• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

CA and Mexico slaughter houses no longer accepting U.S. horses?!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I guess the Nobel Prize that was given to the EU is for creating the gravest crisis in human history and starving people, or creating the conditions to light the flames of riots for desperate people (as has been happening in Greece), might be a little more of the agenda of this "rumor" that may not be a rumor. Or it may. Chaos seems to be the order of the day, and the Obama administration and their financial backers are the masters of it, that and deceit.
    "We, too, will be remembered not for victories or defeats in battle or in politics, but for our contribution to the human spirit." JFK

    Comment


    • Although the abruptness of this development is surprising, the fact that the EU is apparently finally taking action on the issue of tainted horse meat is not. When I began seriously researching the issue of horse slaughter, I was shocked to find that there was virtually no enforcement of regulations designed to ensure that horse meat is safe for human consumption.

      As I learned more, I also realized that the market for US horses to go to slaughter isn't large enough to make even a modest impact on the horse overpopulation problem. We send just over 1% of US horses to slaughter (and that's all the plants will accept) and the market was not showing signs of growing even before this latest development. It's not enough to make a difference.

      Unfortunately, the prospect of slaughter still provides uninformed individuals with the illusion that slaughter is a viable option for a horse that they don't want, and that diverts attention away from the real problem which is irresponsible breeding.

      Finally, and most importantly for the horses that we value so highly, horse slaughter is inhumane and cannot be made humane due to the speed at which the slaughter process has to move for the plant to make money. As we all know, horses are hyper-sensitive flight animals and they are not suited for this process at all. As a result, they suffer terribly as we have all seen in undercover footage.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Bacardi1 View Post
        They may have been Brabants now that I think of it. Certainly looked the part.

        But the point being that in certain areas over there, horse meat isn't considered much different than beef. Different culture.
        Yep totally different. And interestingly, my friend mentioned the other day that the neighbor with the pony will not slaughter the broodmare, because she was laminitic once, and someone gave her bute, and that means forever out of the food chain for humans. That surprised me! She said that their meat horses are not to EVER have any drugs....and I kind of laughed, considering most of the horses from this country have most certainly had some kind of drug at some point (that the EU's would not approve of).

        Comment


        • Originally posted by JackieB12003 View Post
          Finally, and most importantly for the horses that we value so highly, horse slaughter is inhumane and cannot be made humane due to the speed at which the slaughter process has to move for the plant to make money. As we all know, horses are hyper-sensitive flight animals and they are not suited for this process at all. As a result, they suffer terribly as we have all seen in undercover footage.
          Gotta take a little issue here.

          I used to buy the orphan foals from mares who went to slaughter (one foal turned out to be a whalloping good jumper for my daughter). I watched them in the pens leading up to the kill stall and not once did I see horses in an excited state. It was horse goes in, door comes down, door goes up, horse goes in, door goes down and on and on. Of course, they weren't stabbing them either. ETA: I remember quite a few stud horses and also, most horses were standing around waiting 'their turn' and had a hind leg cocked, looked like they were snoozing in a pasture.

          Then, once, after I had paid for some orphans, I walked through the wrong door into the kill chamber and saw the bodies hanging and the kill stall on the other end. Still no 'theatrics' (a bad word to use but can't think of better at the moment) from the live horses in the stall or on the outside.

          If a horse was in an excited state, it was out in the huge corrals where the *(#&%*$ hired help would run the horses around instead of being quiet and calm. One little orphan got ran over by a bunch of big horses and I couldn't get to him/her. The guy said it was good for the colt, teach him a lesson not to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. ????

          This was decades ago, but, still, even back then, the horses were pretty calm, calmer than you see horses at a horse show.
          Last edited by goneriding24; Oct. 14, 2012, 02:43 AM. Reason: .
          GR24's Musing #19 - Save the tatas!!

          Comment


          • Inside a pro slaughter church-

            http://laughingpics.com/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/

            Comment


            • Fairfax, the information you posted from Jerry Finch was an update EWA sent to our members. He was only posting the information to his readers. Nobody is fundraising because we don’t know what we are dealing with yet. The opportunists have already started asking for donations and we don’t want anyone getting scammed. We told people what Jerry was going to do and suggest that as a way to vet out the legitimate orgs. Key words - going to do.

