• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Assaulting our rights to own and use horses:

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
    You really believe the HSUS doesn't has an interest in all those topics and helps where help is needed to further them, as in the guardianship voting in CO lately and so many other out there lobbying?

    You know, the HSUS has been realizing they could not really show how extreme they are, so the past few years have done much PR and toned it down, but a tiger by any name still has stripes.

    I can't believe anyone that supposedly has animals and comes to a horse training forum thinks it can defend animal rights extremists.
    There is a great disconnect there.
    The disconnect is that YOU repeatedly confuse animal rights with animal welfare. As demonstrated here on this bulletin board countless times (and I mean countless) calling fellow animal owners animal rights extremists. YOU even called me a RARA, someone who actually farms and was raised on farm owned by my family for 5 generations since they came over on the boat. How in hell am I supposed to take you seriously? Or believe your selected drivel/propaganda.

    I can't,you've crossed the line with being an extremist yourself. Your opinion is clouded by an agenda. Not unlike the people you rail against.

    ETA how is THAT for critical thinking!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
      You know, the HSUS has been realizing they could not really show how extreme they are, so the past few years have done much PR and toned it down, but a tiger by any name still has stripes.

      .
      The problem is that you think anything with fur is a Tiger. You think that anyone that supports ANY issue, that HSUS supports is an animal rights extremist. (Not an activist, but an extremist). That shows how far your disconnect is to what a true animal rights extremist is.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by sunridge1 View Post
        The disconnect is that YOU repeatedly confuse animal rights with animal welfare. As demonstrated here on this bulletin board countless times (and I mean countless) calling fellow animal owners animal rights extremists. YOU even called me a RARA, someone who actually farms and was raised on farm owned by my family for 5 generations since they came over on the boat. How in hell am I supposed to take you seriously? Or believe your selected drivel/propaganda.
        Echo. I have the posters that assume I am a RARA because I support animal welfare on ignore for precisely this reason. BTDT

        Comment


        • Originally posted by JGHIRETIRE View Post
          In some ways yes in some ways no it isn't.
          Not even touching China
          I read the labels on food. Instead of asking where's the beef you can now ask where's the food. Or better yet.. what the he@@ is that?
          But those chemicals have nothing to do with the original topic.
          What the processor tossed in the vat is not equivalent with bad animal husbandry.

          Separate issue. (I don't disagree with you, but it's a different topic)

          Comment


          • Originally posted by sunridge1 View Post
            The disconnect is that YOU repeatedly confuse animal rights with animal welfare. As demonstrated here on this bulletin board countless times (and I mean countless) calling fellow animal owners animal rights extremists. YOU even called me a RARA, someone who actually farms and was raised on farm owned by my family for 5 generations since they came over on the boat. How in hell am I supposed to take you seriously? Or believe your selected drivel/propaganda.

            I can't,you've crossed the line with being an extremist yourself. Your opinion is clouded by an agenda. Not unlike the people you rail against.

            ETA how is THAT for critical thinking!
            I think the correct term fo people who fail to make the connection is 'usefull idiot'
            And as I have been told, that is the term the Mother Ship uses (aka PETA and HSUS)

            Comment


            • True. I have more issues with the middleman than the actual farmer.

              Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
              But those chemicals have nothing to do with the original topic.
              What the processor tossed in the vat is not equivalent with bad animal husbandry.

              Separate issue. (I don't disagree with you, but it's a different topic)
              The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
              H. Cate

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                I think the correct term fo people who fail to make the connection is 'usefull idiot'
                And as I have been told, that is the term the Mother Ship uses (aka PETA and HSUS)
                An example of "if you run out of arguments or facts, call names."

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                  I think the correct term fo people who fail to make the connection is 'usefull idiot'
                  And as I have been told, that is the term the Mother Ship uses (aka PETA and HSUS)
                  Huh? You call me an idiot? Where is my tin foil hat?

                  Jeez you people are not ready for a brave new world. Thank goodness you'll be dead as well as all your animals so you won't have to suffer through. The future is not yours. Really glad it's not mine.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                    I agree about ARA. But there are those on here, that feel that supporting banning any act like soring TWH or horse slaughter for human consumption, makes you an ARA. I disagree with that. And I don't think that banning those two things, will result in us losing our animals. The fear of ARA's is making it harder to write laws banning truly abusive practices. And while I recognize that some people are ok with horse slaughter as it is currently practiced, being against it does not make someone an ARA.

