• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

CL - seriously?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by SmartAlex View Post
    More than one mistake a year could easily become a problem. We've got three buried over the past 10 years, and we're beginning to run out of spots. You would seriously have to dedicate an area to it. Away from water contamination for both humans and livestock. Fenced off from pasture areas because graves sink and you don't want your good horses breaking legs in sunken graves of worthless horses. And, our friendly neighborhood excavator charges $75 per horse which DOES NOT cover his costs (he's seriously a nice guy and understands most people have already spent all their spare cash on trying to save their horse) so I'm projecting that actual real world backhoe costs on one horse are nearer $100. Plus land taxes on otherwise unuseable land. Plus cost of gun and ammunition. Plus what you fed the horse while you are trying to retrain it/get it sound.
    I don't know the exact figures. And I am sure there's more than one way to skin a cat (have the body rendered, donate to big cat society, sell the tail and use that towards the cost of cremetion, etc. etc.). I don't know how useful it is to try to breakdown someone's hypothetical expenses as opposed to discussing, in the abstract, the concept of humane death/disposal as a reasonable overhead cost of flipping. I'm making up numbers just for the sake of discussion, but I think it's the discussion on not quibbling with the specific numbers that's beneficial.
    Last edited by vxf111; Dec. 3, 2012, 12:29 PM. Reason: spelling, not playing for my team today!
    ~Veronica
    "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
    http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Claddagh View Post
      Oh come on - one minute you defend him as someone trying to make a living doing something that is *legal* (no matter how unethical or deceptive his practices are) and now you're saying that he doesn't want to make money by taking in horses that, as a horse seller he knows will sell well, simply because he doesn't personally like the color grey??? WTH
      I don't give a fig why he does like or not like a certain color of horse.
      It might be that he does not want to deal with melanomas, can't sell them to the meat man or simply has an aversion to them.
      That is his prerogative.

      I sure would like how any of you would like it if your affairs would be put under a microscope in this manner.

      He is taking horses from people who can't/won't market the animal.
      He also gives incentives to call sooner rather than later (re: not skinny)

      non of you knows if he is selling to the meat man. But you all have him already tried, convicted and sentenced. Without evidence, just on 'feel' and emotion.

      it's a business.
      More horse people should try this on for size, maybe we would have a few less problems in the industry.

      he's not going to be the 'forever home'
      he's going to foot the feed bill only for a short while.
      In business you have to make money to keep the doors open.
      And to pay the feed bill.

      Otherwise,w e would end up with just another hoarding situation.

      FWIW, get on to your representatives to support more local, affordable means of disposing of large animals, like zoning for rendering plants, etc....

      because many of the options one can do with a single horse are completely out of the question when dealing in larger volume.
      But I am sure the majority will step back from that issue, since nobody wants to have the knacker in their zip code....

      Comment


      • I believe the "no greys" question was answered in the first few pages by someone who actually contacted him--mud and the challenge of keeping a sales horse clean. The "no skinnies" was answered too--too many well-meaning folks called A/C and A/C is obligated to investigate every claim even if they know that particular farm. It's a bureaucratic hassle.

        Does this mean he doesn't send failed horses to auction? Of course not. But even if he is dumping a ton of horses, he's giving them a shot that they didn't otherwise have in their current situations.

        This has to be one of the least productive threads I've seen in a while. Slaughter sucks in a big way. I don't think many (any??) of us aren't at least nominally bothered by it. But at the moment, it's legal. If you are so adamantly opposed, spend your time and energy doing something productive to help change that. Or just wait a few more months for the new regs to go into effect and then hope that things are better. Frankly, I'm worried that without slaughter, that things might just get worse when people no longer have a dumping ground and then horses just linger and starve to death. I hate slaughter. I think it's awful and evil and cruel. But starvation is a hell of a lot longer and sure isn't pleasant. I certainly don't have all of the answers, nor do I have a crystal ball, but I wish both sides could be a bit less histrionic and a bit more realistic.
        Flip a coin. It's not what side lands that matters, but what side you were hoping for when the coin was still in the air.

        You call it boxed wine. I call it carboardeaux.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by jen-s View Post
          I believe the "no greys" question was answered in the first few pages by someone who actually contacted him--mud and the challenge of keeping a sales horse clean. The "no skinnies" was answered too--too many well-meaning folks called A/C and A/C is obligated to investigate every claim even if they know that particular farm. It's a bureaucratic hassle.

