• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Video of Tennessee Walking Horse We witnessed at the GIHP

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by hundredacres View Post
    Not me. I've never done ANY of those things. Ever. Never will.

    And if the chains don't weight anything, why use them? I'll never understand it...horses don't throw their legs in the air because they're wearing a 6 oz. boot on their leg, why would they for the chain? It doesn't make any sense.
    Never say never.

    Any time you own and much less ride a horse, there are plenty of people out there that think you are terribly abusing that horse, that should be running free.

    There have been high school kids that have been bullied because they had horses and "everyone knows" people that have them "are beating them with whips and spurring them bloody".

    What limits you set to "it's ok to do with MY horses", you will find many others thinking that is abusive.

    Perspective can help you understand where others are coming from, why it is not good to stand there throwing stones, when all that have animals are living in glass houses.

    Better stick to facts, what is clearly not right, not generalize to "all", whatever all is, is wrong.

    Comment


    • Beautiful horse but...hmmm...look closely at the front pasterns on this one. The one on the ground looks raw and the other one looks like the skin is thickened into rolls. Maybe this picture needed some retouching...

      Comment


      • Originally posted by 2Jakes View Post
        Beautiful horse but...hmmm...look closely at the front pasterns on this one. The one on the ground looks raw and the other one looks like the skin is thickened into rolls. Maybe this picture needed some retouching...
        Yup... that pastern is a mess. It has the wavy hair indicative of "irritation." Wonder how that horse made it past the DQPs?
        <>< Sorrow Looks Back. Worry Looks Around. Faith Looks Up! -- Being negative only makes a difficult journey more difficult. You may be given a cactus, but you don't have to sit on it.

        Comment


        • It sure does look raw. Maybe there is another explanation for it, at least I hope. I don't see how they'd make it through checks with that.
          Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole

          Comment


          • You can get wavy leg hair simply by keeping a horse standing wraps. Especially if wrapped when damp, or the hair is not close clipped.

            Don't take the above statement as a judgement as to whether that horse is sore or not.
            Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans

            Comment


            • True, but it does look raw... not just wavy. Who knows... if the horse passed inspection with live human eyeballs on it, who are we to say.
              <>< Sorrow Looks Back. Worry Looks Around. Faith Looks Up! -- Being negative only makes a difficult journey more difficult. You may be given a cactus, but you don't have to sit on it.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
                The problem is "sticking" a foot the the ground while 1200 pounds of horse moves over it and then having it "explode" into motion and then have the horse "flinch" at the other end. A chain is not a "training device." It TRAINS nothing. It is a shortcut used by the incompetent and/or the abusive to obtain a certain leg action. It's that ACTION that causes long an short term injury to the horse.

                It's all physics and equine biomechanics. Good horsemen know that; the jack legs don't.

                G.
                Chains ARE a training device. Why are so many saddle seat horses (excluding TWHs for the moment and am talking about ASBs, Morgans, Arabs, etc.) that come out of GOOD programs who USE chains sound then?? A chain IS a training device, just like side reins, Vienna reins, draw reins, etc. Any of those in the wrong hands are shortcuts, too, BUT they do have their purpose. Same with chains!

                You're also missing my point ENTIRELY--a chain IS abusive on a sored horse. I said that in my post. However, on a horse that hasn't been sored, it is NOT ABUSIVE. Do you really believe that 16 oz. or less has THAT MUCH effect on a 1000 lbs. horse (again, presuming the horse hasn't been sored)? It's a whole 'nother ballgame when that chain hits the sored area. I am not talking about that! I'd like to beat a trainer who sores their horse in the face with 16 oz. of metal.

                Chains on a not-sored horse = help with rhythm and cadence. That. Is. It. Chains on a sored horse = leg lifting higher and higher to get away from the pain.