                    There are lots of issues, like dog fighting, canned hunts, horse tripping, horse slaughter for human consumption etc, that many people feel ARE abusive. But the people that find them abusive are not necessarily ARA's. It has become customary that instead of accepting that some people have the opinion that they are abusive, they want to label them as ARA's to try to diminish their opinion and denigrate them, in spite of them owning animals, riding, wearing leather and eating meat. Or they label them RARA's which is even more of an insult since a true RARA will use terroristic acts like violence, or letting animals loose.

                    While you don't want to support AR agendas, it is also wrong to ignore abuse, misrepresent laws written to prevent abuse (like the legislation to prevent soring which is specific to TWH's), and call people names, just because they support banning an abusive act that you may be ok with.

                    I'd be curious to know what issues those posting on this thread feel were wrong to be made illegal/or wrong to have people trying to make them illegal...dog fighting? cockfighting? horse tripping? canned hunts? gestation crates? cages for poultry where they can stand up and turn around? If you support banning even one of those issues, then you have no right to call someone an ARA that supports a ban on something else they consider abusive, if it doesn't involve losing the right to own animals, because that is the goal of an ARA. There are even people that don't think it is right to have carriage horses in Central park, that aren't ARA's. THey are ok with them elsewhere but object to having them on the city streets there. I may not agree, but that doesn't make them ARA's. (I mean do you really think Georgina Bloomberg and that other BN rider are ARA's, who want animal ownership banned?) they may not agree with your stance on the issue, but they aren't ARA's.
                    BRAVO. Well said.

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      Originally posted by sunridge1 View Post
                      The disconnect is that YOU repeatedly confuse animal rights with animal welfare. As demonstrated here on this bulletin board countless times (and I mean countless) calling fellow animal owners animal rights extremists. YOU even called me a RARA, someone who actually farms and was raised on farm owned by my family for 5 generations since they came over on the boat. How in hell am I supposed to take you seriously? Or believe your selected drivel/propaganda.

                      I can't,you've crossed the line with being an extremist yourself. Your opinion is clouded by an agenda. Not unlike the people you rail against.

                      ETA how is THAT for critical thinking!
                      Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                      The problem is that you think anything with fur is a Tiger. You think that anyone that supports ANY issue, that HSUS supports is an animal rights extremist. (Not an activist, but an extremist). That shows how far your disconnect is to what a true animal rights extremist is.
                      Originally posted by sunridge1 View Post
                      Huh? You call me an idiot? Where is my tin foil hat?

                      Jeez you people are not ready for a brave new world. Thank goodness you'll be dead as well as all your animals so you won't have to suffer through. The future is not yours. Really glad it's not mine.


                      Present irrefutable evidence in the OP article and so many others you can find out there of what those animal rights extremist groups are, their agendas and how they operate and guess what, the regular customers of their propaganda can't do more than make lots of irrelevant noise and yell "not true, everyone else is wrong, we the true believers know!"

                      Ok, who here is wearing tin foil hats, you think?

                      Yes, this would be very funny, if it was not such a serious subject, our rights to own and use animals hanging on the balance.

                      As for those that cry "we are all for welfare, not following animal rights extremist agendas!"
                      Please, if you really want others to believe that, easy, just don't follow their agendas as you so obviously do.
                      Use some common sense for once.
                      Learn to make a difference in what is really animal welfare and what is one more stepping stone to eliminate all animal uses, one at the time, following blindly what animal rights extremists do, using the by now very tired abuse card.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by sunridge1 View Post
                        Huh? You call me an idiot? Where is my tin foil hat?

                        Jeez you people are not ready for a brave new world. Thank goodness you'll be dead as well as all your animals so you won't have to suffer through. The future is not yours. Really glad it's not mine.
                        Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                        An example of "if you run out of arguments or facts, call names."

                        OH EM GEE she called us names!!!11!!eleven!!11!!

                        You missed the little segment where the much beloved organizations themselves call the wellmeaning but ignorant people who further their cause, thinking they are working 'welfare' when they are not, such lovely descriptive monicers.

                        However, as I threw the term out as it has been done before, you ladies are eager to slip that shoe on your foot.
                        I suppose if it fits, you are welcome to wear it.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Bluey View Post

                          Present irrefutable evidence in the OP article and so many others you can find out there of what those animal rights extremist groups are, their agendas and how they operate and guess what, the regular customers of their propaganda can't do more than make lots of irrelevant noise and yell "not true, everyone else is wrong, we the true believers know!"
                          Why don't YOU present irrefutable evidence to support YOUR claim.

