• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

For those who think ... NOT my horse.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    People don't get freedom unless they are super rich. Pretty sure I work a 40 hour week to keep a middle class standard of living. Why can't I just laze around and enjoy my life as I see fit? Oh, because that's unrealistic. Sounds like a bunch of 4th graders came up with this theory...

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by englishcowgirl View Post
      People don't get freedom unless they are super rich. Pretty sure I work a 40 hour week to keep a middle class standard of living. Why can't I just laze around and enjoy my life as I see fit? Oh, because that's unrealistic. Sounds like a bunch of 4th graders came up with this theory...
      Usually kids of that age group have a tighter grip on reality, in spite of Barney.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by lolalola View Post
        Horse people of all disciplines have got to be proactive, because for the some of these nuts, doing anything whatsoever with your horse, even a quiet trail ride, is "slavery."
        Very true, but sadly, and I guess pessimistically, I've concluded it's not gonna happen. One need only read any number of threads in these parts- people are quick to yell 'abuse' at disciplines they don't participate in --dressage fans condemn eventing, hunter/jumping condemns western pleasure, reiners condemn walking horses, you can keep going and get the full spectrum and really truly, please do realize the above are just random examples among many, so please don't fixate on that. To put it another way, the general mindset is, 'MY chosen discipline is Just Fine, YOURS is cruel.' And so no one ever bucks up and goes after the abuse within their own chosen discipline, and yes, we are rapidly getting to where that we will no longer have that option- idjits and animal rights activists will (and have!) get law enforcement authority and just show up and take your horses without due process. Heck, it already happens but until it happens to 'you', (meaning any one of us, personally), we will as a group just keep our heads in the sand.

        Comment


        • #24
          Agreed, but there is a middle ground where abuse to any breed in any activity will no longer be condoned. The existing laws would take care of some of it now. But getting people within their own breed/discipline/neighborhood to step up and blow some whistles is suicidal unless there is enforcement of consequences for the abusers.
          from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

          Comment


          • #25
            Boycott Mane N Tail this is the year 2012. nyc, the capital of the world. horses should not be used to carry carriages, move tourists around, scare and control people in demos, race for people's pleasure, and any other such use. once slaves did all that. should we go back to those times? please evolve, people. These fine noble animals should only do one thing: enjoy their lives however they choose to, and wherever they choose to, just like you 2 hours ago!"

            They might have something with that statement (bolded). I would think it would be very uncomfortable for the horse to "carry" the carriage. I seen several horses happily "pull" a carriage but never seen a horse with one on it's back.



            ETA: Before I get an e-mail from some RARA, ARA, HSUS yahoo asking me to join them because they only read the first 2 sentences of my post (comprehension doesn't seem to their strong point) my horses had better darn work when I want them to. There are no free passes. They get health, dental, clothing, shoes, generous days off, room and board. If I choose not to go to work, I don't get paid. If I don't get paid, they don't get their cushy lifestyle. Now see how easy that is to understand?

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #26
              Originally posted by WalkInTheWoods View Post
              Alagirl. Thanks for the education. Been clicking around and i see that Atlanta is indeed under assault. http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2012/02/...arriage-rides/ The comments are eye-opening.
              As well as St.Louis; https://neighborland.com/ideas/nola-...mule-carriages https://www.facebook.com/pages/START...am/91565842024

              New Orleans; https://www.facebook.com/pages/Campa...59137387527338

              Montreal ; https://www.facebook.com/anticalechedefensecoalition

              General groups ; https://www.facebook.com/groups/7281886468/ ; https://www.facebook.com/BanHDC ; https://www.facebook.com/CarriageHorseCruelty All of these supporting to ban carriages world wide. Take a look at some of who their supporters are HSUS , ASPCA , PETA NYCLass , tons of radical animal rights groups.


              The sad and common denominator none of them are promoting animal welfare ..alll of them simply want a ban for something they don't understand or like. They are not animal welfare they are animal abolitionists.
              "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by bayou_bengal View Post
                NEWS FLASH- the radical animal rights activists and anti-carriage horse groups are well-funded and well-connected. They are NOT just in NYC. They have NOT just targeted the NYC carriages

                As far as which equine activities are set to be targeted- in their own words, the raras have posted over and over that they want ALL horses to be freed from serving people- they want them to be free to "BE" horses doing what they want in freedom. Right now they are focusing on the NYC carriage hroses for the most part, but eventually they want to end all "horse enslavement." - their words, not mine.

                There are various groups actively protesting and campaigning against carriage horses and mules already in the following cities-- These are just the cities and groups I have heard of so far. I am sure that other people may have heard of or seen other groups in other cities.