                I'm going to go beat my head against the wall because I don't have any idea how else to say it.
                RIP my beautiful Lola, ????–August 29, 2014

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Gnalli View Post
                  Not good ones. I am the worlds worst photographer hands down. This is the link to my webshots page. The sorrel is barefoot there and my daughters were just playing with him. He is sound as a gold piece and 22 now. He was 12 there. No one told him that he is not a 2 yr old stud that stands 17.3 instead of an old gelding that is 14.1.

                  http://family.webshots.com/photo/235...87069749jGbBzc
                  That photo hurt me too. Chains, pads, long shank, no helmet, barefeet, shorts

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Gnalli View Post
                    I said I had spent some time in his barn not that I hobnobbed with him. No, he didn't teach me anything.I had a father for that. I went to look at a horse at his barn. No, I didn't see any chemicals, no I didn't see him sore the horse.

                    My skills involve good horsemanship, and hard work. I still it do it old school-break them to ground drive, then to pull a ground sled or plow (ground sled currently as I don't have a plow anymore) and a lot of hill work and wet saddle pads. I don't give a rats ass if you think I have any credibility or not because you don't matter to me or anyone I know on any level but as a Christian not wishing ill on people.

                    I will be getting a prospect shortly-most likely right after Christmas-so let me offer you an invitation. You come watch me. You bring your self righteous self and I will show you how its done. Other than that, keep your opinions of my credibility to yourself. You think you are perfect and that if you don't like it then it is wrong. Not the case. Just because someone has associated with someone who has done something wrong, does not mean they are bad people. The horse world is small, and you will come across people that you may not agree with, but still have to deal with them.
                    If you say you can do it without soring, OK, I'll bite. Please explain to me WHY you want to do BL; and I say that as a TWH owner.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                      Never say never.

                      Any time you own and much less ride a horse, there are plenty of people out there that think you are terribly abusing that horse, that should be running free.

                      There have been high school kids that have been bullied because they had horses and "everyone knows" people that have them "are beating them with whips and spurring them bloody".

                      What limits you set to "it's ok to do with MY horses", you will find many others thinking that is abusive.

                      Perspective can help you understand where others are coming from, why it is not good to stand there throwing stones, when all that have animals are living in glass houses.

                      Better stick to facts, what is clearly not right, not generalize to "all", whatever all is, is wrong.
                      Bluey, your stand confuses me. You say, "Perspective can help you understand where others are coming from, why it is not good to stand there throwing stones, when all that have animals are living in glass houses."

                      Where do YOU draw the line? If we don't have ANY line, where does abuse start? You keep saying different isn't wrong...well, sometimes it is! Soring horses is wrong. Stewarding horses is wrong. Drugging, hanging, studded nose bands, rollkur, riding yearlings, cathedral bits in the wrong hands......it's ALL wrong. Just because I don't do it doesn't mean I can't speak out against it. Why don't you share where exactly you draw the line? I just don't see your line anywhere because you seem to defend *different* as though it's some badge of honor that makes you better than the rest of us in because we won't accept their *different* as an acceptable way to treat horses. Are you defending Big Lick horses that are sored? Do you support Big Lick because it's different from all of the other horrible disciplines that are also abusive? Do you support a sport that has notoriously hidden the criminals and rewarded them regardless, because they are "misunderstood" by the general public? Because I just can't tell.

                      Comment


                      • As a former saddleseat equitation rider (ASBs), I just want to comment that we hold our hands higher... because... the horse's... head... is... higher.... is this obvious to only me? It's the same principle as an automatic crest release... follow the horse's head.

                        Yes, the men, for whatever reason, are generally far more hunch-y than the women.

                        And, having been a SS rider for many years, yes, I can actually ride a horse. I know it looks different and scary and voodoo, but I can sit a buck with the best of 'em, and so can most of the kids in the UPHA medal and the "Good Hands" class (which is, uh, called that for a reason). I cannot speak for other ASB barns, but I rode with two of the best and biggest trainers in the business and the horses were, at times, pretty fresh. A fully keyed-up ASB is both the friendliest horse in the barn and the most showy.

                        The majority of ASB people I know will not touch a Big Lick TWH with a ten-foot pole. The thing is -- there's no joy. I can easily find pictures (and see, I guess) ASB or Arab foals trotting above level in a field http://www.google.com/imgres?num=10&...11&tx=56&ty=60. I have never, like literally never seen a TWH doing the "Big Lick" gait as a foal or out in the field. Sure, they are gaited, and move differently, but the natural mechanics of the horse don't even approach the Big Lick. Why are we trying to make our horses do something they aren't naturally physically capable of? Horses jump stuff out in the field, they will do a showy trot in the field, they will "piaffe" in the field, they will do sliding stops...