                          You have been asked to do so before, but you conveniently ignore any such requests.

                          And please don't cite any of the Berman clan's opinions. They are opinions, not facts.
                          Just like your wash, rinse, repeat extremist bla-bla-bla........
                          ************************
                          \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by philosoraptor View Post
                            The HSUS is not the batch of nutjobs some make them out to be.

                            If it wasn't for work of the HSUS, the American public wouldn't have the awareness it does today of the huge problem of dogfigthing. HSUS was the whistleblower a couple times on slaughterhouses dragging downed cows into the kill room to be used in the *human* food supply. HSUS is also one of the few national voices the horses have against problems such as soring.

                            Don't buy into the factory-farmer's propaganda. The HSUS is not out to steal your animals and give them voting rights and dress them in human clothing. That's insane.

                            Do keep in mind there is a strong ($$$) drive to keep the distrust against HSUS and related groups. Who benefits if HSUS dies? Factory-farmers, fur ranches, puppy mills, poor quality zoos, and other sources of concern for anyone who has any compassion for animals. Follow the money. Follow who is funding the supposed "Humane Watch", a fake so-called watchdog group, funded by Center for Consumer Freedom. The CCF is in turn funded by big ag interests. CCF is also the group that fought against MADD to keep liquor less regulated and fought against health advocates to keep tobacco regulated. Are these really the people who should be speaking for what the public wants in the way of basic animal welfare?

                            Before you buy into the hateful stories about the HSUS, please read StopHumaneWatch. See where much of these press releases are really coming from before you buy into it.
                            http://humanewatch.info/blog/about-hsus/

                            And as someone who works every day in the equine welfare business, I can tell you that HSUS is not out to steal your horses. They've been a wonderful resource to independent animal rescues/shelters nationwide. I've been to one of the conferences they organized, and it was a wonderful learning opportunity. They're the national voice all the little shelters/rescues/sanctuaries need in Washington. Independently we're all little local organizations. We cannot fight the big $$$ lobbyists at the national level without help. There is a lot of money involved in keeping horse abuse legal. If we let the bad rumor mill divide us and turn us against other equine welfare causes, the bad guys win.
                            Of course you believe in the value of HSUS. Did Stacey write this for you, or just give it to you as a press release.

                            Maryland...home of Equiery, and Maryland Horse Council...both in the same building and work together. DEFHR --horse seizure I mean rescue...sits on the council board...and low and behold Stacey is listed in a lawsuit for telling a county to seize horses "as it would be a great training opportunity for her "equine rescue team" and with the press their organization (HSUS) will be able to raise a lot of money in charitable donations.

                            Nothing "fake" about Humane Watch. Not only does he list who he is but also his roll on behalf of Agri Business and food interests. It is HSUS and its followers that repeat the lie that HE is hiding HIS agenda.

                            Funny that Humane Watch does NOT HIDE their donations especially from George Soro's foundations i.e. Tide and Melon that give to HSUS and don't forget the HSUS lawyer who sits on the Presidential advisory board. Coincidence? Not on your life.

                            If this doesn't open your eyes nothing will
                            http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/ecoterrorism.asp
                            The Elephant in the room

                            Comment


                            • One of ECHO's favourite groups;;;Animal Defence League ;;;she takes many quotes from them

                              Vlasak, who is a member of the Animal Defense League, a radical animal rights group that carries out various direct actions, including home demonstrations, also reportedly said, "I don't think you'd have to kill too many. I think for five lives, 10 lives, 15 human lives, we could save a million, 2 million, 10 million non-human lives." Although he was not allowed to attend the conference, Vlasak addressed the gathering via video link.


                              March 2005: Peter Daniel Young, an animal rights activist wanted for allegedly releasing thousand of animals from Wisconsin fur farms in 1997, was arrested in California. Young, 27, had been a fugitive for over seven years when he was arrested in San Jose for shoplifting at a Starbucks. Authorities say Young broke into three Wisconsin fur farms, releasing thousands of animals and causing more than $200,000 in damages. The Animal Liberation Front claimed responsibility for the releases.



                              Terrorism in the name of animal and environmental protection has steadily increased during the past decade in the United States. Automobile dealerships, forestry companies, corporate and university-based medical research laboratories, restaurants, medical-supply firms, fur farms and other industries continue to be targeted. Although no one has yet been injured in a domestic ecoterror attack, the increasingly violent nature of attacks suggests that someone will be hurt before long.

