• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Man Shoots 6 of His Neighbor's Horses for Wandering Onto His Property

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Man Shoots 6 of His Neighbor's Horses for Wandering Onto His Property

    Looks the bad result of a dispute between two neighbors out in the country and the horses ended up being dead because of it.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/AP2cc1...2a5e7e547.html

    NEW BERLIN, N.Y. — State police say a 75-year-old upstate New York man has been charged with fatally shooting six of his neighbor's horses after they wandered onto his property.

    Troopers say Lauren McMaster likely shot the horses Saturday after they wandered onto his land in the rural Chenango County town of New Berlin, 50 miles southeast of Syracuse.

    Police say they arrested McMaster Sunday and charged him with criminal mischief and cruelty to animals.

    Troopers say McMaster used a 12-gauge shotgun to kill the horses. Police say he and the horse's owner had a long-standing dispute over the neighbor's horses and cows wandering onto McMaster's property.

    McMaster is being held in the Chenango County Jail on $500 cash bail. It couldn't immediately be determined if he had a lawyer.
    "No matter how well you perform there's always somebody of intelligent opinion who thinks it's lousy." - Laurence Olivier

  • #2
    Wonder if he'll try and use a "stand your ground defense"?
    The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by 7HL View Post
      Wonder if he'll try and use a "stand your ground defense"?
      No, he'll likely claim the horses were damaging his property.

      The Stand Your Ground defense has been totally misrepresented in the popular press. Intentionally, IMO. It has no place here. I don't understand why it's even mentioned.

      G.
      Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

      Comment


      • #4
        OK, while I don't think ANYONE should SHOOT horses, I will weigh in on the "other" side.

        It IS the horse owner's responsibility to keep the boundary fences in tact. YES, I KNOW that is difficult, but if you have a longstanding problem with your neighbor (as it appears the owner and the shooter had), then you need to be uber careful!! Do a double row of fencing with a laneway in between - use ELECTRIC or barbed wire (ESPECIALLY if you also have cows!!), but DO IT. DOUBLE fencing give you a path on which to ride as well as an extra guarantee against escape artists and jumpers.

        I KNOW how much work and pain keeping your fencing up to date is - believe me! But, keeping your animals safe is also critical. IMHO, double fencing with cattle guards at the base of all driveways is the only way to go.

        My heartfelt condolences to the owner (regardless of this vent).
        co-author of 101 Jumping Exercises & The Rider's Fitness Program; Soon to come: Dead Ringer - a tale of equine mystery and intrique! Former Moderator!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
          No, he'll likely claim the horses were damaging his property.

          The Stand Your Ground defense has been totally misrepresented in the popular press. Intentionally, IMO. It has no place here. I don't understand why it's even mentioned.

          G.
          Stand your ground is a law that wasn't needed.

          And damaging his property is not a reason to shoot someone's horses. This also is a solution that wasn't needed.

          A gun is not an answer to solve problems.
          The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

          Comment


          • #6
            I feel bad for the horses, but it is the horse owner's responsibility to keep them fenced in and I don't think the property owner was out of line for shooting livestock that had repeatedly strayed onto his property. Perhaps if the horse's owner could not keep them fenced in this was a better fate than getting on the road and getting hit by a car.

            Comment


            • #7
              I wonder if there was any fencing. It seems like a lot of people aren't putting it up and it leads to things like this. That guy whose barn burned down with the horses inside as part of an apparent hate crime had not one board of fencing on his property and anyone could drive a car all over it or even walk from the town through his yard and right up into his barn, which he apparently didn't even bother to keep secure. Some people just have no sense.
              Thus do we growl that our big toes have, at this moment, been thrown up from below!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by LexInVA View Post
                I wonder if there was any fencing. It seems like a lot of people aren't putting it up and it leads to things like this. That guy whose barn burned down with the horses inside as part of an apparent hate crime had not one board of fencing on his property and anyone could drive a car all over it or even walk from the town through his yard and right up into his barn, which he apparently didn't even bother to keep secure. Some people just have no sense.
                Was that the gay person in OH? I always thought it was more than a hate crime
                I wasn't always a Smurf
                Penmerryl's Sophie RIDSH
                "I ain't as good as I once was but I'm as good once as I ever was"
                The ignore list is my friend. It takes 2 to argue.

                Comment


                • #9
                  What are the fencing laws in New York? Many states are considered fence out states (mostly western states I think?) In other words if you don't want your neighbors livestock on your property, then you have to fence them out.

                  Personally I can't imagine just letting my horses run around loose. I would want them fenced onto my property, even if I lived out on a huge ranch in the middle of nowhere, I would want to know they were not wandering onto someone elses land.

                  I wouldn't be able to shoot someones horse wandering on my property (unless it was causing physical harm to one of my horses) but I know how frustrating having someone elses livestock wandering on your property can be. I live in a fence out state and when I was growing up we lived in a very rural area and people would just turn their livestock out. We had property damaged from cattle wandering through and were constantly chasing them off.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
                    No, he'll likely claim the horses were damaging his property.

