• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Were paddock boots called paddock shoes in days of old?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Were paddock boots called paddock shoes in days of old?

    I seem to remember this...does anyone else or is my mind going faster than I think? Also, I hear more and more people call the red coats that the hunt stff, MFH etc wear, scarlett rather than Pink. That was a huge nono in days gone by. What is the common parlence these days?

  • #2
    I only remember paddock boots being called boots and the coat only referred to as pink at least going back to 60-70's.


    • Original Poster

      But are they still referred to as Pink coats?


      • #4
        I remember them being called paddock boots also.
        Free bar.ka and tidy rabbit.


        • #5
          Originally posted by trafalgar View Post
          But are they still referred to as Pink coats?
          Pink was the name of the maker. I heard a story that he purchased a 'large' lot of good quality red wool from the British military stores and made his coats out of that. It sounded plausible to me.

          If you call a coat pink it should be made by Pink. Otherwise it is just a red riding jacket. Hey has anyone seen a preview of the new Red riding hood movie? Riding hood and they never mentioned a pony- what's up with that?
          A pussycat of a horse with a chewed off tail won the triple crown, The Cubs won the world series and Trump won the Presidency.
          Don't tell me 'It can't be done.'


          • #6
            I remember calling them paddock shoes in college in the 1990s. Maybe it's a regional thing.
            MelanieC * Canis soloensis


            • #7
              Must be a regional thing. I remember paddock shoes.
              "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein



              • #8
                Originally posted by 5 View Post
                Pink was the name of the maker. I heard a story that he purchased a 'large' lot of good quality red wool from the British military stores and made his coats out of that. It sounded plausible to me.

                If you call a coat pink it should be made by Pink. Otherwise it is just a red riding jacket. Hey has anyone seen a preview of the new Red riding hood movie? Riding hood and they never mentioned a pony- what's up with that?
                It seems the story of the tailor Pink (or Pinque or Pinke) is probably not true.

                Donald Trump - proven liar, cheat, traitor and sexual predator! Hillary Clinton won in 2016, but we have all lost.


                • #9
                  Jodhpur boots in MY day! (Johdpur? - still does not look right)
                  Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique


                  • #10
                    I remember calling them paddock shoes back in the 80s/early 90s. In fact, I still call them that sometimes.
                    Yogurt - If you're so cultured, how come I never see you at the opera? Steven Colbert


                    • #11
                      Back in the fifties/sixties (ugh, I'm old!) in my area (NoVa), it was jodhpur boots and paddock shoes.
                      Mon Ogon (Mo) and Those Wer the Days (Derby)


                      • #12
                        Apparently, interesting evolution and/ or regional differences! Never heard of 'em until I got to Virginia for college in 1971- but they were called paddock boots. Prior to that, 60s in Texas, I did have jodphurs and jodphur boots. And of course cowboy boots and jeans.


                        • #13
                          As for tailor Pink, yes, when I started hunting in 1971 they were routinely called pink coats. But the legend has been pretty thoroughly disproven I think. More recently hunt clothing shops have marketed them as 'Pinque' coats which I find really awful. So I call them scarlet in self defense, maybe that's why others do too.


                          • Original Poster

                            Oh, I am so glad I did not make the memory up....more and more of a problem.....I also remember jodhper boots; I had forgotten them. Were they interchangable terms or different. I remember having a pair that strapped around the ankle instead of lacing up.


                            • #15
                              If there is a distinction between Johdpur boots and paddock boots, it would be that johdpur boots are pull-ons (like Blundstones) and paddock boots zip or lace up.

                              However, both are ridden with johdpurs!
                              Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique


                              • #16
                                The memory is a little misty here, back to the fifties...but I believe jodhpur boots were zip up and associated more with saddle seat riding, and paddock shoes were the lace up type and associated more with H/J. Fellow fossils, am I right?
                                Mon Ogon (Mo) and Those Wer the Days (Derby)


                                • #17
                                  The first official riding gear my mailman brought from Millers in 1962 included a black velveteen hunt cap, and brown jodhpur boots with a strap around the ankle.

                                  And Millers was at 123 E 24th St, New York NY.

                                  Now why can't I remember where I put my glasses!
                                  But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson


                                  • #18
                                    In my mind, Jodhpur Boots do not lace up, and Paddock Boots do. My mother has a lovely old pair of brown Jodhpur Boots with ankle straps. Saddle Seat people ride in Jodhpur Boots which have the elastic panels at the ankle and should never be confused with the cap toed, lace up Paddock Boots.
                                    Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans


                                    • #19
                                      FWIW In my mind, paddock shoes were called shoes because they laced up. Boots were something you pulled on, hence Jodhpur boots with the elastic sides or buckle straps.

                                      Jodhpur boots and paddock shoes became interchangeable terms sometimewise in the early 80's as I remember it. The paddock shoes/boots still mostly laced up (although custom ones were always available with zips) until Ariat came along and when they solved their early zipper issues, the zips began outselling lace ups. Except for kids for whom (on the east coast) brown lace ups were the 'show' boots and black zips were for schooling. Now, with brown zips readily available, most kids are showing in zips, and why not? They can do them themselves, saving Mom's time for the plaited pigtails!
                                      ~Kryswyn~ Always look on the bright side of life, de doo, de doo de doo de doo
                                      Check out my Kryswyn JRTs on Facebook

                                      "Life is merrier with a terrier!"


                                      • #20
                                        Just whipped out my trusty 1962 Miller's catalog and on the page labeled "Correct Riding Shoes" they have:

                                        Jodhpur boots, the strap model ($12.95)
                                        Laced riding shoes, English made (no reference to "paddock") ($22.50)
                                        Elastic side jodhpur boots, calfskin ($22.50)
                                        Zipper jodhpur boots w/elastic sides ("very popular at race and trotting tracks") ($14.95)