• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

When just one WTF cross isn't enough...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by carolprudm View Post
    I have 2 Irish Draught/(supposedly)Connemara/Trakhener crosses. And the Conn/Trak herself. I've also ridden and coveted a Paso/TB cross.
    LOL.. There must be a linux geek somewhere who would like an ip_conntrack :=)
    Nudging "Almost Heaven" a little closer still...
    http://www.wvhorsetrainer.com

    Comment


    • #22
      Keep talking about belgians
      Nudging "Almost Heaven" a little closer still...
      http://www.wvhorsetrainer.com

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by michaleenflynn View Post
        Major pet peeve, second only to 'heart-wrenching' (heart-rending), and only because I hear that one more often
        But I think both of those are actually acceptable? I just checked the dictionary and both appear. Is it cultural perhaps? Certainly as a Brit, I would say "I had a heart wrenching experience". The words are all correct and have the correct meaning, whereas a Belgium draft is incorrect compared to a Belgian draft.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Kate66 View Post
          [...] whereas a Belgium draft is incorrect compared to a Belgian draft.
          heck, it isn't even correct when you talk about beer...

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
            heck, it isn't even correct when you talk about beer...
            Nudging "Almost Heaven" a little closer still...
            http://www.wvhorsetrainer.com

            Comment


            • #26
              Well at least it's an Arab stud... which means that if he's registered they are all eligible to be registered as 1/2 Arabians - which have more of a market than some purebred breeds. (not that the "breeder" isn't an obvious fruitbat)

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Hippolyta View Post
                this!!

                I went to an (unnamed) newer registry inspection & there was one breeder with just a mess of horses, all oddball combos that taken one at a time weren't so bad, but at the end of the day she had run so many through that I got the impression that she was experimenting with her breeding like someone baking new cookie combos.

                None of them were too bad, but not too great, either. and it wasn't like she maybe had a stallion of one breed that she was using on different mares. They were all completely different, all with at least 3 breeds, sometimes more.

                I think there were at least 8 that were hers, possibly more.
                Half-assed "registry" outfits are promoting this problem. I'm one who favors State licensing to become a horse breeder, same as many states require for breeding purebred dogs. This, alas, is why the meat auctions will never run out of material . . .

                Comment


                • #28
                  We used to call these grade horses, in the olden days ... it wasn't really all that bad of a term, just meant they were horses with mixed breeding and no papers. Most of whom were good horses.

                  Now we just have the term "warmblood" and "sporthorse" to cover all that!

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Yes but a "grade horse" can be ANYTHING. Sporthorse implies that it has potential as an English horse. I always thought the same for WB's but apparently the buckaroos are calling ranch horses with draft in them WB's now.
                    "It's never too late to be what you might have been." George Eliot

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      As for the whole "Belgium/Belgian pet peeve" I appologize profusely to any & all I may have offended. I'm obviously as stupid as the CL poster. I can count the number of Belgians that I've met on one hand & had no idea what a hornet's net this topic is.
                      "It's never too late to be what you might have been." George Eliot

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by Kate66 View Post
                        But I think both of those are actually acceptable? I just checked the dictionary and both appear. Is it cultural perhaps? Certainly as a Brit, I would say "I had a heart wrenching experience". The words are all correct and have the correct meaning, whereas a Belgium draft is incorrect compared to a Belgian draft.
                        In popular usage, it seems (to my mind; I have long been a frustrated etymologist ) that when needing to indicate an accent on sadness, people have replaced 'rending' for 'wrenching', due to the widely known phrase, 'gut-wrenching'. I believe some of these people have probably heard the phrase 'heart-rending', but, not knowing what 'rending' (or even what 'rendering' is, see below), either think they misheard, or think it was mispronounced, or just simply stick with what they know that makes some sense. (To back this up, I will bet if you stopped 10 people in the street at random and asked them what 'rend' means, you'd get no more than 1-3 correct answers. The local rendering plant is a thing of the past, and cookbooks no longer give instructions for the housewife on how to make soap. Perhaps you'd get a higher percentage of correct answers if you polled Food Network aficionados, though

                        This lays out my POV perfectly on his:

                        http://www.dailywritingtips.com/hear...gut-wrenching/
                        Last edited by michaleenflynn; Aug. 1, 2012, 03:35 PM. Reason: so that I'm not a goober
                        VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                        https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          We always called it the rendering plant. But we were also, possibly, goobers.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Originally posted by leaf View Post
                            We always called it the rendering plant. But we were also, possibly, goobers.
                            ^^This^^ Lol. Are you from Idaho also?
                            "It's never too late to be what you might have been." George Eliot

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Originally posted by Scaramouch View Post
                              ... somehow doesn't scream "well structured breeding program."

                              It certainly doesn't lead me to assume that the stallion is papered or breeding quality. I hope they end up with good owners willing to put work into yearlings who are more of an unknown quantity than most.
                              Ditto.

                              I don't know about you, but in my area there isn't really a shortage of "unpapered odd-mixed-breed horses out of a random stallion" foals.

                              This is not the right economy to be producing random mutts. My money is that the foals lean towards being a bit fugly. The criteria for picking a stallion for a mare needs to be more than "I got me my own arab stallion and he's so purty and why should I go to the trouble of fencing him out when he can make such ky00t foals!"

                              How about I pay the owner $500, and instead of taking a foal from her I'll only want to take the stud's testicles away?
                              Veterinarians for Equine Welfare

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                I'm with those who get a bit peeved when they hear a horse called a Belgium. Belgium is a country. The breed is Belgian. I'm sorry, I know it sounds mean, but my gut reaction is to assume the speaker isn't very well educated.
                                Veterinarians for Equine Welfare

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Originally posted by leaf View Post
                                  We always called it the rendering plant. But we were also, possibly, goobers.
                                  Leaf, you aren't a goober. It is a rendering plant.

                                  Rend & render are two different words.

                                  But, I suppose when you feel horrible, referring to your heart as being converted into industrial fats isn't a bad description

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    Originally posted by leaf View Post
                                    We always called it the rendering plant. But we were also, possibly, goobers.
                                    Gah, no - *I* am the goober, that was a typo on my part!
                                    VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                                    https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by Hippolyta View Post
                                      But, I suppose when you feel horrible, referring to your heart as being converted into industrial fats isn't a bad description
                                      Very true
                                      VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                                      https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by Miichelle View Post
                                        Yes but a "grade horse" can be ANYTHING. Sporthorse implies that it has potential as an English horse. I always thought the same for WB's but apparently the buckaroos are calling ranch horses with draft in them WB's now.
                                        Actually a " grade" horse is any unregistered horse isn't it? If you can't prove parentage ( through registration) it is a grade horse. Many sporthorses are just a type that someone is breeding for. They have the look that english disciplines require but not all have the actual WB breeding to go with that look.

                                        These horses in the CL ad might be nicer than you think. I've seen many papered horses ( AQHA, TB)with good bloodlines that left me speechless and not in a good way.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Most of the breeding done in my area are registered QH's (since they're registered & their great, great grandsire was a famous "something" that makes them quality, right?). I'll take a chance on an Arab, TB, Belgian before I buy MOST QH's around here.
                                          "It's never too late to be what you might have been." George Eliot

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X