• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Assaulting our rights to own and use horses:

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by JSwan View Post
    The goal of the animal rights movement is the abolition of ALL use of animals. As pets, food, entertainment. Extending 14th Amendment protections to nonhumans would accomplish that.
    And for any kind of research. That includes the kind that helps scientists understand more about disease mechanisms (knowledge that saves lives). And the kind that lets researchers develop better ways of treating diseases and better medications for both humans and other animals.

    Animal rights activists would rather see animals go extinct than be subject to "torture" from humans again. "Torture" includes being eaten, pet on, touched, looked at, ridden, fed, or owned.

    The Animal Rights Movement is insidious. It works on people who have little knowledge of agriculture or animals and it starts with things that most of us would agree with:

    Something like: You don't want the animals that became your hamburger to be TORTURED do you?

    No sane person wants any animal to be tortured, so people start worrying about the food they eat. What do you mean the cows aren't all frolicking on pastures 24/7 before giving up their lives for my hamburger or steak? Oh no! We must never eat steak again!

    Ok, that's an over-simplification of what happens - but that's how these animal rights activists start winning people over. They make big, sweeping statements that on the surface you could agree with. But if you dig deeper, you find out that their definition of torture is vastly different than yours. And that some of the things they say are just completely wrong. But unfortunately we live in a world where many people are far removed from agriculture and many have never walked through a dairy or been to a ranch. And they buy the touchy-feeling stuff behind the ARA without understanding the realities.
    Visit us at Bluebonnet Equine Humane Society - www.bluebonnetequine.org

    Want to get involved in rescue or start your own? Check out How to Start a Horse Rescue - www.howtostartarescue.com

    Comment


    • I totally understand what they want.
      I've seen PETA in action at dog shows. They were protesting the fact that I bought a leather leash
      The problem (one of them) is that the general public has absolutely no idea. The HSUS and PETA put out these pitiful commercials and they are tear jerkers. The general public I don't think realizes that it isn't exactly true. Where's the other side??
      Did anyone look at the link I posted the other day??
      Probably not - I'll have to find it again. Eva Hughes posted it - it was a picture in Times Square saying how bad the HSUS really is. So I believe that people in general are getting a little smarter about it - wanting to be more informed about where their food comes from and what's actually in it. All the fuss about Monsanto on FB and much more information is available about it.

      I did not know that certain drag hunts have now been banned.
      I thought at least you could still do that. After all wasn't the point to end that all about the poor little fox?? Or not.

      I totally totally understand this is what the AR people are doing. I still say that does not mean we get to treat animals cruelly just to prove a point. In order to use animals as we have, then we should make some of these things practically beyond reproach.
      There has been alot done to raise the standard for most of the animals "processed" except horses. Is the argument that we should have horse slaughter just because it's an infringement on our rights otherwise??
      We are losing our rights one by one but it isn't just horses.


      Originally posted by JSwan View Post
      Having an AR activist on record as saying animals should receive 14th Amendment protections is pretty damning.

      Read up on the 14th Amendment.

      I don't always agree with Bluey. But in this case Bluey is spot on.

      The goal of the animal rights movement is the abolition of ALL use of animals. As pets, food, entertainment. Extending 14th Amendment protections to nonhumans would accomplish that.

      I don't see how y'all can't understand how significant that statement is. That and the fact that step by step, little by little, they're working towards that goal. You're being nibbled to death by ducks.
      The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
      H. Cate

      Comment


      • Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
        However, that is not a reason for myself and others to stop fighting for true animal welfare.

        I will not stand by and ignore or condone animal cruelty, because of some RARA agenda.
        But we don't ignore it either.

        Neither to do we fail to fight to improve the lives of domestic animals.

        Perhaps the difference is that people like me do so without working with HSUS and PETA, et al.

        These groups would have the world believe that only THEY care about animal welfare, and THEY are the only ones working on animal welfare issues. Which is a bald faced lie. They lie a lot. As I have witnessed first hand.
        Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
        Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
        -Rudyard Kipling

        Comment


        • Spot on!!

