• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Returning Products That Have Been Used

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Returning Products That Have Been Used

    I have a question for you all. How do you feel about returning products after they have been used, not because they were defective, but just because they were not liked? I will also add that in the process of being used, the product then cannot be sold as new again.

    Would you take advantage of this? Do you think it is fair that the business where the product was brought from will now have have to absorb the cost, since the product can no longer be sold as new?

    The reason I ask is that it has come to my attention that several of the larger online retailers have changed their return policy and are doing just that, taking ANYTHING back, even it if has been used and cannot be sold "as new" again, no questions asked. One retailer is even taking returns of custom items and full refund.

  • #2
    I was doing some shopping on line recently and came accross this item:

    "Returns must be made within 30 days of receipt of your purchase. Merchandise must be unworn and accompanied by a receipt. We will not accept used merchandise for refund or exchange. If you do not want an item in exchange, your return is subject to a 25% restocking fee. Returns not accompanied by a receipt will be for store credit only. We are not a rental agency."

    IMO this is a fair and reasonable policy. If you've got something you don't want then sell it on Craigs List, E-Bay, etc.

    G.
    Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

    Comment


    • #3
      ^ This.

      I work part-time for a clothing company that has a your happiness guaranteed no matter what policy. You can return garments five years after the purchase date if you so desire and they'll happily refund your money. Believe it or not people bring in five year old worn out clothing and take advantage of it! It's crazy to me.
      *Wendy* 4.17.73 - 12.20.05

      Comment


      • #4
        I couldn't personally do it. I bought a pair of really nice tall boots last winter and still haven't been able to get them to stretch out like I expected them to. I bought them from SmartPak and could technically return them, but it's not their fault I was too stupid to buy a larger calf size! The boots aren't defective, they just didn't work out for me.

        I also live in Maine, so I frequently see people abusing the LLBean return policy when I'm in their store. Literally, people bringing in their kids rain boots because they outgrew them (...duh?) and completely worn out shoes they haven't sold in over 40 years. It disgusts me to see people abuse return policies that were created for other reasons for dumb stuff like that. With equine retailers, it makes me wonder if they're going to end up with a bunch of dinged saddles that people bought just to test ride and then return.

        However, I *did* purchase my Dubarry boots from SmartPak because I didn't want to be screwed over if I dropped that much money on boots and they busted quickly. That being said, I don't plan to beat the heck out of them for a couple years and then exchange them for a free new pair
        "Last time I picked your feet, you broke my toe!"

        Comment


        • #5
          I won't participate in it.

          It's a predatory policy used by big businesses to drive little 'ns out of business. The Littles can't afford to do that. The Bigs can.... but won't need to forever. I think it's a tad irresponsible on consumers' part to want this for things that really could have been evaluated for their utility first.
          The armchair saddler
          Politically Pro-Cat

          Comment


          • #6
            I have never been one to return stuff, but I shop with Dover often for precisely this policy. When I buy an item sight unseen and it simply doesn't work, I'm not stuck with it. I have returned two items - a Rhino blanket that ripped after 3 uses (the replacement has held up fine) and some bed sore boots that twisted and slipped and simply didn't stay up no matter what I tried.

            It's a company policy that means I spend more money with Dover overall. Simple marketing. It's no more predatory than a larger company having more capital to buy stock at a lower price.

            Smaller companies need to offer better customer service etc to compete. It's the nature of the beast in the USA - capitalism is the name of the game. It's fine when it works to make people money, but then when they can't compete it's not fair? Hm.

            Now, abusing that policy (returning items that are outgrown, worn out due to use, etc) is morally wrong IMO. And very hard for any company to police effectively without alienating people, which is why they just have a blanket "return anything, anytime" policy.
            ----------------------------------------
            PSSM / EPSM and Shivers Forum
            http://pssm.xanthoria.com/
            ----------------------------------------

            Comment


            • #7
              How would I want to be treated?

              I take back my items-and refund without a hassle. No-I cannot resell that item I originally sent out as new (but now has dirt mark) as a 'new' item. (And some customers can be a real PITA) But..its been my experience that if I make nice with that customer they *might* recommend me to their friends and cohorts. If I make nasty-I can be sure my name is trashed everywhere they can reach.
              I offer a one year unconditional warrantee on everything. That covers proper fit, material integrity and refund if I cannot make it work for you. Some folks-just don't want it to work

              And I can still sell the basically unused item on Ebay-and at least recoup something.
              This, as I understand it, is proper customer service. And part of being in business.
              the NOT!! Spoiled!! Arabian Protectavest poster pony lives on in my heart

              Comment


              • #8
                Used in what sense?

