• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Who funds the horse slaughter lobby? All roads lead to AQHA and Agribusiness.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by betonbill View Post
    Fairfax:

    You, of all people, have been the biggest disappointment to me. When you first started posting on this thread I thought, great, now we can get a relatively unbiased viewpoint on the entire slaughter procedure. Instead we get yet another frothing persona raving about the RARAs, the HSUS, and God knows what else (see posts directly above).
    Yep...I've been following this thread for some time, and continually disappointed by what I've seen, particularly from someone who offered promise of sanity. Nope. Disappointed yet again.

    And just to note, the "20,000 horses!!!11!!1!" number sounds tremendous at first, but the US alone has 9,000,000+ horses. Somehow I think we can figure out what to do with 20,000 of those. That is .2% of the horse population in this country. The image being crafted a country overrun by neglected, feral horses because we can't send them off to be slaughtered is logically ridiculous and bordering on mathematically impossible.

    I still think a bullet is the most humane. And there are numerous possibilities for disposal.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by big_red_ottb View Post
      Yep...I've been following this thread for some time, and continually disappointed by what I've seen, particularly from someone who offered promise of sanity. Nope. Disappointed yet again.

      And just to note, the "20,000 horses!!!11!!1!" number sounds tremendous at first, but the US alone has 9,000,000+ horses. Somehow I think we can figure out what to do with 20,000 of those. That is .2% of the horse population in this country. The image being crafted a country overrun by neglected, feral horses because we can't send them off to be slaughtered is logically ridiculous and bordering on mathematically impossible.

      I still think a bullet is the most humane. And there are numerous possibilities for disposal.
      Very myopic.

      The issue here is not just horses.
      These are assaults on all we do with animals, to eliminate their use, one at the time.

      This is not about the horses, but disrupting any we do with our animals, under any pretense, no matter what it is.
      It is about getting free publicity, about their name out there, about getting the gullible public to donate to their already obscenely overflowing coffers, to, in the end, eliminate all uses of animals, while they make a very good living running the show, of course.

      The horses are a mere prop in these power battles, could be the sad kitten in a cage in their mailings, the tuna frisking in the waves, anything that will pull the purse strings open.

      THAT is why so many are wary of those animal rights extremist groups.
      When someone tells you who they are, better believe them.

      You follow the Pied Piper of animal rights extremists at your own risk.

      Comment


      • Wrong, Bluey. This solely has to do with the plants' inability to trace enough horses' histories to be able to state that the carcasses are not contaminated by THEIR list of forbidden drugs.

        Absolutely nothing to do with any animal rights' movements or anything else. There could be a slaughter house on every corner of every town in the U.S. playing soft mood music and lulling the horses into the most peaceful death imaginable, but if you can't trace each horse's drug history this is all for naught.

        As stated before, this might turn out to not be true, but in the long run the drug problem is going to turn the EU off of processing any horses from the U.S.

        Comment


        • As I posted on another thread. Boarder agents at Coutts Alberta have NO information regarding this. H.H. Smith the LARGEST equine import broker has NO information on this and they are currently processing import papers for MOnday for truck loads.

          If is was only 20,000 horses ...well...that would be okay. There are OVER 20,000 horses in EQUINE FEED LOTS....it has been estimated there are closer to 190,000 horses (however I personally feel that number is probably high due to their designation for unwanted horses)

          This STORY appears to have started when a trucker was rejected at the Ontario border. That however, could be for over packing the number of horses, injuries or sickness.

          Do you anti slaughter groups not read. Water conservation groups have blocked many many sites for shoot, shut up and shovel. If a person can NOT afford to euthanize and render pick up..they are just going to abandon the horses and I remember two years ago when they found the remains of about forty horses in Montana where they had been dumped when it was 30 below F.

          So rather than cheering.....if it is even remotely possible it is true...WHATCHA GONNA DO?

          I have been asking for YOUR solutions...and now all you can say is find someone to shoot the horse?

          WOW...

          Did you know there is a ONE THOUSAND DOLLAR FINE in 23 counties in California alone if you shoot a horse and bury it on your property?