          Originally posted by cowgirljenn View Post
          And for any kind of research. That includes the kind that helps scientists understand more about disease mechanisms (knowledge that saves lives). And the kind that lets researchers develop better ways of treating diseases and better medications for both humans and other animals.

          Animal rights activists would rather see animals go extinct than be subject to "torture" from humans again. "Torture" includes being eaten, pet on, touched, looked at, ridden, fed, or owned.

          The Animal Rights Movement is insidious. It works on people who have little knowledge of agriculture or animals and it starts with things that most of us would agree with:

          Something like: You don't want the animals that became your hamburger to be TORTURED do you?

          No sane person wants any animal to be tortured, so people start worrying about the food they eat. What do you mean the cows aren't all frolicking on pastures 24/7 before giving up their lives for my hamburger or steak? Oh no! We must never eat steak again!

          Ok, that's an over-simplification of what happens - but that's how these animal rights activists start winning people over. They make big, sweeping statements that on the surface you could agree with. But if you dig deeper, you find out that their definition of torture is vastly different than yours. And that some of the things they say are just completely wrong. But unfortunately we live in a world where many people are far removed from agriculture and many have never walked through a dairy or been to a ranch. And they buy the touchy-feeling stuff behind the ARA without understanding the realities.
          The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
          H. Cate

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
            Wherever you are in these issues we discuss regularly, if you wear a tin foil hat, or just like to accuse others of doing so, I thought you may find this opinion article about animal rights and the HSUS interesting.
            Why?
            It can directly affect our rights to use any animals, including horses.
            Why is it relevant to post that here?
            For most here, owning and using horses (and all other kinds of animals) is what we do (bolding mine):
            The HSUS is not the batch of nutjobs some make them out to be.

            If it wasn't for work of the HSUS, the American public wouldn't have the awareness it does today of the huge problem of dogfigthing. HSUS was the whistleblower a couple times on slaughterhouses dragging downed cows into the kill room to be used in the *human* food supply. HSUS is also one of the few national voices the horses have against problems such as soring.

            Don't buy into the factory-farmer's propaganda. The HSUS is not out to steal your animals and give them voting rights and dress them in human clothing. That's insane.

            Do keep in mind there is a strong ($$$) drive to keep the distrust against HSUS and related groups. Who benefits if HSUS dies? Factory-farmers, fur ranches, puppy mills, poor quality zoos, and other sources of concern for anyone who has any compassion for animals. Follow the money. Follow who is funding the supposed "Humane Watch", a fake so-called watchdog group, funded by Center for Consumer Freedom. The CCF is in turn funded by big ag interests. CCF is also the group that fought against MADD to keep liquor less regulated and fought against health advocates to keep tobacco regulated. Are these really the people who should be speaking for what the public wants in the way of basic animal welfare?

            Before you buy into the hateful stories about the HSUS, please read StopHumaneWatch. See where much of these press releases are really coming from before you buy into it.
            http://humanewatch.info/blog/about-hsus/

            And as someone who works every day in the equine welfare business, I can tell you that HSUS is not out to steal your horses. They've been a wonderful resource to independent animal rescues/shelters nationwide. I've been to one of the conferences they organized, and it was a wonderful learning opportunity. They're the national voice all the little shelters/rescues/sanctuaries need in Washington. Independently we're all little local organizations. We cannot fight the big $$$ lobbyists at the national level without help. There is a lot of money involved in keeping horse abuse legal. If we let the bad rumor mill divide us and turn us against other equine welfare causes, the bad guys win.
            Veterinarians for Equine Welfare

            Comment


            • Originally posted by JSwan View Post
              But we don't ignore it either.

              Neither to do we fail to fight to improve the lives of domestic animals.

              Perhaps the difference is that people like me do so without working with HSUS and PETA, et al.

              These groups would have the world believe that only THEY care about animal welfare, and THEY are the only ones working on animal welfare issues. Which is a bald faced lie. They lie a lot. As I have witnessed first hand.
              And we kow, that you are a good egg. So was County. (Miss him a lot).

