• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Video of Tennessee Walking Horse We witnessed at the GIHP

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Summit Springs Farm View Post
    SO since its not the greatest sin you are ok with it. No not me. I am a steward of all horses and will speak out against any abuse, no matter what discipline.
    Thank you.

    Comment


    • #42
      It's disturbing how many people find this okay. I realize there are abuses in other disciplines too, but why does that always come up as an attempt to justify this one?

      I just don't get it. Heaven forbid the natural gait be rewarded (and the big lick gait isn't natural for anything on this planet). How can putting all that crap on be good for a 2 year old?? And yes, I know 2 year old Thoroughbreds are raced, but that's another thread. The horse in the video that katarine posted is gorgeous, but I think he'd look even better without his freakshoes on.

      Add me to the disgusted list.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by cloudy18 View Post
        It's disturbing how many people find this okay. I realize there are abuses in other disciplines too, but why does that always come up as an attempt to justify this one?

        I just don't get it. Heaven forbid the natural gait be rewarded (and the big lick gait isn't natural for anything on this planet). How can putting all that crap on be good for a 2 year old?? And yes, I know 2 year old Thoroughbreds are raced, but that's another thread. The horse in the video that katarine posted is gorgeous, but I think he'd look even better without his freakshoes on.

        Add me to the disgusted list.
        I wonder how many so in arms about how these horses move have dwarfed dogs, like wiener and corgis at home and love them and want to always have some of those, even if it is not the way dogs are supposed to be as a species at all and causes all kinds of health problems?
        Or today's GSD, that also have such an odd crawl behind as these horses do?

        Right, we have the animals we have for our own reasons and some times, some of those animals are not "normal" and that is what some like and, well, who is to point fingers, as long as everyone that likes them is taking care of them well?

        Now, when we have real abuse, then, that is what laws are for and we have plenty of those already.

        Comment


        • #44
          I am repulsed by the posters justifying these practices because abuse happens in other disciplines or because someone has a corgi (honestly, wth Bluey).

          It's just like saying that it is okay for me to hit my dog because other people are starving their dogs or beating them with chains and I just use my hand. Of course there are shades of abuse but it doesn't mean that any of it should be tolerated!!

          That two year old is not physically mature and is moving around in a grotesque "trot" on jacked up pads with a full grown woman sitting on her loin. How is that okay with y'all?

          Comment


          • #45
            I am not 'justifying' anything. I believe as I said- there are WORSE sins visited upon horses day in and day out- if you read that as justifying, then that's your perogative, but that's not how I mean it to sound or how I am trying to convey my feelings about padded horses.

            I will believe until I'm proven wrong that if they nixed pads tomorrow- the soring will get worse rather than better.

            Comment


            • #46
              I have three mutts from the shelter, no deformed looking Shepherds or miniature dogs-that-are-already miniature. Again, why do people throw other issues in as a way to deflect from this one?

              I have to laugh at your "that's what laws are for", Bluey. Many times the laws are weak and not enforced, and people can be bought. What a way to brush off the issue. The horses seem normal enough, it's the pads and chains and possible soring that make them move like freaks.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by GraceLikeRain View Post
                I am repulsed by the posters justifying these practices because abuse happens in other disciplines or because someone has a corgi (honestly, wth Bluey).

                It's just like saying that it is okay for me to hit my dog because other people are starving their dogs or beating them with chains and I just use my hand. Of course there are shades of abuse but it doesn't mean that any of it should be tolerated!!

                That two year old is not physically mature and is moving around in a grotesque "trot" on jacked up pads with a full grown woman sitting on her loin. How is that okay with y'all?
                So, I don't like that either, but it is not for me or you to say to others what they should do, any more than it is for others, that are appalled that we even bred, train and ride horses now demand we leave horses alone, don't breed any more, let the feral ones be the only horses in existence, out there, as "nature", the way they interpret "nature", according to them, meant horses to be.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by katarine View Post

                  I will believe until I'm proven wrong that if they nixed pads tomorrow- the soring will get worse rather than better.
                  I couldn't agree more...

