• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

CA and Mexico slaughter houses no longer accepting U.S. horses?!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
    On Friday an "incorrectly labelled" shipment arrived in France causing the temporary shutdown of US horses accepted for import into the European Union (EU).

    The lack of complete information given to US kill buyers and auction houses led to them to believe that the shutdown was due to the new regulations pending on US horse meat. The regulations will require a "passport" system that certifies animals as drug free and in the care of the seller for at least six months. Those regulations will become enforced sometime between now and July of 2013.

    Auction yards and trucks have resumed "business as usual."




    How many crow would you like with your humble pie.

    EU was going to issue a press release? Didn't happen

    CFIA CONFIRMED...unlisted sources....? Didn't happen

    You are WORKING WITH GROUPS WHO GOT CFIA CONFIRMATION............................never happened

    And WHERE would that confirmation be?


    WOW....and you accuse me....WOW....

    A story from ONE truck driver stopped a WHOLE industry..

    WOW......turns out that plant in Quebec WAS taking shipments

    Brian Moore turned back...now people are saying he didn't try..
    I did not say the EU was issuing a press release. I said they were issuing a statement and they did this morning to the plants. Bouvry confirmed that. No, a story from one truck driver did not stop a whole industry. The EU stopped a whole industry and restarted it this morning. This matches what the source from the CFIA told our partners in Canada.

    I was trying to reply to another post of yours and when I hit submit, the screen went blank and now I can’t find the post. It was the one about where we called and what language they spoke. In response…. Two people spoke to two different people in different departments in Brussels around 4p their time and both spoke English. Another person we work with also spoke to one of the same people in Brussels and was also told the ban was lifted this morning. We’ve always had English speaking people whenever we’ve called. Some have heavy accents but we were always able to understand them.

    One of our board members spoke to Bouvry that told us they got the word from the EU this morning. The KBs said they got the word from the plants this morning which makes sense since the EU doesn't have a direct relationship with them.

    You can make whatever snide comments you want but the fact is that the EU was not accepting shipments from Canada or Mexico on Friday. This has been confirmed by slaughter supporters as well as equine advocates. No one is going to lose several days business over rumors.

    Comment


    • And people on this board think I'm mercenary?

      Ay caramba!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Frizzle View Post
        If done by someone who knows how to do it properly, a gunshot would be a far better option than the slaughterhouse.

        Personally, I'm glad that the Europeans are no longer accepting our (probably often very tainted) horse meat. The people who eat horses (although I personally find that appalling) will be safer, and people here will have to accept responsibility for their horses' lives/deaths. If you can't can't afford chemical euthanasia, find someone who can put the horse down with a gun or do it yourself--bullets are pretty inexpensive.
        Well said. And while horses in urgent need of euthanasia wouldn't be slaughter candidates anyways, given how far some folks are geographically from their veterinarian in the event of an emergency, I think it's a good thing for folks to know how to do.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          Originally posted by JGHIRETIRE View Post
          I second that.

          QUOTE=sunridge1;6610616]Aw...Swamp what a great post.
          Third that.

          Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
          Seriously, some of you here take this person seriously?
          Good Lord, I hope not.

          Originally posted by JGHIRETIRE View Post
          As I recall it was stated that there was alot of confusion about this.
          In any event so what's your point???
          Don't hold your breath that there will be any groveling.
          I find it rather sad that it's more important that you be right than what was actually going to happen to the horses.
          Exactly. Had the situation been more serious, it would have been nice to see a white flag raised so that both sides could come together, but sadly, some people have an inflated sense of self importance....

          Originally posted by mvp View Post
          Take note! This drying up of the EU market for the US horse garbage is going to happen sooner or later. No reason for it to be a surprise next time.
          Sadly, it may well be because as long as slaughter is an option, horse people won't work together. What I find interesting is those who repeatedly post as being pro slaughter insist because it is an "option" yet won't lend support to the true options. Why not exhaust all valid options before resorting to the worst?

          Originally posted by vickitobin View Post
          How are your rights being impacted? You can sell them, donate them, euthanize them, use them for work, service, etc. When slaughter ends, you will have those same rights.

          You are worried about toxic waste in the ground but have no problems with humans eating toxic meat?
          Ah, but the argument will be not EVERY horse in the slaughter system has had Bute or wormer, so eating the meat is a MUCH safer option than burial...

          And don't forget Bluey and her pals believe that if horse slaughter is banned, the RARAs will have so much power they will be able to abolish use of horses by humans in any way.

          What THEY forget is they are able to slaughter and eat their own horses any time they choose. There is no law against that.
          Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
          http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
          http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

          Comment


          • Originally posted by PhoenixFarm View Post
            You know, I have a normal personal restriction of never posting on threads like this, and the below is exactly the reason.



            Allow me to speak for the thousands of people who are hoping both sides (to borrow from Dave Barry) will go away and whack each other with their signs and leave the rest of us alone. There are an INFINITE number of other ways than looking at horse ownership. And even these two listing are biased!