              It's the extremists on the pro side who accuse everyone who is remotely concerned with animal welfare, to be an RARA.


              There are a lot of animal advocates who work without any influence from HSUS/PETA.
              That doesn't mean that in some instances they don't come to the same conclusion.

              I am no fan of HSUS, however, I am thrilled of what their undercover Big Lick video has accomplished for the horses involved.
              None of us COTHers or any little animal welfare group could have gotten that kind of media attention.
              Last edited by luvmytbs; Oct. 10, 2012, 07:21 PM.
              ************************
              \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

              Comment


              • I agree about ARA. But there are those on here, that feel that supporting banning any act like soring TWH or horse slaughter for human consumption, makes you an ARA. I disagree with that. And I don't think that banning those two things, will result in us losing our animals. The fear of ARA's is making it harder to write laws banning truly abusive practices. And while I recognize that some people are ok with horse slaughter as it is currently practiced, being against it does not make someone an ARA.

                There are lots of issues, like dog fighting, canned hunts, horse tripping, horse slaughter for human consumption etc, that many people feel ARE abusive. But the people that find them abusive are not necessarily ARA's. It has become customary that instead of accepting that some people have the opinion that they are abusive, they want to label them as ARA's to try to diminish their opinion and denigrate them, in spite of them owning animals, riding, wearing leather and eating meat. Or they label them RARA's which is even more of an insult since a true RARA will use terroristic acts like violence, or letting animals loose.

                While you don't want to support AR agendas, it is also wrong to ignore abuse, misrepresent laws written to prevent abuse (like the legislation to prevent soring which is specific to TWH's), and call people names, just because they support banning an abusive act that you may be ok with.

                I'd be curious to know what issues those posting on this thread feel were wrong to be made illegal/or wrong to have people trying to make them illegal...dog fighting? cockfighting? horse tripping? canned hunts? gestation crates? cages for poultry where they can stand up and turn around? If you support banning even one of those issues, then you have no right to call someone an ARA that supports a ban on something else they consider abusive, if it doesn't involve losing the right to own animals, because that is the goal of an ARA. There are even people that don't think it is right to have carriage horses in Central park, that aren't ARA's. THey are ok with them elsewhere but object to having them on the city streets there. I may not agree, but that doesn't make them ARA's. (I mean do you really think Georgina Bloomberg and that other BN rider are ARA's, who want animal ownership banned?) they may not agree with your stance on the issue, but they aren't ARA's.

                Comment


                • True.


                  Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                  And we kow, that you are a good apple. So was
                  County. (Miss him a lot).

                  It's the extremists on the pro side who accuse everyone who is remotely concerned with animal welfare, to be an RARA.


                  There are a lot of animal advocates who work without any influence from HSUS/PETA.
                  That doesn't mean that in some instances they don't come to the same conclusion.

                  I am no fan of HSUS, however, I am thrilled of what their undercover Big Lick video has accomplished for the horses involved.
                  None of us COTHers or any little animal welfare group could have gotten that kind of media attention.
                  The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                  H. Cate

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                    I agree about ARA. But there are those on here, that feel that supporting banning any act like soring TWH or horse slaughter for human consumption, makes you an ARA. I disagree with that. And I don't think that banning those two things, will result in us losing our animals. The fear of ARA's is making it harder to write laws banning truly abusive practices. And while I recognize that some people are ok with horse slaughter as it is currently practiced, being against it does not make someone an ARA.

                    There are lots of issues, like dog fighting, canned hunts, horse tripping, horse slaughter for human consumption etc, that many people feel ARE abusive. But the people that find them abusive are not necessarily ARA's. It has become customary that instead of accepting that some people have the opinion that they are abusive, they want to label them as ARA's to try to diminish their opinion and denigrate them, in spite of them owning animals, riding, wearing leather and eating meat. Or they label them RARA's which is even more of an insult since a true RARA will use terroristic acts like violence, or letting animals loose.

                    While you don't want to support AR agendas, it is also wrong to ignore abuse, misrepresent laws written to prevent abuse (like the legislation to prevent soring which is specific to TWH's), and call people names, just because they support banning an abusive act that you may be ok with.