                  ----------------

                  Now back to the regularly scheduled bickering.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                    Then we will probably see you speaking with Congressmen/women asking them to outlaw all use of horses as they should run free in green pastures
                    Leo, she was being facetious.
                    http://community.webshots.com/album/548368465RfewoU[/url]

                    She may not have changed the stars from their courses, but she loved a good man, and she rode good horses….author unknown

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by shakeytails View Post
                      I thoroughly believe this. Gnalli, if I'm ever in your neck of the woods, can I come watch you work horses? I love a good big lick! Yeah Boy!
                      Yes, you can. At this moment, I don't have one on pads simply because I am down to 3, but I am actively looking for my next project. All this nonsense has just made me harden my resolve to PROVE that it can be done and done well, without chemicals. Come on, I'll let you ride Renegade- may even put a small pad on him for you (not too heavy, just a small package as he has not been padded in a long time.)
                      http://community.webshots.com/album/548368465RfewoU[/url]

                      She may not have changed the stars from their courses, but she loved a good man, and she rode good horses….author unknown

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by WalkInTheWoods View Post
                        Gnalli you have no credibilty. You will defend Big Lick until it is no more and then you will miss it. Here is a direct quote from you:

                        "So before you talk about how bad they are, do some research, beyond I went to one no name barn and this is how they do it. I have spent time at the barns of some of the top trainers in the South (Jackie McConnell for starters) and ridden and owned some truly nice TWH that could win without soring, so I know of which I speak."

                        Really ? You hobnobbed with Jackie McConnell and choose to brag about it ? If he was your starters what other lovely barns did you hang at next to learn your "skills"?
                        I said I had spent some time in his barn not that I hobnobbed with him. No, he didn't teach me anything.I had a father for that. I went to look at a horse at his barn. No, I didn't see any chemicals, no I didn't see him sore the horse.

                        My skills involve good horsemanship, and hard work. I still it do it old school-break them to ground drive, then to pull a ground sled or plow (ground sled currently as I don't have a plow anymore) and a lot of hill work and wet saddle pads. I don't give a rats ass if you think I have any credibility or not because you don't matter to me or anyone I know on any level but as a Christian not wishing ill on people.

                        I will be getting a prospect shortly-most likely right after Christmas-so let me offer you an invitation. You come watch me. You bring your self righteous self and I will show you how its done. Other than that, keep your opinions of my credibility to yourself. You think you are perfect and that if you don't like it then it is wrong. Not the case. Just because someone has associated with someone who has done something wrong, does not mean they are bad people. The horse world is small, and you will come across people that you may not agree with, but still have to deal with them.
                        http://community.webshots.com/album/548368465RfewoU[/url]

                        She may not have changed the stars from their courses, but she loved a good man, and she rode good horses….author unknown

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Justification is required when you need a defense - when you need a reason to prove what you are doing is okay. You wouldn't a defense if what you see as acceptable were normal. People who fight birds and dogs enjoy what they do too and will also try and defend their past time...it doesn't make it right because the rest of the world "misunderstands" what they do. Most of us can't understand a defective mind.

                          Defending stacking pads on a horse by comparing it to other atrocities simply makes it more apparent that you are defective, and lack the ability to understand your own inhumanity.

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Originally posted by Rudy View Post
                            I couldn't agree more...

                            ----------------

                            Now back to the regularly scheduled bickering.
                            Those who say that they see no immediate negative consequences of these practices might (note the conditional) be quite right. And if the devices meet the strictures of the HPA then it's quite legal.

                            But just 'cause it's legal doesn't mean I have to like it. Or that we ought to turn our collective backs on it. Or that I can't state that in my opinion and experience it's a serious, long term detriment to the horse.

                            If they get to show it, I get to thumb my nose at it.

                            G.
                            Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Yes. And those that "like it" are used to doing so in dark corners and recesses of their inner circles. And it is not because other horse people do not understand or do not agree. Spectators with no knowledge of this "use" find it grotesque on its face - without having to see Jackie McConnell getting his championship.

                              I know there are plenty of back yard owners and such who feel a stacked horse is NEVER sored. ANd maybe they do not intentionally sore - but I am sure there is soreness they are not fully aware of. Like a poster here states they have a stacked horse who has been out of stacks for a while and they are not considering stacking them back up. If it is a good non-harmful thing to do, if it is a good balance point for the horse, why do you hesitate to re-stack him?

                              And I also wonder if someone would point me to the list of stacked horse World Grand Championship trainers who do not have HPA violations???? And does anyone dispute that the bulk of the HPA violations are with stacked horses?

