• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

Question about horse rescues - should they stay local, or rescue all over?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Question about horse rescues - should they stay local, or rescue all over?

    Updated post #24

    I am NOT trying to start a train wreck here, I just have a genuine question. I have many friends on Facebook who are in the horse world, either as trainers, breeders, horse show folks, and just regular back yard riders. I also have a few rescues on my friend list, and when I see a horse that I may be able to help, I share him/her.

    But not long ago, something came to my attention that really rubbed me the wrong way. I am going to try and be pretty general here, as I do not want to tarnish anyone's reputation, but basically, a rescue saw a horse that was in a "kill pen" was older, lame, and across the country from them. The horse's price was $500 and shipping was going to be $1500, so they were asking $1500 in donations. Now, I think it's very kind that they wanted to help the old soul, but I also couldn't help but think of how many horses - locally - $1500 could help save.

    I get that they wanted to help, but I wonder if maybe instead they could have tried to find a home closer to where the horse was located?

    So, my question is, how do you feel about rescues getting horses across the country from them? Do you feel it is money well spent, as at least the horse gets a good home, or do you feel they should instead concentrate there efforts to local horses in need?
    Last edited by Freebird!; Dec. 17, 2012, 08:31 PM.
    The Equine Wellness and Nutrition FB Group - Come join us!!
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/equinewellness/

  • #2
    =Local=
    I have an issue with local rescues spending/asking for 1000$ of dollars to rescue a horse a couple thousand miles away when there are horses in need at the killpen 20 miles down the road. I quit supporting a local rescue after they pulled a similar stunt - good PR yet, but eh, I'd rather they'd spent that dough on helping several horses close at hand , rather then 1 way over there>
    Originally posted by ExJumper
    Sometimes I'm thrown off, sometimes I'm bucked off, sometimes I simply fall off, and sometimes I go down with the ship. All of these are valid ways to part company with your horse.

    Comment


    • #3
      wise use of resources

      With the price of gas, I think it bears looking at.

      Comment


      • #4
        I'd vote local. Now if the rescue were to see this horse, contact a rescue local to this horse and send funds I could see that - but $1500 just for shipping when there are other horses in need? C'mon.
        Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
        Incredible Invisible

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by rainechyldes View Post
          =Local=
          I have an issue with local rescues spending/asking for 1000$ of dollars to rescue a horse a couple thousand miles away when there are horses in need at the killpen 20 miles down the road.
          THIS. Especially when the group has to beg for money all the time. And also when the horse(s) are probably never going to do anything besides be pasture puffs. (Of course, I also have a problem with small rescues who target specific breeds or types of horses. Which usually means they go all over the country for these rescues.)

          But that's just me. It just seems like the money could go a lot further if they targeted local horses in need.
          The dude abides ...

          Comment


          • #6
            I guess it depends. If it's a breed rescue that someone has a particular affinity for, absolutely, wherever the "rescuer" should be - so should the horse!

            Comment


            • #7
              As someone involved in horse rescue, I feel local need should be met first. Then regional. Then you can think about helping horses 2000 miles away.

              The only exception might be in cases of unusual, huge events. Few years back some wingding overloaded his trailer full of Belgian & headed toward a slaughter plant. The trailer crashed leaving 40some horses injured and in need of immediate help. Rescue groups all over the region stepped in, because that's just too many horses in one day for one single horse shelter.

              For the rescue I'm involved with, the organization owns its own stock trailer. We can pick up the horse for the cost of gas, which works out to be half or even less than a pro hauler. I have nothing against pro haulers (they have to make a living, too!). But when a rescue has limited funds, I personally feel it's best to find ways to maximize the % of donations that goes directly to horse care/feed/rehab.
              Veterinarians for Equine Welfare

              Comment


              • #8
                I agree with philosraptor. Meet local need first. Assist in emergencies such as the one she described. When local need has been met, assist elsewhere as resources permit.

                And I wish small animal rescues would do that too. We are spending huge sums on animals in other parts of the country, trying to get them here to be adopted. While local animals are put down left and right. We could have saved and placed ten animals for the amount of money spent on one animal 1200 miles away. But that one animal had that emotional appeal added to its photo...... And those ten other animals were just sitting in a shelter cage .....waiting.
                Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                -Rudyard Kipling

                Comment


                • #9
                  I try to remind myself that as long as the rescue is following the law, informing its donors of what it is doing, and acting ethically that I shouldn't care if they rescue from their backyard or 2000 miles away.

                  BUT I will admit that it really bothers me to see rescues buying horses AT ALL. I'm turning away tons of horses every week that we can't help. These horses are FREE because their owners cannot care for them (turned away 40 TBs this week alone - did tell the owners if they got me a list of horses, I would send out some emails and try to find people to take them).