                    I'd be curious to know what issues those posting on this thread feel were wrong to be made illegal/or wrong to have people trying to make them illegal...dog fighting? cockfighting? horse tripping? canned hunts? gestation crates? cages for poultry where they can stand up and turn around? If you support banning even one of those issues, then you have no right to call someone an ARA that supports a ban on something else they consider abusive, if it doesn't involve losing the right to own animals, because that is the goal of an ARA. There are even people that don't think it is right to have carriage horses in Central park, that aren't ARA's. THey are ok with them elsewhere but object to having them on the city streets there. I may not agree, but that doesn't make them ARA's. (I mean do you really think Georgina Bloomberg and that other BN rider are ARA's, who want animal ownership banned?) they may not agree with your stance on the issue, but they aren't ARA's.

                    Just to clarify Jetsmom Georgina Bloomburg is an ASPCA Welfare Amabassador. I personally have never seen her speak out in her own words about the carriage horses. I believe her name ends up on that list by default through her association with them.
                    "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      Originally posted by philosoraptor View Post
                      The HSUS is not the batch of nutjobs some make them out to be.

                      If it wasn't for work of the HSUS, the American public wouldn't have the awareness it does today of the huge problem of dogfigthing. HSUS was the whistleblower a couple times on slaughterhouses dragging downed cows into the kill room to be used in the *human* food supply. HSUS is also one of the few national voices the horses have against problems such as soring.

                      Don't buy into the factory-farmer's propaganda. The HSUS is not out to steal your animals and give them voting rights and dress them in human clothing. That's insane.

                      Do keep in mind there is a strong ($$$) drive to keep the distrust against HSUS and related groups. Who benefits if HSUS dies? Factory-farmers, fur ranches, puppy mills, poor quality zoos, and other sources of concern for anyone who has any compassion for animals. Follow the money. Follow who is funding the supposed "Humane Watch", a fake so-called watchdog group, funded by Center for Consumer Freedom. The CCF is in turn funded by big ag interests. CCF is also the group that fought against MADD to keep liquor less regulated and fought against health advocates to keep tobacco regulated. Are these really the people who should be speaking for what the public wants in the way of basic animal welfare?

                      Before you buy into the hateful stories about the HSUS, please read StopHumaneWatch. See where much of these press releases are really coming from before you buy into it.
                      http://humanewatch.info/blog/about-hsus/

                      And as someone who works every day in the equine welfare business, I can tell you that HSUS is not out to steal your horses. They've been a wonderful resource to independent animal rescues/shelters nationwide. I've been to one of the conferences they organized, and it was a wonderful learning opportunity. They're the national voice all the little shelters/rescues/sanctuaries need in Washington. Independently we're all little local organizations. We cannot fight the big $$$ lobbyists at the national level without help. There is a lot of money involved in keeping horse abuse legal. If we let the bad rumor mill divide us and turn us against other equine welfare causes, the bad guys win.
                      Pure nonsense that I have already addressed in some post before on this thread.

                      Animal rights extremist groups are riding the coattails of those of us that take care of animals.
                      Why do you think they have trouble finding abuses and use those same videos time and again?
                      That would be like using whatever the name of that college football team trainer that is a sexual predator story to say all college team coaches are like that, beware!

                      Temple Grandin has been paid for decades now to study how to better manage cattle.
                      She is part of the beef industry, just like others like her, that have always been trying to do better and better.

                      Animal rights groups go around the back way to find abuses and use that for their agenda to eliminate all animal use.
                      They never do anything good for any animals, they are after whatever serves their agenda to show any animal use in the worst light they can manage and make a good living off that too.

                      Abusers we ought to know by now are in anything we do and it is not because we use animals that there are abusers, but because there are some defective people that are abusers of anything they can abuse, even other humans and yes, animals too.

                      Don't kid yourself, the world is better every day and getting even better for more and more, humans and animals and that is because those caring for everything, including animals, are doing a better job, not because some extremist groups are making a living by crying abuse and putting their hands out for the gullible to donate to them to "make it go away".

