• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Humane Society of the United States

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Humane Society of the United States

    Good, Bad or indifferent

    I too, have my doubts. The University of Davis published the Minimal Care Standards for Equines. This was the study that misused research done by other groups in other countries and applied it to the United States. i.e. REM study of shetlands all of a sudden became a minimal stall size i.e. 12 ' 5 " by 12 ' 5 " and a variety of other "weird" sizes it raised alarm bells.

    Imagine our surprise when Susan Parisio challenged both the study and the University for attempting to pass an underground law adopting this study as a law..and she was told it was NOT written by a university equine authority, but, was written by an HSUS employee and published by the university.

    They would not disclose whether or not money was directly paid to the University for their use of their name and reputataion,

    The fact that HSUS has a reputation of going underground and behind the backs of others is what concerns horse and animal owners.

    And. I guess, I should still present my contempt of a group that collects donations under ify pretenses and so little actually goes to any animal directly.

    Ten thousand dollars, compared to the available MILLIONS of DOLLARS available is a meaningless drop in the bucket.

    Why not take all of the donations ear marked for soring, by donors (and yes, you do track the use requests) and put that into a kitty to provide money and training to stop soring.

    Leo
    The Elephant in the room

  • #2
    Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
    Good, Bad or indifferent

    I too, have my doubts. The University of Davis published the Minimal Care Standards for Equines. This was the study that misused research done by other groups in other countries and applied it to the United States. i.e. REM study of shetlands all of a sudden became a minimal stall size i.e. 12 ' 5 " by 12 ' 5 " and a variety of other "weird" sizes it raised alarm bells.

    Imagine our surprise when Susan Parisio challenged both the study and the University for attempting to pass an underground law adopting this study as a law..and she was told it was NOT written by a university equine authority, but, was written by an HSUS employee and published by the university.

    They would not disclose whether or not money was directly paid to the University for their use of their name and reputataion,

    The fact that HSUS has a reputation of going underground and behind the backs of others is what concerns horse and animal owners.

    And. I guess, I should still present my contempt of a group that collects donations under ify pretenses and so little actually goes to any animal directly.

    Ten thousand dollars, compared to the available MILLIONS of DOLLARS available is a meaningless drop in the bucket.

    Why not take all of the donations ear marked for soring, by donors (and yes, you do track the use requests) and put that into a kitty to provide money and training to stop soring.

    Leo
    I am not sure what you are aiming at....
    Originally posted by BigMama1
    Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
    GNU Terry Prachett

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
      I am not sure what you are aiming at....
      Maybe at the latest contribution of one new member, JanHSUS, post 176:

      http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...=357235&page=9

      A HSUS sympathizer poster asked this thread be started, don't know why?

      Comment


      • #4
        I refuse to drink Kool-aid. From a cup extended in anyone's hand.

        After much reading and many moments I thought my brain might just explode, I stand firmly and confidently by my conclusion that like PETA, the HSUS and the like are more concerned with image, face time in the press and income potential than the animals.
        Owned by a Paint/TB and an OTTB.
        RIP Scoutin' For Trouble ~ 2011 at 10
        RIP Tasha's Last Tango ~ 2010 at ~23
        RIP In Sha' Allah ~ 2009 too young at 5

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
          I am not sure what you are aiming at....
          I suspect the point is that HSUS speaks with a forked tongue.

          G.
          Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
            I suspect the point is that HSUS speaks with a forked tongue.

            G.
            AGREED...

            JanHSUS,


            "HSUS is not interested in ending all horse ownership."
            The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Bluey View Post
              Maybe at the latest contribution of one new member, JanHSUS, post 176:

              http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...=357235&page=9

              A HSUS sympathizer poster asked this thread be started, don't know why?
              [edit]

              My sport has been the victim of their very well funded campaign of lies, lies, and more lies.

              Every legislative session we have to deal with their very well funded full time lobbyists. And the lies. Misinformation. Outrageous statements. Intentional misrepresentation of data. False conclusions from studies.

              I'm sick of HSUS taking credit for the REAL work done by small rescues; especially the high profile cases in which HSUS has swooped in with cameras, taken the credit and the donations, and left rescues holding the bag.

