• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

I have GOT to understand this or I will bust! Eventers vs Hunters

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by RunForIt View Post
    I mean they are laying down! - over a fence. Now, THAT'S something I don't get.
    We get very tired out there, and need to nap occasionally.

    Mostly it is a bad habit but one with little in the way of consequences for the hunter rider (well groomed footing, related distances that are set up to show off the horse, very inviting ground lines and level groomed surfaces). It's a bad habit in the way that event riders who tend to employ their xc country position in stadium don't pay a physical penalty, but certainly run the risk of adding rails to their score when cups are flat or combinations are technical. But in both cases it is more technically difficult to hold that perfect position at the top of the fence thatn the respective discipline's "default position". The challenge with a hunter rider is to create that position and not unfold too quickly and compromise the horse's style on the backside of the jump and with event riders the challenge is to not jump up the neck too early and compromise the riders health.

    Doing it "perfectly" takes a lot of commitment, time and practice for everyone regardless of discipline, and certainly there are riders in both disciplines that achieve it (and plenty more that don't), it's just we forget those pictures. Those pics do exactly as they are supposed to - make the rider look eminently forgettable as we focus on the awesomeness of the jumping horse.

    But bottom line is hunter riders do end up with a horse with a to die for front end over fences and they are mostly SMRT enough not to try that over solid obstacles and uncertain terrrain. And we get some quality nap time in as well, so it's all good.
    Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

    Comment


    • #42
      As someone who has and does participate in both the hunter ring and the event world, I say that the differences in form between good hunter riders and good event riders are practically nill. I am not a good one, so my position is no judge I'd rather have Trixie's leg position at any time over any jump.


      As for riders who do the praying mantis look, most of them are either a) legimately getting jumped out of the tack and onto the horses neck or b)want it to look like the horse is jumping them out of the tack. Mostly b. And they don't do it on the greenies, because they want to live, just like event riders over drops. However, in the 4' Working Hunters, where they all jump with even knees and all being piloted by pros who never miss, you gotta make an impression somehow

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by crittertwitter View Post
        I stick to my position in the hunter ring, though. It was not the place for me and I was always taught that your position was important. But at the same time I was taught that your effect was more important, whether it earned you a win or not.
        To quote something biblical (not somethign I do a lot!)... When I was a child, I spoke like a child, thought like a child, and reasoned like a child.

        Meaning if hunters are something you don't like or want to do, and you like what you are doing, I say goodonya and more power to you! That's a great thing. But as an adult to judge something solely through your child's eye is probably a disservice to whatever you judge, whether you had fond or unpleasant memories.

        As to politics, probably not nearly as much as people think. It still is a subjective sport though, and that isn't for everyone, and that is fair enough.
        Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

        Comment


        • #44
          ..

          I think if all eventers had experience with Jr. Hunter & equitation, we'd have much better riders.
          The truth is rarely pure, and never simple. Oscar Wilde

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Ajierene View Post
            All classes are done within one day, for one division. Each division has three or four classes in it, one or two flat classes and one or two jumping classes. Sometimes there is a hack class that has flat and then a pattern, which includes one or two jumps. In a hack class, everyone stands to one side of the arena while one competitor completes the pattern - it is usually trot at this point, canter on this lead at this point, do a circle, jump this jump, stop back up - or something similar. During the jumping classes in a division, the only rider in the ring is the one going over the jumps.

            The classes in each division are run right after the other.
            Um, no.

            A division is usually split between two days. There are between 4-5 classes: one flat (otherwise known as a 'hack') and 3 or four over fences classes.

            In the hack classes all horses are in the ring at the same time. Everyone tracks the same direction and walks, trots, canters together per the judge's instruction. There is no jumping in a hack class UNLESS it is a Hunter Hack (this is a class name, and not a generalized term like 'hack'. The offical class name of a 'hack' is Hunter Under Saddle. Also the Hunter Hack is not really seen at rated shows) in which there is a 'hack' portion first and then each rider jumps a line per the judge's instruction.

            The hack classes are judged on quality of movement (forward, ground covering, relaxed walk; daisy cutter trot with minimal knee action; long, slow canter with little knee action), manners, way of going. The horse should do these things on light rein contact and with little rider input. Riders tend to two-point the canter in a hack class to free the horse's back for a long, swinging, relaxed stride. Etc.
            Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
            Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

            Comment


            • #46
              RugBug, I would assume, has more experience at the A levels where things are split up, and Ajierene at the Bs or lower levels, where things do tend to be run consecutively. Either way, doesn't make a huge difference on this topic, I'd suppose.

