• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Video of Tennessee Walking Horse We witnessed at the GIHP

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by red mares View Post
    Yes, somebody define this. Correct for dressage is not the same as correct for huntseat which is not the same as correct for saddleseat or western. If the standard for correct was the same for all seats there would be 1 style saddle for all types of riding, with different sizes for different horses or riders.

    Correct is relative when talking about different styles of riding.

    By the way, as a SS rider, most dressage riders look horrible to me on a horse, and H/J folks look like frustrated jockey wanna-bes.

    That was my point.
    We do all kinds of things with our horses and someone somewhere will think what they do is fine, what others do stupid or dangerous or, oops, even abusive.

    You know, if BL is truly abusive in itself, yes, it should go.

    If it is just different, but not any more abusive than jumping or prancing around on it's behind in dressage or spinning silly in reining or turning inside out cutting or flying wide out in racing or whatever, if it is just different than what we do, that in itself, if they ride like constipated ducks in hunter classes, or hunchbacks in BL, well, who cares other than the judge?

    If there is abuse anywhere, work to stop the abuse, but let the people that like to do whatever with their horses do it, if we like it or not.

    If nothing else, because there is someone, somewhere, that will not like what WE do with OUR horses also and, if we keep others from doing what they want just because WE DON'T LIKE IT, THERE!, well, you can't really expect not to be next.

    Look at what those do that you don't like what they do are doing.
    Ask the right questions if it is abuse or not.
    If it is not really abuse, real abuse, not taken out of context idea of what abuse is, like "riding a horse is abuse in itself", well, if it is not abuse, like soring clearly is and that already is illegal, as now the question is if stacks, that are already regulated and inspected are abuse themselves or not and that will be eventually determined, lets shake our heads, say as much as we want that we don't like it, but let them enjoy their horses as they wish, even if that is walking funny.
    It really should not be up to us to say what others can and can't do to enjoy themselves and their horses.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Regala View Post
      that link is to a horse in full stacks, ridden by a girl with no helmet and barefoot, sitting unbalanced on the horse's loin, and hauling on the reins attached to long shanks.

      i did see other albums, but was time consuming to try to find what you wanted to show. do you have a direct link to the barefoot horse? did you mean that there were some walking horses who were relaxed and happy (don't think anyone doubts this), or ones with/showing a big lick gait?

      i appreciate you trying to explain, but the picture i'm seeing is not a shining example of good horsemanship, or natural movement, or a happy, relaxed horse. and i better go explain to a couple of my horses that 12 is "old".
      He is 22 now, that is why I refer to him as old. I prefaced it with I am a horrid photographer. I was asked to show a picture of someone who is not hunched over. I was showing that you don't have to ride hunched over. She was sliding back a little, however the saddle was placed correctly, and she was sitting in it correctly, barefeet not included. This was the first time she had ever been on that horse, it was not an intentional ride. We had been on the way to my dad's and stopped by a friend's barn. He had so much going on that day trying to get ready for a show, that he said hello, climb on that horse. She did as she was told and I snapped a bad picture of it. You don't like it, that is fine. Why do you say she is sitting on the loins? Where do you want her to sit-on his withers with her hiney poked out in the air? We don't ride 2 point, and we don't ride in a hunt seat or something that puts us way far forward. I don't see where you are saying she is on his loins.
      http://community.webshots.com/album/548368465RfewoU[/url]

      She may not have changed the stars from their courses, but she loved a good man, and she rode good horses….author unknown

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Regala View Post
        that link is to a horse in full stacks, ridden by a girl with no helmet and barefoot, sitting unbalanced on the horse's loin, and hauling on the reins attached to long shanks.

        i did see other albums, but was time consuming to try to find what you wanted to show. do you have a direct link to the barefoot horse? did you mean that there were some walking horses who were relaxed and happy (don't think anyone doubts this), or ones with/showing a big lick gait?

        i appreciate you trying to explain, but the picture i'm seeing is not a shining example of good horsemanship, or natural movement, or a happy, relaxed horse. and i better go explain to a couple of my horses that 12 is "old".
        Oh, she is not unbalanced, and as far as a helmet goes, I was not raised to wear one. No one in my family did, no one I knew did. That has since changed, but it was what it was.