              I remember Katrina. I remember the photos the LSU volunteer posted showing HSUS employees throwing away perfectly good dog food, and crates still in their boxes, while rescuers tearfully begged for the crates so they could save starving animals left behind. And all the while, the HSUS website fundraising for CRATES!!

              And what about the lawsuits from owners whose animals were taken by HSUS and lost?
              I remember the photo of their creepy employee, looking tough in black, telling reports how he loved to kick in doors.

              I know of the federal lawsuits, in which HSUS employees were accused of impersonating police officers and seizing animals without due process. Smooth move, HSUS. Terrifying a poor widower in Hawaii. A man who was innocent of wrongdoing. News flash, HSUS. You are NOT police officers so stop acting like you are before you kick in the door of someone who has enough money and sense to fight back.

              And hey, what's this about HSUS procuring false testimony in the Feld case? Lying to a federal judge, and the judge catching you, is pretty serious. Wonder why the mainstream press never reported on the fact that the basis for the Feld suit was a LIE.

              I'm sick of HSUS. It's not an animal welfare org. It's nothing but a gigantic fundraising machine, doing next to nothing for REAL animal welfare. Guess that's why they got a D. Personally, I'd given them an F. For FRAUD.

              I wouldn't piss on Wayne LaPierre if he was on fire.
              Last edited by Moderator 1; Jun. 20, 2012, 11:36 AM.
              Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
              Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
              -Rudyard Kipling

              Comment


              • #8
                There is an enormous difference between animal rights and animal welfare.
                HSUS is the prototype for animal rights.
                Nina's Story
                Epona Comm on FB

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                  [edit]

                  My sport has been the victim of their very well funded campaign of lies, lies, and more lies.

                  Every legislative session we have to deal with their very well funded full time lobbyists. And the lies. Misinformation. Outrageous statements. Intentional misrepresentation of data. False conclusions from studies.

                  I'm sick of HSUS taking credit for the REAL work done by small rescues; especially the high profile cases in which HSUS has swooped in with cameras, taken the credit and the donations, and left rescues holding the bag.

                  I remember Katrina. I remember the photos the LSU volunteer posted showing HSUS employees throwing away perfectly good dog food, and crates still in their boxes, while rescuers tearfully begged for the crates so they could save starving animals left behind. And all the while, the HSUS website fundraising for CRATES!!

                  And what about the lawsuits from owners whose animals were taken by HSUS and lost?
                  I remember the photo of their creepy employee, looking tough in black, telling reports how he loved to kick in doors.

                  I know of the federal lawsuits, in which HSUS employees were accused of impersonating police officers and seizing animals without due process. Smooth move, HSUS. Terrifying a poor widower in Hawaii. A man who was innocent of wrongdoing. News flash, HSUS. You are NOT police officers so stop acting like you are before you kick in the door of someone who has enough money and sense to fight back.

                  And hey, what's this about HSUS procuring false testimony in the Feld case? Lying to a federal judge, and the judge catching you, is pretty serious. Wonder why the mainstream press never reported on the fact that the basis for the Feld suit was a LIE.

                  I'm sick of HSUS. It's not an animal welfare org. It's nothing but a gigantic fundraising machine, doing next to nothing for REAL animal welfare. Guess that's why they got a D. Personally, I'd given them an F. For FRAUD.

                  I wouldn't piss on Wayne LaPierre if he was on fire.
                  I heart you JSwan. Couldn't have said it better myself.
                  Last edited by Moderator 1; Jun. 20, 2012, 11:37 AM.
                  Riding a horse is not a gentle hobby, to be picked up and laid down like a game of solitaire. It is a grand passion.... ~ Emerson

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                    [edit]

                    My sport has been the victim of their very well funded campaign of lies, lies, and more lies.

                    Every legislative session we have to deal with their very well funded full time lobbyists. And the lies. Misinformation. Outrageous statements. Intentional misrepresentation of data. False conclusions from studies.

                    I'm sick of HSUS taking credit for the REAL work done by small rescues; especially the high profile cases in which HSUS has swooped in with cameras, taken the credit and the donations, and left rescues holding the bag.

                    I remember Katrina. I remember the photos the LSU volunteer posted showing HSUS employees throwing away perfectly good dog food, and crates still in their boxes, while rescuers tearfully begged for the crates so they could save starving animals left behind. And all the while, the HSUS website fundraising for CRATES!!

