• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Assaulting our rights to own and use horses:

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Assaulting our rights to own and use horses:

    Wherever you are in these issues we discuss regularly, if you wear a tin foil hat, or just like to accuse others of doing so, I thought you may find this opinion article about animal rights and the HSUS interesting.
    Why?
    It can directly affect our rights to use any animals, including horses.
    Why is it relevant to post that here?
    For most here, owning and using horses (and all other kinds of animals) is what we do (bolding mine):

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_1933863.html

    -
    -

    ---" ...
    These two alliances aren't as unlikely as they initially appear. That's because the Humane Society, the country's largest animal advocacy organization, has increasingly embraced a moderate, Goldilocks approach to animal rights advocacy over the past several years. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the Humane Society's litigation group, which was founded by attorney Jon Lovvorn in 2005.

    "We look at cases that are going to have a concrete impact on animals but that are winnable," Lovvorn told The Huffington Post. "You won't see us out asking for courts to declare animals persons. Or to file habeas corpus requests on behalf of animals, or other things that require judges to go way beyond what they're comfortable with."

    The narrow path between animal rights extremists and the agricultural industry can be lonely. The Humane Society sometimes gets pilloried by critics on both sides at once. But experts in the field say the group's moderation has produced real results. The group started with just three full-time lawyers, including Lovvorn; it now employs 25 and works with 2,000 others on a pro-bono basis. Lovvorn, 43, estimated that he and his colleagues have won about three dozen cases in the past seven years.

    "They are definitely the leading shop for litigation for animal protection," attorney David Wolfson, who teaches courses on animals and public policy and animal law at NYU and NYU Law, respectively, explained. "They are generally extremely disciplined, focused and professional. I would also characterize them as extremely pragmatic and realistic. They're not chasing dreams."

    The ultimate dream for animal rights advocates would be something like the application of the 14th Amendment's equal protection to animals as well as humans. Such a ruling might ban the rearing of domesticated animals for meat altogether. And some major thinkers in the field -- most famously Steve Wise of the Nonhuman Rights Project -- are actively pursuing it.

    "Right now, it's really easy to determine who has the capacity to have a right," he explained. "You look at the species. If you're human, you have rights. If you're not, you don't. What we're arguing is that species is completely arbitrary. There are many nonhuman animals that have really serious cognitive complexity. And we think that cognitive complexity alone is a sufficient condition to make some animals legal persons."
    "---

    -
    -

    For those that keep insisting animal rights extremists groups are not after our rights to have horses, well, there is proof they really, after all, are after eliminating all uses of animals, as so many of us have been trying to point to all along.

  • #2
    Remember, the HSUS is animal rights-not welfare....and animal terrorist supporting whackjob, Alex Pachecko, is now the HSUS Director. Evil people wrapped in a sick dog's plea for money.
    "Sic Gorgiamus Allos Subjectatos Nunc"

    Comment


    • #3
      How do these people address things like predators and prey in animals. How is it OK for that fox to eat a mouse but it is not OK for us to eat an animal?

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Originally posted by trubandloki View Post
        How do these people address things like predators and prey in animals. How is it OK for that fox to eat a mouse but it is not OK for us to eat an animal?
        They lack logic, they don't go there.
        They focus their propaganda only on the "cute little animals we need to protect from evil humans" propaganda.

        Have been at that for some decades now, a generation they have been trying to brain wash into thinking animals are other than one more renewable, natural resource everything alive, including the human animal, are in this world.

        Those groups are not aiming for you or I, they are after all those that don't think things thru, just mostly react to what others say and present and so fall for causes of the moment that are used to further certain agendas.

        Just see the one now very long thread someone started with an animal rights extremist driven article a while back for a good example of what I and that article are saying.

        I thought this article was a good answer to that one, but deserved it's own thread.

        Comment


        • #5
          HSUS is PETA in a better suit. In this case "clothes do not make the man."

          HSUS and PETA are allies in a war against animal ownership and use. HSUS is the "political" wing and PETA is the "provisional" wing (a la the organization of the Irish Republican Army).

          G.
          Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
            HSUS is PETA in a better suit. In this case "clothes do not make the man."

            HSUS and PETA are allies in a war against animal ownership and use. HSUS is the "political" wing and PETA is the "provisional" wing (a la the organization of the Irish Republican Army).

            G.
            Would that make them Sinn Fern?

            Comment


            • #7
              Sinn Fawn, my mistake!

              Comment


              • #8
                The HSUS and PETA make me want to quit the world.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Originally posted by SLW View Post
                  The HSUS and PETA make me want to quit the world.
                  Putting this in perspective, to animal rights extremists, as one poster here, that goes to their conventions told us, that we use animals and at times abuse them makes her wish "humans were wiped off this world".
                  And she was serious.

                  I think those feelings are mutual, but for opposite reasons.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by AlterNetReality View Post
                    Would that make them Sinn Fern?
                    No, but maybe Sinn Foal!!!

                    G.
                    Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by AlterNetReality View Post
                      Sinn Fawn, my mistake!
                      Sinn Féin, actually.
                      RIP my beautiful Lola, ????–August 29, 2014

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
                        No, but maybe Sinn Foal!!!

                        G.
                        Or Fianna Foal might even be better... since Fianna is "Warrior"

                        :=)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by AlterNetReality View Post
                          Or Fianna Foal might even be better...
                          lol! Brilliant!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Bluey View Post

                            "They are definitely the leading shop for litigation for animal protection," attorney David Wolfson, who teaches courses on animals and public policy and animal law at NYU and NYU Law, respectively, explained. "They are generally extremely disciplined, focused and professional. I would also characterize them as extremely pragmatic and realistic. They're not chasing dreams."