                              In a statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee in May 2004, John E. Lewis of the FBI's Counterterrorism Division noted the "upswing in violent rhetoric and tactics" among ecoterrorists and said that in recent years ALF and ELF "have become the most active criminal extremist elements in the United States."



                              Alex Epstein quotes follow:

                              Millions of humans would suffer and die unnecessarily if animal testing were prohibited. Animal rights activists know this, but are unmoved. Chris DeRose, founder of the group Last Chance for Animals, writes: "If the death of one rat cured all diseases, it wouldn't make any difference to me."

                              To ascribe rights to animals is to contradict the purpose and justification of rights - to protect the interests of humans. Rights are moral principles necessary for men to survive as human beings - to coexist peacefully, to produce and trade, to provide for their own lives, and to pursue their own happiness, all by the guidance of their rational minds. To attribute rights to non-rational, amoral creatures, who can neither grasp nor live by them, is to turn rights from a tool of human preservation to a tool of human extermination.

                              It should be no surprise that many in the animal rights movement use violence to pursue their man-destroying goals. While these terrorists should be condemned and imprisoned, that is not enough. We must wage a principled, intellectual war against the very notion of animal rights; we must condemn it as logically false and morally repugnant.
                              The Elephant in the room

                              Comment


                              • Fairfax,

                                why are you quoting and linking stuff that's almost a decade old?
                                ************************
                                \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                  What do you think it will mean to give animals the same rights that we give humans, as the OP article explains animal rights groups attorneys are working to get passed?

                                  Do I need to say more?
                                  That is not going to happen. You said yourself that these groups are scammers. Scammers don't win everyone over.

                                  No one with an ounce of education and a spoonful of common sense would support giving animals "right's" the same as humans have. The majority of people do not think that way. Some do, but not the majority. Support "welfare", yes. If you like other living things, this is automatic.

                                  Those who try to propose laws to take away our animals would be laughed right out of the door. These people supporting this are nothing but a cult. Cults don't make laws. Washington DC would be snickering and guffawing through the whole presentation by any RARA.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                                    Fairfax,

                                    why are you quoting and linking stuff that's almost a decade old?
                                    Because it is still relevant and a leopard doesn't change its spots.

                                    Now..if you don't like that explaination...why do you quote statements regarding abuse, transportation regarding delivery of horses that is almost a decade old?

                                    These are people who are still very much active.

                                    It is an explaination as to animals rights and terrorism

                                    But lets bring it up to date. HSUS, PETA DAILY...now..here and now..in this year..and this month...use much of that "decade old" information in their ongoing struggle on behalf of "the animal"

                                    They just water it down
                                    The Elephant in the room

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by Dispatcher View Post
                                      That is not going to happen. You said yourself that these groups are scammers. Scammers don't win everyone over.

                                      No one with an ounce of education and a spoonful of common sense would support giving animals "right's" the same as humans have. The majority of people do not think that way. Some do, but not the majority. Support "welfare", yes. If you like other living things, this is automatic.

                                      Those who try to propose laws to take away our animals would be laughed right out of the door. These people supporting this are nothing but a cult. Cults don't make laws. Washington DC would be snickering and guffawing through the whole presentation by any RARA.
                                      Designating livestock as companion animals is just the first step and that IS currently on the books for these groups

                                      Cults DO make laws and get them through. Just ask the AKC and their ongoing legal battles to stop anti dog designation, city by city, county by county and state by state
                                      The Elephant in the room

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                                        Designating livestock as companion animals is just the first step and that IS currently on the books for these groups

                                        Cults DO make laws and get them through. Just ask the AKC and their ongoing legal battles to stop anti dog designation, city by city, county by county and state by state
                                        A "law" to make livestock companion animals will not fly in the U.S. You can bet your bottom dollar that farmers across our nation would call all out war on this.

                                        Where I live, cults don't make laws. I think because there are so many libraires, colleges, and universities around here. People have vast resources to learn the truth behind a movement.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                                          Now..if you don't like that explaination...why do you quote statements regarding abuse, transportation regarding delivery of horses that is almost a decade old?
                                          A decade old?

                                          Below is the the most recent documentation we posted earlier.
                                          Dated 09/21/2012.
                                          Less than a month old!

                                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCBHE...ature=youtu.be

                                          Bet you didn't even bother to check it out, because you prefer to wear blinders and sing la-la-la.

                                          And there is plenty more documentation from 2012 revealing animal cruelty is pretty much still part of the slaughter pipeline. The same as it was a decade ago.
                                          ************************
                                          \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X