• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Who funds the horse slaughter lobby? All roads lead to AQHA and Agribusiness.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by mbm View Post
    wtf?

    on that note i am outta here because clearly this thread just hit an all time low.
    Yes, the houseguest also posted, as horse lover, against horse haters.
    From here it will go down hill with insults.

    I will just answer one question.
    Those that post propaganda from animal rights sites as their excuses for their positions and following those group's ideas are seen as animal rights followers, guess why, because that is what they are doing.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by fivehorses View Post
      I am curious what bluey and alagirl and 7hl think...just basics...no arguing propoganda, HSUS/peta, etc

      Just explain why you think horse slaughter is ok. I really am curious.

      with all the videos(remember the one that video'd days in a slaughter house that was posted on here?) and some of the other papers that are not propoganda based, I really am curious how anyone can think the way equine slaughter is done can be an acceptable way to dispose of horses humanely.

      So, no arguing/positioning, just your soul talking why you find it ok the way it is currently being done?
      Hello, am I being ignored?

      Instead the same old points are being argued, as they have been for years. why can't they be put aside and try and give some perspective on the process and if it is acceptable to you.

      If we want to try and come to some type of resolution, we at least need to know how we feel.
      save lives...spay/neuter/geld

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by JumpingPaints View Post
        Because goodness knows, the USDA did such an exemplary job when the US plants were open, LOL. Did you miss all the pix of horses arriving with gouged eyes, limbs torn of, broken necks or dead?

        Or by that measure, they do such a great job today ensuring animal welfare ((sarcasm intended)) Did you see last week's video of Central Valley Meats??

        Folks need to take off the rose colored glasses and see the cruelty and suffering horse slaughter entails through the entirety of the slaughter pipeline.

        And no, I'm no PETA supporter, but I do believe in basic animal welfare. And not only is horse slaughter patently unnecessary, it involves abuse and suffering that is not preventable by any kind of realistic oversight. Plus I don't support lottery style horse breeding, which is enabled by availability of horse slaughter.
        You are certainly swallowing their swill.

        Horse breeding is ALWAYS a lottery.
        Otherwise the market would not be full with offspring from top sires and dams barely scraping by.

        All the good it has done to shut inspection down in the US was sending the horses on yet longer trips.
        Canad - even with the horrific evidence of the labor dispute gone bad is still better than Mexico...

        All you antis should pad yourself on the back and giver yourself a carrot stick.

        What people outside the industry do not understand: injured animals are bad product!
        They cost money.

        asshats are omnipresent, sadly enough.

        Comment


        • #64
          Yes tonight!

          Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
          considering that the AQHA is the world's largest registry should have something to do with this.

          Is is full moon already?
          Right on time!!

          Comment


          • #65
            I think

            People could save a whole lot of time just posting See post from such and such dates. This is all the same thing that is discussed over the years. I know why did I open it!

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by fivehorses View Post
              I am curious what bluey and alagirl and 7hl think...just basics...no arguing propoganda, HSUS/peta, etc

              Just explain why you think horse slaughter is ok. I really am curious.

              Because it is ok.


              Slaughter is killing. I don't have a problem with that as a choice to dispose of unwanted horses.
              The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

              Comment


              • #67
                aaahhhh, thank you 7hl.
                Now will you answer the question that was posed at the end of my post. The last part is key...not slaughter, but 'how' it is done. I am going to assume since you and Bluey and alagirl support slaughter, that you also know that the method is designed for cattle, etc, not horses. Also, unlike in europe, there is not such a mass production line which keeps on moving along regardless of the animals condition after the stun.
                I understand why people support slaughter, but what I don't understand is why people support equine slaughter or any slaughter for that matter that is not done with respect and humane treatment of the animal.

                "So, no arguing/positioning, just your soul talking why you find it ok the way it is currently being done?"

                Thank you.
                save lives...spay/neuter/geld

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Bluey View Post

                  As long as those of us that understand the world as it is and our use of animals as the renewable, natural resource they are, you will find those that have them and the associations formed by them to try to protect the right to own and use animals from those that want to eliminate those rights on some wrongheaded idea of how this world works.
                  See, I just can't look at my horse and consider him a renewable natural resource. I'm not anti-slaughter, though. I don't personally want to eat horse, nor do I want mine to be eaten, but I don't have a problem with other people doing it. What I do have a problem with is a terrifying death preceded by days on a trailer. If we could bring back local abattoirs, or even make on-farm slaughter an option, it would be much easier to stomach, so to speak.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    I think the original post tied AQHA to slaughter, so I'd like to follow up.

                    Here's a question: How does AQHA justify all the bovine-like, steak on hooves halter horses (don't even bring up HYPP) they registered, and STILL encourage folks to breed via rewarding them at their "World" show?