              We reached out to Jerry to help because he is an expert at large rescues/seizures. HSUS and ASPCA have the resources and funds to help out and that’s why we reached out to them. They have a presence in almost every state. Jerry coordinated efforts at 3 Strikes and called HSUS and they were immediately on the ground helping. Who do you recommend we ask to help out? The pro slaughter that are still saying all of this is a hoax and trying to discredit anyone that is trying to help?

              There is nothing in that email asking for money. Nothing.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                This is NONSENSE....you are trying to back track it .... All of the press released stated THE CANADIAN BORDER WAS CLOSED TO SLAUGHTER AND LIKEWISE WITH MEXICO.....That has proven to be a LIE.

                You can try and rewrite it as a generalization but that is what they said over and over and over. When TWO of us contacted the borders and posted that only then..one day later..did they now say...oh gosh..maybe the slaughter plants made that decision and they had been told of a ban...but then why is it no one mentioned the Quebec slaughter plant and claim they had spoken to a rep...you wanna know why...BECAUSE THEY DO NOT SPEAK ENGLISH...TRY FRENCH...the receptionist has such broken English I defy anyone to get any information from her. All she could do is take my number and let me know someone will call...and that was in FRENCH.

                They tried to say yesterday that the plant was in Ontario...when that was disputed..with a map..they no longer QUOTE THAT plant...

                This whole situation smells...and smells and smells....Habitat is crying for donations...and conveniently this occurs...they notify HSUS who know NOTHING ABOUT IT but are on stand by...I don't even think Angela Freda could buy that one with a straight face
                Fairfax, do you understand the confusion when this broke? The KBs were telling us the borders were closed – Brian Moore being one of the first. The information in the press release was the information we had at that time. Did you not see the word Confusion in the title? The fact is that the EU is no longer accepting shipments from Canada. It’s impossible to get information out of Mexico but since this is coming from the EU, we suspect their shipments aren’t being accepted, either. I finally got a hold of POE and they told me the borders weren’t closed. As we researched further, we determined it was indeed the plants, not the borders. And what difference does it make? The news is that the EU doesn’t want our horses.

                And oh, the drama. Habitat is crying for donations! Jerry hasn’t asked for one penny. Perhaps you should calm down and read slower.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by vickitobin View Post
                  Fairfax, the information you posted from Jerry Finch was an update EWA sent to our members. He was only posting the information to his readers. Nobody is fundraising because we don’t know what we are dealing with yet. The opportunists have already started asking for donations and we don’t want anyone getting scammed. We told people what Jerry was going to do and suggest that as a way to vet out the legitimate orgs. Key words - going to do.

                  We reached out to Jerry to help because he is an expert at large rescues/seizures. HSUS and ASPCA have the resources and funds to help out and that’s why we reached out to them. They have a presence in almost every state. Jerry coordinated efforts at 3 Strikes and called HSUS and they were immediately on the ground helping. Who do you recommend we ask to help out? The pro slaughter that are still saying all of this is a hoax and trying to discredit anyone that is trying to help?

                  There is nothing in that email asking for money. Nothing.
                  Are you talking about this Habitat for Horses and this Jerry Finch?

                  http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=371091

                  Sounds like they only have 3 days worth of feed for their own rescue and are desperate.
                  Yes, they are asking for money, "URGENT!"

                  Must be a different group.

                  As for the HSUS, we already know how they "come to help" and how they "use their resources" to do so.

                  Have you forgotten their so helpful ways in the last two hurricanes?
                  According to those there, the HSUS was INTERFERING with real help and the real helpers doing the work.
                  Really, some kinds of "help" are very questionable.

                  Comment


                  • I am just dumbstruck that the EU has made their decision without the knowledge and superior intellectual contributions of LEO/FAIRFAX. What gall.
                    from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                      Are you talking about this Habitat for Horses and this Jerry Finch?

                      http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=371091

                      Sounds like they only have 3 days worth of feed for their own rescue and are desperate.
                      Yes, they are asking for money, "URGENT!"

                      Must be a different group.

                      As for the HSUS, we already know how they "come to help" and how they "use their resources" to do so.

                      Have you forgotten their so helpful ways in the last two hurricanes?
                      According to those there, the HSUS was INTERFERING with real help and the real helpers doing the work.
                      Really, some kinds of "help" are very questionable.
                      Bluey, can you ever use facts to support your anti-animal welfare agenda?