          Does this mean he doesn't send failed horses to auction? Of course not. But even if he is dumping a ton of horses, he's giving them a shot that they didn't otherwise have in their current situations.

          This has to be one of the least productive threads I've seen in a while. Slaughter sucks in a big way. I don't think many (any??) of us aren't at least nominally bothered by it. But at the moment, it's legal. If you are so adamantly opposed, spend your time and energy doing something productive to help change that. Or just wait a few more months for the new regs to go into effect and then hope that things are better. Frankly, I'm worried that without slaughter, that things might just get worse when people no longer have a dumping ground and then horses just linger and starve to death. I hate slaughter. I think it's awful and evil and cruel. But starvation is a hell of a lot longer and sure isn't pleasant. I certainly don't have all of the answers, nor do I have a crystal ball, but I wish both sides could be a bit less histrionic and a bit more realistic.
          All valid points (except I seriously doubt that he doesn't take greys because he doesn't want to keep them clean!). And I don't think that any of them are at issue here, really. I think the *real* issue is not what he (the CL advertiser) does, but the way he does it. He places ads in hopes that he can collect free horses to make money with. Fine. But he doesn't advertise that some (maybe a lot) of those horses are going to be flipped to the meat man! Because if he told people this fact, he'd most likely get far fewer horses given to him.

          Again, the issue isn't so much what he does but the fact that he is deceptively collecting the horses that he does it with (and for his own personal monetary gain). Heck, if those horse owners wanted their horses to go to the meat man they could sell them to him themselves - and put the money in their own pockets!

          Comment


          • Most dealers will send a horse through auction if they can't sell it.

            Going through auction is not an automatic death sentence. Meat buyers aren't going to buy more than they're contracted to deliver.

            Dealers prefer to sell privately. They make a *lot* more to a private buyer than a meat buyer.

            No dealer is going to put "unsold horses to be auctioned" in their ads. No dealer should have to.

            But if the person giving the horse away or selling it them asks, "What happens if you can't sell it?" the dealers say "It'll probably end up going through auction." The seller/owner has the option of saying no, saying they'll take it back, etc. If a dealer is putting a straight-forward ad like that up, he's not about to tell them "It'll be a free donated pony to the nuns who will keep it forever."

            He's not going to say anything if they don't ask. He's not obligated to, not even morally. The morals lie with the person giving the horse away. He won;t take every one. And it won't be "he'd get a lot less if he said they might go to auction" because 90% of the owners never ask. They don't want to know, they just want the animal off the payroll.

            And as for having them checmically euthanized...very few vets will euthanize a horse that's not in chronic pain or terminal. If a horse is unsound but otherwise content, try finding a vet to euthanize it. Then there's disposing a body full of chemicals.

            And yes, legally on paper you can shoot your own animals. In reality? Try dealing with lots of unsound animals, shooting a handful annually and watch how fast you get reported for cruelty by all the nosy-bodies out there. And yes, AC will come down on you with both feet. Highly doubt anyone would want to be investigated repeatedly.
            You jump in the saddle,
            Hold onto the bridle!
            Jump in the line!
            ...Belefonte

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Claddagh View Post
              Again, the issue isn't so much what he does but the fact that he is deceptively collecting the horses that he does it with (and for his own personal monetary gain). Heck, if those horse owners wanted their horses to go to the meat man they could sell them to him themselves - and put the money in their own pockets!
              How do you know that he is deceptively acquiring horses? Have you called him to ask if he ever sends a horse to auction? Have you asked him if he tells buyers what might happen to their horse if they don't work out for his program? Some people would never ask what might happen to their unwanted horses. If they don't ask or don't want to know, is that his problem? Should every buyer/acquirer disclose every possible option for each and every horse they look at? Seems to me there's a whole lot of speculation and accusations being flung and a whole lot of information lacking.

              I'm not saying Tim is a perfect angel, but the closeminded, judgey pants, condemned before a fair trial attitudes are pretty offensive.
              Flip a coin. It's not what side lands that matters, but what side you were hoping for when the coin was still in the air.

              You call it boxed wine. I call it carboardeaux.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by jen-s View Post
                How do you know that he is deceptively acquiring horses? Have you called him to ask if he ever sends a horse to auction? Have you asked him if he tells buyers what might happen to their horse if they don't work out for his program? Some people would never ask what might happen to their unwanted horses. If they don't ask or don't want to know, is that his problem? Should every buyer/acquirer disclose every possible option for each and every horse they look at? Seems to me there's a whole lot of speculation and accusations being flung and a whole lot of information lacking.