        As for the long shank, IIRC, there was no curb chain on that horse.
        http://community.webshots.com/album/548368465RfewoU[/url]

        She may not have changed the stars from their courses, but she loved a good man, and she rode good horses….author unknown

        Comment


        • Oh, and btw, there is no such thing as "Big Lick Plantation".
          http://community.webshots.com/album/548368465RfewoU[/url]

          She may not have changed the stars from their courses, but she loved a good man, and she rode good horses….author unknown

          Comment


          • gnalli, do you mean you put your horses in stacks and don't show? You don't have any show level pictures? Your defense just crumbled...I was slightly hopeful that I'd learn something but it turns out, I don't think there is much to learn....that picture shows us a horrible, horrible rider. I'm sorry that you can't see that. You really think the rider is to be on the cantle, ass hanging off? Seriously?

            None of the supporters here have shared any pictures showing us how THEY don't ride horrendously, how their horses are relaxed and content, but they are defending the discipline by stating all we do is focus on the bad. Give us some good. Please!

            ETA: I looked through your album and all of your riders are unbalanced. I won't comment on the bare feet and slumped seat, except to say that your credibility is gone.

            Comment


            • This is where you sit a happy, relaxed Walker lol.
              http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...Gemwalking.jpg

              Out of the mouth of babes- we went to the PA National Horse Show two years ago (after owning this walking gelding for years) and the girl in that picture asked what kind of horses the TWH's were as they were peddling around the ring- absolutely could not believe they were the same breed as our guy. Wanted to know how you rode that kind of horse on the trails lol.

              I'm in the to each his own camp- as long as it doesn't hurt the horse. There are just so many types of show horses that suffer what we non-high-end-show-people would consider abuse. All we can really do is make sure we don't contribute towards what offends us.
              Kerri

              Comment


              • http://www.shaneshifletphoto.com/dsp...Show%20Winners

                Some have lovely seats, some are hunchbacks of Notre Dame.

                Richard Spooner, anyone?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by katarine View Post
                  http://www.shaneshifletphoto.com/dsp...Show%20Winners

                  Some have lovely seats, some are hunchbacks of Notre Dame.

                  Richard Spooner, anyone?
                  That's a great link to so many different styles.
                  Kerri

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by katarine View Post
                    http://www.shaneshifletphoto.com/dsp...Show%20Winners

                    Some have lovely seats, some are hunchbacks of Notre Dame.

                    Richard Spooner, anyone?
                    Someone mentioned that some horses at times require you to ride hunched up to stay up with them, others not so much.

                    Maybe if the rider is hunchbacked or not really doesn't matter, as the pictures are to show off whatever the judge looks for in the horse at that moment of the picture, no matter how the rider looks right then?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by kasjordan View Post
                      This is where you sit a happy, relaxed Walker lol.
                      http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...Gemwalking.jpg
                      Great picture

                      Comment


                      • Go back to that page of show pictures. Enlarge all the BL horses. Look at their eyes. I dont see a happy horse in the bunch. Most look intimidated. Some look resigned. Then look at the foamy mouths and stretched lips. Sickening. Look at the look on the mugs of the riders. Not a pretty picture.
                        from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by WalkInTheWoods View Post
                          Go back to that page of show pictures. Enlarge all the BL horses. Look at their eyes. I dont see a happy horse in the bunch. Most look intimidated. Some look resigned. Then look at the foamy mouths and stretched lips. Sickening. Look at the look on the mugs of the riders. Not a pretty picture.
                          I did this, expecting to see what you described. I was actually surprised to see many more happy, alert looking horses than I thought? Can't go by the ears, my TWH almost always has ears back listening to me at some point in time. Most of the black ones actually had pretty great expressions. Some of the women had nice seats, seems to be that the guys tend to do the hunched over thing a lot more?
                          Kerri

                          Comment


                          • http://www.shaneshifletphoto.com/dsp...z%20Player.jpg

                            http://www.shaneshifletphoto.com/dsp...r%20Pepper.jpg

                            http://www.shaneshifletphoto.com/dsp...%20Sherman.jpg

                            Those don't look terrified.

