• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

President Bush Issues 48 Hr. Ultimatum....Please Pray For Our Soldiers

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Again, I apologize for the length of this one, but here's my favorite article by Tony Parsons written on the first anniversary of 9/11.

    ************************
    SHAME ON YOU AMERICAN-HATING LIBERALS
    9/11/2002
    Tony Parsons


    ONE year ago, the world witnessed a unique kind of broadcasting - the mass murder of thousands, live on television.

    As a lesson in the pitiless cruelty of the human race, September 11 was up there with Pol Pot's mountain of skulls in Cambodia, or the skeletal bodies stacked like garbage in the Nazi concentration camps.

    An unspeakable act so cruel, so calculated and so utterly merciless that surely the world could agree on one thing - nobody deserves this fate.

    Surely there could be consensus: the victims were truly innocent, the perpetrators truly evil.

    But to the world's eternal shame, 9/11 is increasingly seen as America's comeuppance.

    Incredibly, anti-Americanism has increased over the last year.

    There has always been a simmering resentment to the USA in this country - too loud, too rich, too full of themselves and so much happier than Europeans - but it has become an epidemic.

    And it seems incredible to me. More than that, it turns my stomach.

    America is this country's greatest friend and our staunchest ally. We are bonded to the US by culture, language and blood.

    A little over half a century ago, around half a million Americans died for our freedoms, as well as their own. Have we forgotten so soon?

    And exactly a year ago, thousands of ordinary men, women and children - not just Americans, but from dozens of countries - were butchered by a small group of religious fanatics. Are we so quick to betray them?

    What touched the heart about those who died in the twin towers and on the planes was that we recognised them. Young fathers and mothers, somebody's son and somebody's daughter, husbands and wives. And children. Some unborn.

    And these people brought it on themselves? And their nation is to blame for their meticulously planned slaughter?

    These days you don't have to be some dust-encrusted nut job in Kabul or Karachi or Finsbury Park to see America as the Great Satan.

    The anti-American alliance is made up of self-loathing liberals who blame the Americans for every ill in the Third World, and conservatives suffering from power-envy, bitter that the world's only superpower can do what it likes without having to ask permission.

    The truth is that America has behaved with enormous restraint since September 11.

    Remember, remember.

    Remember the gut-wrenching tapes of weeping men phoning their wives to say, "I love you," before they were burned alive. Remember those people leaping to their deaths from the top of burning skyscrapers.

    Remember the hundreds of firemen buried alive. Remember the smiling face of that beautiful little girl who was on one of the planes with her mum. Remember, remember - and realise that America has never retaliated for 9/11 in anything like the way it could have.

    So a few al-Qaeda tourists got locked without a trial in Camp X-ray? Pass the Kleenex.

    So some Afghan wedding receptions were shot up after they merrily fired their semi-automatics in a sky full of American planes? A shame, but maybe next time they should stick to confetti.

    AMERICA could have turned a large chunk of the world into a parking lot. That it didn't is a sign of strength.

    American voices are already being raised against attacking Iraq - that's what a democracy is for. How many in the Islamic world will have a minute's silence for the slaughtered innocents of 9/11? How many Islamic leaders will have the guts to say that the mass murder of 9/11 was an abomination?

    When the news of 9/11 broke on the West Bank, those freedom-loving Palestinians were dancing in the street. America watched all of that - and didn't push the button. We should thank the stars that America is the most powerful nation in the world. I still find it incredible that 9/11 did not provoke all-out war. Not a "war on terrorism". A real war.

    The fundamentalist dudes are talking about "opening the gates of hell", if America attacks Iraq. Well, America could have opened the gates of hell like you wouldn't believe.

    The US is the most militarily powerful nation that ever strode the face of the earth.

    The campaign in Afghanistan may have been less than perfect and the planned war on Iraq may be misconceived.

    But don't blame America for not bringing peace and light to these wretched countries. How many democracies are there in the Middle East, or in the Muslim world? You can count them on the fingers of one hand - assuming you haven't had any chopped off for minor shoplifting.