                    Fat, repulsive, unathletic mounds of fat on tiny hooves that can barely trot a few feet in a halter class? They are bred for slaughter as sure as an Angus steer is!
                    TypaGraphics
                    Graphic Design & Websites
                    typagraphics.com

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by mbm View Post
                      well, as someone who is for animal welfare, who is a vegetarian (most of my life) who goes out of her way to ensure that every $$ that i spend goes only to businesses that i think are doing a good job ecologically, economically, animal welfare wise, etc. .

                      I am 100% FOR humane slaughter of horses. Even if it is for human food.

                      The lack of available slaughter here in the US only HURTS horses.
                      True.

                      From a pure biomass perspective, destroying that much meat and organic material in a way that means the carcass can't be eaten by something or decompose naturally into the soil is irresponsible.
                      Author Page
                      Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
                      Steampunk Sweethearts

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by fivehorses View Post
                        "So, no arguing/positioning, just your soul talking why you find it ok the way it is currently being done?"
                        The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by downen View Post
                          Here's a question: How does AQHA justify all the bovine-like, steak on hooves halter horses (don't even bring up HYPP) they registered, and STILL encourage folks to breed via rewarding them at their "World" show?

                          Fat, repulsive, unathletic mounds of fat on tiny hooves that can barely trot a few feet in a halter class? They are bred for slaughter as sure as an Angus steer is!
                          Since you asked. I wish they would stop ALL halter classes for all breeds. End the horse beauty pageant for ALL horse breeds.

                          A little more direct to AQHA. The Impressive crap could have been elliminated a long time ago. All male offspring gelded. Female offspring removed from registry. I would have no problem if they sent them all to slaughter.
                          The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Roasted, toasted, baked or fried,
                            you can always eat 'em if they don't ride !

                            Quarter horses, the new beef.

                            "Sewage Wallace makes me want to vomit.

                            I took on Bob Goodlatte and Smithfield Foods and their European Horse slaughter outfit ANIMEX a few years ago, what scum they are.
                            Snowflakes become an avalanche.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by GraceLikeRain View Post
                              So what is your magical solution? If slaughter results in more slaughter then what are we supposed to do? Who is supposed to accept the financial burden of unwanted horses? Who is supposed to pay the endless vet bills of chronically lame horses? Who do we put at risk by asking them to give a dangerous horse a permanent home? Increase taxes further and create permanent holding pens and hope people adopt (because that's been an overwhelming success with BLM)? If your solution is euthanasia then who accepts the vet costs, burial fees, etc?

                              If slaughter is not an acceptable option that what do you think would fix this solution we find ourselves in?

                              Of course education is the answer in the longterm. Education and a whole lot of luck might change this situation (even though it has failed to change irresponsible breeders of dogs).

                              However it does not stop the number of unwanted horses from building. Most universities won't even take horses at this point and rescues are overflowing. Are we supposed to rely on the compassion and sympathy of individuals in the horse community?

                              I have the resources for a single horse and honestly, I will never go to an auction to pick up a broken down reject. Sorry. Call me heartless. If I want a retiree then it will be my own loved horse who has had a long and fruitful (or maybe not so long and fruitful) career. I will provide for the animals that I take on but I know that I am not alone in feeling that the irresponsibility of others should not fall on the individuals in this country.

                              I am not arguing that the past practices of horse slaughter were humane or acceptable but if you think that horse slaughter is inherently morally wrong (but somehow slaughtering meat animals is ok) then I would love to hear your reasoning about how we fix this problem.
                              Umm...maybe the OWNERS?????
                              If we didn't have slaughter and it started COSTING money to dispose of culls, the large breeders would think twice about breeding. Right now, they are rewarded for their excess.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                                You are certainly swallowing their swill.

                                Horse breeding is ALWAYS a lottery.
                                Otherwise the market would not be full with offspring from top sires and dams barely scraping by.

                                All the good it has done to shut inspection down in the US was sending the horses on yet longer trips.
                                Canad - even with the horrific evidence of the labor dispute gone bad is still better than Mexico...

                                All you antis should pad yourself on the back and giver yourself a carrot stick.

                                What people outside the industry do not understand: injured animals are bad product!
                                They cost money.

                                asshats are omnipresent, sadly enough.
                                They slaughter horses in Mex using the same EU regs we did.

                                And no one cares if eyes are gouged out/faces lacerated. They don't use that for their meat export.

                                THe KB are abandoning horses to starve more than the general public. You only have to google "Presidio C4 holding pens" or Santa Teresa stray horses to see that.

                                And largest neglect case in TX history was owned by a vet outside dallas Crowne when it was open.