                I'm not saying Tim is a perfect angel, but the closeminded, judgey pants, condemned before a fair trial attitudes are pretty offensive.
                From Jetsmom's earlier post. Saying people who ask about the ones that don't work out are "shitheads" doesn't really sound like someone who is being open and honest. Purely speculation on my part, however.

                Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                Yes,
                I've been emailing with him. He won't say what he does with ones that don't work out. I'm pretty sure they are sold at auction with no reserve. He is pro slaughter, but does seem to be helping some, by retraining and selling. I am ok with what he is doing but wish he was more upfront with what the horse's fate will be if he doesn't work out. That's my only issue with him.

                On a personal level he sounds like kind of a jerk in his emails. I've been very polite, and he calls anyone who has the nerve to ask what he does with the horses "shitheads".
                Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                Comment


                • He's probably not going to win any congeniality prizes, but I also fully understand anyone not telling some random, unknown caller asking questions. Things may be a lot different when he's talking face to face with a person that's giving or selling him a horse.

                  I know around here most dealers, auctions, etc will not answer any questions over the phone. Why? So many times it's slightly nutty folks trying to screw them over because they disagree with what they do. If they're going to talk to you, it's face to face with someone they'll be doing business with as opposed to phone interviews with people they aren't doing actual business with.
                  You jump in the saddle,
                  Hold onto the bridle!
                  Jump in the line!
                  ...Belefonte

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by MistyBlue View Post
                    And yes, legally on paper you can shoot your own animals. In reality? Try dealing with lots of unsound animals, shooting a handful annually and watch how fast you get reported for cruelty by all the nosy-bodies out there. And yes, AC will come down on you with both feet. Highly doubt anyone would want to be investigated repeatedly.
                    Someone can correct me if I am misreading the NY Ag and Markets code, because it may be this applies only to seizure of abused animals (I'm no lawyer)but wanton shooting of healthy horses could possibly be prosecuted and at least make a dealer's business a big darn hassle. I have no idea what Virginia's laws say on the matter.

                    http://www.agriculture.ny.gov/AI/AILaws/Article-26.pdf

                    4. a. Any method of euthanasia other than that provided for in
                    subdivision three of this section is prohibited except that euthanasia
                    of an animal by gunshot is permissible as an emergency measure for an
                    animal that is posing an imminent threat of serious physical injury to a
                    person or to another animal as provided in section one hundred
                    twenty-one-a of this chapter and where the use of a humane method of
                    euthanasia prescribed in this section is rendered impossible or where a
                    severely injured animal is suffering and cannot otherwise be aided.
                    Last edited by SmartAlex; Dec. 3, 2012, 10:31 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Yes, this is true in many to most states.

                      You cannot just shoot your animals Just Because. They have to require shooting and each states' version of requirement is different.

                      But shooting or euthanizing a chronic condition that isn't in severe pain is usually not allowed. So if a vet can't/won't do it and the owner wouldn't so fobbed it off on someone else and nobody else is allowed to do it either. So what the heck do these folks do?

                      Yeah, in an ideal paradise everyone would want to/be able to care for every lame horse for the 25-30 natural years of it's life. But this isn't Eden. Countless people can't/won't for a pet fish or hamster...tons more can't/won't for something 50x more expensive to care for and that lives a helluva lot longer.

                      And no...at no time ever in the future will responsibility or someone else's ideals be legally enforceable onto the general public.
                      You jump in the saddle,
                      Hold onto the bridle!
                      Jump in the line!
                      ...Belefonte

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by MistyBlue View Post
                        And as for having them checmically euthanized...very few vets will euthanize a horse that's not in chronic pain or terminal. If a horse is unsound but otherwise content, try finding a vet to euthanize it. Then there's disposing a body full of chemicals.
                        I think this isn't really the whole story of having an animal that you can't rehome euthanized by a vet. Just look at the blog for the Horse Plus Humane Society (formerly Nor Cal).

                        They have a safe surrender site that takes any horse, no questions asked. It gets evaluated and if it won't have a "good quality of life", it gets euthed by their vet. They don't elaborate on disposal but there are a heck of a lot of bodies that they're somehow managing to get rid of every year.

                        So I don't think anyone should be so quick to dismiss the realistic option of euthanasia for horses that can't be given away. It does happen and these don't seem to be in chronic pain or terminal, necessarily.