              But hey, while the eventing board is discussing eq (who'd a thunk it?) I have to say that I am a new event rider who has previous experience in hunters, jumpers, eq and (a bit of) dressage... and after not having jumped much the last few years then beginning event work with my (sometimes overzealous, sometimes beligerent) mare, I have paid VERY little attention to my own eq lately. As Mare tends to vary between racing jumps, stopping, and bucking with glee (hey, we're getting over it!), I've become a defensive rider. I think so much about the approach and the landing, just getting her around the course, that my mind skims right over the actual jump. This and a few other threads (as well as the constant "Your leg was not under you" from my trainer ) got me thinking about reforming my hard-headed ways. I got on Mare today determined to play around a bit with my eq... Well I'll be danged... When I actually THOUGHT "heels down, butt back, auto release (yes- auto release!)" instead of letting my mind black out for a moment, Mare surprisingly never raced, never bucked... just cantered around and jumped the jumps like the sweet little mare that I KNOW she has inside her, because I was more relaxed and not interfering. I might mention, this wasn't in an arena with stadium jumps, these were solid jumps out in the pasture... So the moral of my little experiement is (A) I'm an idiot for not paying more attention most of the time (maybe *I* am the learning-disabled monkey??) and (B) effective riding is effective riding no matter what discipline you're working on.

              Now you may all point and laugh at me.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by archieflies View Post
                RugBug, I would assume, has more experience at the A levels where things are split up, and Ajierene at the Bs or lower levels, where things do tend to be run consecutively. Either way, doesn't make a huge difference on this topic, I'd suppose.
                You're right, it doesn't make a ton of difference....and I did misread a sentence that led me to believe she thought ALL hack classes involved a 'pattern' (the wording of which makes me suspect breed show knowledge...not USEF hunters). I re-read...but still stand by my post.

                Originally posted by archieflies View Post
                effective riding is effective riding no matter what discipline you're working on.


                To add to this: eventing has helped this hunter rider to go forward, gallop and stop worrying too much about distances....
                Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                Comment


                • #48
                  One comment about dressage...for the most part it is judged on the effectiveness, accuracy and grace of the horse, but there is a "collective" mark specifically for the rider. This is different from the hunters.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #49
                    Wow! I have bookmarked this thread for future reference! Thank you EVERYONE who contributed so far! Even those who disagreed with other posters, which is not necessarily bad. It rather provides a more in-depth picture of the two disciplines, hunter and eventer.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      I for one am glad we can disagree with me and correct misread material and misperceptions without me even having to step in and clarify....I am just THAT good!

                      And yea, I did a few B levels, mostly C's when I was in high school. I have seen A rated shows, including Devon, but did not notice the difference in classes.

                      One class I loved was team hunters? I forget exactly what it was called- three horses and jump course supposed to be done specifically - sometimes they jumped right after each other, some were three jumps abreast, some were three jumps staggered that they jumped at the same time.

                      The winners that year were three grays, beautifully in sync - they even patted their horses in unison when they were done!

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        This may have already been said, but not only are hunter classes starting to look an AWFUL lot like cross country (seen any hunter derbies lately?) but we eventers would do well to go compete in a 3'6" hunter class once in a while, strictly for the sake of our own humility. Laying down a good, smooth, flawless hunter trip is both BLOODY HARD and enormously gratifying. You think your eventer is obedient and well schooled in dressage and jumping? Go watch a big Eq. class.
                        Click here before you buy.

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #52
                          Originally posted by deltawave View Post
                          This may have already been said, but not only are hunter classes starting to look an AWFUL lot like cross country (seen any hunter derbies lately?) but we eventers would do well to go compete in a 3'6" hunter class once in a while, strictly for the sake of our own humility. Laying down a good, smooth, flawless hunter trip is both BLOODY HARD and enormously gratifying. You think your eventer is obedient and well schooled in dressage and jumping? Go watch a big Eq. class.

                          Yeah I was thinking the same about the hunters from what I've read so far. It must be a very difficult job to do given the requirements they are given and have to adhere to in order to be successful.

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            To add to everything- there is a reason why the norm for a lot of people is to put their green jumpers in a few hunter classes for a while. It teaches the horses patience, improves communication, and introduces courses at shows in a less-scary manner than plopping them right into a jumper course.

                            The basic principles are the same in any English riding over fences- you want balance, an appropriate path, and rhythm. The rider's form should complement and help, when necessary, the horse's jump. The showiness of a hunter is something that can be played up by a really good hunter rider but it would be counter-productive to a jumper or eventer ride.

                            Not rocket science, but each discipline has different goals that require variations in style. I can't speak to eventing much but it is obvious that XC is wildly different than showing hunters! When I ride a hunter over fences I will usually go between two-point and a hunter seat (slightly leaning forward in the saddle, but still sitting). This allows me to jump them out of stride with a nice flowing effect. When I ride my jumper I am pretty much always sitting or hovering over him in a more upright position- this allows me to get him to the base and tackle the more difficult questions posed by the course designer. Both of these get the job done in their respective rings.
                            You can take a line and say it isn't straight- but that won't change its shape. Jets to Brazil

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Originally posted by archieflies View Post
                              (B) effective riding is effective riding no matter what discipline you're working on.
                              IMO, the best event riders out there are the ones who remember good equitation is important! It's much, much more dangerous in eventing to forget a release or not keep your heels down - things are typically faster and more intense and you definitely want to make sure your balance is on target so that your horse isn't affected by poor riding.