                            http://www.shaneshifletphoto.com/dsp...%20Brogdon.jpg

                            That is an intelligent looking, sane, non terrified grey horse.

                            http://www.shaneshifletphoto.com/dsp...%20Brogdon.jpg

                            Foam is a GOOD thing in a horse's mouth. Foam is GOOD.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                              So, I don't like that either, but it is not for me or you to say to others what they should do, any more than it is for others, that are appalled that we even bred, train and ride horses now demand we leave horses alone, don't breed any more, let the feral ones be the only horses in existence, out there, as "nature", the way they interpret "nature", according to them, meant horses to be.
                              This. As long as there is no abuse, we can't say to people they can't ride the way they want. Because if we do, we're giving PETA a foot in the door. I play mounted games, and although I don't think it's abusive, I'm sure there are people who think it's terrible. I think western pleasure is abusive.
                              blogging at HN: http://www.horsenation.com/
                              check out my writing: http://jeseymour.com
                              Just out: http://www.barkingrainpress.org/dd-p...ead-poisoning/

                              Comment


                              • Jackie McConnell's abuse case had a horse named Moody Star is the picture 063-065 that horse,if it is you are looking at a SORED horse.so how many showing are or not,you wont know. thats why the rules for BL need to change they need to stop the stacks and pkges. thats the only way to end soring. maybe not all sore but can ya tell.

                                that way of riding hunched over is called goose-necking,alot of the heavy men do it they say it helps the dog walk of the hindend.you can see some women do it,the skinny guys do cause thats the way its done.

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by aarpaso View Post
                                  Jackie McConnell's abuse case had a horse named Moody Star is the picture 063-065 that horse,if it is you are looking at a SORED horse.so how many showing are or not,you wont know. thats why the rules for BL need to change they need to stop the stacks and pkges. thats the only way to end soring. maybe not all sore but can ya tell.

                                  that way of riding hunched over is called goose-necking,alot of the heavy men do it they say it helps the dog walk of the hindend.you can see some women do it,the skinny guys do cause thats the way its done.
                                  Do you acknowledge that NON PADDED horses are also the victims of soring?

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by aarpaso View Post
                                    Jackie McConnell's abuse case had a horse named Moody Star is the picture 063-065 that horse
                                    Link for simplicity: http://www.shaneshifletphoto.com/dsp...20-%20Star.jpg
                                    ::I do not understand your specific kind of crazy, but I do admire your total commitment to it::

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by WalkInTheWoods View Post
                                      Go back to that page of show pictures. Enlarge all the BL horses. Look at their eyes. I dont see a happy horse in the bunch. Most look intimidated. Some look resigned. Then look at the foamy mouths and stretched lips. Sickening. Look at the look on the mugs of the riders. Not a pretty picture.
                                      I don't think there's much point in reasoning with you. You made up your mind before you even saw the pictures. The riders look intense, but they are competing and athletes often look intense during competion. I will concede that there were some not too pretty riders there, but I don't think that is really a reason to call anything abusive.

                                      If you see pictures of a pony or horse pull, what do you see? Do you see a horse rearing to evade the lashings of a teamster or a horse using his weight effectively to move a dead load?
                                      Visit my Spoonflower shop

                                      Comment


                                      • i agree the grey does have a lovely expression both while moving and standing still. keep looking. some of the others show intimidation, resignation or a vacant checked out look. if you dont see it, then we will just have to agree to disagree.
                                        from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

                                        Comment


                                        • red mares - ive been looking at BL pics for years now and you are so right ! my mind was made up many years ago. thanks for noticing.
                                          from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X