                                Comment


                                • #76
                                  Originally posted by mayhew View Post
                                  See, I just can't look at my horse and consider him a renewable natural resource. I'm not anti-slaughter, though. I don't personally want to eat horse, nor do I want mine to be eaten, but I don't have a problem with other people doing it. What I do have a problem with is a terrifying death preceded by days on a trailer. If we could bring back local abattoirs, or even make on-farm slaughter an option, it would be much easier to stomach, so to speak.
                                  It's perfectly legal to shoot and eat your own horse in almost all 50 states...
                                  There's your cheap way to dispose of an unwanted horse without having commercial horse slaughter. And I am ok with that.

                                  Comment


                                  • #77
                                    Originally posted by danceronice View Post
                                    True.

                                    From a pure biomass perspective, destroying that much meat and organic material in a way that means the carcass can't be eaten by something or decompose naturally into the soil is irresponsible.
                                    Horses can be composted. And horse slaughter plants are not exactly environmentally friendly.

                                    Comment


                                    • #78
                                      Originally posted by danceronice View Post
                                      True.

                                      From a pure biomass perspective, destroying that much meat and organic material in a way that means the carcass can't be eaten by something or decompose naturally into the soil is irresponsible.
                                      And you're not concerned with putting toxins in foreign food chains...this seems the most irresponsible of all.

                                      Comment


                                      • #79
                                        Originally posted by fivehorses View Post
                                        aaahhhh, thank you 7hl.
                                        Now will you answer the question that was posed at the end of my post. The last part is key...not slaughter, but 'how' it is done. I am going to assume since you and Bluey and alagirl support slaughter, that you also know that the method is designed for cattle, etc, not horses. Also, unlike in europe, there is not such a mass production line which keeps on moving along regardless of the animals condition after the stun.
                                        I understand why people support slaughter, but what I don't understand is why people support equine slaughter or any slaughter for that matter that is not done with respect and humane treatment of the animal.

                                        "So, no arguing/positioning, just your soul talking why you find it ok the way it is currently being done?"

                                        Thank you.
                                        I don't agree with the past methods done to slaughter horses. However, I do think that opening slaughter plans would open the door for discussing the most humane and ethical way to transport and kill. I do think that there is room for improvement on all fronts but conflating whether slaughter is ethical and whether the past methods were ethical clouds the discussion and slows dialogue.

                                        I do think that methods need to be updated and changed but I don't think that equine slaughter is inherently unethical.

                                        Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                                        It's perfectly legal to shoot and eat your own horse in almost all 50 states...
                                        There's your cheap way to dispose of an unwanted horse without having commercial horse slaughter. And I am ok with that.
                                        What do you suggest we do to prevent people from shirking this responsibility and cost by dumping their animals? How do we prevent people from leaving horses in pastures? How do we adjust for people who wait until they truly have no money to care for all of their horses? What do we do with horses of the deceased that have no marketability? Why is it ethical for breeders to shoot a foal but not to send a horse to slaughter (I am NOT referring to the current practices which have issues but a potentially humane and horse-designed slaughter system)? How do we stop breeders from giving away horses that should be euthanized due to genetic defects, behavioral problems, etc. to avoid the cost associated with disposing of them?

                                        Of course owners need to step up. Breeders need to grow a moral compass and aim to only produce the best stock possible. People need greater accountability for their animals.

                                        Until this day comes, what are we going to do?

                                        Comment


                                        • #80
                                          What about the drugs??? I notice that there's always a large silence when this particular subject comes up. The EU has a list of medicines that it deems unacceptable for any meat processed for them. The last time I looked, a vast majority (say 90%+++) of the horses in my neighborhood (and these are mainly run of the mill pleasure horses) had had at least one bute in their lifetimes.

                                          As far as I know, bute is also not an acceptable medicine by FDA standards on animals slaughtered under their jurisdiction due to its being a potential carcinogen. I don't believe that the U.S. FDA allows for a period of time before the bute leaves an animal's system; I believe it is simply forbidden.

                                          Most actual meat producing animals seem to have heavily regulated, very controlled (feed/medicine/vet care) throughout their relatively short lives--so the possibility of a foul-up with a forbidden drug is a relatively small one.

                                          Let's contrast it with horses, who have virtually unregulated access to a cornucopia of medicines and health care products, plus have the potential to live far longer lives than regular slaughterable animals. This potentially longer life span raises the potential for having ingested not only a larger quantity of forbidden drugs but a larger variety of the same.

                                          Shall we just sweep this under the table? You all know that if there is a push to market horse meat in the U.S. that this will raise its ugly head at some point. Just how in the world are they going to realistically regulate something like this?

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X