                USA
                Boston
                Chicago
                St. Augustine
                Atlanta (at least two different groups of raras)
                New Orleans
                Salt Lake City
                Philadelphia
                Savannah
                Charleston
                Dallas


                Canada
                Montreal
                Quebec
                Victoria, British Columbia


                Europe
                Belgrade
                Dublin
                Florence
                QInnsbruck
                Rome
                Salzburg
                Vienna
                Oxford
                Edenburgh

                South and Central America
                Cozumel
                Bogota

                Middle East
                Tel Aviv
                Where? Where are all the free horses supposed to go? Will they be managed by the BLM? How do the raras feel about helicopter round ups? Will someone vaccinate them? Will fences be erected to keep them off roads? Can I shoot them if they eat my crops? Once the feral horse population reaches deer proportions, will there be a " horse season" for hunters?
                these folks are a tad short sighted, to say the least.
                "Absent a correct diagnosis, medicine is poison, surgery is trauma and alternative therapy is witchcraft" A. Kent Allen
                http://www.etsy.com/shop/tailsofglory

                Comment


                • #28
                  Thanks hackinaround. Will look at these links later. I have to go clear my head.
                  from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Well, some of the horse sanctuaries are already on board supporting raras' campaign to ban carriage horses in NYC. One of them in NYC is called Equine Advocates.

                    Their president is on record as supporting Intro 86 and its companion bill in the NYC state assembly. There is a youtube video of her embedded on the facebook page called "No Walk In The Park." In it the EA president thanks E. Forel for invitiing her to some event to raise funds to campaign against carriage horses. EA also has a facebook page.

                    Please be aware- Equine Advocates supports INTRO 86 proposition to ban carriage horses in NYC and force their owners to sell the then-jobless horses ONLY to homes that will keep them as companion animals ONLY. This is a very unrealistic bill.

                    How many people do you know who can afford to keep a 1,500 to 2,000 lb horse as a pasture ornament? Yes, Intro 86 specifys that the carriage horses forced out of work, if the ban is adopted, cannot EVER be "worked" again. Under NY law "work" for a horse is defiend as being ridden or driven.

                    While EA may have done some very good things for other horses, its president's support of anti-carriage horse expremists and this proposed Intro 86, is a very BAD thing for carriage hroses in NYC and elsewhere.

                    She also has a story about "Bobby Freedom II" - their "poster horse" they use when advocating against carriage horses. This is a horse they acquired from AC$H and kill buyer Brian Moore, who had bought him at the New Holland auction.

                    Billy, who was remaned Bobby" by EA WAS a NYC carriage horse that belonged to one of the carriage owners who, if I remember correctly, is not a member of the Horse and Carriage Association of NYC. Anyway, that owner gave him to an Amish man. It is not clear if the Amish man sent him to the New Holland auction or if he sold or gave the horse to someone who sent him to the auction.

                    The point is that BILLY/ BOBBY was NOT sent to auction by the NYC carriage owner, nor was he sold by THAT owner to Brian Moore, but Equine Advocates' president tells a story that leaves out this vital info.

                    And for the record, I have been told that the HCANYC also TRIED to buy Billy from Moore as soon as they found out he had the horse, but the horse had already been sold to E. Forel and EA. Personally, I believe that Forel and EA wouldn't have bought Billy if they had not figured a way to try to use him in their campaign against carriage horses.

                    I would ask that those so inclined post to the EA fb page to let the president know how misguided her support of this proposal is. On behalf of carriage horses everywhere- Thank you.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by hackinaround View Post
                      The sad and common denominator none of them are promoting animal welfare ..alll of them simply want a ban for something they don't understand or like. They are not animal welfare they are animal abolitionists.
                      <LIKE> Animal abolitionists- that is a PERFECT description of what they are.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        [QUOTE=Shine;6312329]They might have something with that statement (bolded). I would think it would be very uncomfortable for the horse to "carry" the carriage. I seen several horses happily "pull" a carriage but never seen a horse with one on it's back.

                        Actually the horse pushes not pulls a carriage.

                        I think if there were a way to clean out the bad apples in the business it would be a big step. I'm always amazed how even people who could step in look the other way.....at the prestigious Villa Louis Classic carriage show there has been a pathetic old gelding, (his head hanging, ribs sticking out, horrid overgrown feet) waiting right at the gate for 'carriage rides'. He stands and drives on blacktop all day....yes she has 'permission' to be there......it that is what is 'presented' at the gate no wonder people point fingers.

                        That's only one example. I could give bad examples in too many cases......I usually politely ask some questions both of the horse owner and who ever has sponsored the activity and I can honestly say the response has been weak if not downright MYOB.
                        So if we don't clean up our own problems it leaves us open to further criticism.