                        For all of you saying that you can run in heels (yes, I can also run in heels, I live in a city)... is someone riding you while you do it!? (Um... if there is, perhaps I don't want to know).

                        I'm not trying to be "self righteous." Hell, I got out of showing any discipline entirely because of the abuses that I saw in all of them. I am just utterly confused as to how someone could a) enjoy riding that b) think it was OK to do.
                        [/obligate outrage from ASB community at being lumped in with the TWH community. note that TWHs are generally no longer included -- cough, allowed -- in the ASB/Morgan shows. over and out. sorry.]

                        Comment


                        • The stupidity of it all is that the TWH was bred to cover the ground efficiently and effortlessly; and with a minimum amount of effort by the rider. They were bred to be ridden many miles, all day long, without getting tired or going unsound. This is the work the vast majority of them still do.

                          The BL goes 180 degrees in the opposite direction; and I lay the blame at the feet of the breed association for promoting it.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by hundredacres View Post
                            Bluey, your stand confuses me. You say, "Perspective can help you understand where others are coming from, why it is not good to stand there throwing stones, when all that have animals are living in glass houses."

                            Where do YOU draw the line? If we don't have ANY line, where does abuse start? You keep saying different isn't wrong...well, sometimes it is! Soring horses is wrong. Stewarding horses is wrong. Drugging, hanging, studded nose bands, rollkur, riding yearlings, cathedral bits in the wrong hands......it's ALL wrong. Just because I don't do it doesn't mean I can't speak out against it. Why don't you share where exactly you draw the line? I just don't see your line anywhere because you seem to defend *different* as though it's some badge of honor that makes you better than the rest of us in because we won't accept their *different* as an acceptable way to treat horses. Are you defending Big Lick horses that are sored? Do you support Big Lick because it's different from all of the other horrible disciplines that are also abusive? Do you support a sport that has notoriously hidden the criminals and rewarded them regardless, because they are "misunderstood" by the general public? Because I just can't tell.
                            Look, I have said time and again that I don't even like any of those gaited horses like WH and ABS and other breeds that have fallen into such, Morgans and Arabians, when they move funny and throw their legs around and have cut tails trained over their backs and all that, much less the soring and padding.

                            It is painful for me to watch some people do to horses, that happens here and there in all we do with horses.
                            When it is just not very good horsemanship in my opinion, or crosses into abuse, there we need to know to make that important difference.

                            What I am saying, complain about any abuses any place they happen, but remember not to throw the whole away because of abuses, because abuses can happen any place, even in what you do and yes, "abuse" is a moving target any more, depending on who is looking and doing the talking.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by SwampYankee View Post
                              The stupidity of it all is that the TWH was bred to cover the ground efficiently and effortlessly; and with a minimum amount of effort by the rider. They were bred to be ridden many miles, all day long, without getting tired or going unsound. This is the work the vast majority of them still do.

                              The BL goes 180 degrees in the opposite direction; and I lay the blame at the feet of the breed association for promoting it.
                              That is correct the TWH was bred to carry the plantation owner thru the fields checking his crops and farm hands for hundreds of acres all day long.

                              If twhbea had STOPPED this Big Lick back in the 50's it would not be here today.the true villian is TWHBEA,now they claim its not THEIR problem they are only a bred registry.REALLY check the board of Directors violation list.Who is running TWBEA?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by BigBayHanoMare View Post
                                Chains ARE a training device. Why are so many saddle seat horses (excluding TWHs for the moment and am talking about ASBs, Morgans, Arabs, etc.) that come out of GOOD programs who USE chains sound then?? A chain IS a training device, just like side reins, Vienna reins, draw reins, etc. Any of those in the wrong hands are shortcuts, too, BUT they do have their purpose. Same with chains!