    I love America, yet America is hated. I guess that makes me Bush's poodle. But I would rather be a dog in New York City than a Prince in Riyadh. Above all, America is hated because it is what every country wants to be - rich, free, strong, open, optimistic.

    Not ground down by the past, or religion, or some caste system. America is the best friend this country ever had and we should start remembering that.

    Or do you really think the USA is the root of all evil? Tell it to the loved ones of the men and women who leaped to their death from the burning towers.

    Tell it to the nursing mothers whose husbands died on one of the hijacked planes, or were ripped apart in a collapsing skyscraper.

    And tell it to the hundreds of young widows whose husbands worked for the New York Fire Department. To our shame, George Bush gets a worse press than Saddam Hussein.

    Once we were told that Saddam gassed the Kurds, tortured his own people and set up rape-camps in Kuwait. Now we are told he likes Quality Street. Save me the orange centre, oh mighty one!

    Remember, remember, September 11. One of the greatest atrocities in human history was committed against America.

    No, do more than remember. Never forget.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    A dog has one master, a cat has an entire staff.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    If the Number 2 pencil is so popular, why is it still number 2?

    Comment


    • I don't care what your stance on the war is - blatent PREJUDICE against people of a religion that DOES, IN FACT, espouse peace, is hurtful, shameful, and offensive. MOST Muslims are peace-loving people, and deserve better than that.

      There are religious zealots in EVERY RELIGION who twist the tenents of their "beliefs" into something inhumane and ugly. That does not mean that the entire religion/culture shares their opinions, or are deserving of such abusive stereotypes.

      Poorly done, all who have said such things here or elsewhere.

      One of the lessons of history is that Nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say.
      - Will Durant
      One of the lessons of history is that Nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say.
      - Will Durant

      Comment


      • Save the French Fries!

        I have to say that all of this anger towards France and Germany is nothing short of childish. It makes me sick to read about it.

        France and Germany are not the only countries in the world to have benefited from middle eastern oil, nor will they be the last. And to all those people protesting that France makes money off of Sadam Hussein et al and may have made them missiles or whatever, just think about how many armies/groups/whathaveyou that the US has also provided money and arms to.

        Nothing here is new. Most of the large countries in the world have sold weapons to other countries at some point.

        So to cast all this anger at France is just terrible and serves no purpose. Some of those European countries that are being bashed just might want to settle things peacefully, or wait for proper UN approval, and what is wrong with that?

        I for one am glad that my country is not giving military aid without UN support, because I think going ahead now is very wrong.

        Comment


        • It appears to me that some people are selecting "the facts" to support their beliefs, rather than formulating their beliefs from all available "facts". I guess this is just typical human behaviour.

          In response to Canterlope's post of Tony Parson's column in the Daily Mirror, a London newspaper on a par with the New York Post, today's editorial in the Daily Mirror, 'The Voice of the Mirror" is also worth a read, if only to broaden the range of "facts" and opinions from which to formulate your beliefs. It's quite long so I won't copy it here.

          In the same column as his "French dissing the USA" piece, Tony Parsons has this to say about the USA:

          WEST SIDE GORY

          THE traveller to America can never quite decide if America is the friendliest place in the world or the most heartless.

          Individually, Americans are kind, generous, supportive. They want you to succeed. Unlike back in Britain, where people want you to fall flat on your face.

          The British convention of scratching cars out of pure spite does not exist in America. They might steal your car. Or they might ram it and rob you at gunpoint. But nobody is going to scratch it out of petty jealousy.

          America is a strange cocktail of affability and brutality. You walk into a Banana Republic store and people are so keen to make you happy that you feel you could say, "Any chance of a blow job?" and nobody would bat an eyelid.

          But then you pick up a paper and realise that this is still a very young, very violent country. A woman was sacked from her job delivering pizza after attending to a man who was lying in the street with a gunshot wound.

          "She was away from her job for no good reason," said her manager.

          But I bet that when that manager gave her the boot, he ordered her to have a really great day.