                              These are the kind of questions people like to shout and deflect these discussions away from - for what ever reason.
                              from sunridge1:Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.it is going to be good until the last drop!Eleneswell, the open trail begged to be used. D Taylor

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by hundredacres View Post
                                Justification is required when you need a defense - when you need a reason to prove what you are doing is okay. You wouldn't a defense if what you see as acceptable were normal. People who fight birds and dogs enjoy what they do too and will also try and defend their past time...it doesn't make it right because the rest of the world "misunderstands" what they do. Most of us can't understand a defective mind.

                                Defending stacking pads on a horse by comparing it to other atrocities simply makes it more apparent that you are defective, and lack the ability to understand your own inhumanity.
                                False logic there, as so many falsely accused can attest to a need for defense.

                                All of us have to defend what we believe in, that is how we come to agreements about what is acceptable or not to the situation at hand.
                                Culture play an important role in what is acceptable also.
                                Some cultures accept human and animal abuses that others would not.
                                I expect I don't have to give you any examples of that, do I?

                                Yes, I was puzzled and didn't like it at all when I saw my first three/five gaited horses prancing around on those wooden shoes, tails in harnesses and learned the little I did about their uses and training.

                                Coming from a different culture without any such, well, it seemed very absurd.
                                It still does today, most those gaited horses still seem crippled to me, but I have learned there is much others do that I don't like, but it is not my place to tell them what to like.

                                If someone can show true abuse, not animal rights extremists driven propaganda to make any we do with our animals abuse, then that is grounds to call for stopping abuses.

                                If others can do that without real abuse, well, then I don't think it is my place to tell them what to do and don't like others coming to tell me I or anyone they don't agree with are "defective" because they don't agree with them.
                                That just shows me that person is after their personal agenda, going overboard and becoming insulting, with lack of common sense.

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                  False logic there, as so many falsely accused can attest to a need for defense.

                                  All of us have to defend what we believe in, that is how we come to agreements about what is acceptable or not to the situation at hand.
                                  Culture play an important role in what is acceptable also.
                                  Some cultures accept human and animal abuses that others would not.
                                  I expect I don't have to give you any examples of that, do I?

                                  Yes, I was puzzled and didn't like it at all when I saw my first three/five gaited horses prancing around on those wooden shoes, tails in harnesses and learned the little I did about their uses and training.

                                  Coming from a different culture without any such, well, it seemed very absurd.
                                  It still does today, most those gaited horses still seem crippled to me, but I have learned there is much others do that I don't like, but it is not my place to tell them what to like.

                                  If someone can show true abuse, not animal rights extremists driven propaganda to make any we do with our animals abuse, then that is grounds to call for stopping abuses.

                                  If others can do that without real abuse, well, then I don't think it is my place to tell them what to do and don't like others coming to tell me I or anyone they don't agree with are "defective" because they don't agree with them.
                                  That just shows me that person is after their personal agenda, going overboard and becoming insulting, with lack of common sense.
                                  Exactly what constitutes "true abuse" to you?

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                    I wonder how many so in arms about how these horses move have dwarfed dogs, like wiener and corgis at home and love them and want to always have some of those, even if it is not the way dogs are supposed to be as a species at all and causes all kinds of health problems?
                                    Or today's GSD, that also have such an odd crawl behind as these horses do?

                                    Right, we have the animals we have for our own reasons and some times, some of those animals are not "normal" and that is what some like and, well, who is to point fingers, as long as everyone that likes them is taking care of them well?

                                    Now, when we have real abuse, then, that is what laws are for and we have plenty of those already.
                                    Are you referring in to DACHSHUNDS? I've had dachshunds for 50 + years, yes I am that old. In general they really don't have health issues unless they are overfed and underexercised.
                                    I wasn't always a Smurf
                                    Penmerryl Sophie RIDSH
                                    "I ain't as good as I once was but I'm as good once as I ever was"
                                    The ignore list is my friend. It takes 2 to argue.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Originally posted by carolprudm View Post
                                      Are you referring in to DACHSHUNDS? I've had dachshunds for 50 + years, yes I am that old. In general they really don't have health issues unless they are overfed and underexercised.
                                      You make my point very well.

                                      You are used to seeing dwarf dogs and coping with their handicaps, those way too short legs and way too long backs.

                                      That is really not much different than horse with grotesque walks.

                                      All that is extremes we like in our animals and that is fine, for each one that likes those extremes.

                                      Look at the big picture, look at how those that don't like extremes see some dog breed characteristics, horse characteristics and understand why there is controversy and yes, a need to explain if not defend what we do and what we like and don't like and why.

                                      There is no sensible person that can say with a straight face dwarfed dogs are not without consequences from their very important differences from the norm.

