• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Water rights for wild horses questioned

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Water rights for wild horses questioned

    This is just creepy and wrong. Whatever you think about mustangs, IMHO if they're out there they deserve to have access to water.

    http://www.capitalpress.com/content/...s-water-011411

    Water use for wild horses questioned by Nevada panel
    By SANDRA CHEREB
    Associated Press

    CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) -- A Nevada wildlife committee has suggested mustangs and burros are not legally entitled to quench their thirst from water rights allocated to federal agencies to support wildlife.

    The Feral Horse Committee of the Nevada Wildlife Commission has drafted a letter to the state engineer, contending the federally protected horses are not wildlife under state law, and the animals' drinking of water does not constitute "beneficial use" as required for a water rights permit.

    Among other things, the committee wants the state engineer to instruct federal agencies to immediately remove any wild horses or burros "that are making unlawful use of Nevada waters," according to the letter obtained Friday by The Associated Press.
    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

  • #2
    That's just obscene!!! Who do we write to??
    "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

    Comment


    • #3
      Is there something more going on? Are they chasing other wildlife away from scarce water sources or something? Otherwise I can't imagine why anyone would try to argue this.
      Proud Member Of The Lady Mafia

      Comment


      • #4
        Well, if the argument is local farmers and native wildlife species need it, given the drought I can see removing feral invasives. Horses and burros are feral animals, not native wildlife.

        If it's just the people downriver in Las Vegas, turn off the fountains first and then we'll talk.
        Author Page
        Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
        Steampunk Sweethearts

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          The way I read it, it's a new line of attack for people who want the horses off the range. I don't think there's a credible argument that the drinking needs of horses is significantly infringing on the availability of water for other uses, not even in the driest of the dry areas of the west.

          If you read the whole article, there's a meeting coming up on Tuesday.
          If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

          Comment


          • #6
            political grand standing between state and feds.

            Since they do assume the horses to belong to the BLM, that would conclude the feds own lifestock, no?

            But yeah, how about draining some of them fountains in Vegas...I hear they lose 4 inches a day to evaporation....lovely but wastefull.
            Originally posted by BigMama1
            Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
            GNU Terry Prachett

            Comment


            • #7
              Water policy is extremely complicated.

              There's definitely more to this than simply mustangs getting water.
              Pam's Pony Place

              Pam's Pony Ponderings

              Comment


              • #8
                Differences in definitions between state and feds as well as water rights laws. Feds have 87% of this state in their hands one way or the other (BLM, Forest Service, Military bases, things like Area 51 etc). Mustangs and burros are protected under federal law while on Horse Management Areas but not while off of them or on state or private land. Feds can round up via BLM and place in holding for adoption but state rounds up and goes through steps to find the owner (yeah!), and then can dispose of them in any legal way they choose if no owner steps up...usually they go through a local auction. State considers them to be feral livestock. State issues water permits based on "best use" doctrine which is for livestock mostly. Feds don't consider them livestock but rather wild life. State doesn't issue water permits to supply wildlife. State feels that feds are circumventing state water rights laws by getting water permits for what the feds consider to be wildlife when state doesn't allow for that. Ranchers will continue to provide water tanks and maintain them for their cattle...so the mustangs will have water there just as they have had for a hundred years.
                Colored Cowhorse Ranch
                www.coloredcowhorseranch.com
                Northern NV

                Comment


                • #9
                  Ranchers will continue to provide water tanks and maintain them for their cattle...so the mustangs will have water there just as they have had for a hundred years.
                  Ranchers are overlooked in their support of both mustangs and wildlife...they provide water (even if they have to haul it in in a water truck, which is very expensive), they repair the fences on their allotments, and they rotate the grazing with the objective of maintaining grazing (both under and overgrazing will damage the grazing resource).

                  It is going to gall me when the same folks who scream that ranchers just want the feral horses gone because they want to graze more cows, scream that the ranchers need to be paying out of pocket to water the feral horses. First of all, they do provide water, while there is grazing there for their cattle, and second, when the feral horses get overpopulated or learn to go through fences, the ranchers (and the BLM) can no longer maintain the grazing for anything appropriately, whether livestock, wildlife or feral horses-overgrazing is extremely damaging on the high desert ranges of the west.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    There are a lot of good ranchers out there, who look out not only for their own animals but for the mustangs and the wildlife.
                    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                      There are a lot of good ranchers out there, who look out not only for their own animals but for the mustangs and the wildlife.
                      We have been a wildlife preserve, at our own cost, since 1957.
                      One we do is we provide special water access to wildlife even when we don't have cattle in those pastures, have specific tanks that are not turned off, have special small ponds on some tanks with special overflows constantly running so wildlife, that can't reach the tanks, have water.
                      We have special wildlife ladders on tanks so they can walk up and reach water and get back out without drowning in other tanks, some just floating boards in tanks so certain wildlife can get out of them.

                      We let some tanks overflow all winter so wildlife, especially antilope, can have water, when we don't use those pastures for cattle, as we do in the winter pastures during the dry summers we don't have cattle there, so that wildlife there can get water.

                      There have been years in the worst of droughts that we didn't graze not one head for several years, the last spell 1999 to 2003, but kept water going there for the wildlife, all that at our cost of money running the wells, repairs and checking them regularly, so no one went without water.
                      Lately converted a small 200ac+ field to migratory bird grasses, as they come by here regularly, that one with a government cost share program to buy and sow those grasses, as we were asked by the Department handling that to do so.
                      We lost production in those acres, for the common good, at mostly our cost.
                      That would be the equivalent of social services asking some restaurant to volunteer to offer, say, Meals on Wheels take out type food to some needy group. Some do.
                      Many migratory birds have been using that already, as there is a wildlife lake sanctuary right close to us they use for a stop during their migrations.

                      We are not the only ones, most everyone around here knows to tend to all critters in the land they take care of, it is part of what you do.

                      I always wonder about how some are so rabidly against ranchers, when they don't really have any earthly idea of what all we do.
                      Their information seems to come from listening to some with agendas, where "the land raping, animal abusing ranchers" are their handy scapegoat to ask for donations for their causes of the moment.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        This is sick. I know congressman Nick Rahall II from W. VA does support some legislation for mustang protection, or a least he has in the past - perhaps he would be a good start?

                        Bluey, for what it's worth, I'm not against ranchers - it sounds like you are part of the good guys. There are some, though, that are not so good. Personally, I'm all for BC for mustangs. let's keep them as part of the American landscape, but we do not need so many.
                        Horse sense is the thing a horse has which keeps it from betting on people.
                        W. C. Fields

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X