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #32
                          [QUOTE=twadwis;6312419]
                          Originally posted by Shine View Post
                          They might have something with that statement (bolded). I would think it would be very uncomfortable for the horse to "carry" the carriage. I seen several horses happily "pull" a carriage but never seen a horse with one on it's back.

                          Actually the horse pushes not pulls a carriage.

                          I think if there were a way to clean out the bad apples in the business it would be a big step. I'm always amazed how even people who could step in look the other way.....at the prestigious Villa Louis Classic carriage show there has been a pathetic old gelding, (his head hanging, ribs sticking out, horrid overgrown feet) waiting right at the gate for 'carriage rides'. He stands and drives on blacktop all day....yes she has 'permission' to be there......it that is what is 'presented' at the gate no wonder people point fingers.

                          That's only one example. I could give bad examples in too many cases......I usually politely ask some questions both of the horse owner and who ever has sponsored the activity and I can honestly say the response has been weak if not downright MYOB.
                          So if we don't clean up our own problems it leaves us open to further criticism.
                          Do you happen to have pictures ? I do agree about the groups culling those who are not keeping up to standard; however I don't believe in throwing out all of a bushel just because I fine one bad apple.
                          "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            [QUOTE=twadwis;6312419]
                            Originally posted by Shine View Post
                            They might have something with that statement (bolded). I would think it would be very uncomfortable for the horse to "carry" the carriage. I seen several horses happily "pull" a carriage but never seen a horse with one on it's back.

                            Actually the horse pushes not pulls a carriage.

                            I think if there were a way to clean out the bad apples in the business it would be a big step. I'm always amazed how even people who could step in look the other way.....at the prestigious Villa Louis Classic carriage show there has been a pathetic old gelding, (his head hanging, ribs sticking out, horrid overgrown feet) waiting right at the gate for 'carriage rides'. He stands and drives on blacktop all day....yes she has 'permission' to be there......it that is what is 'presented' at the gate no wonder people point fingers.

                            That's only one example. I could give bad examples in too many cases......I usually politely ask some questions both of the horse owner and who ever has sponsored the activity and I can honestly say the response has been weak if not downright MYOB.
                            So if we don't clean up our own problems it leaves us open to further criticism.
                            Well, have you ever asked the event sponsors why such a poorly kept horse is allowed to participate at their event or in conjunction with it?

                            I used to attend a local RenFest with my students when I was teaching. They have a group of traveling Knights that do the joust shows. They also offer rides on their "chargers" for a fee- $5 for a walk while led around a 80 ft. round pen.

                            One of the horses had a very nasty infected wound on its rump. I asked the young woman leading the horse what had happened and why the wound wasn't cleaned and some kind of ointment, etc. applied? I mean, I could smell the infection in it and there were flies all over it. And I asked also why a horse with such a wound was being used to give rides.

                            She tried to tell me the wound was a bite from another horse (didn't look like any bite I had ever seen, it was deep, and looked more like a gouge from a splintered lance.) She said that it had just happened that morning--- she also said that all of their "chargers" were rescued from Pennsylvania auctions and would have been slaughtered if they had not bought them instead to use as knight's chargers.
                            In truth, they were all drafts or draft crosses.

                            She also said they didn't apply anything to the wound because, "They didn't have things like that in the Middle Ages." And these are reasons NOT to clean and dress a wound?

                            Dumb wench.

                            I told her they had better tend the wound, and that I was going to complain to the RenFest sponsors. And I DID. I don't know if it did that much good, but a friend who went there the next day said the horse was no longer being used for rides, and had what looked like Corona on the wound.

                            I also heard that a local vendor who was doing wagon rides there also complained about that horse's wound- so see most times carriage horse or other horse people do speak up.

                            The next year that particular group of traveling knights- who had been there three years in a row- were not there. There was a different group of knights doing the jousts.

                            It could have been coincidence. But really most event sponsors don't want any negative impressions, so maybe a word to the event sponsors could effect some changes- but then again maybe not.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              [QUOTE=hackinaround;6312444]
                              Originally posted by twadwis View Post

                              Do you happen to have pictures ? I do agree about the groups culling those who are not keeping up to standard; however I don't believe in throwing out all of a bushel just because I fine one bad apple.
                              Not trying to ignore you but that was twadis's post with part of mine edited in.

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                                They don't want you to serve that cat either....
                                Yes, I smell like a horse. No, I don't consider that to be a problem.

                                Originally posted by DottieHQ
                                You're just jealous because you lack my extensive koalafications.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Well I don't think cats will think very highly of them. Remember the difference between dogs and cats?

                                  Dogs think their owner is GOD.

                                  Cats know that they ARE God.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    Originally posted by bayou_bengal View Post
                                    Well I don't think cats will think very highly of them. Remember the difference between dogs and cats?

