• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

CL Stallion with a "tilted head"???

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    If somebody put the $$ into gelding him, how rideable would he be? Or would he still just be a big pasture puff. After the $200 purchase price + $800 gelding fee, $1,000 investment doesn't seem that bad for a reasonable trail horse. He seems like a good enough soul, based on the pictures.

    Comment


    • #42
      For one non-descended testicle, either cryptorchid or monorchid is correct. Cryptorchid means either one or both of the testicles has not descended. Source - Merck Vet Manual

      Monorchid refers to either one non-descended testicle or only one testicle developing in the first place.


      Comment


      • #43
        Actually he had been advertised on CL (in NY) for quite a while by the previous owner. Apparently he was given to them for their grand-daughter as a X-mas present (I think she was 6 or 7). He was for sale for $500.00, then $400.00, $350.00 and then $300.00. Or trade for hay, goats, or a beef cow.

        It was mentioned in one of their ads that he did only drop 1 testicle and he hadn't been handled other than being able to lead and to be brushed.

        If she didn't need a stallion in the first place, why did she agree to purchase him with her friend? Especially, an un-broke, unregistered stud when she already had 9 horses.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Shine View Post
          Actually he had been advertised on CL (in NY) for quite a while by the previous owner. Apparently he was given to them for their grand-daughter as a X-mas present (I think she was 6 or 7). He was for sale for $500.00, then $400.00, $350.00 and then $300.00. Or trade for hay, goats, or a beef cow.

          It was mentioned in one of their ads that he did only drop 1 testicle and he hadn't been handled other than being able to lead and to be brushed.

          If she didn't need a stallion in the first place, why did she agree to purchase him with her friend? Especially, an un-broke, unregistered stud when she already had 9 horses.
          Because a 4 year old, unbroke stud is a GREAT X-Mas present for a 6 year old... There is no rhyme or reason to some people, I'm convinced of it!

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Miss J View Post
            The second 'confo?' pic does suck, but I think the back of the stall board has blended into his neck making it look like it droops down. And I'm pretty sure he isn't bucksin.
            The original owners had posted better pictures in their ad. He' a cute little buckskin and has a dark dorsal stripe with a white star. I think they probably deleted the ad when they sold him to this person because now I can't find it.

            One of my farrier's customers were interested in him until they found out about the "missing ball".

            Comment


            • #46
              This thread illustrates (to me) how 'many' (not all) Democrats love 'the poor' en general, en masse, but not...you know, individuals that are poor or in dire straits or living in old trailers or without mud control in place. Those individuals, well, we'd better mock and humiliate them from the convenience of our smart phones, teach 'em a lesson.

              If the seller was smart she'd say her local power company dropped a pole on his head after Sandy, and it's all their fault he's got his head screwed on wrong. Somehow work in LIPA and this horse would be snapped up in a heartbeat.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by katarine View Post
                Those individuals, well, we'd better mock and humiliate them from the convenience of our smart phones, teach 'em a lesson.
                AHAHAHAHAHA!

                Those particular individuals are posting those pics and the ad from the convenience of their smartphones, as it happens!
                Proud Member Of The Lady Mafia

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Superminion View Post
                  Because a 4 year old, unbroke stud is a GREAT X-Mas present for a 6 year old... There is no rhyme or reason to some people, I'm convinced of it!
                  You are confusing the two ads. The previous poster stated there was an original ad that stated the horse had been given as a Christmas present. This is from the person who went in with her friend to buy him from them.

                  For all we know, there was a promise of paying to have him gelded and paying for his feed or a deal where one pays gelding, the other trains and they flip him. Then the first individual bails.

                  Originally posted by Coanteen View Post
                  AHAHAHAHAHA!

                  Those particular individuals are posting those pics and the ad from the convenience of their smartphones, as it happens!
                  It could be a really inexpensive tablet device. There are a lot of them around and selling for a lot less than a cell phone and only having wireless means no data charges. So, there is that also.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Some folks get alllll up in arms about how other people should live, where they should live, and how they should live, and even who gets to live with horses.

                    The other folks belong to the other political party, right? Right?

                    This is about my fill of Friday Judgypants Day in LaLaLovelyLand, where we text or email complete and utter strangers and tell them how to spell, and how to live, where to live (no trailers!) and how many horses to own, AND finally how to manage the end of a life they don't want to feed anymore.

                    Fascinating.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Snowflake View Post
                      Why do these ads always have an abundance of mud and an old mobile home in the pictures?
                      I don't know about the mobile home but my guess about the mud is simply that quite a few people don't think about selling these kind of horses until bad weather hits and they realize they will have to buy more hay to feed the extra mouth. Then it becomes a mad dash to move that extra mouth on down the road. It's so easy to put things off when the sun is shining.
                      My blog: Crackerdog Farm

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by katarine View Post
                        This thread illustrates (to me) how 'many' (not all) Democrats love 'the poor' en general, en masse, but not...you know, individuals that are poor or in dire straits or living in old trailers or without mud control in place. Those individuals, well, we'd better mock and humiliate them from the convenience of our smart phones, teach 'em a lesson.
                        Politics has absolutely NOTHING to do with this thread. I'm sorry your candidate lost and you're obviously still affected by it. I've moved on from the election. I voted and made my voice heard. Not much more I can do than that.