                      The legitimate animal welfare folks who worked with HSUS after Katrina give rave (and accurate) reviews of their help there. The only criticisms are unsubstantiated grumblings from dog breeders and puppy millers who, for obvious reasons cannot be remotely objective on the topic of HSUS.

                      And no, Jerry is not asking for money to deal with this issue, as Vicki stated. The link you posted refers to their rescue.
                      "There's something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man" ~ Sir Winston Churchill

                      Comment


                      • Vickitobin:

                        Glad that you showed up with the updates--at least I know that you have your ear onto what is going on in this mess. Please keep us updated with what you do know.

                        As far as Habitat and HSUS, one can think whatever they want about them, and I know that both have made poor decisions/actions in the past. However, the Three Strikes seizure will stay in my memory forever, especially the account of Jerry flying over the property, seeing the grazed down to nothing terrain in contrast to the normal vegetation filled fields of the neighbors and the piles--literal piles--of carcasses of starved horses, hundreds of them. For that action alone they deserve my respect.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by JackieB12003 View Post
                          As I learned more, I also realized that the market for US horses to go to slaughter isn't large enough to make even a modest impact on the horse overpopulation problem. We send just over 1% of US horses to slaughter (and that's all the plants will accept) and the market was not showing signs of growing even before this latest development. It's not enough to make a difference.
                          Someone once figured out on here that the numbers slaughtered per year, 120,000 approximately, amount to about 2 horses per US county that will need to be dealt with in a different manner. That is hardly overwhelming when you look at it that way.

                          What I do suspect is that way more slaughter bound horses come out of certain areas or from certain groups...large "breeders" who overproduce and regularly dump youngstock at sales, race horses, Amish, etc...will be the ones who really feel the bite of this change. I kind of doubt Joe Average American horseowner is really going to be in deep trouble with this change. I know of very few people who use sales as a disposal method for their horses and those who did were all larger breeders with foal crops of 20-100 a year...and some of these folks are still producing that many which borders on insanity in this market. I really won't mind seeing these people forced to slow down production finally.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                            Are you talking about this Habitat for Horses and this Jerry Finch?

                            http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=371091

                            Sounds like they only have 3 days worth of feed for their own rescue and are desperate.
                            Yes, they are asking for money, "URGENT!"

                            Must be a different group.

                            As for the HSUS, we already know how they "come to help" and how they "use their resources" to do so.

                            Have you forgotten their so helpful ways in the last two hurricanes?
                            According to those there, the HSUS was INTERFERING with real help and the real helpers doing the work.
                            Really, some kinds of "help" are very questionable.
                            Bluey, I thought this thread was about the recent shutdown by the EU of North American horse meat? Fairfax posted my email and I was addressing her snide comment saying let the fundraising begin. Not only did the email not ask for donations, our organization specifically stated we will not accept donations for this effort. I stand by my comment that Jerry hasn’t asked for a penny.

                            What you are saying about HSUS is also irrelevant. I mentioned 3 Strikes. They hit the ground immediately when Jerry called them and didn’t leave until the end. Whether you like them or not, they were a tremendous help.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by vickitobin View Post
                              Bluey, I thought this thread was about the recent shutdown by the EU of North American horse meat? Fairfax posted my email and I was addressing her snide comment saying let the fundraising begin. Not only did the email not ask for donations, our organization specifically stated we will not accept donations for this effort. I stand by my comment that Jerry hasn’t asked for a penny.

                              What you are saying about HSUS is also irrelevant. I mentioned 3 Strikes. They hit the ground immediately when Jerry called them and didn’t leave until the end. Whether you like them or not, they were a tremendous help.
                              Whether you like them or not, the HSUS has a record of mismanaging funds and supplies in rescues.
                              There is enough out there to show that, don't need to take my word.
                              I know from the people that were at the site, in the hurricane rescue efforts.
                              The HSUS used those for their donation drives and raked in so much more money in a short time ... for their general coffers, already overflowing and used to lobby against animal ownership.
                              Fine, that is what they do, more power to them.

                              Nevertheless, if they want to "help" here and some of you want to welcome them, why not.
                              Maybe they have learned to keep a bit tighter ship from the previous controversies about their less than stellar help efforts.