          This is ALL going to be blamed on the breeders...that is the ONLY solution this idiots can come up with. BAN ALL HORSE BREEDING until a forever home is found for every Dobbin...OR TAX THEM TO DEATH....for you one horse owners...just think for a moment. Where in HECK did your horse come from? A BREEDER...whether it was a breeder with one mare or a breeder with fifty.
          The Elephant in the room

          Comment


          • The rumors appear to revolve around the drug question, anything else is simply not relevant. Perhaps the rumors are true, perhaps not.

            One can scream and rant and rave about everything else, but it is immaterial to the current story at hand.

            Guess we have to wait and see how this hand plays out.

            Comment


            • Yup
              The Elephant in the room

              Comment


              • but. dont they slaughter horses for things *besides* human consumption?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by big_red_ottb View Post
                  Yep...I've been following this thread for some time, and continually disappointed by what I've seen, particularly from someone who offered promise of sanity. Nope. Disappointed yet again.

                  And just to note, the "20,000 horses!!!11!!1!" number sounds tremendous at first, but the US alone has 9,000,000+ horses. Somehow I think we can figure out what to do with 20,000 of those. That is .2% of the horse population in this country. The image being crafted a country overrun by neglected, feral horses because we can't send them off to be slaughtered is logically ridiculous and bordering on mathematically impossible.

                  I still think a bullet is the most humane. And there are numerous possibilities for disposal.
                  COTH needs a "Like" button, and I'd click on it for this...

                  Comment


                  • Totally agree.

                    Originally posted by big_red_ottb View Post
                    Yep...I've been following this thread for some time, and continually disappointed by what I've seen, particularly from someone who offered promise of sanity. Nope. Disappointed yet again.

                    And just to note, the "20,000 horses!!!11!!1!" number sounds tremendous at first, but the US alone has 9,000,000+ horses. Somehow I think we can figure out what to do with 20,000 of those. That is .2% of the horse population in this country. The image being crafted a country overrun by neglected, feral horses because we can't send them off to be slaughtered is logically ridiculous and bordering on mathematically impossible.

                    I still think a bullet is the most humane. And there are numerous possibilities for disposal.
                    The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                    H. Cate

                    Comment


                    • Time and time again we have said-that most of us would be ok with "slaughter" as long as it was done humanely. DDB posted videos of how it could be done differently. That wasn't good enough. Time and time again we have said we would be happier with a well placed bullet, if it came to that. We care how a horse gets dead - not necessarily what happens after that. Several solutions have been offered. All you and Bluey do is sit back and say how THOSE suggestions can't possibly work without one good reason why not. Or that falls right into the hands of the RARA's and OMG we all must be RARA's because we don't agree with the 2 of you. Last time I checked this was still a free country and we have a right to our opinions but no no no we still have to be RARA's to not agree with you.
                      All you do is sit back wringing your hands with the "woe is me, we're losing our rights". If that's absolutely all you can do - you're right - you will lose your rights because you didn't actually DO anything to stop it but sit on your behinds and be paranoid. Good luck with that.


                      Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                      As I posted on another thread. Boarder agents at Coutts Alberta have NO information regarding this. H.H. Smith the LARGEST equine import broker has NO information on this and they are currently processing import papers for MOnday for truck loads.

                      If is was only 20,000 horses ...well...that would be okay. There are OVER 20,000 horses in EQUINE FEED LOTS....it has been estimated there are closer to 190,000 horses (however I personally feel that number is probably high due to their designation for unwanted horses)

                      This STORY appears to have started when a trucker was rejected at the Ontario border. That however, could be for over packing the number of horses, injuries or sickness.

                      Do you anti slaughter groups not read. Water conservation groups have blocked many many sites for shoot, shut up and shovel. If a person can NOT afford to euthanize and render pick up..they are just going to abandon the horses and I remember two years ago when they found the remains of about forty horses in Montana where they had been dumped when it was 30 below F.

                      So rather than cheering.....if it is even remotely possible it is true...WHATCHA GONNA DO?

                      I have been asking for YOUR solutions...and now all you can say is find someone to shoot the horse?

                      WOW...

                      Did you know there is a ONE THOUSAND DOLLAR FINE in 23 counties in California alone if you shoot a horse and bury it on your property?