                        We are talking in theory about horses for whom you've exhausted every other option, after all. I don't think it's so clear-cut that their owners can't get the vet to put them down, humanely, rather than resort to a flipper.

                        I just bought enough hay to feed my two horses for about eight weeks and it cost me $360. [One of them, by the way, is lame and totally useless, and if I had to get rid of him it would either be as a companion to someone I trust or I would see if the hunt would take him, etc. No horse of mine is going to an auction.]

                        My point though is that if you can't afford to euth a horse you can't afford to feed it either and you never should have gotten it. Why are so many so quick to gloss over that basic fact? And I'm not sure why the onus then falls on the rest of us to bail that irresponsible owner out.

                        I realize that not being able to afford to care for a horse does not deter plenty of idiots from acquiring them anyway, but they're going to keep on doing that no matter how many we condemn to the slaughter auctions.

                        You'll never kill enough horses to make them so rare that idiots can't get them. And as long as people want to eat them, there will be slaughter, even if the slaughterhouses start to have to pay more.

                        So no, as far as the OP goes...I don't think this flipper is doing the horses a service by taking them off the hands of their deadbeat owners. He's just making room for more, and more, and more, to suffer the same fate.

                        Flippers aren't part of any solution, they're just people capitalizing on an easy way to make money. I don't oppose making money in the horse world, but if you can't do it without having to resort to dumping horses off at auctions, maybe you should find another job.

                        I work full time to support my horses, not the other way around, and it's not anyone's god-given right to have their horses turn into a paycheck.
                        \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                          I just bought enough hay to feed my two horses for about eight weeks and it cost me $360. [One of them, by the way, is lame and totally useless, and if I had to get rid of him it would either be as a companion to someone I trust or I would see if the hunt would take him, etc. No horse of mine is going to an auction.]

                          My point though is that if you can't afford to euth a horse you can't afford to feed it either and you never should have gotten it. Why are so many so quick to gloss over that basic fact? And I'm not sure why the onus then falls on the rest of us to bail that irresponsible owner out.

                          I realize that not being able to afford to care for a horse does not deter plenty of idiots from acquiring them anyway, but they're going to keep on doing that no matter how many we condemn to the slaughter auctions.

                          You'll never kill enough horses to make them so rare that idiots can't get them. And as long as people want to eat them, there will be slaughter, even if the slaughterhouses start to have to pay more.

                          So no, as far as the OP goes...I don't think this flipper is doing the horses a service by taking them off the hands of their deadbeat owners. He's just making room for more, and more, and more, to suffer the same fate.

                          I work full time to support my horses, not the other way around, and it's not anyone's god-given right to have their horses turn into a paycheck.
                          You don't know what others are going through financially. Maybe they could afford a horse, maybe they aren't and never were "deadbeats", maybe they're just everyday people that have hit hard times.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                            I think this isn't really the whole story of having an animal that you can't rehome euthanized by a vet. Just look at the blog for the Horse Plus Humane Society (formerly Nor Cal).

                            They have a safe surrender site that takes any horse, no questions asked. It gets evaluated and if it won't have a "good quality of life", it gets euthed by their vet. They don't elaborate on disposal but there are a heck of a lot of bodies that they're somehow managing to get rid of every year.
                            I agree that the programs they have running (the euthanasia clinic and the gelding clinic) are wonderful and should be available in every other region. But the sad fact is that those programs aren't available everywhere, and even the organizations that offer them have a finite limit on their resources and sometimes have to turn people away.
                            Sheilah

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Gestalt View Post
                              You don't know what others are going through financially. Maybe they could afford a horse, maybe they aren't and never were "deadbeats", maybe they're just everyday people that have hit hard times.
                              You don't know either, but the running assumption on here is that they, through no fault of their own, got down to their last $200 and still hadn't figured out what to do with their horses. I don't buy it.
                              \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by IdahoRider View Post
                                I agree that the programs they have running (the euthanasia clinic and the gelding clinic) are wonderful and should be available in every other region. But the sad fact is that those programs aren't available everywhere, and even the organizations that offer them have a finite limit on their resources and sometimes have to turn people away.
                                Sheilah
                                You're right. My point was that getting a vet to euthanize a horse that isn't in clear need of immediate euthanasia can clearly be done, even with limited resources, and the bodies do get handled. In large numbers in the case of that rescue in Sacramento. But let's keep making excuses for individuals who can't do the same, I suppose.
                                \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                Comment


                                • Mandy, I think you need to learn the cost and effort involved in euthanization clinics. It's not close to "on limited resources." And even then with 2 clinics annually there, plenty auction horses also.

