• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Assaulting our rights to own and use horses:

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Dispatcher View Post
    A "law" to make livestock companion animals will not fly in the U.S. You can bet your bottom dollar that farmers across our nation would call all out war on this.

    Where I live, cults don't make laws. I think because there are so many libraires, colleges, and universities around here. People have vast resources to learn the truth behind a movement.
    Is under Senatorial study in South Dakota and will come to a vote at the end of the month
    The Elephant in the room

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Dispatcher View Post
      A "law" to make livestock companion animals will not fly in the U.S. You can bet your bottom dollar that farmers across our nation would call all out war on this.
      Totally laughable to even consider possible.
      ************************
      \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
        Is under Senatorial study in South Dakota and will come to a vote at the end of the month
        Plenty of BS legislation comes up all the time, never making it past the garbage can.
        ************************
        \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

        Comment


        • No. I do understand there are problems but I also understand there are laws that can be enforced and I also know that truckers who are going to ship to Canada and break those laws will NOT be able to bring the horses in through the Sweetgrass Mt/Coutts Alberta crossing.

          I observed FOR TWO YEARS the Fort MacLeod plant. Many improvements were made, many changes in the culture were implemented.

          You don't want to hear about those as they rebut your slaughter comments.

          So..you will go after transportation amd auctions. They WILL have to undergo numerous changes and they will as it will make them more money.

          There is ALWAYS going to be a u tube of a woman striking her child in the face.

          Does that mean ALL women strike their children in the face and therefore Motherhood should be banned?

          THIS is what the industry battles daily...this woman IS a PETA member and in a "non threatening" interview this morning managed to slip in...of course a LITTLE beef or meat is good for you, but there are substitutes that are not of an ethical nature regarding abusive animal care and if we have the right to consume another being....Direct quote from the Dave Rutherford Show, CHQR Calgary..11:15 am

          Here is her book she is pushing:

          Publication Date: October 16, 2012
          Each year the average North American ingests well over two hundred pounds of animal protein. Meanwhile the global appetite for meat has increased dramatically. But feeding our meat addiction comes at tremendous cost. Mainting our current level of consumption is ecologically impossible in the longterm and undermines our personal health and community well-being.

          High Steaks documents the disastrous consequences of modern large-scale industrial meat production and excessive consumption, including:

          The loss of vast tracts of arable land and fresh water to intensive livestock production

          Increased pollution, loss of biodiversity, deforestation, and accelerating climate change

          The environmental and health impacts of too much animal fat, and of antibiotics and other chemicals in our food.
          Timely and compelling, this powerful book offers a modest, commonsense approach to a serious problem, suggesting strategies for all of us to cut back on our consumption of animal products and ensure that the meat we do consume is produced in a sustainable, ecologically responsible manner. At the same time, High Steaks describes progressive food policy shifts that will discourage factory farming and encourage people to eat in ways that support ecosystems and personal health.

          Eleanor Boyle has been teaching and writing for twenty-five years, with a focus on food systems and their social, environmental, and health consequences. As well as working with organizations aiming for better food policy, she holds an MSc in food policy and is an instructor at the Centre for Sustainability at the University of British Columbia.

          Climate change/////here we go AGAIN...COW FARTS ARE DESTROYING THE ENVIRONMENT

          Loss of land IS of concern...but NOT by livestock and farming interests. It is by the overrun of housing developments AND golf courses.
          The Elephant in the room

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
            No. I do understand there are problems but I also understand there are laws that can be enforced and I also know that truckers who are going to ship to Canada and break those laws will NOT be able to bring the horses in through the Sweetgrass Mt/Coutts Alberta crossing.

            I observed FOR TWO YEARS the Fort MacLeod plant. Many improvements were made, many changes in the culture were implemented.

            You don't want to hear about those as they rebut your slaughter comments.

            So..you will go after transportation amd auctions. They WILL have to undergo numerous changes and they will as it will make them more money.

            There is ALWAYS going to be a u tube of a woman striking her child in the face.

            Does that mean ALL women strike their children in the face and therefore Motherhood should be banned?