                If I try an item on my horse and it doesn't fit, I'll return it. I don't think that counts as used -- but I also try it on in such a way that I CAN return it as an unused item (using sheets and towels to protect it, etc).

                On the other hand, I got an item with defective packaging and had a return lined up. A situation came up and I had to use the item. I am still very unhappy about the packaging situation, but I'm the one who chose to use the item so... it's my problem now. I did not return it.

                Once it's used, unless it's defective, it's the buyer's problem. I think people who expect companies to take anything and everything back are unreasonable. The buyer is not always right -- sometimes they are entitled and obnoxious.

                Rather than seeing companies take anything and everything back, I'd like to see more programs like demo saddles and bit trial programs. Set up a system that allows customers to try before they buy, so they don't feel tempted to try to do just that via sale/return.
                Halt Near X | Horse Bloggers - Blog Directory

                Comment


                • #9
                  What? Return worn out garments, outgrown shoes? That is nuts.

                  I have returned stuff I haven't worn a few times. The only one thing that close to a "worn" item was a pair of breeches. They glued to my saddle so bad that I couldn't ride at all. I took them off within ten minutes and returned them to the local tack shop I bought them from. Technically they were "worn"... but they let me return them and got a different kind.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by HappyVagrant View Post

                    I think people who expect companies to take anything and everything back are unreasonable. The buyer is not always right -- sometimes they are entitled and obnoxious.
                    .
                    I totally agree with this. nhr, but once I worked at hardees (back in high school) and our manager followed company policy but it still annoyed the heck out of me.. (policy is if a customer complains about the meal, they get a free combo card). The customer complained because we "refused" to put Big Mac sauce on his burger (because we weren't McDonalds and didn't have big mac sauce, or anything remotely similar, as the company didn't have salads at the time.. so no 1000 island dressing or anything). But he complained, and got a combo card for it. Stupid. I had an acquaintance who figured out policies at places like that.. and would purposely ask for something that couldn't be done, so her meal or whatever would be comped. No longer hang around her, so no idea if any place figured her out.
                    "Sadly, some people's greatest skill, is being an idiot". (facebook profile pic I saw).

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      During my years of retail warfare, my personal all time favorite was the lady who brought back her set of Revereware pots & pans. Most of them had food burnt to the bottoms of them. Why was she returning them? They were defective - food stuck to them. Uh, No, you just don't know how to cook.

                      We didn't accept them. They were stainless steel, not teflon and not sold as non-stick. It was also a not even a set that we carried.

                      The close second was the recently marked down clock someone "brought" in. They had just been marked down b/c none had sold in 6 months. The people claimed it had been bought a few weeks early. Not so much.
                      Visit my Spoonflower shop

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        no way. I've only returned defective items, or ones that have broken after what seems like an unreasonable amount of time (like a leadrope I bought from Smartpak that unraveled after 2 months of light use).

                        Some places have crazy return policies though. Like Costco? When our GPS broke they let us exchange for a new one...two years later. We weren't expecting anything from them, just thought we would try. Or Nordstrom, they will let you return anything or at least they used to.

                        When I worked at Target though, people frequently got PISSED about our return policy and fully expected to be able to return anything. Like I remember one guy who brought in a ratty, paint splattered pair of jeans that had a broken belt loop (probably got snagged on something because he was clearly a contractor) and expected to exchange them for new ones. Um...no.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I have returned maybe 2, 3 items in the last 20 years and it was for parts missing and the same day as purchased. If I buy it it's MINE. Mine = My problem.

                          When I worked as a cashier at a store that had a 'take anything back' policy the people that seemed to have bought somthing, gone home and found it didn't work/hated it and brought it right back were the minority.

                          Most returns were people that would buy the same product over and over, use 95% of it and then bring it back for a return.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I don't return stuff that has been used, I usually either sell it myself or I put it on consignment with the shop. I bought a $50 gel front riser for my horse about 3 months ago and it did not work. However, in the process of just trying it on the horse, it got rather dusty and does not look brand, spanking new. I certainly do not expect the tack store to take it back despite the fact that it was only on the horse for about 10 minutes. My fault, I should have been more careful! Speaking of which, I should get around to selling it...

                            ETA: I should clarify that I will return used things that are defective within a warranty period.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Xanthoria View Post
                              Smaller companies need to offer better customer service etc to compete. It's the nature of the beast in the USA - capitalism is the name of the game. It's fine when it works to make people money, but then when they can't compete it's not fair? Hm.

                              Now, abusing that policy (returning items that are outgrown, worn out due to use, etc) is morally wrong IMO. And very hard for any company to police effectively without alienating people, which is why they just have a blanket "return anything, anytime" policy.
                              A little OT, but how can you make this argument?:

                              1) Capitalism is the way it is.