                                    Dogs think their owner is GOD.

                                    Cats know that they ARE God.
                                    Exactly. They are planning to topple those deities...

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by bayou_bengal View Post
                                      Well, some of the horse sanctuaries are already on board supporting raras' campaign to ban carriage horses in NYC. One of them in NYC is called Equine Advocates.
                                      This makes me sick.

                                      How many horses are suffering right now because these piles of excrement are sitting back, holding onto their available space, waiting for a political opportunity? How many horses are dying?

                                      These repugnant buckets of vomit do a disservice to the rescues that do the hard work, saving and rehabilitating horses in need.

                                      It's demented.

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by bayou_bengal View Post
                                        NEWS FLASH- the radical animal rights activists and anti-carriage horse groups are well-funded and well-connected. They are NOT just in NYC. They have NOT just targeted the NYC carriages

                                        As far as which equine activities are set to be targeted- in their own words, the raras have posted over and over that they want ALL horses to be freed from serving people- they want them to be free to "BE" horses doing what they want in freedom. Right now they are focusing on the NYC carriage hroses for the most part, but eventually they want to end all "horse enslavement." - their words, not mine.

                                        There are various groups actively protesting and campaigning against carriage horses and mules already in the following cities-- These are just the cities and groups I have heard of so far. I am sure that other people may have heard of or seen other groups in other cities.

                                        USA
                                        Boston
                                        Chicago
                                        St. Augustine
                                        Atlanta (at least two different groups of raras)
                                        New Orleans
                                        Salt Lake City
                                        Philadelphia
                                        Savannah
                                        Charleston
                                        Dallas


                                        Canada
                                        Montreal
                                        Quebec
                                        Victoria, British Columbia


                                        Europe
                                        Belgrade
                                        Dublin
                                        Florence
                                        Innsbruck
                                        Rome
                                        Salzburg
                                        Vienna
                                        Oxford
                                        Edenburgh

                                        South and Central America
                                        Cozumel
                                        Bogota

                                        Middle East
                                        Tel Aviv
                                        I can only speak for this country, but we're protected more than we know, carriages included, by laws having nothing to do with "animal cruelty." They are the laws concerning "restraint of trade," and they have fairly sharp teeth. In short, you've got to have one heluva compelling legal argument to deny a legitimate businessperson their livelihood. In the absence of a consensus of veterinary opinions that a truly abusive situation exists, legally these people haven't a leg to stand on. They are a noise machine.

                                        The best thing we as horsemen can do? Make damn-tootin' sure we're not providing any credible ammunition for their propaganda mill. Also, give your peers the benefit of a doubt and back 'em up. There are lots of reasons anyone can have a horse that temporarily presents as "skinny," unfit, or lame.

                                        Calling something "abuse" is like yelling "fire." The truth is that like it or not many people today have both a strong victim identification and a chip on their shoulders that they will happily act out through a "transference" onto animals.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Originally posted by SwampYankee View Post
                                          I can only speak for this country, but we're protected more than we know, carriages included, by laws having nothing to do with "animal cruelty." They are the laws concerning "restraint of trade," and they have fairly sharp teeth. In short, you've got to have one heluva compelling legal argument to deny a legitimate businessperson their livelihood. In the absence of a consensus of veterinary opinions that a truly abusive situation exists, legally these people haven't a leg to stand on. They are a noise machine.

                                          The best thing we as horsemen can do? Make damn-tootin' sure we're not providing any credible ammunition for their propaganda mill. Also, give your peers the benefit of a doubt and back 'em up. There are lots of reasons anyone can have a horse that temporarily presents as "skinny," unfit, or lame.

                                          Calling something "abuse" is like yelling "fire." The truth is that like it or not many people today have both a strong victim identification and a chip on their shoulders that they will happily act out through a "transference" onto animals.
                                          The animal rights extremists are not playing with a full deck.
                                          This is about PR, as you say, try not to do anything that could be called abusive, but also, how do you defend yourself when their PR has videos of horses napping and the running commentary in their propaganda is the horse is lame because it is resting a leg, worn down because it holds it's head down (while asleep) and being abused with a blindfold when it is wearing a face mask to protect it from insects.

                                          No matter how much you educate the public, all they remember is that such is an abused horse, because that is what their brain first received and won't bother thinking further.

                                          That is what is happening for decades with animal agriculture, the animal rights extremists present some horrible abuse video and insist all are caring like that for their animals, ban animal agriculture.

                                          You can't defend yourself from those with deep pockets that make their living out of hounding you to get donations so they can keep making a living, you are a sitting duck without recourse, as is clear in the case of the NYC carriage business.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X