                    And what about the lawsuits from owners whose animals were taken by HSUS and lost?
                    I remember the photo of their creepy employee, looking tough in black, telling reports how he loved to kick in doors.

                    I know of the federal lawsuits, in which HSUS employees were accused of impersonating police officers and seizing animals without due process. Smooth move, HSUS. Terrifying a poor widower in Hawaii. A man who was innocent of wrongdoing. News flash, HSUS. You are NOT police officers so stop acting like you are before you kick in the door of someone who has enough money and sense to fight back.

                    And hey, what's this about HSUS procuring false testimony in the Feld case? Lying to a federal judge, and the judge catching you, is pretty serious. Wonder why the mainstream press never reported on the fact that the basis for the Feld suit was a LIE.

                    I'm sick of HSUS. It's not an animal welfare org. It's nothing but a gigantic fundraising machine, doing next to nothing for REAL animal welfare. Guess that's why they got a D. Personally, I'd given them an F. For FRAUD.

                    I wouldn't piss on Wayne LaPierre if he was on fire.
                    TRUTH! PISS on HSUS. Bunch of [liars].
                    Last edited by Moderator 1; Jun. 20, 2012, 11:38 AM.
                    Visit Sonesta Farms website at www.sonestafarms.com or our FaceBook page at www.facebook.com/sonestafarms. Also showing & breeding Cavalier King Charles Spaniels.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Yea...JSwan, Barb, et all pretty much said it.

                      HSUS = Animal RIGHTS. They don't have fark-all to do with animal welfare.
                      You jump in the saddle,
                      Hold onto the bridle!
                      Jump in the line!
                      ...Belefonte

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                        [edit]

                        My sport has been the victim of their very well funded campaign of lies, lies, and more lies.

                        Every legislative session we have to deal with their very well funded full time lobbyists. And the lies. Misinformation. Outrageous statements. Intentional misrepresentation of data. False conclusions from studies.

                        I'm sick of HSUS taking credit for the REAL work done by small rescues; especially the high profile cases in which HSUS has swooped in with cameras, taken the credit and the donations, and left rescues holding the bag.

                        I remember Katrina. I remember the photos the LSU volunteer posted showing HSUS employees throwing away perfectly good dog food, and crates still in their boxes, while rescuers tearfully begged for the crates so they could save starving animals left behind. And all the while, the HSUS website fundraising for CRATES!!

                        And what about the lawsuits from owners whose animals were taken by HSUS and lost?
                        I remember the photo of their creepy employee, looking tough in black, telling reports how he loved to kick in doors.

                        I know of the federal lawsuits, in which HSUS employees were accused of impersonating police officers and seizing animals without due process. Smooth move, HSUS. Terrifying a poor widower in Hawaii. A man who was innocent of wrongdoing. News flash, HSUS. You are NOT police officers so stop acting like you are before you kick in the door of someone who has enough money and sense to fight back.

                        And hey, what's this about HSUS procuring false testimony in the Feld case? Lying to a federal judge, and the judge catching you, is pretty serious. Wonder why the mainstream press never reported on the fact that the basis for the Feld suit was a LIE.

                        I'm sick of HSUS. It's not an animal welfare org. It's nothing but a gigantic fundraising machine, doing next to nothing for REAL animal welfare. Guess that's why they got a D. Personally, I'd given them an F. For FRAUD.

                        I wouldn't piss on Wayne LaPierre if he was on fire.
                        Someone else that agrees with you:

                        http://www.nathanwinograd.com/?p=6510

                        Anyone that wants to keep their horses should beware of anyone claiming to be working in their interest, while clearly acting against it.
                        There is a very important difference between animal welfare, to see that we do what we do with our animals in non-abusive ways, as the animals they are and the resources they are for us and animal rights, trying to provide human rights to animals and set them off limits from humans.

                        Animal rights extremists have caught on that it is bad PR any more to show their hand, so they are doing heavy animal welfare type PR to cover all the other they do to eliminate our uses of animals.