                      Those groups are a scam at many levels and definitely not but rarely they do any real good, that is not also in their own interest to make anyone with animals look terrible and so gain track on their push to eliminate all use of animals.

                      Already forgotten the lawsuit they lost against that circus, where in court it was shown they made up the charges?
                      You talk about abuses?
                      What do you call what those you defend did to the circus people?
                      Nice folks you are defending there.

                      Comment


                      • The world is better everyday???
                        We have more chemicals in everything. The farmers make less to grow gmo soybeans and corn
                        Have you seen the pollution??
                        Have you noticed how many people are overweight these days (including myself). If not actually obese?? We hardly have REAL food anymore. Do you ever read labels???
                        Why has TG worked to improve things?? Do you really think McDonald's would have started improving things for cattle just because??? I'm sure they're just angels right???
                        None of us likes the extremists but we do need the checks and balances. There are abuses out there and someone needs to make sure they don't happen.
                        The faster things have to happen leaves more room for mistakes.


                        Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                        Pure nonsense that I have already addressed in some post before on this thread.

                        Animal rights extremist groups are riding the coattails of those of us that take care of animals.
                        Why do you think they have trouble finding abuses and use those same videos time and again?
                        That would be like using whatever the name of that college football team trainer that is a sexual predator story to say all college team coaches are like that, beware!

                        Temple Grandin has been paid for decades now to study how to better manage cattle.
                        She is part of the beef industry, just like others like her, that have always been trying to do better and better.

                        Animal rights groups go around the back way to find abuses and use that for their agenda to eliminate all animal use.
                        They never do anything good for any animals, they are after whatever serves their agenda to show any animal use in the worst light they can manage and make a good living off that too.

                        Abusers we ought to know by now are in anything we do and it is not because we use animals that there are abusers, but because there are some defective people that are abusers of anything they can abuse, even other humans and yes, animals too.

                        Don't kid yourself, the world is better every day and getting even better for more and more, humans and animals and that is because those caring for everything, including animals, are doing a better job, not because some extremist groups are making a living by crying abuse and putting their hands out for the gullible to donate to them to "make it go away".

                        Those groups are a scam at many levels and definitely not but rarely they do any real good, that is not also in their own interest to make anyone with animals look terrible and so gain track on their push to eliminate all use of animals.

                        Already forgotten the lawsuit they lost against that circus, where in court it was shown they made up the charges?
                        You talk about abuses?
                        What do you call what those you defend did to the circus people?
                        Nice folks you are defending there.
                        The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                        H. Cate

                        Comment


                        • Can someone please post where it has been said that these groups really want to take all the animals away? Please do not repost ad naseum the out of context "one generation and out." (whatever that really means) What else you got that explicitly says, without a doubt, they want to take our animals away?

                          I'm sorry, but just saying it over and over with no real 'true' source is not good enough for me and my critical thinking.

                          Parcell's "one generation and out" with the whole content doesn't even make any real sense. Except they don't care about heritage cattle?

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            Originally posted by JGHIRETIRE View Post
                            The world is better everyday???
                            We have more chemicals in everything. The farmers make less to grow gmo soybeans and corn
                            Have you seen the pollution??
                            Have you noticed how many people are overweight these days (including myself). If not actually obese?? We hardly have REAL food anymore. Do you ever read labels???
                            Why has TG worked to improve things?? Do you really think McDonald's would have started improving things for cattle just because??? I'm sure they're just angels right???
                            None of us likes the extremists but we do need the checks and balances. There are abuses out there and someone needs to make sure they don't happen.
                            The faster things have to happen leaves more room for mistakes.
                            Every industry has many laws, regulations, supervisors, inspectors and government and industry itself are continuously tweaking those as problems come up.

                            The cattle industry had since 1984 BQA, that has trained many in the industry, from ranchers to feedlots to truckers for many years and certifies premises.

                            If you work in any industry, as a professional, even as a teacher or trucker, you would know that.