            THIS is what the industry battles daily...this woman IS a PETA member and in a "non threatening" interview this morning managed to slip in...of course a LITTLE beef or meat is good for you, but there are substitutes that are not of an ethical nature regarding abusive animal care and if we have the right to consume another being....Direct quote from the Dave Rutherford Show, CHQR Calgary..11:15 am

            Here is her book she is pushing:

            Publication Date: October 16, 2012
            Each year the average North American ingests well over two hundred pounds of animal protein. Meanwhile the global appetite for meat has increased dramatically. But feeding our meat addiction comes at tremendous cost. Mainting our current level of consumption is ecologically impossible in the longterm and undermines our personal health and community well-being.

            High Steaks documents the disastrous consequences of modern large-scale industrial meat production and excessive consumption, including:

            The loss of vast tracts of arable land and fresh water to intensive livestock production

            Increased pollution, loss of biodiversity, deforestation, and accelerating climate change

            The environmental and health impacts of too much animal fat, and of antibiotics and other chemicals in our food.
            Timely and compelling, this powerful book offers a modest, commonsense approach to a serious problem, suggesting strategies for all of us to cut back on our consumption of animal products and ensure that the meat we do consume is produced in a sustainable, ecologically responsible manner. At the same time, High Steaks describes progressive food policy shifts that will discourage factory farming and encourage people to eat in ways that support ecosystems and personal health.

            Eleanor Boyle has been teaching and writing for twenty-five years, with a focus on food systems and their social, environmental, and health consequences. As well as working with organizations aiming for better food policy, she holds an MSc in food policy and is an instructor at the Centre for Sustainability at the University of British Columbia.

            Climate change/////here we go AGAIN...COW FARTS ARE DESTROYING THE ENVIRONMENT

            Loss of land IS of concern...but NOT by livestock and farming interests. It is by the overrun of housing developments AND golf courses.
            Well PETA is an AR group, but where do you see that she is a member?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
              Totally laughable to even consider possible.
              Sorry...North Dakota



              H$U$' campaign manager for Measure 5 in North Dakota claims ) that Measure 5 has "nothing to do with animal agriculture"... But WE KNOW that H$U$ doesn't do ANYTHING without setting a precedent! Why else would they be grouping horses, cats and dogs together unless they were making an attempt to reclassify horses from livestock to companion animals?!

              Also in this link is a recording of Jason Schmidt, with North Dakota Animal Stewards to defeat Measure 5 and he is really giving HSUS a run for their money in North Dakota! Please support their campaign!!!
              Measure 5 Town Hall Meeting Tonight in Valley City | NewsDakotawww.newsdakota.com

              VALLEY CITY, N.D. (NewsDakota.com) Opponents of Measure 5 will hold a meeting in Valley City tonight...



              Lovey..ya need to get out of Kentucky and travel America.
              The Elephant in the room

              Comment


              • Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                Well PETA is an AR group, but where do you see that she is a member?
                From my membership list and she also attended and was a guest speaker in New Oreleans at their convention around 2002-2003
                The Elephant in the room

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                  Lovey..ya need to get out of Kentucky and travel America.
                  That is soooooooooooooo funny.
                  Not that you'd know why.
                  ************************
                  \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                    So..you will go after transportation amd auctions. They WILL have to undergo numerous changes and they will as it will make them more money.
                    THAT has been mine and many other's number one priority - for over a decade.

                    That's where some of us have the on the ground experience.

                    You could build the most incredible slaughter plant in the world, but there will NEVER be any changes in the pipeline unless the plant contracts someone like Sallee's for transportation and auctioneers/feedlot owners/KB's who give a damn.
                    ************************
                    \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                      Plenty of BS legislation comes up all the time, never making it past the garbage can.
                      I could write a book......

                      On the other hand, plenty of bad legislation DOES make it through. Well intentioned, perhaps. But bad public policy in the long run.

                      Which is why it's possible to be against specific legislation, but not necessarily opposed to the intent behind it.

                      It's unfortunate, because often poorly drafted legislation pits groups against each other when if folks would pull their heads out.... some good could be done.