                              Always good to learn those lessons early on!

                              Also, I there's a little bit of splitting hairs on the hunters vs. eq thing. I think most folks meant "hunters" in a very general way, not splitting out hunter/equitation. A local "hunter series" show might include both hunters under saddle and eq, so it's easy to combine the terminology. Good to point out the difference though.

                              My favorite difference between hunter shows and eventing is that eventing is scored objectively. You know what you got in dressage, along with comments by the judge, and you know exactly how you did in SJ & XC because of times and jump faults/penalties. Hunter shows are more subjective, and you will likely never know why Sally Sue and Pookie beat you.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by DMK View Post
                                You actually cannot believe the restraint Trixie is practicing, although you might have given her the laugh of a lifetime. Saying Rodney wasn't effective in the hunter ring is a bit like saying Jack Le Goff might not have been effective in eventing, or that Klimke fellow wouldn't have cut it in dressage.

                                Not only were they "effective" they are the patriarchs of the sport!
                                too true!
                                http://s31.photobucket.com/albums/c3...nibbystrot.jpg
                                http://s31.photobucket.com/albums/c3...t=IMGP0754.jpg

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by crittertwitter View Post
                                  I don't buy it that position doesn't play into judging in Hunters. Rodney Jenkins, as effective as he was, couldn't have placed well in the Hunter ring!
                                  OK... let's bump it again.

                                  I *did not say* that Rodney was ineffective. Period. I was wrong in saying he didn't place well in hunters. Geez. Feel free to rearrange a statement, but the above quote actually reflects a deep respect for his effectiveness as a rider. He is the gold standard, and an example of effectiveness to aspire to. His riding was amazing, though it often wasn't "pretty." That said, he was highly effective. I don't associate him with Hunters. I've actually been corrected on this before - that Rodney Jenkins did Hunters and did well at them. I wasn't alive then, and never saw his championship hunter rides. That said, things in the hunter ring have changed a lot since the 60s and 70s, so I've heard.

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    It has changed, of course, yes. Some. What has NOT changed is that a soft, correct, and beautiful ride is rewarded.

                                    Rodney may not have had the most "orthodox" style but every ride he rode was soft and beautiful, without interfering with the horse.

                                    I can't imagine he wouldn't do just as well now as he did then. His horses performed well because he rode well. Despite some of the changes over the years, a good performance still wins in the hunters.

                                    What was hard for us, as hunter riders, to follow is the consistent assumption that "politics" and "look" and never performance is what counts in the hunter arena, which is obviously patently untrue. Rodney is a perfect example of being able to perform, get the job done, and win, despite the folks thinking his style is unorthodox.
                                    ---
                                    They're small hearts.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Oh Rodney, Rodney. I hope he knows what a lot of fans he still has.

                                      An interesting commentary article you guys might enjoy: http://www.chronofhorse.com/index.ph...92208070713157

                                      And some Rodney pics...
                                      http://www.webshots.com/search?query=Rodney+Jenkins

                                      Enjoy

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by crittertwitter View Post
                                        That said, things in the hunter ring have changed a lot since the 60s and 70s, so I've heard.
                                        Courses make horses, not the other way around, or so the saying goes. Things (courses) are different now and so are the horses that jump them, but I too have every confidence that if Mr. Jenkins wanted to do hunters he'd probably be damn good at it.

                                        I remember reading that linked column and wondered "who doesn't know Rodney did hunters?" I thought everyone who knew of RJ mostly knew the infamous "how hunters got the trot jump" legend. But now I know that indeed there are some young'uns who didn't know about RJ's hunter career. I stand corrected and better informed.

                                        Later we shall teach you about Mr. Ace and The Very First Hunter Trot Jump, but first a bit of friendly advice: When you find yourself in a hole, put down the shovel. You did an awesome job of graciously accepting some good natured ribbing, but now you seem to want to jump down in a hole and pick up a shovel! Resist the temptation! It never ends well for the person in the hole.
                                        Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Trying to cover for your misquoting, eh, DMK? I think that was you... who said something about my post suggesting that his riding was ineffective, when in fact I said a lot of hunter rides and positions are ineffective (not in so many words)?

                                          I'll gladly admit it when I'm wrong, but Yea, sure, I'll bite a couple of times if I'm misquoted. I don't mind ignoring it once or twice, ignoring misunderstandings, etc. but to continue it as if it were what I said, that's ridiculous.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X