                    The Stand Your Ground defense has been totally misrepresented in the popular press. Intentionally, IMO. It has no place here. I don't understand why it's even mentioned.

                    G.
                    cause he's an anti gun nazi silly

                    Tamara
                    Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
                    I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Even if the horses' owner was an irresponsible twit, doesn't make shooting the horses right. I also wonder if the local cops were insufficiently responsive to complaints over the problem. That would make them culpable too.

                      Sickening and unnecessary.
                      I tolerate all kinds of animal idiosyncrasies.
                      I've found that I don't tolerate people idiosyncrasies as well. - Casey09

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        long standing dispute over the animals getting out...oye veh....

                        Seems like the neighbor is claiming victim.
                        6 horses...the fences must be like swiss cheese.

                        As to shooting horses with a shotgun....sounds messy to me, not like a clean kill.


                        And the 'stand your ground' defense....7 you should write for Law&Order! DH and I always look forward to the 'SAR', smart a$$ remark at the beginning of the show!

                        The old man forgot the integral part of the SSS method: shovel and shut up...
                        (though it seems it would have been less involved to use the method on the useless neighbor?)
                        Originally posted by BigMama1
                        Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                        GNU Terry Prachett

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Lori B View Post
                          Even if the horses' owner was an irresponsible twit, doesn't make shooting the horses right. I also wonder if the local cops were insufficiently responsive to complaints over the problem. That would make them culpable too.

                          Sickening and unnecessary.
                          we have neighbors who last year intentionally turned their dairy goats out on our planted growing corn fields....they cost me about an acre of yield...or in non corn grower terms,$781
                          their "defense" was "well you have 499 more acres anyway"

                          that day trust me,some dairy goats were very close to meeting their Maker.And Himself told them so.

                          Tamara
                          Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
                          I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                            long standing dispute over the animals getting out...oye veh....

                            Seems like the neighbor is claiming victim.
                            6 horses...the fences must be like swiss cheese.
                            As to shooting horses with a shotgun....sounds messy to me, not like a clean kill.
                            not with slugs.That would be a pretty clean kill even at distance...buckshot would be the same but not so much with bird shot

                            Tamara
                            Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
                            I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by BabyGoose View Post
                              What are the fencing laws in New York? Many states are considered fence out states (mostly western states I think?) In other words if you don't want your neighbors livestock on your property, then you have to fence them out.
                              Laugh, we are talking NY here. Unless Chenango county is way different than the counties I am in (which I do not think it is), we most certainly need to contain our animals here.

                              Sad for the horses. Them getting shot sounds like the fault of their owner.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                                long standing dispute over the animals getting out...oye veh....

                                Around here there is always a team of horses getting loose at sometime. One night coming home ( 1:00 AM), I woke an Amish farmer up because his draft team was loose and walking down the road. I recognized the horses. Took us about 30 minutes to get them back at the barn.

                                Seems like the neighbor is claiming victim.
                                6 horses...the fences must be like swiss cheese.

                                Sounds like this guy didn't have any adequate fence either.

                                As to shooting horses with a shotgun....sounds messy to me, not like a clean kill.


                                And the 'stand your ground' defense....7 you should write for Law&Order! DH and I always look forward to the 'SAR', smart a$$ remark at the beginning of the show!

                                What about the rider and horse that constantly trespasses on property to ride? Ok to shoot the rider, the horse or both?

                                The old man forgot the integral part of the SSS method: shovel and shut up...
                                (though it seems it would have been less involved to use the method on the useless neighbor?)


                                Six horses you'ld need a big hole.
                                The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by 7HL
                                  Sounds like this guy didn't have any adequate fence either.
                                  Um, the guy does not have to have fencing. They are not his horses.


                                  Making an endless list of what if stories about shooting various things really does not make you seem overly sane.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    that's why I said it might have been more cost effective to shoot the owner.
                                    One bullet and a smallish hole.

                                    I think the horse owner needs a lesson in fencing...I am sure Home Depot has something like that for cheap or free...


                                    And no, I don't think the horses were at fault.
                                    Originally posted by BigMama1
                                    Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                                    GNU Terry Prachett

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Tamara in TN View Post
                                      cause he's an anti gun nazi silly

                                      Tamara
                                      Not a nazi anything...

                                      Also not anti gun, I am ANTI STUPID. This was not the proper way to solve a trespass issue.
                                      The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by 7HL View Post
                                        This was not the proper way to solve a trespass issue.
                                        I doubt anyone would disagree with this.



                                        It sounds like the idiot horse owner felt the old guy should just have to put up with their horses..... He appears to have given up and dealt with them on his own.


                                        I admit, I am not getting the animal cruelty thing. That charge just does not make sense.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X