                                      The same with putting stacks on a horse's feet to get certain grotesque actions and expect it not to have some consequences.

                                      To try to deny that is useless, anyone can show you why that is not ideal.

                                      Why not say, yes, there is no action without reaction, we like our little short legged, way too long backed dogs for optimal, heck, for normal dog function and can take the best care of them and think that is ok.

                                      I think the same with those that put pads on those horses.

                                      There are trade-offs to all we do in life and, just because someone else's trade-offs are not ours, that doesn't mean they are automatically bad, unless clearly so, like dog or rooster fighting and other such, that is clearly of no redeeming qualities, that is real abuse, as starving or beating them would be.

                                      People like hairless cats and dogs, dwarfs, extremes of gaits in horses and whatever else they like that is different, they always have.

                                      That is why we have those ongoing discussions about what is appropriate and what questionable and what clearly wrong.

                                      We can breed our animals, especially dogs seem to be very genetically malleable, to be and look so many different ways and that is ok for many, questionable when taken to extremes by others.

                                      The ones with those animals way different than the norm for their species are the ones that have to answer them for themselves and defend them from those that have questions.

                                      I don't have any answers to all those questions, but will say if I want to keep my own rights to do as I see best, as long as I follow existing laws, I need to be sure I don't tramp on the rights of others to do just that when we disagree.

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                        You make my point very well.

                                        You are used to seeing dwarf dogs and coping with their handicaps, those way too short legs and way too long backs.

                                        That is really not much different than horse with grotesque walks.

                                        All that is extremes we like in our animals and that is fine, for each one that likes those extremes.

                                        Look at the big picture, look at how those that don't like extremes see some dog breed characteristics, horse characteristics and understand why there is controversy and yes, a need to explain if not defend what we do and what we like and don't like and why.

                                        There is no sensible person that can say with a straight face dwarfed dogs are not without consequences from their very important differences from the norm.

                                        The same with putting stacks on a horse's feet to get certain grotesque actions and expect it not to have some consequences.

                                        To try to deny that is useless, anyone can show you why that is not ideal.

                                        Why not say, yes, there is no action without reaction, we like our little short legged, way too long backed dogs for optimal, heck, for normal dog function and can take the best care of them and think that is ok.

                                        I think the same with those that put pads on those horses.

                                        There are trade-offs to all we do in life and, just because someone else's trade-offs are not ours, that doesn't mean they are automatically bad, unless clearly so, like dog or rooster fighting and other such, that is clearly of no redeeming qualities, that is real abuse, as starving or beating them would be.

                                        People like hairless cats and dogs, dwarfs, extremes of gaits in horses and whatever else they like that is different, they always have.

                                        That is why we have those ongoing discussions about what is appropriate and what questionable and what clearly wrong.

                                        We can breed our animals, especially dogs seem to be very genetically malleable, to be and look so many different ways and that is ok for many, questionable when taken to extremes by others.

                                        The ones with those animals way different than the norm for their species are the ones that have to answer them for themselves and defend them from those that have questions.

                                        I don't have any answers to all those questions, but will say if I want to keep my own rights to do as I see best, as long as I follow existing laws, I need to be sure I don't tramp on the rights of others to do just that when we disagree.
                                        IMHO any dog, even a mutt, who is overfed and under exercised is liable to have health issues.
                                        I wasn't always a Smurf
                                        Penmerryl Sophie RIDSH
                                        "I ain't as good as I once was but I'm as good once as I ever was"
                                        The ignore list is my friend. It takes 2 to argue.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Bluey is making valid, calm statements that we all need to read and digest before replying.

                                          For the record, the gaited horses, specifically TWH have been under fire for 40+ years. I repeat 40+years.
                                          The problem is the US Government has been 'testing' and monitoring riders and trainers instead of the judges. As long as the judge places the "Big lick" horse, then everyone involved will do their best create the same with their horse.
                                          Quick way to resolve, if the horses placed in a class can be proved to have soared, the judge and the rider/owner/trainer should be fined. After awhile, judges will either retire, not be hired or change their judging.

                                          For the record, I know someone who grew up in the gaited world. Soaring it not done in her family's or in her current barn. SHE was amazed that I ride my horses across country jumping fences. She considers what I do to be insane and borderline abusive. Back to Bluey's statements. . . WHO decides what is right and good. And what criteria are will be used to make those decisions?
                                          "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
                                          Courtesy my cousin Tim

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X