• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Tennessee Walking Horse Soring Issue *Update post 1*

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by aarpaso View Post
    i just don't understand why some of you folks can't just let this Thread be about what it was placed on this forum for.to let other horse owners those that ride a different breed that did not know about SORING.THEY KNOW NOW,they can help by writing to a JUDGE. by thanking those who have been in this battle for yrs.

    a story for ya i know a lady she was asked to help at an equine affair to promote the Sound TWH,she said sure i want to help to STOP SORING when she got to the AFFAIR,they told her she had to have BODYGUARDS,could only go to the restroom if someone went with her.she put her self in danger to stand up and say SOUND not SORE.this has been yrs back.some of us tryed really really hard to STOP SORING and we are still in the battle.

    PLEASE leave this Thread alone if you are not willing to accept what has been done to this point.take your personal dislikes away to another thread.

    your venom has NO value here.
    Thank you.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by katarine View Post
      Why do you think? Only Bluey and i are concerned on this thread.... everyone else is happy with the HSUS.
      That is not true. What IS true is that everyone is happy that HSUS brought the video to the forefront on national television.

      Big difference there.

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        Ditto
        from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

        Comment


        • I am responding specifically to this post:


          Absolutely agree! I refuse to be distracted from stopping soring by people whose motives are questionable.

          I want to understand exactly whose motives are questionable.

          From the trend in the thread, it sounded like s/he was questioning my motives, and Blueys.

          So, clarify that point, if I'm confused, correct me:

          Whose motives are questionable, in the context of this conversation?

          Comment


          • thank you, very big difference.in 40+yrs nothing has helped as much as that video.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by katarine View Post
              I am responding specifically to this post:


              Absolutely agree! I refuse to be distracted from stopping soring by people whose motives are questionable.

              I want to understand exactly whose motives are questionable.

              From the trend in the thread, it sounded like s/he was questioning my motives, and Blueys.

              So, clarify that point, if I'm confused, correct me:

              Whose motives are questionable, in the context of this conversation?
              I took that to mean that some don't want to have this thread sidetracked by posts about the HSUS agenda of ending all ownership and use of animals.

              Comment


              • THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IT MEANSthe subject is to help folks know about soring and that they can help STOP it. NO matter what type of horse you own or ride.

                Comment


                • that makes my motives questionable?


                  perhaps it was just poorly worded- but to suggest I am trying to steer attention AWAY from the BL situation is dead wrong. I am just raising the concern about their demand to end riding 2YOs undersaddle at the TWHC will creep into a larger demand. To say that does not diminish my concern about how BL horses are treated. Apples, oranges, and surely we can talk about TWO things at the same time without being accused of nefarious intent.

                  Comment


                  • What does riding two year olds have to do with soring?

                    That was slipped in by HSUS in their "suggestions" however do not believe those are just suggestions. They will already be part of their lobby.

                    I do not know of one person (on COTH) who is not against soring.

                    As you support HSUS they will become "enabled" to insert other conditions, not truly related, but making a bit of sense i.e. non use of two year olds.

                    BUT..they have nothing to do with soring
                    The Elephant in the room

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by aarpaso View Post
                      i just don't understand why some of you folks can't just let this Thread be about what it was placed on this forum for.to let other horse owners those that ride a different breed that did not know about SORING.THEY KNOW NOW,they can help by writing to a JUDGE. by thanking those who have been in this battle for yrs.

                      a story for ya i know a lady she was asked to help at an equine affair to promote the Sound TWH,she said sure i want to help to STOP SORING when she got to the AFFAIR,they told her she had to have BODYGUARDS,could only go to the restroom if someone went with her.she put her self in danger to stand up and say SOUND not SORE.this has been yrs back.some of us tryed really really hard to STOP SORING and we are still in the battle.

                      PLEASE leave this Thread alone if you are not willing to accept what has been done to this point.take your personal dislikes away to another thread.

                      your venom has NO value here.
                      Your story has no value here

                      I have not been able to find ANY report registered with any police or sheriff division regarding intimidation. We have a researcher who is "in the know" in Tennessee and she can not locate ONE case with an investigated report.

