• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

AQHA is threatened with lawsuit over clone registrations:

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AQHA is threatened with lawsuit over clone registrations:

    Seems that the AQHA may be sued over the rule that clones can't be registered:

    http://quarterhorsenews.com/index.ph...#ixzz1suSr5gN0

  • #2
    Very interesting..

    They claim "the rule violates anti trust laws that prohibit any entity from monopolizing commerce ,WITHOUT A LEGITIMATE REASON".
    Science will come crashing in on this argument. This will be fascinating if both sides bring their best reasoning forward.

    Bluey, could you post this on the Sporthorse breeders forum? We've had some good cloning debates there..

    Comment


    • #3
      Dejavu all over again.

      Same thing happened when they wouldn't register multiple foals from the same mare via ET. (Same argument, too. Didn't read the article, wonder if it's the same people suing?)

      Got sued, changed the rules.

      Comment


      • #4
        "Same thing" as in lawsuit, but very different science involved and thus a very different argument.

        Comment


        • #5
          I really hope AQHA doesnt loose this..I may be weird, but I dont agree with cloning..period..so certainly dont think the offspring should be registered either.

          Comment


          • #6
            The Clone War has begun... (cue Star Wars soundtrack).....


            Aw come on - you knew someone was going to post that!
            Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
            Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
            -Rudyard Kipling

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm putting this out there...the AQHA will cave. Just like on the markings and the multiple foals. Might as well save the money from the legal fight and put it towards abandoned QH horses or QH rescues, if there are any.

              *I haven't a dog in this fight, just going by what I've read in the past*
              GR24's Musing #19 - Save the tatas!!

              Comment


              • #8
                I have no dog in this fight either. But if you're going to play in my sand box you need to play by my rules. Breeders know ahead of time that cloning is not accepted.

                I would think that most people wouldn't want cloning to be accepted by the AQHA. The average breeder doesn't have the funding for such specialties. I think the Quarter horse is a diverse breed that needs to be diverse and not narrowed down to a few horses that are successful in the show ring. Let mother nature pick the genetics and not have carbon copies.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Just like with any other such lawsuit, they have to cave in, because the ones protesting that rule are right, the horses in question ARE AQHA horses.
                  It will be very hard to deny that.

                  I would suggest that, like with appendix horses, that have an X before their registration number, they make a special part of the registry for clones and use a C in front of their registration number.

                  I don't think clones will really be but a drop in the bucket, too expensive and who needs one more horse anyway to spend that kind of money in them, other than a few individuals that have $100,000 laying around for a clone.

                  On the other hand, yes, the association members in the conventions have been voting on that rule repeatedly and it has been voted down time and again.

                  Why would anyone want to get that rule changed thru the courts, when the association and most members don't want it, even if they are "right" in principle, the clones ARE indisputably AQHA horses, just as the one they were cloned from?

                  THAT is what the courts will have to decide, I think, unless they settle somehow.
                  The vet and the breeder named in the suit have been trying to work with the AQHA for years and didn't get anywhere.
                  I think that this is their last resort and, knowing them and all they do, I see their point also.
                  The AQHA is a very big sandbox and the ones cloning a very small part of it.
                  They want in to be let play too and I think they have the right to, if the rest like it or not.
                  The clones ARE AQHA horses.
                  I don't like that this finally is coming down to a lawsuit.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Of particular concern was the fact that, in nearly every case, the offspring of a male clone is indistinguishable from the offspring of the original. (Because of the mitochondrial DNA contributed by the mare’s oocyte, the sperm of a cloned stallion is not identical to his “parent.” In the breeding process, however, the stallion’s mitochondrial DNA is not passed on. Therefore, a foal by the original would possess the exact same DNA as a foal by a clone.)

                    AQHA statement;
                    http://www.aqha.com/News/News-Articl...statement.aspx
                    ... _. ._ .._. .._

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                      Just like with any other such lawsuit, they have to cave in, because the ones protesting that rule are right, the horses in question ARE AQHA horses.
                      It will be very hard to deny that.
                      But, devil's advocate here, there are plenty of horses who ARE AQHA horses, but are NOT eligible for registry under the rules for whatever reason. Heck, maybe even because they have too much white hair or too few testicles on them. There will always be horse's whose identity is known who are unable to get papers with their breed registry because some rule or other has been violated.
                      ::Sometimes you have to burn a few bridges to keep the crazies from following you::

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        Originally posted by SmartAlex View Post
                        But, devil's advocate here, there are plenty of horses who ARE AQHA horses, but are NOT eligible for registry under the rules for whatever reason. Heck, maybe even because they have too much WHITE HAIR on them. There will always be horse's whose identity is known who are unable to get papers with their breed registry because some rule or other has been violated.
                        Exactly, remember Melvin Hatley and the white rule, that the AQHA fought thru the courts and lost, at a very high cost to them?

                        Rules have to abide by rules too and if a horse has two duly registered parents, the offspring should be able to get registration papers.
                        ANY rule to say no, you don't, can be contested in the conventions and if you still think you are very right and everyone else wrong, go the legal route, as others before have done.

                        Let the courts decide, if it gets there, but we kind of already know common sense will win this one again, that states "the offspring of two registered parents of the same breed IS of the same breed" and a clone by default is too.

                        The vet and the breeder are right, now they will get to prove that in court, as others have done before.
                        Remember, there is a precedent already with other similar lawsuits, the white rule one of them.
                        I don't see how the AQHA can win this one either, if they like it or not.

                        The australian JC I have heard is looking at that same situation with AI not being permitted in their registry.
                        All it takes is for someone to contest such restrictive rules and they will fall.
                        They stand now only because no one cares, but when some does care enough about what is not right, well, hard to lose when you are right.

                        Those two named in the lawsuit are not hotheads on an ego trip, but AQHA members that have worked for many years with the association, trying to get their point across and this is their last resort.
                        Someone else may have given up and let this go, evidently they choose to follow thru to the end, whatever that may be.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                          Rules have to abide by rules too and if a horse has two duly registered parents, the offspring should be able to get registration papers.

                          The australian JC I have heard is looking at that same situation with AI not being permitted in their registry.
                          All it takes is for someone to contest such restrictive rules and they will fall.
                          I was going to the Jockey Club AI rule next... foiled again.

                          Well played Bluey. Yes, the future brings us such anomalies as spotted Arabians, solid Appaloosas, bald faced QHs, palomino TBs, airborn sperm, and clones. What IS this world coming to?
                          ::Sometimes you have to burn a few bridges to keep the crazies from following you::

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            Originally posted by SmartAlex View Post
                            I was going to the Jockey Club AI rule next... foiled again.

                            Well played Bluey. Yes, the future brings us such anomalies as spotted Arabians, solid Appaloosas, bald faced QHs, palomino TBs, airborn sperm, and clones. What IS this world coming to?
                            Well, we would not be discussing these topics on our computers and IPhones, the world would still supposedly be flat, if someone had not braved the inquisition and kept being hardheaded about what it is, is, no matter if others are not seeing it, even if their heads will fall for it.

                            Don't kid yourself, the majority is against clones being registered and practically all against lawsuits to force hands.
                            There will be a personal fallout for that vet and breeder and those supporting them too, if nothing else for bringing this to a lawsuit.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              We own two Qhs, both foundation Qhs and I am an AQHA member. I would not be opposed to allowing a horse to be registered that was a result of cloning. However I would want their registraion to reflect that as well as the offspring of the cloned horses. Cloning has gotten better but we cannot be sure of long term effects to the breed by intoducing cloned horses.
                              The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I wonder just how they would go about filing a stallion breeding report if they are going mix the thing up in a test tube

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X