            I do not view my horses as commodified livestock valuable only as $$ signs. I also do not view them all as pets that I owe a permanent, lifetime home to. I have a couple of lifers here. They have earned their spot on that list. But I don't have the kind of ego that is certain that I'm the only one that can ever offer an appropriate care and home. Nor do I believe that every horse that crosses my path is entitled to lifer status. They have every right to try for it, but I just don't assume it's automatic. Every horse that crosses my path does deserve the very best care, training, and management I can possibly offer it for the time it is with me. And if I am going to sell or rehome one, I owe them my very best effort to make the very best match. But they aren't my dogs. And I don't want them to be. I've pulled my share out of the kill pipeline, but I pull the ones I think I can help. In other words, not the crippled or the crazy (neurotic and slightly nutty, sure, but not flat out crazy).

            But don't try to tell me that my only two choices are "horses as beef cattle" or "pretty pony petter who think they are my wittle pets". I'd guess most of us fall between those two points.
            Thank you very much, well stated.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
              As if a decomposing carcass, or one that is composted is somehow worse than the environmental damage that slaughterhouses do.

              Bluey- google "Paula Bacon Letter about horse slaughter plant"
              She talks about the environmental damage Dallas Crowne did, the unpaid fines, and how it almost bankrupted the city's bankroll for prosecuting crime.

              Give me a break, that is nonsense.

              There should not be any enviromental damage done, not by badly run plants or carcass contamination by a clueless owner burying their own horse in their own land.

              Of course, she had an agenda, wanted to make all look bad and worse.
              That plant was overdo closing, not the right place there for an industrial plant, once it was becoming residential.

              You know better, or should after this has been repeated time and again, but here it goes once more.
              Those plants, like any other out there, are regulated by several agencies, are inspected and fined when not in compliance.

              That specific plant had an old last stage fluid cleaning system that tended to fail and they had to shut it down and fix it, but as they were being run out of town, they didn't want to replace it, so it kept having problems and fixing it and having problem and ... you get the picture.

              Bad management is that, bad management, the companies get fined and eventually closed.

              That some mismanage a plant, sorry, use some logic, doesn't in any way mean "slaughter is evil and needs banning".

              Comment


              • Originally posted by vickitobin View Post
                How are your rights being impacted? You can sell them, donate them, euthanize them, use them for work, service, etc. When slaughter ends, you will have those same rights.

                You are worried about toxic waste in the ground but have no problems with humans eating toxic meat?
                You parrot animal rights extremist words and then wonder why you are considered one?

                "Humans eating toxic meat"?

                Really?

                Ok, maybe you don't understand the process of those that are providing what we eat to the rest of us.

                There are many laws and regulations, many government agencies overseeing them, individual protocols by producers, that insure best we can that what is offered to the public is as safe as we know how to make it.

                That is an ongoing, less than perfect process, but if you look back, we have today the safest, most aboundant and varied produce humanity ever had.

                Well, the same applies to horse meat, that is inspected and tested extensively.
                That meat has been sold for decades now and no one is dying like flies from eating it, or getting the dreaded purple polka dot disease either.

                Really.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by jenm View Post
                  Third that.



                  Good Lord, I hope not.



                  Exactly. Had the situation been more serious, it would have been nice to see a white flag raised so that both sides could come together, but sadly, some people have an inflated sense of self importance....



                  Sadly, it may well be because as long as slaughter is an option, horse people won't work together. What I find interesting is those who repeatedly post as being pro slaughter insist because it is an "option" yet won't lend support to the true options. Why not exhaust all valid options before resorting to the worst?



                  Ah, but the argument will be not EVERY horse in the slaughter system has had Bute or wormer, so eating the meat is a MUCH safer option than burial...

                  And don't forget Bluey and her pals believe that if horse slaughter is banned, the RARAs will have so much power they will be able to abolish use of horses by humans in any way.

                  What THEY forget is they are able to slaughter and eat their own horses any time they choose. There is no law against that.
                  I sure hope that you don't only buy meat from cattle that never had been dewormed.

                  My point in these "BAN SLAUGHTER!" debates is this:

                  When some extremist animal rights followers want to BAN, eliminate, not let others do what they do, that is a perfectly good and legal, regulated process, then they cross the line of their rights and impinge on the rights of others.

                  Don't like some that some do in slaughter?
                  First, be sure you got the story right, you are not following bad information from those with agendas.
                  Then, if there is something wrong, work to change that, not BAN-BAN-BAN or else.

                  That is nonsense, like wanting to ban driving because some keep running stop signs and some times cause wrecks.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by SwampYankee View Post
                    Time-sharing at a well-run riding club would be one model that would allow people who cannot afford to keep their own horse to ride and enjoy horses on whatever level they wish
                    Um, I do believe this option already exists, it is called a lesson barn. They are all over in various price ranges. Many even have trail riding lessons.
                    Maybe you were too busy looking down your nose to notice them.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by trubandloki View Post
                      Um, I do believe this option already exists, it is called a lesson barn. They are all over in various price ranges. Many even have trail riding lessons.
                      Maybe you were too busy looking down your nose to notice them.
                      Right, I wonder when someone finally would state the obvious.

