said they would keep me updated on her. Unfortunately there isn't much that I can do if they decide not to contact me. I hope that all of the ponies that I have bred end up with happy homes, and I do my best to make sure they do, but once they are out of my hands it is beyond my control.
                                  www.facebook.com/SunsetPonies

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                                    Does it bother you that the pony you bred may wind up at an auction when they get the daughter a new one?
                                    Doesn't this apply to EVERY person that has ever sold a horse?

                                    People lie and flip it immediately, people who say it's a forever home change their minds or their circumstances change and they don't want to let the old owner know, people sell to another "perfect, forever home" and they end up selling, etc.

                                    I don't think anyone is saying this guy is a great person they would love to introduce to mommy, they are saying at least he isn't starting out by blowing sunshine up someone's rear.

                                    That isn't perfect, but it IS an improvement over the "horsie wanted for my kids/I'll keep them forever" ads and the ones that scan the ads for cheap horses and answer them professing a forever home and then load them immediately to ship to the plants.

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by Sobriska View Post
                                      But he's a greedy bass turd, who cares about his profit only.
                                      Bass turd, as in fish sh*t?

                                      Sorry but this cracks me up. Love auto correct.
                                      \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                      Comment


                                      • That isn't perfect, but it IS an improvement over the "horsie wanted for my kids/I'll keep them forever" ads and the ones that scan the ads for cheap horses and answer them professing a forever home and then load them immediately to ship to the plants.
                                        PRECISELY.

                                        And what I'm saying (in addition) is that the moral outrage and condemnation is useless and doesn't serve the horses. It doesn't punish him. It does absolutely nothing.

                                        Comment


                                        • The sad fact is that many people don't care about what happens to an animal after they relinquish ownership/control. As long as they aren't the ones being asked to make the decision, there is a minimum of angst over the ultimate fate of the animal in question.

                                          I ran the foster program for a large, regional animal shelter. It was open admission, meaning they took whatever came through the door. As with most (all?) open admission shelters, they euthanized animals when they ran out of room. It didn't happen often (especially with dogs), but it was a fact of life and anyone surrendering an animal had to sign a form stating they were aware that their pet could be euthanized.

                                          Although I didn't work at the front desk, I was often up there and saw countless conversations about this. The surrendering owner might complain, saying they thought we were no-kill. They might insist that the animal in question had some redeeming quality that should automatically preclude it from ever being in danger. But 99% of the surrendering owners still signed their animal over, and about 98% of them did not check the box on the form that required the shelter to contact them and give them the option of taking the pet back if it ever ended up on a euthanization list. I heard so many variations on the comment, "If it happens, I don't want to know".

                                          I would think the psychology with horses is very similar. Even if this broker/flipper under discussion is up front with people who decide to hand their horses over to him, being one degree removed from that decision is all it takes to indemnify the surrendering owner from responsibility (at least, in their own eyes). They aren't the ones who consigned the horse to a low end auction, someone else did, and that is all it takes to make many people okay with handing the horse over.

                                          So I wouldn't be so quick to assume that he doesn't disclose a possible auction end to people who are serious about giving their horse to this guy. Just because he doesn't chat about auctions and slaughter pipelines to every Tom, Dick and Harry who calls wanting to rubberneck his operation doesn't mean it isn't disclosed to those who are serious about giving up a horse. And just because people hand their horses over willingly doesn't mean he isn't disclosing either.

                                          I know nothing about him, so he could very well be the Devil Incarnate. But I have watched too people rationalize their willing abdication of responsibility for an animal's ultimate fate to think that the majority of them need to be tricked in order to hand the animal over.
                                          Sheilah

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X