          Tony parson's full column can be read at Mirror Columnists
          ------------------------------------------------------------
          But all the finest horsemen out—the men to Beat the Band—
          You’ll find amongst the crowd that ride their races in the Stand

          Comment


          • OK, I have to post this excerpt from Jake Tapper's article in todays Salon.com on Pres. Bush speech from last night:

            "With approximately 235,000 American and 45,000 British troops currently in the Gulf, assuming pere et les fils Hussein don't get out of Dodge within the proscribed time, another 48-hour time period then becomes significant: the Pentagon's announced two-day "shock and awe" bombing campaign.

            Three thousand cruise missiles and satellite-guided bombs could begin falling at any moment beginning Wednesday evening, preempting CBS's "Survivor" with a much more horrific and un-ironic offering of reality television.

            While the president was polishing up his speech with aides such as wordsmith Mike Gerson and pit bull Karen Hughes on Monday, U.S. Army Gen. Tommy Franks, the commander of Central Command, was in Kuwait meeting with Army Lt. Gen. David D. McKiernan, his land forces commander.

            In anticipation of war, more than 350 U.N. employees -- both weapons inspectors and relief aid workers -- were ordered out of the country on Monday by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan. Others have been told to leave, but just in case they hadn't read a paper in a few days, President Bush kindly suggested that "all foreign nationals -- including journalists and inspectors -- should leave Iraq immediately." Other individuals were going the other way, into Iraq, as Bush announced the expulsion of those "with ties to Iraqi intelligence services" from this country and others. In recent days, the State Department has told American citizens, nonessential embassy personnel and the families of U.S. diplomats in Gaza, Israel, Kuwait, Syria, and the West Bank to leave. It strongly suggested that those who didn't have to travel to Bahrain, Lebanon, Qatar and Saudi Arabia refrain from doing so.

            The speech wasn't inspiring, or all that long, even. Its overall message: Duck!

            And this was not just to the Iraqis and those abroad, but here at home as well. The president warned that "possible" but not necessarily inevitable "terrorist operations against the American people and our friends" might be in store. Immediately after the speech, the Homeland Security Council returned the national threat level to Code Orange, indicating a high risk of terrorist attack, and fired up something called "Operation Liberty Shield" to protect U.S. infrastructure, with extra Border Patrol officers, security over the food supply, an increased National Guard presence at public facilities, "additional security of our airports, and increased Coast Guard patrols of major seaports," Bush said."

            Written by Jake Tapper, copyright 2003, Salon.com

            Here's a link to the whole piece. (I'm not sure if it will work, as I'm a Salon premium subscriber but this may be restricted.)
            Salon/Tapper Article on Bush Address
            "I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but why is it that a woman will forgive homicidal behavior in a horse, yet be highly critical of a man for leaving the toilet seat up?" Dave Barry

            Comment


            • Has anyone ever seen Fouad Ajami interviewed? Both Bush and Blair have been similar to his views. I remember seeing him interviewed right after Sept. 11, and this has pretty much gone the path he predicted.

              He is open in any criticism of the arab muslim world and it's needs to modernize in politics and human rights if they are to progress with power, and did believe the U.S. needed to strike Saddam's regime to protect itself and open that door.

              Iraq and the Arab World

              Comment


              • I think a few lines of the Mirror column that HG referred us to are worth copying here:

                <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Saddam Hussein is not the target of our sympathy and never would be. He's a repulsive, murderous dictator who deserves everything that he gets. But the Iraqi people are. The innocent civilians who are about to be unlawfully killed deserve none of the bombardment they are about to receive. The reality of this war is that Iraq is about to be demolished under the heaviest military attack ever unleashed on one nation. Baghdad will be blitzed, we are told, by 3,000 Cruise missiles in 48 hours. The city will be smashed to pieces, as will many of its inhabitants, military or otherwise.
                <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                Remember, people, that's the result of war. Civilians are going to die. Many of them will be children. Most of them wish us no harm. Just because they "wear towels on their heads" and "read the Koran" does not make their lives worth less than the lives of other civilians that have died unjust deaths. If this was just about smashing Saddam, I think there would be very little disagreement. But this is also about subjecting a civilian population to a devastation far greater than the attacks on our country, for which they were not responsible anyway. We owe it to the world and ourselves to avoid this at all costs. If compassion for innocent humans, even if they worship a different god and their skin is a different color, makes me a leftist liberal tree hugger, I stand guilty as charged.

