• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

"Hazardous Duty Pay"- body clipping

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "Hazardous Duty Pay"- body clipping

    I am in the process of updating our price list...nothing major has changed, just needs to be done. However, one thing I am seriously considering adding (and have on my rough draft), is "Hazardous Duty Pay" for body clipping unruly horses. For me, this means clipping horses who are potentially dangerous even when using common methods of restraint, such as twitching or mild sedation.

    Most of the horses I clip on a regular basis (I really just clip my boarders horses) are pretty easy. Quite a few need nothing or the occasional twitch for the very most tickly parts. A few do better with very light sedation. But I've had a handful of regulars in the last couple of years that I DREAD doing (my own horse is included in this list ). Clipping is HARD on my body, messy, screws up my contacts, and is time consuming, even with the best behaved horses, and I've decided that if I have to clip some unruly bastard who is trying to brain me every 5 seconds, I should have the right to charge extra for that privledge. I'm thinking an extra $40...the bad ones usually take me at LEAST twice as long as the easy ones.

    Is this an unreasonable charge? If your horse is a bad clipper, would you be willing to pay a little extra? Fellow clippers, do you charge a little extra for your extra naughty horses?
    Amanda

  • #2
    Definitely would pay extra for someone else to deal with my clipping monster. Unfortunately he only really trusts me, so I have to do it myself. I'm afraid he'd brain someone else. It would SO be worth an extra $50 or whatever not to have to deal.

    Comment


    • #3
      I think that's entirely reasonable. You're being paid to clip, not to train. And if it's taking you more time, then that messes up your schedule and is essentially paying you less for a harder job.

      FWIW, when I'm trimming hooves I charge extra if the horse is difficult enough to take a lot of time, although it comes up pretty rarely actually (for me, anyway). I've had a couple of potential clients be turned off by it, but I figure if it's that much of an issue for them I probably don't want to be doing their horses anyway. Most people are just fine with it.
      exploring the relationship between horse and human

      Comment


      • #4
        I wouldn't have a problem with that at all. You need to make it worth your time, and it's not your problem that the horse feels the need to have a meltdown.
        Full-time bargain hunter.

        Comment


        • #5
          I'd have no problem at all with an extra charge. Perhaps make it less about horse behavior and more about time? Body clipping $X up to 1 hour, $Y for each additional hour or part thereof.
          --
          Wendy
          ... and Patrick

          Comment


          • #6
            I wouldn't charge extra, I would just make sure the horse either behaves or is sedated enough to stand quietly. The extra expense for the dormosedan or whatever the vet decides to give the horse is enough.
            McDowell Racing Stables

            Home Away From Home

            Comment


            • #7
              Time is money

              I'd pay for sure, and I'd feel pretty damn bad that my horse was being such a butthead for whoever was clipping him, and probably offer them a drink

              Comment


              • #8
                I wouldn't hesitate to charge extra. I think the idea of charging more based on the time involved is a good one, to avoid any discussions about just how bad the horse has to be to warrant an extra fee.

                ("Pookey would NEVER hurt you!" )

                Don't forget to charge for the medication if you sedate the horse yourself.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think that your website's pricelist page should play The Ramones "I Wanna Be Sedated" when it loads.

                  And yes you can and should charge more for having to avoid being brained by wiggly uncooperative horses.
                  I tolerate all kinds of animal idiosyncrasies.
                  I've found that I don't tolerate people idiosyncrasies as well. - Casey09

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Well, I'd have said charge extra but Laurierace brings up a good point. Have the horse more heavily sedated instead of lightly sedated. Forty extra dollars isn't going to begin to pay for your doctor bills and lost future revenue if slightly sleepy Pookie decides to throw a fit.
                    Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
                    Incredible Invisible

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I would charge extra (I know when my old horse got dangerous, I felt HORRIBLE and would definately pay extra) AND I would get the owner to help hold monster horse (unless the horse is worse with the owner around
                      .

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Absolutely. I am usually totally embarrassed when I've got a monster that someone else has to deal with, and I make sure they know I don't expect them to "just deal with it" and that I am working on that horse's manners!