                            Yes, things are better all along and getting better.
                            Quit listening to all that is wrong and look around you and wonder at all that we have already made better.
                            Someone did all that for the rest of us to live better, so you can now sit behind a computer and complain, with a handy refrigerator full or a service industry that brings you ready to eat food, with all else that keeps our societies functioning and helping those that don't yet get there.

                            Of course there is always more to do, some that is not quite right, some bad, but to only see that as you keep bringing up, that is very shortsighted of you.

                            As long as you only look at what is still not good enough, all you will do is become frustrated and look for someone to blame.
                            Fine, if that is what floats your boat, but when you come here to tell us, sorry, there are too many of us that know better.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by JGHIRETIRE View Post
                              The world is better everyday???
                              We have more chemicals in everything. The farmers make less to grow gmo soybeans and corn
                              Have you seen the pollution??
                              Have you noticed how many people are overweight these days (including myself). If not actually obese?? We hardly have REAL food anymore. Do you ever read labels???
                              Why has TG worked to improve things?? Do you really think McDonald's would have started improving things for cattle just because??? I'm sure they're just angels right???
                              None of us likes the extremists but we do need the checks and balances. There are abuses out there and someone needs to make sure they don't happen.
                              The faster things have to happen leaves more room for mistakes.
                              Yes, the wolrd is much better than it used to be.
                              At least in terms of pollution and chemicals.
                              We have made great strides in eliminating many such contaminants.
                              And don't bring in China. They ar eout of our reach and sadly have not paid any attention to the failures of ours from the 60s and 70s.

                              The 'chemicals' of today ar emuch more targeted than in the past. Also, due to cost, they are used much more sparingly.

                              The GMO crops? Well, the jury is out on them still. They have not been out long enough. And while some suspect them in having a hand in certain conditions, so far it's annecdotal evidence (Much of it supported by Rodale Press...but not many more) The Monsanto angle is much more worrisome, but for a different reason.

                              Seriously, read more real sources and less of the populistic ones.
                              Originally posted by BigMama1
                              Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                              GNU Terry Prachett

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                                And we kow, that you are a good egg. So was County. (Miss him a lot).

                                It's the extremists on the pro side who accuse everyone who is remotely concerned with animal welfare, to be an RARA.


                                There are a lot of animal advocates who work without any influence from HSUS/PETA.
                                That doesn't mean that in some instances they don't come to the same conclusion.

                                I am no fan of HSUS, however, I am thrilled of what their undercover Big Lick video has accomplished for the horses involved.
                                None of us COTHers or any little animal welfare group could have gotten that kind of media attention.
                                I'm with you on that. PETA and HSUS do have their use, when there are actual cases of cruelty that they can get the media on. Unfortunately most of the time they're too busy souting insanity. But hy, at least one good thing came out of there being RARA's: the horrors of the Big Lick shows finally ot some exposure. In the long run, I don't think they can accomplish much in the way of getting people to loose the right to have pets of livestock, because those of us with common sense and who truly care for animals still outweigh the crazies.
                                Yes, I smell like a horse. No, I don't consider that to be a problem.

                                Originally posted by DottieHQ
                                You're just jealous because you lack my extensive koalafications.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  Originally posted by sunridge1 View Post
                                  Can someone please post where it has been said that these groups really want to take all the animals away? Please do not repost ad naseum the out of context "one generation and out." (whatever that really means) What else you got that explicitly says, without a doubt, they want to take our animals away?

                                  I'm sorry, but just saying it over and over with no real 'true' source is not good enough for me and my critical thinking.

                                  Parcell's "one generation and out" with the whole content doesn't even make any real sense. Except they don't care about heritage cattle?

                                  What do you think it will mean to give animals the same rights that we give humans, as the OP article explains animal rights groups attorneys are working to get passed?

                                  Do I need to say more?

                                  Comment


                                  • Yes and you can sit behind a computer and say the sky is falling.
                                    And thank you for pointing out what I would know as a professional. As happens I can see both sides.
                                    I'm actually trying not to be shortsighted or have blinders on. Unlike some.