                                You're also missing my point ENTIRELY--a chain IS abusive on a sored horse. I said that in my post. However, on a horse that hasn't been sored, it is NOT ABUSIVE. Do you really believe that 16 oz. or less has THAT MUCH effect on a 1000 lbs. horse (again, presuming the horse hasn't been sored)? It's a whole 'nother ballgame when that chain hits the sored area. I am not talking about that! I'd like to beat a trainer who sores their horse in the face with 16 oz. of metal.

                                Chains on a not-sored horse = help with rhythm and cadence. That. Is. It. Chains on a sored horse = leg lifting higher and higher to get away from the pain.

                                I'm going to go beat my head against the wall because I don't have any idea how else to say it.
                                A chain is a method of soring a horse. So is a stack (or "pads" or whatever else you want to call it). Take the "chain" way and the movement goes away. How can you claim something "trains" a horse when the removal of that something means the horse doesn't do it anymore???

                                Ever watch a horse trained for mounted archery? If not Google it and watch the movement. THAT is what training does.

                                I, too, don't know what else to say.

                                G.
                                Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Regala View Post
                                  that link is to a horse in full stacks, ridden by a girl with no helmet and barefoot, sitting unbalanced on the horse's loin, and hauling on the reins attached to long shanks.

                                  i appreciate you trying to explain, but the picture i'm seeing is not a shining example of good horsemanship, or natural movement, or a happy, relaxed horse. and i better go explain to a couple of my horses that 12 is "old".
                                  Regala, I'm the girl on the big black horse. Yes I was barefoot and helmetless. At that point in time, I did not see the point in wearing a helmet on any horse save for the greenies that we were gentling. I was barefoot simply because I went to the barn that day to visit. I had been wearing Birkenstocks but when I was asked to ride, I kicked off my shoes after mounting.

                                  As for your claim that I was sitting unbalanced, yes I was. I ride sitting slightly cockeyed. It has never to my knowledge adversly affected any of my horses' gaits, TWH, Arab, or QH.

                                  Lastly I was NOT hauling on Blue's mouth! If you'll look closely at the picture of that ride, you'll see that I only have contact on his mouth, except on the left hand side. I do have a slight bit of pressure on that side to keep him off the fenceline. He was very very right handed, so to speak.
                                  Devil Pup 13 May 2010
                                  Veni, vidi, nates calce concidi
                                  Molly~4yo Blue Heeler & Dakota Nov 09 Baby Heeler

                                  Comment


                                  • Chains are used at some barns that are very heavy. The point of a chain is to make the horse pick their feet up higher. Just like putting a heavier shoe on a horse. Go out and put heavy chains on a qh and he will also pick up his feet higher than usual. Not to the degree of these horses but he will. I agree that it is crazy what they do to these bl horses. Why can't they just go natural the way they are suppose to go? What is the obsession with bl and people? Even my vet did say it is not good for the horses. It is not natural. I compared to say the work up a gp dressage horse. His answer well that is hard work but it's natural for the horse. The horse does those things out in the wild. Is it hard on them, yes it can be if done to hard and to fast but bl is much worse on the horse.
                                    Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by hundredacres View Post
                                      It doesn't matter what other people do to their horses in other disciplines and in backyards all over the world - it will never minimize or absolve what happens to TWH's to make them look like this. To say this looks "fine" and the horses look happy is like saying soft porn with teens is okay, because it's not real porn and the girls enjoy what they're doing.

                                      It's the most unnatural discipline in the horse world and people get their rocks off on how much more grotesquely one horse can move over another. The people who enjoy it are defective.
                                      *standing ovation*

                                      Who cares if the footage is made my animal right extremists or just another Joe? The videos speak for themselves. The horses on the HSUS video are being beaten and sored without mercy, period.
                                      Yes, I smell like a horse. No, I don't consider that to be a problem.

                                      Originally posted by DottieHQ
                                      You're just jealous because you lack my extensive koalafications.

                                      Comment


                                      • http://www.horsegroomingsupplies.com...on-160044.html

                                        Go to the 3rd post and check out the difference in the to photos and where this sport has gone. First photos the man looks great, soft hand following the horse, nice seat then the second picture ughhh
                                        Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole

                                        Comment


                                        • now does this look NATURAL,or normal

                                          http://www.boblangrish.com/galleriesimage.php?id=6525

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X