                        I paid my farrier an extra $20 per shoeing (that's an extra 20% around here) as "danger pay" - without his asking. I'd rather not find myself without a farrier, either through injury or unwillingness!
                        Blugal

                        You never know what kind of obsessive compulsive crazy person you are until another person imitates your behaviour at a three-day. --Gry2Yng

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by MHM View Post
                          Don't forget to charge for the medication if you sedate the horse yourself.
                          Do not sedate the horse yourself. This is practicing veterinary medicine without a license!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Really, spacehorse? Really? Do you honestly believe that every single time someone gives their slightly nutty steed a little Ace, they need to call the vet? Or in this case, when an experience horse person gives dormosedan in order not to die while body clipping?

                            I get that there are things that non-pros shouldn't do, but do you really think that folks are going to call the vet so they can do a body clip?
                            I tolerate all kinds of animal idiosyncrasies.
                            I've found that I don't tolerate people idiosyncrasies as well. - Casey09

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by spacehorse View Post
                              Do not sedate the horse yourself. This is practicing veterinary medicine without a license!
                              Fine. Then have the owner do it.

                              Seriously, if you're going to get all worked up about this "practicing veterinary medicine without a license" nonsense, there are many far worse offenses than giving your horse a few ccs of dormosedan so it doesn't kill you while you body clip it.

                              It's not uncommon for vets to dispense a certain amount of a tranq for a specific purpose, like body clipping, to someone they know can administer it properly and won't abuse the privilege. That isn't always going to be the horse's owner. It might be the barn manager whose job it is to body clip Mr. Meltdown.
                              Full-time bargain hunter.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Definately charge for unruly ponies! I body clip professionally in the winter both at my barn and out to others. I will not clip unruly beasts that are not sedated, it is not my problem they are jerks. Our vet at home will leave cocktails for our couple of problem children that I will administer but I would never sedate a horse outside my barn. If an outside horse is bad I always make sure they have made arrangements with their vet to either be there to sedate, or that the owner gets a dose and gives it themselves. I will not be responsible for someone elses horse in that way. Honestly though never even had to ask for the extra money, the owners always offered it up when they saw how bad pookie was being.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by ReSomething View Post
                                  Well, I'd have said charge extra but Laurierace brings up a good point. Have the horse more heavily sedated instead of lightly sedated. Forty extra dollars isn't going to begin to pay for your doctor bills and lost future revenue if slightly sleepy Pookie decides to throw a fit.
                                  The problem is that while most people have no problem lightly sedating with Ace, having the vet out for heavy sedation is going to probably cost close to $75 (farm call plus exam plus sedation - hopefully the vet won't put a horse under sedation without a least a cursory exam). Offering the $50 charge to her boarders might actually save them money if she doesn't mind dealing with the fussing for the extra pay.

                                  But I agree the alternate could be to put in the price list that unruly horses are required to be sedated by the vet.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I used to groom dogs for a living and we had a starting rate for certain cuts/ grooming procedures. All the groomers that worked there were allowed to increase the rate based on behavior and this was made known to the customers, especially first timers that we weren't sure how the dog would behave. In that line of business, time is money- you could be working on an additional dog instead of spending more time on someone's ill behaved animal.

                                    I absolutely would charge additional money for the extra time needed to get the job done when it is due to poor manners.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Absolutely! I would either require horse be adequately sedated or charge accordingly. I wouldn't go near an unruly horse without it being sedated. As pp mentioned- $20-50 is nothing compared to your medical bills. Always best to be on the safe side- which includes a few ccs of some kind of tranq!

                                      I pay my farrier an extra 25% for the unruly TB babies that are here without his charging me so. They come in here like they've never seen human before- it's unreal. If they need to be tranq'd for anything- we do it and pass the charge to the owner. There is no reason to brain the blacksmith over a 20m trim job. Or an hour clip job for you.

                                      I'd pay the extra fee while blushing in embarrassment that my horse was so misbehaved.

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #20
                                        The funny thing is, I've had a couple of boys that the vet could have gelded as sedated as they were, and they still tried to kill me (themselves, whoever was brave enough to try to help, and tear down the barn in the process...ok, they aren't THAT bad ).

                                        I am very comfortable administering whatever I need to give, and my vet knows it. I often wonder why more people don't try and learn how to do it or get all up in arms about it...I had a horse this am that I was certain was trying to colic on me. It would have been stupid to wait for the vet to get out to administer IV banamine (which she told me to do, anyway...I was actually in the process of drawing it up when I called her). Seems risky to me to not know how to do something like that.
                                        Amanda

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X