                      If this lady did not report it, then she was enabling those bad characters.
                      The Elephant in the room

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        The "story has a lot of value. The "story" is true and who said it took place in Tennessee ? A crime did not take place because precautions were suggested and implimented.
                        from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          Lets see............

                          Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                          What does riding two year olds have to do with soring?

                          Read post #1998 to see how TWH perfomance horses are affected when shown as 2 yr olds.

                          That was slipped in by HSUS in their "suggestions" however do not believe those are just suggestions. They will already be part of their lobby.

                          Possibly, but that remains to be seen

                          I do not know of one person (on COTH) who is not against soring.

                          As you support HSUS Define Support they will become "enabled" to insert other conditions, not truly related, but making a bit of sense i.e. non use of two year olds.

                          Read #1998 again for comprehension

                          BUT..they They? the other conditions that do not exist ? have nothing to do with soring
                          Young horses that may not even be 24 months old endure months of abusive prep work to be able to be shown as "2 yr olds". Why is it so hard to see that this is the epitome of poor horsemanship and extremely relevant to the issue of soring?
                          from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by WalkInTheWoods View Post
                            Lets see............



                            Young horses that may not even be 24 months old endure months of abusive prep work to be able to be shown as "2 yr olds". Why is it so hard to see that this is the epitome of poor horsemanship and extremely relevant to the issue of soring?
                            Seems to me that abuse in TWH happens all along, a bit simple to focus on two year olds as you seem to be.
                            I think that was just one more place the HSUS was trying to stick that there and hope it passes unnoticed and represents a precedent to then apply to other situations.

                            So many seem to be so clueless to what the HSUS really is and how they operate.
                            You really can't be paranoid enough if you care about humans and our animals and animal rights groups and their vegetarian agendas, when they are involved.

                            I know you don't want to hear this, but you are the one that keeps bringing the HSUS up as such a paragon of helpfulness here, so you will get comments about what else they are, if you like it or not.

                            You want to help horses and curb abuses without losing use, do it right, not following other's agendas that are further reaching into eliminating animal use.
                            Don't see why you can't see that?

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                              Seems to me that abuse in TWH happens all along, a bit simple to focus on two year olds as you seem to be.
                              I think that was just one more place the HSUS was trying to stick that there and hope it passes unnoticed and represents a precedent to then apply to other situations.

                              So many seem to be so clueless to what the HSUS really is and how they operate.
                              You really can't be paranoid enough if you care about humans and our animals and animal rights groups and their vegetarian agendas, when they are involved.

                              I know you don't want to hear this, but you are the one that keeps bringing the HSUS up as such a paragon of helpfulness here, so you will get comments about what else they are, if you like it or not.

                              You want to help horses and curb abuses without losing use, do it right, not following other's agendas that are further reaching into eliminating animal use.
                              Don't see why you can't see that?
                              Just b/c one happens to agree with a couple points made by HSUS and be grateful they exposed the video on soring, does not constitute following their agenda. Don't see why you can't see that?

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                Seems to me that abuse in TWH happens all along, a bit simple to focus on two year olds as you seem to be.
                                I think that was just one more place the HSUS was trying to stick that there and hope it passes unnoticed and represents a precedent to then apply to other situations.

                                So many seem to be so clueless to what the HSUS really is and how they operate.
                                You really can't be paranoid enough if you care about humans and our animals and animal rights groups and their vegetarian agendas, when they are involved.

                                I know you don't want to hear this, but you are the one that keeps bringing the HSUS up as such a paragon of helpfulness here, so you will get comments about what else they are, if you like it or not.