                                  Euthanizing clinics are great. And rare. Why? They're not even close to free and not held often because they take tons of hard work and time raising the money to be able to pay for them. And the bulk of the payment is the disposal of the bodies.

                                  Gelding clinics are also great...and less expensive. (lot cheaper to dispose of testicles only )

                                  (sorry guys, not saying those things are cheap)

                                  It's not anyone's given right to make their money in any way. Tons of sale barns also send their horses through auctions. *Tons* of them, not low end barns either. Dealers are there because there's a market. They're cleaning up other peoples' messes. Removing the dealers will not lower the amount of ignorant or uncaring horse owners. It won't make a dent in them. They've always been around, they'll always be around. You just cannot force responsibility.

                                  Believe me, I wish things were different and everyone who ever decides to own any animal did so in a planned, affordable and humane manner. But it's like wishing for World Peace, fat reducing ice cream and honest politicians.

                                  And even planned does not include those who do indeed have some sort of catastrophe financially.

                                  Something that does have a chance of happening...safer, better slaughter process. Done correctly for horses from start to finish. THAT can be changed.

                                  And no...there wasn't public suppport for ammending and enforcing process policies before. Nobody wanted that, they wanted to ban it. Without taking into consideration the entire history of human nature...it didn't and never will force owners to become responsible. Neither will trying to stop equine export.
                                  You jump in the saddle,
                                  Hold onto the bridle!
                                  Jump in the line!
                                  ...Belefonte

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                                    You're right. My point was that getting a vet to euthanize a horse that isn't in clear need of immediate euthanasia can clearly be done, even with limited resources, and the bodies do get handled. In large numbers in the case of that rescue in Sacramento. But let's keep making excuses for individuals who can't do the same, I suppose.
                                    No, not every vet is willing to do a convenience euthanasia. And euthanazing a horse that is not clearly in need of it is seen as a convenience by many vets.

                                    The vets that take part in the euthanasia clinics are vets that ALREADY believe in giving a humane death to a healthy horse. Try to get a vet who doesn't believe in it to participate, then tell me that it "can clearly be done".
                                    Sheilah

                                    Comment


                                    • I don't think they even do the euthanasia clinics anymore. They euthanize horses all.the.time. at Horse Plus. Why are we arguing about how much it costs? Wasn't the issue that you don't think vets will put down horses that just can't be given away?

                                      No, you won't change human nature. Slaughter isn't there to fix the stupidity of humans. It's for the few to make a lot of money without getting real jobs. Whether it's here or not, people will keep on abusing horses. But don't pretend it serves a purpose. It doesn't spare any horses from any worse fate. There is none.
                                      \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by IdahoRider View Post
                                        No, not every vet is willing to do a convenience euthanasia. And euthanazing a horse that is not clearly in need of it is seen as a convenience by many vets.
                                        Then why are there threads on this board every day about what to do with a horse you don't want anymore, and euthanasia is ALWAYS one of the options the owner is considering. The filly that may or may not have UV. The gelding who needs pricey shoes for his rotated coffin bone. Convenience euthanasia?

                                        I don't know, but I do know these people could just as easily call this guy from the OP, not mention the horses' issues, and give this guy their problem horses. And nobody ever throws up the "well the vet might not want to do it..." when we're talking about real horses that really might end up in a bad place. No one. And nobody suggests an auction for it either.
                                        \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                                          . Why are we arguing about how much it costs? Wasn't the issue that you don't think vets will put down horses that just can't be given away?
                                          The cost of euthanasia and disposal should be a part of any discussion regarding unwanted horses, simply because the cost can make the difference between accessible and inaccessible for many owners who are in that position.

                                          And I don't just "think" that many vets won't euthanize a healthy horse, I know that many vets won't do it. It goes against their moral beliefs to do it.

                                          I completely understand why people are opposed to slaughter. I certainly wouldn't choose that end for any horse I owned. But lets not become willfully naive about the choices available for those people who have hit the end of the road regarding their horse(s). In many areas there aren't euthanasia clinics. In many areas the local vets won't put down a healthy horse. To believe that there is a euthanasia option every where, for every unwanted horse, is just plain silly.
                                          Sheilah

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X