                        Originally posted by katarine View Post
                        If the seller was smart she'd say her local power company dropped a pole on his head after Sandy, and it's all their fault he's got his head screwed on wrong. Somehow work in LIPA and this horse would be snapped up in a heartbeat.
                        Wha??

                        Originally posted by katarine View Post
                        Some folks get alllll up in arms about how other people should live, where they should live, and how they should live, and even who gets to live with horses.
                        I didn't say anything negative. I just made a comment about a trend I notice in a large number of the very low end Craigslist ads. I have family that live in mobile homes. I don't consider them to be trailer trash. They're educated, well spoken and employed. Some of their homes are BEAUTIFUL and nicer than mine. My aunt has a master en suite that I would kill for. No, no judgypants, just generalized observation.

                        It's marketing. Clean the horse up and present him like a million bucks and he might have a shot. Keep him filthy and have the pictures a representation of some redneck rodeo, and well... you're going to drive away a lot of prospective customers. It's the same reason why, if you're selling your car, you clean it out and get it detailed. By doing so, you will be able to squeeze an extra $500-1000 out of your buyer because you'll present yourself like a responsible car owner. You may not tell him that you haven't changed the oil in like 80,000 miles, but it's all about the impression you give. It's the total package.

                        May I suggest going commando next Friday Judgypants Day so you don't get your panties all in a bunch?

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by katarine View Post
                          Some folks get alllll up in arms about how other people should live, where they should live, and how they should live, and even who gets to live with horses.

                          The other folks belong to the other political party, right? Right?

                          This is about my fill of Friday Judgypants Day in LaLaLovelyLand, where we text or email complete and utter strangers and tell them how to spell, and how to live, where to live (no trailers!) and how many horses to own, AND finally how to manage the end of a life they don't want to feed anymore.

                          Fascinating.
                          Isn't your post all "judgypants" about other COTHer's posts...or doesn't that count?

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Sure, I suppose it is Jetsmom. For all the 'get your opinions out of my bedroom' some COTHers are often all about jumping up and down about what's happening in someone else's barn.

                            I just find it fascinating and consistent.

                            Carry on. I'll keep my panties, thanks.

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Originally posted by Snowflake View Post
                              Politics has absolutely NOTHING to do with this thread. I'm sorry your candidate lost and you're obviously still affected by it. I've moved on from the election. I voted and made my voice heard. Not much more I can do than that.

                              Wha??

                              ?
                              My point is that if ONLY she was well spoken and wrote the write tear jerker, folks would be petitioning to save the buckskin. Instead we're telling the owner how to live and what to do.

                              Panties on, thanks, it's cold out.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                There's a point there, even if folks don't like to see it. Are these the folks that should have their horse and their food stamps because they deserve some happiness? How come it's ok to make a joke about a trailer house here but in political posts you better not make a single appraising remark about a single food stamp recipient? I've been slammed myself for saying that I didn't think it was right for tattooed drunk smoking parents to use their EBT card to buy the baby a freaking full suger SOBE when there was a perfectly good grocery store across the road (judging behavior, not circumstances) but over here on Off Course anyone can make fun of the very same people for living in a trailer house or being poor spellers, just because it's horse related.

                                I can't believe it's taken this long for someone to point out the double standard.
                                “Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.” Stephen R. Covey

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Even though the CL poster explained the tilted head, I wanted to add that a horse with visual problems will often tilt his/her head to see better.

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Originally posted by Snowflake View Post
                                    Why do these ads always have an abundance of mud and an old mobile home in the pictures?
                                    Rhetorical question...
                                    Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                                    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                                    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Uh, I don't think this has anything to do with politics, it has to do with a horse who has issues, in need of expensive surgery, has a possible neck defect and is being sold for a price that might better be spent on euthing. It's impossible to say if he's much of anything from the ad, and by the advertisers comments to people who emailed with her it's not like she thinks much of him. It's sad more than anything else, and despite where and who owns him, he's got a bleak future no matter where he goes if he's not humanely put down. No one wants to put a "healthy" horse down but you have to admit he's got more than a few strikes against him sadly. I think it's fair to question the owners responsibility for selling this horse as she just wants to get rid of him. A responsible owner would either find him a free lease situation with a good contract that he not be "sold down the road" but that would be predicated on if she cared which she doesn't seem to.

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Yeah, the whole situation is very sad.
                                        Groom to trainer: "Where's the glamour? You promised me glamour!"

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by Ajierene View Post
                                          You are confusing the two ads. The previous poster stated there was an original ad that stated the horse had been given as a Christmas present. This is from the person who went in with her friend to buy him from them.

                                          For all we know, there was a promise of paying to have him gelded and paying for his feed or a deal where one pays gelding, the other trains and they flip him. Then the first individual bails.



                                          It could be a really inexpensive tablet device. There are a lot of them around and selling for a lot less than a cell phone and only having wireless means no data charges. So, there is that also.

                                          I was referring to Shine's post when she stated that the first buyer recieved him as a Christmas present for their daughter, then was trying to unload him for $500. Regardless of which ad it was, I still wouldn't give a 6 year old a 4 year old stud for Christmas.

                                          I'm in agreeance with those who have a point in saying that a "Sandy dropped a telephone pole on his head" story would move him a lot faster than talking about his wilting flowers.
                                          Last edited by Superminion; Nov. 17, 2012, 10:31 AM. Reason: spelling

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X