                              2) There is no logical room in capitalism for talking about fairness or lack of fairness.

                              2a) We know this is true because people mistakenly apply a double standard: They cry "Capitalism!" when winning and "No fair!" when losing.

                              But,

                              3) It's *immoral* to do X or Y in the buying/selling relationship.

                              Is 2 or 3 true? There is either room for morality and justice in economic behavior or there is not. You can't have it both ways.

                              The consumer borrowing goods is being a fabulous and predictable kind of capitalist.
                              The armchair saddler
                              Politically Pro-Cat

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I find it rude to return an item that's obviously been used. The closest I've come? I agonized over returning a quarter sheet that I had used for half an hour before deciding that it was poorly made and poorly fitting. I hated it but I debated the ethics of returning something that had already been on my mule for a brief trail ride. (In the end, I sent it back because I felt it was not as advertised.)

                                I can't imagine trying to return something that had really been used to the point of appearing no longer new!
                                My ears hear a symphony of two mules, trains, and rain. The best is always yet to come, that's what they explained to me. —Bob Dylan

                                Fenway Bartholomule ♥ Arrietty G. Teaspoon Brays Of Our Lives

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by mvp View Post
                                  It's a predatory policy used by big businesses to drive little 'ns out of business.
                                  Good grief.......

                                  You should add that to OWS' list of whines.

                                  Small and large companies engaged in the same line of business are called competitors for a reason. They compete.

                                  And in competition the stronger and smarter beats the weaker and dumber. Every. Single. Time.

                                  "Fairness" does not exist in the context of business competitors.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Well, I think it's really about assessing if the item met reasonable expectations or not. I think if a pair of paddock boots self destructs in 4 months, returning them under a policy like that is fair. I think after years of use, not fair.

                                    Maybe you tried a new kind of $200 breeches with a special patch type. You get in the saddle and find them stiff and too sticky to use. That's a fair return, especially since you might not have been willing to try them without that policy.

                                    Retailers are offering it because they think it is a plus for them in the end. If it makes me more likely to order because I feel less risk (especially for an item I can't see before buying), then they figure they'll make enough extra sales to make up for it. It also makes the customer more likely to try another item if the first didn't work.

                                    The test is simple, really. If you were the retailer, or the clerk, taking the proposed item back, would you feel like the customer was screwing you?
                                    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by mildot View Post
                                      Good grief.......

                                      You should add that to OWS' list of whines.

                                      Small and large companies engaged in the same line of business are called competitors for a reason. They compete.

                                      And in competition the stronger and smarter beats the weaker and dumber. Every. Single. Time.

                                      "Fairness" does not exist in the context of business competitors.

                                      The OWS have bigger fish to fry.

                                      The well-heeled, middle class, however, has been bitching about this long before the 2008 debacle gave anyone anything to cry about. Walmart is perhaps the most famous corporation recently accused of this.

                                      You are making a mistake to lump all social agendas with which you do not agree into the OWS' rather amorphous one.

                                      You make some mistakes below, too:

                                      I'll grant, for the sake of the argument, that there is no such thing in fairness in business.

                                      You seem to group "smarter," "stronger" and "bigger" together in your post; dumber, weaker and smaller are synonyms.

                                      But if the large company wins solely for reasons of its size (as it true in the case of this policy), then how can you infer about it's relative intelligence, strength or some other characteristic?

                                      You could argue that the larger will always win at the game of getting larger. But that's all you can argue. You can't imply (as with the attribute "smarter" and less so with the one "stronger"), that big companies deserve to win.
                                      The armchair saddler
                                      Politically Pro-Cat

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Xanthoria View Post
                                        I have never been one to return stuff, but I shop with Dover often for precisely this policy. When I buy an item sight unseen and it simply doesn't work, I'm not stuck with it. I have returned two items - a Rhino blanket that ripped after 3 uses (the replacement has held up fine) and some bed sore boots that twisted and slipped and simply didn't stay up no matter what I tried.

                                        It's a company policy that means I spend more money with Dover overall. Simple marketing. It's no more predatory than a larger company having more capital to buy stock at a lower price.

                                        Smaller companies need to offer better customer service etc to compete. It's the nature of the beast in the USA - capitalism is the name of the game. It's fine when it works to make people money, but then when they can't compete it's not fair? Hm.

                                        Now, abusing that policy (returning items that are outgrown, worn out due to use, etc) is morally wrong IMO. And very hard for any company to police effectively without alienating people, which is why they just have a blanket "return anything, anytime" policy.
                                        Yeah this!
                                        Every mighty oak was once a nut that stood its ground.

                                        Proud Closet Canterer! Member Riders with Fibromyalgia clique.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X