                        The trouble, they are winning, I am afraid, looking at their riches and influence in high places.
                        Last edited by Moderator 1; Jun. 20, 2012, 11:38 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                          I'm sick of HSUS. It's not an animal welfare org. It's nothing but a gigantic fundraising machine, doing next to nothing for REAL animal welfare. Guess that's why they got a D. Personally, I'd given them an F. For FRAUD.
                          This sums up my feelings pretty well.
                          Sheilah

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                            I wouldn't piss on Wayne LaPierre if he was on fire.
                            I <3 you.

                            I really should keep a running tally of all the CoTH'ers I need to buy beers for.
                            The dude abides ...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              J Swan said it very well. Throw their fund raising stuff away!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by JSwan View Post

                                I'm sick of HSUS taking credit for the REAL work done by small rescues; especially the high profile cases in which HSUS has swooped in with cameras, taken the credit and the donations, and left rescues holding the bag.
                                ^^^ This is a huge problem.

                                Locally HSUS has swooped in on cases of horse neglect (the horses better be real skinny and there has to be more than 50 of them), then asked small local rescues to take the horses in, but refusing monetary support for the rehab and maintenance of the animals.

                                Many rescues no longer have any intentions of assisting when HSUS is asking.

                                It does not help the animals (which should be the number one priority) when local support walks (runs) away because they have been burned before.

                                ASPCA sets aside certain funds every year to be able to award grants to equine welfare groups.

                                It would be a drop in the bucket for HSUS to do the same.
                                ************************
                                \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Well, the jokes on me because I wouldn't piss on the wrong person.

                                  I was out watering my tomatoes and it dawned on me I'd typed the name of the head of the NRA, not the head of HSUS.

                                  I'd blame my IPad but it was truly a typo on my part.

                                  Note to self: Think faster, type slower.

                                  Hey Pacelle - how do you sleep at night knowing HSUS is directly responsible for the suffering of horses being slaughtered in Mexico? How many animal welfare advocates (as opposed to animal rights activists like the people in HSUS) warned that rescues would not be able to handle the deluge of horses - and that the suffering of the nations herd would be INCREASED if the US plants closed.

                                  That all came to pass - as HSUS was warned. But hey - you got how many millions of dollars in donations?

                                  Nice try riding the coattails of respectable orgs trying to stop soring. That's typical of HSUS - sliding in and "teaming" with the people doing the REAL work - and then taking credit for something you didn't do.
                                  Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                                  Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                                  -Rudyard Kipling

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                                    [edit]

                                    I'm sick of HSUS taking credit for the REAL work done by small rescues; especially the high profile cases in which HSUS has swooped in with cameras, taken the credit and the donations, and left rescues holding the bag.

                                    I remember Katrina. I remember the photos the LSU volunteer posted showing HSUS employees throwing away perfectly good dog food, and crates still in their boxes, while rescuers tearfully begged for the crates so they could save starving animals left behind. And all the while, the HSUS website fundraising for CRATES!!

                                    And what about the lawsuits from owners whose animals were taken by HSUS and lost?
                                    I remember the photo of their creepy employee, looking tough in black, telling reports how he loved to kick in doors.

                                    I'm sick of HSUS. It's not an animal welfare org. It's nothing but a gigantic fundraising machine, doing next to nothing for REAL animal welfare. Guess that's why they got a D. Personally, I'd given them an F. For FRAUD.

                                    I wouldn't piss on Wayne LaPierre if he was on fire.
                                    I agree 100%. My vet showed me the pet crates and pet food that she and others dug out of the dumpsters when the HSUS people were snug in their beds for the night. I saw the stuff they got right out of the dumpsters with my own eyes JSwan, so I can attest that what you posted was 100% TRUE.
                                    Last edited by Moderator 1; Jun. 20, 2012, 11:40 AM.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                                      Locally HSUS has swooped in on cases of horse neglect (the horses better be real skinny and there has to be more than 50 of them), then asked small local rescues to take the horses in, but refusing monetary support for the rehab and maintenance of the animals.
                                      Yep, they land just long enough for a photo op and then it is off to the next fund raising bonanza. Horses, dogs, cats. You name it and HSUS has exploited suffering, and not lifted one finger to help.
                                      Sheilah

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Please Coth mods can we get a <LIKE> button? It would make things so simple. I<Like> your post, too, IdahoRider

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X