                            The ultimate dream for animal rights advocates would be something like the application of the 14th Amendment's equal protection to animals as well as humans. Such a ruling might ban the rearing of domesticated animals for meat altogether. And some major thinkers in the field -- most famously Steve Wise of the Nonhuman Rights Project -- are actively pursuing it.

                            "Right now, it's really easy to determine who has the capacity to have a right," he explained. "You look at the species. If you're human, you have rights. If you're not, you don't. What we're arguing is that species is completely arbitrary. There are many nonhuman animals that have really serious cognitive complexity. And we think that cognitive complexity alone is a sufficient condition to make some animals legal persons."
                            "---

                            I think the argument for giving rights to animals is a way to forget about giving the perks of rights to people we don't like. Could we not have a measurable poverty rate for children in the US *before* we get amped up about the rights of animals?

                            It seems to me that we'll work harder to create rhetoric for an animal's having great quality of life than insuring that human beings actually have that.

                            A few years ago, NYU got $1M or so from some animal rights guy in order to form the (more broad-sounding) "Animal Studies" program.

                            It's the latest, expansionist move in Cultural Studies. Over the last 30 years or so, we did women, we did people of color, we did LGBT. So now the academic types have moved onto animals, the final frontier. Oh, there were a few who, for a minute after the 2008 Crash, thought that we ought to consider socioeconomic class as a characteristic that is defining of experience and discrimination. But no one in America wants to acknowledge that class exists, so we leapt over that to talk about animals.

                            All well and good, but I don't know many academics who know diddly about any actual animals besides the pets they have personally owned.
                            The armchair saddler
                            Politically Pro-Cat

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by trubandloki View Post
                              How do these people address things like predators and prey in animals. How is it OK for that fox to eat a mouse but it is not OK for us to eat an animal?
                              It is often not okay to them. That's how far they are removed from a love of, and understanding of, animals. Take the late Linda McCartney. She donated to a raptor rehabilitation program in England. When it was pointed out to her that the money she gave to feed the owls & hawks was spent on mice, since that's what they ate, she (no joke) asked the rehabbers if they could switch the birds to a vegetarian diet. When told that wasn't possible she arranged that her money would go to support in other ways but specifically could not be used for food for them.

                              There is also a movement to have your own pets be vegans. Here's only one site: http://www.vegetariandogs.com/

                              Make no mistake. Although the people with these views say it's for the animals, it is NOT about the animals at all, nor is it about what is best for them.
                              Last edited by Anne FS; Oct. 4, 2012, 11:51 AM. Reason: fixed typo

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                And we think that cognitive complexity alone is a sufficient condition to make some animals legal persons.""---
                                ok, I agree some animals are smarter than some people. So if they become "legal persons", though, I am baffled as to how that works. Sure, us humans have rights- but with rights come responsibilities, chiefly the responsibility to respect the rights of other "legal persons". How are you going to explain to the grizzly bear that now that he is a "legal person" he can't go around eating hikers (other "legal persons") anymore? or explain to the horses, who have been released from their "prison", that they can't stand in the middle of the road and block traffic, and it doesn't matter how hungry they are, they can't just go eat the golf course unless they pay a membership fee first? or, if you could explain that, they'd have to figure out how to earn money. Oh wait, maybe they could work and carry people around in exchange for food. Oh right we already do that...

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by wendy View Post
                                  ok, I agree some animals are smarter than some people. So if they become "legal persons", though, I am baffled as to how that works. Sure, us humans have rights- but with rights come responsibilities, chiefly the responsibility to respect the rights of other "legal persons". How are you going to explain to the grizzly bear that now that he is a "legal person" he can't go around eating hikers (other "legal persons") anymore? or explain to the horses, who have been released from their "prison", that they can't stand in the middle of the road and block traffic, and it doesn't matter how hungry they are, they can't just go eat the golf course unless they pay a membership fee first? or, if you could explain that, they'd have to figure out how to earn money. Oh wait, maybe they could work and carry people around in exchange for food. Oh right we already do that...




                                  Seriously, you see, that is where guardianship comes in.

                                  The trouble, once we have animal guardians, they can sue you if they don't think you are doing what they think you need to do for your animals.
                                  Just try to defend yourself and cope with the aggravation and expenses in time and other resources defending will bring.

                                  Guardianship of animals given human rights is one more assault on our rights to own animals as we do today.
                                  Those assaults are coming on so many fronts, with money gullible people donate to those animal rights extremists groups to care for those little defenseless animals in cages in their donation mailing drives.
                                  And we are talking millions a year here.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Anne FS View Post
                                    Make no mistake. Although the people with these views say it's for the animals, it is NOT about the animals at all, nor is it about what is best for them.
                                    This in spades. It is about control. They start with small groups and pick them off ie the Carriage horses in order to gain political and public footholds.

                                    No matter how many are fooled into believing they about animal welfare they are truly about animal abolition.

                                    I also do NOT understand their constant need to humanize animals. Why can't animals be animals and humans be humans.
                                    http://www.ranchosantafereview.com/2...mplex-animals/
                                    "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Wait, I can see a positive.

                                      Deer will have to carry insurance so when they smash into my car it is on them to pay for it.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        http://occasionalsongs.wordpress.com...ighting-dirty/
                                        "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X