                Comment


                • GotSports...what's Nanci's song? I have slow modem. She is the greatest!

                  And about prejudice I forgot who posted...we've all experienced it. I work with 95% male peers. There have been sales meetings in strip clubs I haven't been invited to, nor would I wanted to have attended them; "let go" because I was pregnant by someone of a different culture and I was working in AMERICA, not abroad; been on conference calls when the SVP sales thought I dropped off and heard the derogotory remarks about Southerns, "but at least she exceeds quota" remarks; have been #3 in a sales force of 25, Presidents CLub two years in a row and let go so that the new VP Sales could bring in a Western Union buddy in my territory...so excuse me for my out spokenness. It has become a survival tactic.

                  Comment


                  • Jake Tapper

                    He kind of kills me - don't always agree with him politically but he has a sly dog kind of humour that's refreshing.

                    And Portia, Salon.com is indeed "subscribers only."

                    Comment


                    • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by maggymay:
                      Yeh, well Israel has had 30+ years to comply with the UN resolution to withdraw from the occupied territories. Don't see us going in there guns blazing.... oh wait they're our _ally_ <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                      ooo, MaggyMay, talk about a riot starter I can't even IMAGINE the hissing and spitting THAT topic would start

                      --- And how did you feel about being denied these Hungry Hippos?
                      ------------------------------
                      Life Goes On

                      Comment


                      • Yep, Flashy Gray, I feel the same about his writing.

                        I didn't know whether the direct links would work or not. They do for me, but then the site recognizes my computer as a subscriber.

                        Another good source of world news, with different viewpoints, is the new Google News site. It gives you links to headlines and articles from thousands of different news sources around the world, allowing you to guage international reactions and attitudes. And also useful if you want to keep up with the action in the Cricket World Cup.

                        Google News

                        "International law may sound like the arcane obsession of bureaucrats in striped pants, but it is what protects us from a permanent condition of global war and insecurity." Joe Conason, Salon.com, March 18, 2003
                        "I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but why is it that a woman will forgive homicidal behavior in a horse, yet be highly critical of a man for leaving the toilet seat up?" Dave Barry

                        Comment


                        • No one who supports the idea of removing Saddam by war is happy that innocent people will be killed. I think this is Saddam's choice though, isn't it? He has had 12 years to live up to the commitment he made as terms of his surrender in the Gulf war. He chose to keep the childern of his country in poverty rather than to keep his word. That is why there were trade sanctions against Iraq. The world cared more about the suffering of his people than he does. That is what the inspections were designed to remedy. Nice idea, but not what Saddam was interested in.

                          I also have concern about democracy flourishing in the Middle East. It seems that Islam is oriented to support totalitarian regimes. And there is a cultural propencities towards this as well. I think it is naive to expect that there will be a democrtic Iraq at the end of this war or even 10 years down the road. But if you look back in recent history, at the beginning of the 20th century, democracy wasn't flourishing in Europe either. It took about 70 years, but they are there today. This is a huge commitment humanity rather than an unjustified attack.
                          See those flying monkeys? They work for me.

                          Comment


                          • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by SimpsoMatt:

                            Not quite true.

                            http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/31/opinion/31PELL.html
                            <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                            Actually, quite true. After further investigation, Pelletier seems to be the only one believing this nowadays. Iraq has committed acts of genocide; it's no secret. Yes, both Iran & Iraq gassed the poor Kurds. Pelletier based his conclusions on the condition of the bodies. It has since been shown that the Iraqi substances used at that time break down into similar cyanide-like compounds.

