• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Clucking vs Clicking

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Clucking vs Clicking

    Going to pick up our new shelter dog tonight (yaaaaay!).

    She has been getting some clicker training at the shelter, and will be my first dog so trained. I am one of those people who clucks at my dog (and boyfriend....and other people in their cars...) to get his attention and hurry him up. Had horrible thought this morning: is this going to confuse the new dog?

    It's the time of year when I should be going cold turkey anyway so as not to incur dressage judge wrath. Easier said than done, though!

    ETA: Oops, meant to post in The Menagerie, not here...mea culpa, Mods! Please move if you see fit.
    bullyandblaze.wordpress.com

    "The present tense of regret is indecision."
    - Welcome to Night Vale

  • #2
    no, it won't. A tongue cluck sounds nothing like a mechanical clicker.

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes, but my tongue cluck sounds just like my tongue click. So if they have been using a verbal click, he may be confused. But you can give him another cue instead if you want to continue his training.

      Comment


      • #4
        "Clicker training" is not a voice command. It's made by a "clicker" which is a piece of equipment. So your cluck will sound nothing like a click from a clicker.

        http://www.clickertraining.com/whatis

        Comment


        • #5
          The idea of using a mechanical object as a clicker, be it a real clicker or ballpoint or some such, is that it is a neutral sound.

          Our voices, even just clicking, have way too much else riding on them than a mere mechanical click, even when we try to be as neutral as we can make it.

          Comment


          • #6
            Good on the shelter for attempting to put some training in prior to re-homing!

            However, clicker training does not have to be done with a mechanical clicker - it merely has to have a definite, positive, event marker. I use "clicker training" to shape behaviour in my dogs - I started with a mechanical clicker but used that to get the connection to any defined noise. The most common one I use is a click of my fingers as you always have those with you and I also dont just use food as the associated reward. (That is long after they have got used to it!) It is amazing how quickly dogs learn that the click of my fingers = reward = listen for it.

            However a click with fingers or a mechanical clicker is nothing like a tongue cluck - just make sure that you do not use that when training/playing your dog.

            I must try it with my horse ..... Rae wanders off to give it a go
            Still Working_on_it - one day I will get it!

            Comment


            • #7
              Yes, but my tongue cluck sounds just like my tongue click. So if they have been using a verbal click, he may be confused.
              Let me assure you that practically no one who "clicker trains" uses their tongue to produce the clicks. If they stated they were using clicker training, they were almost certainly using a mechanical device to produce a click.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by wendy View Post
                Let me assure you that practically no one who "clicker trains" uses their tongue to produce the clicks. If they stated they were using clicker training, they were almost certainly using a mechanical device to produce a click.
                What?! Wait! I'm a very serious clicker trainer, and I have used tongue clucks since the second day I was clicker trainer (more than ten years).

                The first day, I had my clicker in hand, and I was so excited. It was going so well!

                The second day, I did not have my clicker in my hand, and my horse did something brilliant; and before I could even think, I clucked. My horse understood immediately that a mechanical click and a tongue cluck were interchangeable. And they have been ever since, making clicker training even more handy.
                I have a Fjord! Life With Oden

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Cindyg View Post
                  What?! Wait! I'm a very serious clicker trainer, and I have used tongue clucks since the second day I was clicker trainer (more than ten years).

                  The first day, I had my clicker in hand, and I was so excited. It was going so well!

                  The second day, I did not have my clicker in my hand, and my horse did something brilliant; and before I could even think, I clucked. My horse understood immediately that a mechanical click and a tongue cluck were interchangeable. And they have been ever since, making clicker training even more handy.
                  In theory, you are making it more difficult for your subject, if it is an animal very attuned to your voice.
                  There is no way to keep any voice produced sound from not carrying intonation, how you feel about what the student is doing to how you feel at that time.

                  Using voice, the purist operant conditioning theory claims, is muddling that kind of signal, that is supposed to be void of any other meaning than being a marker.

                  in reality, whatever works for you is ok, training is not mathematics, where you have to be that exact.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I have interacted with large numbers of of clicker-trained dogs and when I absent-mindedly do a "hurry up there" horse-cluck at them they sure don't seem to recognize it as a "click".

                    -using a verbal marker isn't a direct substitute for the mechnical device, it simply can't replicate the "sameness" and "shortness" of it. Most people I know make real sure they have a mechanical clicker around for planned training sessions, and for later work or whoops I forgot my clicker moments they use a verbal marker, usually something like the word YES (not a tongue click noise) knowing full well it's not the same and is not as effective as a mechanical clicker.

                    I would think that trying to use a tongue-click noise for clicker-training horses would be an exercise in confusion for the horses, because most horses are constantly and regularly exposed to people tongue- clucking at them intending it to mean something totally different than a "marker".

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                      In theory, you are making it more difficult for your subject, if it is an animal very attuned to your voice.
                      There is no way to keep any voice produced sound from not carrying intonation, how you feel about what the student is doing to how you feel at that time.

                      Using voice, the purist operant conditioning theory claims, is muddling that kind of signal, that is supposed to be void of any other meaning than being a marker.

                      in reality, whatever works for you is ok, training is not mathematics, where you have to be that exact.
                      I think we're arguing semantics.

                      My horse understands a "hurry up click" coming from the side of my tongue against the side of my cheek as a signal to trot or just to "come on!"

                      My C/T cluck is made with the bottom of my tongue behind my top front teeth. There is no vocal sound. I totally agree with you that a verbal "atta boy" or "gooooood" is not as effective as a click. A C/T click needs to be quick, sharp, and nonverbal.

                      My horse never confuses a my click and my cluck.

                      Regardless of the details, I do love clicker training!
                      I have a Fjord! Life With Oden

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        My point was that I have been training dogs, horses, and mules now using positive reinforcement since the mid 90s, using a verbal signal, and everyone seems to figure it out just fine. Yes, the clicker is probably the most exact signal one can use, but it becomes highly inexact when I am riding, because I am busy riding, and it is really easy to get your timing off. And timing is everything, so I use a verbal signal "AH". But I reserve my clucks for a go faster signal. And if I could do a verbal click that didn't sound just like my cluck, I would do so.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Cindyg View Post
                          I think we're arguing semantics.

                          My horse understands a "hurry up click" coming from the side of my tongue against the side of my cheek as a signal to trot or just to "come on!"

                          My C/T cluck is made with the bottom of my tongue behind my top front teeth. There is no vocal sound. I totally agree with you that a verbal "atta boy" or "gooooood" is not as effective as a click. A C/T click needs to be quick, sharp, and nonverbal.

                          My horse never confuses a my click and my cluck.

                          Regardless of the details, I do love clicker training!
                          I click with my tongue off the top of my mouth. It's more a a physical movement than "air" movement, and much different than my cluck cluck.

                          I find using the mechanical clicker can be a little cumbersome when you have object to touch in hand and treats in the other (or fanny pack) so I click click with my tongue. Also good when on a trail ride, horse does something good she gets the clicks, so I don't have to fumble for the mechanical clicker or remember to bring it.
                          I want a signature but I have nothing original to say except: "STHU and RIDE!!!

                          Wonderful COTHER's I've met: belleellis, stefffic, snkstacres and janedoe726.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X