                              As for some bringing up the HSUS and then wanting anyone else to stay quiet about them, I don't think this is that kind of forum, where you can ban anyone that has inconvenient facts and questions you may not like.
                              Thankfully, COTH is not a rescue or animal rights extremist groups only web site.
                              There are some internet places that still operate under free speech, as long as it abides by the rules already posted.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by WalkInTheWoods View Post
                                I am just dumbstruck that the EU has made their decision without the knowledge and superior intellectual contributions of LEO/FAIRFAX. What gall.
                                And apparently so is Leo/Fairfax.
                                Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                  Thankfully, COTH is not a rescue or animal rights extremist groups only web site.
                                  I don't think anyone is trying to take away your right to free speech; however, you have to remember that there are many of us on COTH that wouldn't agree with your thoughts and frankly exaggerated comments and you label us animal rights extremists. I'd say that most people reading this thread want some actual facts on what is happening, not hysterical responses from either side of the pro/con group.

                                  Sigh...one day I wish we could have a civil discussion about slaughter/rescue/carriages/you name it...
                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                                  ~Coth's Resident Deatheater~

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                                    Why is the pro slaughter side saying that all of those horses in the pipeline and on feedlots are going to be starved or dumped? Any pro slaughter posters want to answer that? The horses have owners (KB/Dealers/SH). It's illegal to neglect/dump horses.

                                    Aren't these the same "businessmen" that we have routinely been assured by the pro slaughter side, that are horsemen that have the horse's welfare in mind? And we are repeatedly told that they are engaged in a legal business, and abide by the law? And that incidents of abuse and neglect are so rare or set up by RARAs, to be inconsequential?

                                    So pro slaughter people...why are you now saying all of these horses on feedlots/owned by killer buyers/dealers in jeopardy?
                                    Yes. These individuals bought these horses for a commercial purpose. Now they have goods they can't sell for the use they intended to sell them. I for one won't send a dime to help these dealers out of the mess they made for themselves. Let them pry open their wallets to feed and re-sell all these horses they now own.
                                    \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                    Comment


                                    • Wouldn't it be funny come tomorrow AM to find out it was just a rouse started by some extremist group and 6 pages of arguing later the whole world took the bait and ran with it.

                                      Darkstar the reason there is little civility involved when topics like Horse slaughter for consumption , carriages horses , race horses , animal rights groups etc . Is because 99% of their following is based on an emotional response. Once emotion enters the stage , logic and reason exit quickly.

                                      The whole world is just one big nosy neighbor these days and everyone believes they have the right to have an opinion and rights to everyone else s business.

                                      Personally I have no issue with horse meat for consumption. On the same hand I truly understand that those that do eat horse very much would like to eat a product that is safe for consumption. That mud hole is one this country will have to work out if it wishes to remain an exporter of horse meat if its targeted consumer has finally put their foot down.
                                      "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by Darkstar View Post
                                        I don't think anyone is trying to take away your right to free speech; however, you have to remember that there are many of us on COTH that wouldn't agree with your thoughts and frankly exaggerated comments and you label us animal rights extremists. I'd say that most people reading this thread want some actual facts on what is happening, not hysterical responses from either side of the pro/con group.

                                        Sigh...one day I wish we could have a civil discussion about slaughter/rescue/carriages/you name it...
                                        Your take on these discussions would be more believable as presented if you had not been picking on me only.

                                        Yes, there is much to this topic and no, we are not where only one side's story is permitted, thankfully.

                                        We don't know if there is really a problem here and if so, what that is and what will come of this.

                                        In reality, we should maybe be more concerned about the January 2013 fiscal cliff and how that will affect all, including the horse industry.
                                        I don't think we will be doing business as usual any more after that.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by vickitobin View Post
                                          Not only did the email not ask for donations, our organization specifically stated we will not accept donations for this effort. I stand by my comment that Jerry hasn’t asked for a penny.
                                          Vicky, I was the one posting the e-mail and making that statement.
                                          Yes, EWA stated that they are not accepting any donations regarding this efffort.

                                          "Jerry will set-up a separate fund that will go through his accountant. Only the accountant will release funds to pay for any horses, supplies, etc."

                                          The above implies there will be fundraising.

                                          In the meantime others are planning the same, whether legitimately or not needs to be determined by those who are being asked to support the effort.

                                          As an example:

                                          https://www.wepay.com/donations/1824...28854223929240
                                          ************************
                                          \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X