                            Here's one of many sites:

                            http://hnn.us/articles/1242.html

                            "High Iraqi officials, including Vice-Premier Tariq Aziz, have since admitted using chemical weapons against the Kurds."

                            You don't need Pelletier when Iraq's own Vice-Premier says they did it.

                            Comment


                            • My God, We are leaving the survival of innocent HUMAN beings in the hands of the murdeous man we want to dispose?

                              Is there and sanity left in the world? These ARE INNOCENT people we are about to un-leash the most horendous of attacks upon, and we are washing our hands of their fate. I don't believe my eyes.

                              We are marching forwad under the pretense that we are up-holding a 12 year old ****UN**** resloultion; the SAME UN that we couldn't get a consensus from to support this action. This doesn't bother anyone?

                              Well they're only rage heads, right? How about kikes, nigers, jews, spics, chinks, ... wops (i'm one of "THOSE"). "What you do unto the least of these, my bretheren, you do also unto me".

                              Dear God save us!

                              I plan to live forever ...
                              ... so far so good.
                              \"The fool on the hill\"

                              Comment


                              • salon.com is a subsciption site, but you can easily get a free 'day-pass' by simply clicking through a single advertisement.

                                Comment


                                • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by lisamarie8:
                                  <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by sallylou:
                                  Cherry your understanding of international politics is underwhelming...how mature of you!
                                  The innocent people in Irak might actually be free to voice THEIR opinion on this once Saddam is gone and enjoy some of the rights that you currently have (the right to free speach?).<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                  pssst, SallyLou...Before you start discussing individuals "underwhelming" grasp of this ridiculous situation and other international politics, you might want to check on how to spell Iraq

                                  knowing is half the battle, and reading if fundamental.

                                  --- And how did you feel about being denied these Hungry Hippos?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                  She was trying to make a point not teach a spelling lesson. And what does "reading if fundamental" mean? If we're going to attack spelling, maybe we should include grammar?

                                  Comment


                                  • Eomer, I don't understand your point. No one is washing their hands of the fate of the Iraqi people. The hope is to get Saddam gone and to let Iraq develop into a thriving and prosperous society with support. The people of Irag are suffering now, have been suffering for over a decade. It is clear (to me anyway) that they will continue to suffer as long as he is their leader.

                                    As long as the French have veto power in the security council, I believe there will never be a consensus to remove Saddam. They have too much at risk (in terms of their ego and economy) to let this happen.

                                    I think the US is the leading power in the world. To be a leader sometimes means to act without consensus, in other words, to lead. I support this action and at the same time, am heartbroken it has come to this.

                                    What do you think should be done instead?
                                    See those flying monkeys? They work for me.

                                    Comment


                                    • Jumphigh, if these Koran-reading towel heads are so unworthy, how do you justify, rationalize, defend, pick a word, any word, the call for war by the gastrointestinally-fortified Bush?

                                      I have greater difficulty supporting this war than I would have had for a U.S.-lead attack in Rwanda or Sierra Leone. That said, I suspect the war will be quick, with untold civillian casualties; and we will be no safer than we were last week from the threat of terrorist attacks.

                                      I also believe that North Korea poses the greater threat to world peace than Iraq. Yes, Saddam is an evil bastard who deserves to be assassinated. Iraq does, however, have some remote smidge of political infrastructure. And lots and lots of oil. North Korea has nothing to lose. Their 'leader' is not only evil. He is crazy. He thinks he is Elvis.

                                      Comment


                                      • Salon.com will let you have a free "day pass" if you look at a multipage ad. It's not all that inconvenient (you don't have to register or anything) and IMHO this very excellent report on chemical plants is well worth it.
                                        If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                        Comment


                                        • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Heidi:
                                          North Korea has nothing to lose. Their 'leader' is not only evil. He is crazy. He thinks he is Elvis.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                          And, he needs food badly. The worst thing about their nuclear program isn't that those missles can reach the West Coast, but that he probably considers his nuclear weapons as a cash crop.
                                          If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X