                  I want to see rescues put their dollars to the best use possible, and I don't think spending $2K on one horse to ship it across the country is a great use of resources. Unless there are no free (or even cheap) horses nearby looking for homes.
                  Visit us at Bluebonnet Equine Humane Society - www.bluebonnetequine.org

                  Want to get involved in rescue or start your own? Check out How to Start a Horse Rescue - www.howtostartarescue.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I think rescues should stay within a certain radius. I know some who have adopted out horses several states away - the adopter paid for the shipping - but the adopter decided they didn't want the horse and wouldn't pay to ship it back. The rescue had to beg for money, over $1,000, to get the horse back.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                      I agree with philosraptor. Meet local need first. Assist in emergencies such as the one she described. When local need has been met, assist elsewhere as resources permit.
                      Same here. I also donate to the local rescue organizations first when I can.
                      There are friends and faces that may be forgotten, but there are horses that never will be. - Andy Adams

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Local needs first.

                        I don't support "rescues" that buy from kill pens, doing the mass buy and flip. Too many are scams and horse traders trying to wrap themselves in clean linen.

                        I like to donate to groups that I feel use the money efficiently. Hence the local support...no way is the closest needy horse 1200 miles away.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          golly, I got myself a roasted bottom a while back when I questioned a rescue spending money on something a bit out there...can't quiet remember what it was.

                          I have to say that local needs ought to be put first.
                          Having said that, I do not mind breed specific rescues. Maybe because I first found rescues for dogs, you gotta specialize or you end up like the pound...

                          I also don't mind 'importing' adoptable pets from the south to the north. As I understand at least small dogs don't make it through northern winters well...in the south they breed like rats....but then the wrapper makes it...(do we need to import dogs from the Caribbean?)

                          I don't mind brokers in cheap horses either. I don't care for the 'buy now or it ships' tag line.

                          But I really don't see why 'my' money should be used to clean up a mess 10 states over. Thee is enough mess here to deal with.

                          Then again, if you are upfront with it....

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I would think with fuel as high as it is, that rescuing local is the better way to go. I understand the motive to save "long distnce" when some "special case" like a "name" TB or other "famous" horse or a particular breed ends up in a kill pen.

                            But honestly, I wish the horse rescues would get their acts more together and "network" with each other better. Some of the breed specific dog rescues are already doing this with great success. For example, there is or was a group called Labs 4 rescue that was pulling purebred labs from the kill shelters down south were these dogs are a dime a dozen and tansporting them up north where apparently they were not as common. The organized a monthly trip hauled the labs from down south up to waiting homes up north that had already been approved.

                            The rescue had volunteers who would drive the dogs at least to Tennessee, where they would them be loaded onto another van or truck for their destination in a New England state. The adopters from all around New England met the second transport van at a designated point and the adoptions were completed there.

                            I had first-hand experience with them back in 2002 when I fostered a black lab pulled from a high kill shelter for them. He was a nice young black lab about a year old, and I had him for six months before they found the perfect match for him up north. I still get a couple emails a year and pictures at Christmas from his adopter. He's a grand old man now, and in his twilight years.

                            Two breed specific examples would be the nice draft horses (Belgians and Percherons and their crosses) that go to New Holland and end up headed for slaughter in Canada, and the nice gaited horses (TWHs, MFT, Racking Horses, etc) that go through auctions held in middle Tennessee and end up on trucks for Mexican slaughter houses.

                            The old midwest (Ohio and PA) and the northeast are literally crawling with drafts from what I understand, but they are a pretty rare horse down here in the south. While gaited horses are are a dime a dozen down south, but not so common up north.

                            I know it would be more challenging to coordinate horse transports than it is to do dog transports, but it could be done. Most of the breed specific dog and cat rescues have volunteers in each state. The local volunteers closest to the pound where the dog is spring it, and it is fostered locally. But the rescue advertises its dogs on the internet and does arrange adoptions either within a state or region or even nationally. The dog rescues are usually, but not always, connected with and supported by people (often breeders) interested in that particular breed.

                            I really don't know why a rescue would involve itself in trying to buy horses many, many states away and then have to pay for shipping as well, when there good horses often being offered free or for next-to-nothing these days in the newspaper classifieds, on craigslist and even in notices tacked up at the feed stores.

                            For the $1,500 spent on one long-distance "save" they could probably get as many as six or seven horses at the local auction, from craigslist or as owner surrenders.

                            Horses are going so cheaply down here (or not selling at all) that a couple of the monthly auctions have suspended sales the past several months. A couple are now requiring a seller to pay a $50 deposit per horse and are checking IDs of people wanting to consign their horses because lots of people have just up and left their horses at the auction when they didn't sell.

                            With the drought in Texas, hay is going to be hard to come by or expensive this winter from what I hear, so things are only going to get worse. And fuel prices have not really gone down much and probably won't.