                                You want to help horses and curb abuses without losing use, do it right, not following other's agendas that are further reaching into eliminating animal use.
                                Don't see why you can't see that?
                                I really wish you would quit talking down to me, Bluey. Its only in the last day or so i have mentioned the 2 yr old side of things in perfomance TWHs just because it was an added suggestion by you know who. As i said before WE GET IT about you know who. Really. Honest. Dayam.
                                from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by walknsound View Post
                                  Just b/c one happens to agree with a couple points made by HSUS and be grateful they exposed the video on soring, does not constitute following their agenda. Don't see why you can't see that?
                                  Do I need to repeat that wholesale banning two year olds, as the HSUS seem to be presenting, is irrelevant to stopping TWH abuse?

                                  Anyone involved with animals in a professional way is fighting the HSUS at every step of the way, on many fronts.
                                  I don't think you are aware of all that is going on and seem to be shortsightedly focusing on this one skirmish in a much, much larger battle the HSUS against so many wanting to keep our uses of animals are fighting in so many fronts.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by WalkInTheWoods View Post
                                    I really wish you would quit talking down to me, Bluey. Its only in the last day or so i have mentioned the 2 yr old side of things in perfomance TWHs just because it was an added suggestion by you know who. As i said before WE GET IT about you know who. Really. Honest. Dayam.
                                    I don't know that I am talking up or down to you, don't know what you mean with that.
                                    I know that the HSUS video was critical in getting this abuse out in the open, but don't think many see what all the HSUS is doing when it pursues and presents and follows up with these situations.
                                    Those that don't, that ignore "the rest of the story", when the HSUS is involved, do so at their own risks.
                                    Thus the warnings when these topics come up.

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                      Seems to me that abuse in TWH happens all along, a bit simple to focus on two year olds as you seem to be.
                                      It sure looked like you were telling me it was a bit simple to focus on 2 yr olds. Have I ? I guess you havent read many of my posts if you think my focus is on them. For the moment -yes - discussing the impact on 2 yr olds.

                                      adding:
                                      I'm a retired govt employee with a healthy mistrust of bureaucracy. Do you think that i dont hate it that the TWH groups will not do what is right ? To the extent that the whole world is watching and the govt and you know who had to step in ? It is what it is and there may be repercussions that will have to be dealt with because a small group of BLers thumb their nose at the world.
                                      from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

                                      Comment


                                      • So what kind of a GENTLE man (i use this term loosely)are you i did not memtion a STATE. so your TN snitch wasted her time.
                                        calling me a liar is low and underhanded,i have been in this battle for better than 20yrs in the SOUTH not in the frozen tundra.

                                        and as far as Law enforcement is concerned you haven't seen BUBBA yet.you have NO freakin idea what happens in the SOUTH fool.people get fed to GATORS in the SOUTH.

                                        Comment


                                        • I said it was not relevant. I have always been challenged by the COTH regulars to back up ANY statement or "story" I have printed on a thread. I have always tried to provide documentation rather than urban legends and when I have not been able to back up or have been proven wrong, the Coth'ers have quickly made their displeasure known.

                                          I do not see that you should be exempt.

                                          IF the story was true, she should have immediately gone to the police. I took for granted it was Tennessee as I was corrected in a previous post when a person told me I did not understand how powerful the Tennessee mafia type was IN TENNESSEE.

                                          I see no one seemed to mind that HSUs SAT ON THE VIDEO for over 8 months while they shopped it around. Thin of how many horses were sored during that period of time. Diane Sawyer picked it up as she had several friends who are connected to Waynes (Pacelle's) wife who heads the Los Angeles "movie star" office insist she do something. I am happy she did expose this torment, however Bluey has it correct. This is an important issue but it is not the only issue and you see how quickly they stuck the 2 year old clause in. THIS IS WHAT THEY DO....There is never a bill they get through that doesn't have something put into it in the last minute.

                                          Everyone will support you. I have written to your judge as you reqested and let him know BL is ILLEGAL in Canada. I have written to horse counsels asking for their membership support. I have written to the Shelby Rotary Club, the Chamber of Commerce and to the Masons asking all of them to interven.
                                          The Elephant in the room

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X