                      This is ALL going to be blamed on the breeders...that is the ONLY solution this idiots can come up with. BAN ALL HORSE BREEDING until a forever home is found for every Dobbin...OR TAX THEM TO DEATH....for you one horse owners...just think for a moment. Where in HECK did your horse come from? A BREEDER...whether it was a breeder with one mare or a breeder with fifty.
                      The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                      H. Cate

                      Comment


                      • All of those horses in feed lots. or owned by KB HAVE OWNERS...the feedlot owners or KB owners. I own rental homes, and try to buy as many as possible. If the rental market took a nosedive, I can't say "oh no...all of you other people figure out how to bail me out from my mistake". The KB/Feedlot owners, made a business decision, where there are no guarantees. They knew that the EU had an issue with drug residues. They are the ones legally responsible for doing something with THEIR horses. Something legal and humane. Haven't we been told for years by the pro slaughter side, that those in the slaughter business, are BUSINESSMEN, and are concerned about the animal's welfare? That we anti slaughter people were being mean for implying they were only in it for the money and didn't care what is in the horse's best interest? Well, nows the time for them to prove it.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by JGHIRETIRE View Post
                          All you do is sit back wringing your hands with the "woe is me, we're losing our rights". If that's absolutely all you can do - you're right - you will lose your rights because you didn't actually DO anything to stop it but sit on your behinds and be paranoid. Good luck with that.
                          Hear, hear !!!
                          ************************
                          \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                          Comment


                          • According to an article in the DRF, all of this came about almost immediately of a release of a report on an inspection of Mexican plants. While there was generally good compliance with standards, there seems to be a real problem with those EIH papers and tracing of what the horses have been given, along with trouble matching some of these papers to individual horses. Also, no way that the Mexican side could check and verify the paperwork they had been given.

                            No way to check the veracity of the paperwork from the U.S. horses equals no way to check drug history on the horse, which equals lots of room for the presence of forbidden drugs and/or withdrawal history, which in turn probably drove the accountants bat-sh*t crazy.

                            So perhaps it just isn't the drugs but the paperwork required to prove compliance. Lots of luck with that, EU.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by betonbill View Post
                              According to an article in the DRF, all of this came about almost immediately of a release of a report on an inspection of Mexican plants. While there was generally good compliance with standards, there seems to be a real problem with those EIH papers and tracing of what the horses have been given, along with trouble matching some of these papers to individual horses. Also, no way that the Mexican side could check and verify the paperwork they had been given.

                              No way to check the veracity of the paperwork from the U.S. horses equals no way to check drug history on the horse, which equals lots of room for the presence of forbidden drugs and/or withdrawal history, which in turn probably drove the accountants bat-sh*t crazy.

                              So perhaps it just isn't the drugs but the paperwork required to prove compliance. Lots of luck with that, EU.
                              Easy to fix with the proper testing protocol.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                Easy to fix with the proper testing protocol.
                                Then why don't you go fix it.
                                They'll need all the help they can get.
                                ************************
                                \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                                  Then why don't you go fix it.
                                  They'll need all the help they can get.
                                  Why would I have anything to do with "fixing"?

                                  Would it not be better to wait and see what happens, if they really are not accepting horses and if so, what the CONSEQUENCES will be for all of us in the horse world?

                                  I have stated time and again I don't care if they have slaughter or not.
                                  In fact, have said clearly it is nice we don't have any open plants here, as it is one less place for animal rights extremists to terrorize those there.

                                  I think that, for several reasons, slaughter is a perfectly fine way to use one more renewable, natural resource SOME horses are for us humans.
                                  That the extremist animal rights groups you and others here so heartily seem to defend are very wrong, when they want to ban slaughter and eliminate all uses of animals.

                                  Will be interesting how this develops from here on.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                    That the extremist animal rights groups you and others here so heartily seem to defend
                                    Baiting again?

                                    Must be getting boring in the basement.
                                    ************************
                                    \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                                      Baiting again?

                                      Must be getting boring in the basement.
                                      Who is baiting there?

                                      Better quit being so giddy with the news, because it may be a publicity hoax after all yet.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                        Who is baiting there?

                                        Better quit being so giddy with the news, because it may be a publicity hoax after all yet.

                                        you wish...

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X