                            Sorry to have run on. To restate my position, I think we need to begin thinking more local about everything including horse rescue.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              OK, I'll be the voice of semi-dissent here --

                              This falls under my parenting rule: "If it works, do it".

                              If it is working for the rescue and its supporters then I don't think it is anyone's business how a rescue rescues. Full stop.

                              If you don't like how an operation is run, i.e. if you only want to support rescues that work locally -- don't support the ones that rescue nationally. It is no big deal!

                              On the other hand -- if it isn't working, then the rescue's practices need to change.

                              If things are working (horses are getting helped, supporters are happy, the IRS is happy) then I really don't like other people telling rescues (or anyone else for that matter) they *should* do it differently.
                              https://www.facebook.com/SugarMapleFarm
                              Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/peonyvodka/
                              www.PeonyVodka.com

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I don't disagree, SMF, just give my $$ to the ones I believe spend it most wisely.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  This is why I research the rescue(s) what I support. I also research human charities to be sure where my $ is spent. Since I have only limited $ to donate I want the most bang for my buck that I can get. Local shelters that limit themselves to local needs usually spend my dollars best.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by lolalola View Post
                                    I think rescues should stay within a certain radius. I know some who have adopted out horses several states away - the adopter paid for the shipping - but the adopter decided they didn't want the horse and wouldn't pay to ship it back. The rescue had to beg for money, over $1,000, to get the horse back.
                                    The rescue I know...they used to allow horses to go anywhere within the continental US, so long as the adopter had stellar references and paid for shipping themselves...and agreed that in the event they had to send the horse back, they'd pay for shipping then too.

                                    Yeah, after two or three adopters in a row were like, "the horse must leave ASAP and no I can't pay!" and the horses came back in worse condition than they went out (training problems that weren't there before, lots of weight lost...)...well, the rescue started limiting adoptions to a radius that makes it possible for them to go with their trailer on short notice, as opposed to being stuck with the bill for a hauler.
                                    The Trials and Jubilations of a Twenty-Something Re-rider
                                    Happy owner of Kieran the mostly-white-very-large-not-pony.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by bayou_bengal View Post
                                      But honestly, I wish the horse rescues would get their acts more together and "network" with each other better. Some of the breed specific dog rescues are already doing this with great success.
                                      Horse rescuers are -very- hard to network with. I've tried working with other rescues and it has been a nightmare. It might be because our group focuses on neglect cases, not the 'buy them from the evil slaughter man and ship them across the country' type deals. But I've tried to work together with another rescue, more than once, to do a large seizure. Each time, the other rescues don't want to do the hard work, but they want to get territorial about who is the "lead" rescue, who gets the most media attention, etc. Often they don't know HOW to do a horse seizure properly either and our group has to supervise.

                                      We've also been involved in seizing animals from people claiming to be rescues, so I am a bit jaded about trusting someone with the label of rescue.

                                      (I sound so cynical and jaded this morning!).

                                      I did try to reach out to the 501c3 rescues I could find in Texas and have us form a coalition. The smaller, start-up rescues wanted in and told me they thought I should turn our organization's large annual fundraiser into a group fundraiser (which would be great for them and awful for us). The larger rescues told me they had no need to be in any sort of coalition. *sigh*

                                      Yeah, I am jaded today!
                                      Visit us at Bluebonnet Equine Humane Society - www.bluebonnetequine.org

                                      Want to get involved in rescue or start your own? Check out How to Start a Horse Rescue - www.howtostartarescue.com

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by cowgirljenn View Post
                                        Horse rescuers are -very- hard to network with. I've tried working with other rescues and it has been a nightmare. It might be because our group focuses on neglect cases, not the 'buy them from the evil slaughter man and ship them across the country' type deals. But I've tried to work together with another rescue, more than once, to do a large seizure. Each time, the other rescues don't want to do the hard work, but they want to get territorial about who is the "lead" rescue, who gets the most media attention, etc. Often they don't know HOW to do a horse seizure properly either and our group has to supervise.

                                        We've also been involved in seizing animals from people claiming to be rescues, so I am a bit jaded about trusting someone with the label of rescue.

                                        (I sound so cynical and jaded this morning!).

                                        I did try to reach out to the 501c3 rescues I could find in Texas and have us form a coalition. The smaller, start-up rescues wanted in and told me they thought I should turn our organization's large annual fundraiser into a group fundraiser (which would be great for them and awful for us). The larger rescues told me they had no need to be in any sort of coalition. *sigh*

                                        Yeah, I am jaded today!

                                        Too early to put on the rose colored glasses?

                                        nah, you don't sound jaded. Burned, maybe. But it pretty much echos the impression I have gotten over the years of not dealing with them how most horse rescues are run.
                                        Or how people function: You do the work I get the credit (and money) yeah, right!

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X