                                    Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                    Every industry has many laws, regulations, supervisors, inspectors and government and industry itself are continuously tweaking those as problems come up.

                                    The cattle industry had since 1984 BQA, that has trained many in the industry, from ranchers to feedlots to truckers for many years and certifies premises.

                                    If you work in any industry, as a professional, even as a teacher or trucker, you would know that.

                                    Yes, things are better all along and getting better.
                                    Quit listening to all that is wrong and look around you and wonder at all that we have already made better.
                                    Someone did all that for the rest of us to live better, so you can now sit behind a computer and complain, with a handy refrigerator full or a service industry that brings you ready to eat food, with all else that keeps our societies functioning and helping those that don't yet get there.

                                    Of course there is always more to do, some that is not quite right, some bad, but to only see that as you keep bringing up, that is very shortsighted of you.

                                    As long as you only look at what is still not good enough, all you will do is become frustrated and look for someone to blame.
                                    Fine, if that is what floats your boat, but when you come here to tell us, sorry, there are too many of us that know better.
                                    The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                                    H. Cate

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                      What do you think it will mean to give animals the same rights that we give humans, as the OP article explains animal rights groups attorneys are working to get passed?

                                      Do I need to say more?
                                      The ultimate dream for animal rights advocates would be something like the application of the 14th Amendment's equal protection to animals as well as humans. Such a ruling might ban the rearing of domesticated animals for meat altogether. And some major thinkers in the field -- most famously Steve Wise of the Nonhuman Rights Project -- are actively pursuing it.

                                      "Right now, it's really easy to determine who has the capacity to have a right," he explained. "You look at the species. If you're human, you have rights. If you're not, you don't. What we're arguing is that species is completely arbitrary. There are many nonhuman animals that have really serious cognitive complexity. And we think that cognitive complexity alone is a sufficient condition to make some animals legal persons."
                                      Well yes you do. Steven Wise has no affiliation with HSUS or Peta for that matter. He is his own man, The Nonhuman Rights Project to be precise.

                                      So we degrade HSUS who are now considered 'moderate' by lumping Wise in with them in the article. News sites you just can't trust them.That critical thinking AND reading for comprehension will get you every time.

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        Originally posted by sunridge1 View Post
                                        Well yes you do. Steven Wise has no affiliation with HSUS or Peta for that matter. He is his own man, The Nonhuman Rights Project to be precise.

                                        So we degrade HSUS who are now considered 'moderate' by lumping Wise in with them in the article. News sites you just can't trust them.That critical thinking AND reading for comprehension will get you every time.
                                        You really believe the HSUS doesn't has an interest in all those topics and helps where help is needed to further them, as in the guardianship voting in CO lately and so many other out there lobbying?

                                        You know, the HSUS has been realizing they could not really show how extreme they are, so the past few years have done much PR and toned it down, but a tiger by any name still has stripes.

                                        I can't believe anyone that supposedly has animals and comes to a horse training forum thinks it can defend animal rights extremists.
                                        There is a great disconnect there.

                                        Comment


                                        • In some ways yes in some ways no it isn't.
                                          Not even touching China
                                          I read the labels on food. Instead of asking where's the beef you can now ask where's the food. Or better yet.. what the he@@ is that?

                                          Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                                          Yes, the wolrd is much better than it used to be.
                                          At least in terms of pollution and chemicals.
                                          We have made great strides in eliminating many such contaminants.
                                          And don't bring in China. They ar eout of our reach and sadly have not paid any attention to the failures of ours from the 60s and 70s.

                                          The 'chemicals' of today ar emuch more targeted than in the past. Also, due to cost, they are used much more sparingly.

                                          The GMO crops? Well, the jury is out on them still. They have not been out long enough. And while some suspect them in having a hand in certain conditions, so far it's annecdotal evidence (Much of it supported by Rodale Press...but not many more) The Monsanto angle is much more worrisome, but for a different reason.

                                          Seriously, read more real sources and less of the populistic ones.
                                          The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                                          H. Cate

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X