                      I guess that's a whole 'nother subject....
                      Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                      Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                      -Rudyard Kipling

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                        From my membership list and she also attended and was a guest speaker in New Oreleans at their convention around 2002-2003
                        And here we go again; info from a decade ago.
                        ************************
                        \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                        Comment


                        • Climate Change and the Livestock Industry - Eleanor Boyle
                          http://eleanorboyle.com/articles/ClF...SheetDec07.pdf

                          Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                          From my membership list and she also attended and was a guest speaker in New Oreleans at their convention around 2002-2003
                          This is only part of what she has to say on the subject.
                          I'm not finished reading it yet.

                          Modern industrial meat production causes global warming by several means, including:
                          1) Deforestation. Unknown to most citizens, the livestock industry is “the major driver of
                          deforestation” (FAO, 2006, p.xxiii). Most of the Amazon rainforest that has been cut
                          down is used for livestock pasture, and much of the rest is used to grow the huge amounts
                          of feed needed to fatten cows and pigs to produce steak and pork chops. Not only does
                          deforestation cause environmental problems such as loss of biodiversity, but it removes a
                          link in the carbon cycle in which trees would naturally take some of the atmosphere’s
                          excess carbon dioxide and turn it into oxygen. Deforestation therefore decreases nature’s
                          ability to mitigate global warming.
                          The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                          H. Cate

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                            Climate change/////here we go AGAIN...COW FARTS ARE DESTROYING THE ENVIRONMENT
                            I heard a few years ago they were going to charge a tax on farmers who own livestock that chew cud as their " Belching" was a direct link to ozone loss and global warming. I think sheep and dairy cows were at the top of their list.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                              I could write a book......

                              On the other hand, plenty of bad legislation DOES make it through. Well intentioned, perhaps. But bad public policy in the long run.

                              Which is why it's possible to be against specific legislation, but not necessarily opposed to the intent behind it.

                              It's unfortunate, because often poorly drafted legislation pits groups against each other when if folks would pull their heads out.... some good could be done.

                              I guess that's a whole 'nother subject....
                              Totally agree.

                              The KY Ag Dept. put a board together to write minimal care standards for equines, because in the past they used the one for cattle/livestock.

                              Well intentioned? Or just a passifier to calm the mounting horse neglect calls they have been receiving in recent years.

                              The majority of this board is AG or industry related. Only one member has some animal welfare experience, but he doesn't have a back bone .

                              Thus some of the changes would override good county ordinances already in place for horses.
                              ************************
                              \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                              Comment


                              • Too true. Helps to read the entire thing.
                                You should totally write a book!! Don't you think it would be a bestseller?? LOL Surely you could outdo 50 shades???


                                Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                                I could write a book......

                                On the other hand, plenty of bad legislation DOES make it through. Well intentioned, perhaps. But bad public policy in the long run.

                                Which is why it's possible to be against specific legislation, but not necessarily opposed to the intent behind it.

                                It's unfortunate, because often poorly drafted legislation pits groups against each other when if folks would pull their heads out.... some good could be done.
                                :X
                                I guess that's a whole 'nother subject....
                                The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                                H. Cate

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                                  Thus some of the changes would override good county ordinances already in place for horses.
                                  This is REALLY common. Not just for animal laws, but for all kinds of legislation.

                                  Even at the local level, the people responsible for drafting the legislation know little to nothing about the subject matter. Or, they might know the subject matter (let's say... hog farming), but not be really educated on laws and regulations pertaining to hog farming. But because they're the only hog farmer willing to chip in and help - he's "it".

                                  Or, you have a very urban oriented planner - who might be a fantastic county employee, a hard worker, the works, who gets stuck drafting an ordinance on a something he knows nothing about.

                                  An example where I live would be a proposed ordinance directed at something very specific, but had the unintended consequence of banning all unloading or loading of livestock except at certain places on farms. All kinds of setback requirements, screening requirements, etc. HUH?

                                  That didn't go over too well with the farmers. Or horse owners - because we load and unload horses at parks, shows, meets, schooling facilities, on private land to trail ride (with permission of course)... etc etc etc.