                      Thank you.

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                        I sure hope that you don't only buy meat from cattle that never had been dewormed.

                        I don't eat meat.

                        My point in these "BAN SLAUGHTER!" debates is this:

                        When some extremist animal rights followers want to BAN, eliminate, not let others do what they do, that is a perfectly good and legal, regulated process, then they cross the line of their rights and impinge on the rights of others.

                        There is nothing good and regulated about the slaughter process, including how the horses are transported.

                        Don't like some that some do in slaughter?
                        First, be sure you got the story right, you are not following bad information from those with agendas.
                        Then, if there is something wrong, work to change that, not BAN-BAN-BAN or else.

                        I'm all about the ban, but you aren't so what are you doing to change it?

                        That is nonsense, like wanting to ban driving because some keep running stop signs and some times cause wrecks.

                        And yet again, another ridiculous "analogy". Did you get tired of using your drunk driving one?
                        As many of us have stated numerous times, it's not illegal to slaughter and eat your own horse. Go for it.
                        Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                        http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                        http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by jenm View Post
                          Sadly, it [the surprise when the EU finally bans "undocumented" meat again] may well be because as long as slaughter is an option, horse people won't work together. What I find interesting is those who repeatedly post as being pro slaughter insist because it is an "option" yet won't lend support to the true options. Why not exhaust all valid options before resorting to the worst?
                          What? There are laws on the books requiring documentation that horses have lived a drug-free life if they are sold to a slaughter plant and you think there's any good reason to have the next round of EU bans be a surprise? Why?

                          It makes no difference whether or not horse folk work together. When selling horses as meat becomes unprofitable, it will stop. That's largely out of our control.

                          IMO, the ethical or even emotional debates about whether or not horses are livestock or pets won't ever trump the economics of it all. And you don't have to scratch the surface of anyone's position to find an economic agenda behind it, either.
                          The armchair saddler
                          Politically Pro-Cat

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by mvp View Post
                            What? There are laws on the books requiring documentation that horses have lived a drug-free life if they are sold to a slaughter plant and you think there's any good reason to have the next round of EU bans be a surprise? Why?

                            It makes no difference whether or not horse folk work together. When selling horses as meat becomes unprofitable, it will stop. That's largely out of our control.

                            IMO, the ethical or even emotional debates about whether or not horses are livestock or pets won't ever trump the economics of it all. And you don't have to scratch the surface of anyone's position to find an economic agenda behind it, either.
                            Very true.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                              Very true.
                              So what is your economic agenda?
                              I support equine meat processing as an option for those who choose to use it.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by wonderhorseguy View Post
                                So what is your economic agenda?
                                I think you misread...
                                I'm agreeing that economics are what drives slaughter. It won't be stopped because of any emotional appeal about whether it is wrong, arguments about rights to do what you want with horses, etc. It will stop when it no longer is economically profitable.

                                Comment


                                • And yet more confusion over why and who and what....

                                  http://www.drf.com/news/canadian-sla...-deliveries-us
                                  ************************
                                  \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                                  Comment


                                  • It is a wholly contradictory article given the known frequency of bute in US horses, not to mention the apparent ass-coverage by the EU.
                                    "Absolutely not," Bouvry said. "We used to test for [drugs] in the parts per thousands and millions, and now we test per billions."
                                    Never mind I reread it, comprehension fail...but there still is NO test for bute.

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                                      I think you misread...
                                      I'm agreeing that economics are what drives slaughter. It won't be stopped because of any emotional appeal about whether it is wrong, arguments about rights to do what you want with horses, etc. It will stop when it no longer is economically profitable.
                                      The original post said "anyone's position", not "anyone with a pro-slaughter position". If you are agreeing with the original post then you must have an economic position.

                                      As a pro-slaughter person there is an economic part to my position but the major part is my right to use my property.
                                      I support equine meat processing as an option for those who choose to use it.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by wonderhorseguy View Post
                                        The original post said "anyone's position", not "anyone with a pro-slaughters position". If you are agreeing with the original post then you must have an economic position.

                                        As a pro-slaughter person there is an economic part to my position but the major part is my right to use my property.
                                        Either that mantra is so old it's obsolete or from another planet, "my right to use my property". We haven't had those "rights" for decades. We have had privileges like driving, and hunting. So far the the only "rights" are that we can OWN. We haven't in my lifetime been able to do as we please on our own property or with our own property. Check your state statutes. You'll be amused and surprised.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by SwampYankee View Post
                                          And people on this board think I'm mercenary?

                                          Ay caramba!
                                          Maybe they should just see how mercenary you are Swamp Yankee.
                                          http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/showthread.php?t=371433

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X