                                  When that was pointed out - the shock on people's faces was obvious.

                                  Here's the problem. That proposed ordinance was pretty close to being voted on and put into law.

                                  All because people didn't realize what they were doing.

                                  This sort of things happens a great deal. If I was to put on my tin foil hat and look in the sky for the black helicopters - I could accuse the locality of being infiltrated by RARA's and hating horsies and ponees and cute widdle cows.

                                  The truth is, it was an extremely well intentioned effort to promote agriculture, which is our largest industry. (where I live) It was just poor drafting by very well educated, wonderful, competent people our locality is blessed to have working for us. That's all.

                                  Personally, I chalk that up in the "sh** happens" category. And happily work with these terrific people.
                                  Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                                  Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                                  -Rudyard Kipling

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                                    This sort of things happens a great deal. If I was to put on my tin foil hat and look in the sky for the black helicopters - I could accuse the locality of being infiltrated by RARA's and hating horsies and ponees and cute widdle cows.
                                    Thank you!
                                    ************************
                                    \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                                    Comment


                                    • I'm glad you're doing it - you're absolutely right.
                                      It's scary.

                                      Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                                      This is REALLY common. Not just for animal laws, but for all kinds of legislation.

                                      Even at the local level, the people responsible for drafting the legislation know little to nothing about the subject matter. Or, they might know the subject matter (let's say... hog farming), but not be really educated on laws and regulations pertaining to hog farming. But because they're the only hog farmer willing to chip in and help - he's "it".

                                      Or, you have a very urban oriented planner - who might be a fantastic county employee, a hard worker, the works, who gets stuck drafting an ordinance on a something he knows nothing about.

                                      An example where I live would be a proposed ordinance directed at something very specific, but had the unintended consequence of banning all unloading or loading of livestock except at certain places on farms. All kinds of setback requirements, screening requirements, etc. HUH?

                                      That didn't go over too well with the farmers. Or horse owners - because we load and unload horses at parks, shows, meets, schooling facilities, on private land to trail ride (with permission of course)... etc etc etc.

                                      When that was pointed out - the shock on people's faces was obvious.

                                      Here's the problem. That proposed ordinance was pretty close to being voted on and put into law.

                                      All because people didn't realize what they were doing.

                                      This sort of things happens a great deal. If I was to put on my tin foil hat and look in the sky for the black helicopters - I could accuse the locality of being infiltrated by RARA's and hating horsies and ponees and cute widdle cows.

                                      The truth is, it was an extremely well intentioned effort to promote agriculture, which is our largest industry. (where I live) It was just poor drafting by very well educated, wonderful, competent people our locality is blessed to have working for us. That's all.

                                      Personally, I chalk that up in the "sh** happens" category. And happily work with these terrific people.
                                      The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                                      H. Cate

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                                        And here we go again; info from a decade ago.
                                        My list is from 2010
                                        The Elephant in the room

                                        Comment


                                        • Here's another example.

                                          My state created a minimum care standard for livestock not too long ago. It was part of a larger effort to update the animal care code. (as time went one changes here and there had made a bit of a muddle out of it - which was NOT helpful for anyone.)

                                          It wasn't an "agribusiness" bill. The bill was the result of a cooperative effort between animal care professionals, veterinarians, and yes, ag interests. But note - leadership within the animal shelters were at the forefront of the effort.

                                          It was a good Bill. No longer was the mere presence of food or water on the premises sufficient to thwart animal control officers, even when the animal was starved or dehydrated. The animal COULD NOT be starved or dehydrated. There was a lot more to the Bill - including an exception for Acts of God (massive flooding with stranded livestock, hurricane, etc.)

                                          But it was a big improvement, it was reasonable, it balanced the desire to protect animal welfare with the need to have exceptions for Acts of God, and did not venture into animal rights territory, and it had the full support of law enforcement, shelter leadership, the AG's office, the ag community, etc.


                                          Who opposed the Bill and put a lot of money and effort into defeating it?


                                          HSUS.
                                          Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                                          Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                                          -Rudyard Kipling

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X